'Stupid deal': 4 times Trump berated, mocked world leaders
US President Donald Trump is not known for holding back his thoughts, or a refusal to voice opinions. In an often shocking manner, his comments frequently receive the spotlight and reactions from the international community, including world leaders.
While his recent spats with world leaders have received widespread media coverage, his arguments go as far back as his first term. Here are 4 times Trump ambushed world leaders, and made some scathing remarks.
Ambushing South African President
A South African leader that came to the Oval Office in hopes of resetting his country's relationship with the US, after aid was cancelled. And a US President who turned the White House into a theatre for his false claims of white genocide.
This is an equation that could not have gone down well. And the conversation did soon go sideways, with an official visit turning into an official ambush.
Trump's tools for this ambush on South African President Cyril Ramaphosa? Good old-fashioned newspapers and a TV, which is not usually seen in the White House, according to Reuters.
Trump turned the lights down, and showed a series of videos, which he claimed were graves of white people, and opposition leaders making inflammatory speeches. He also sheafed through newspaper articles, which showed "death and horrible death" according to the US President.
He alleged that white farmers in South Africa were having their land taken away, and being persecuted. To escape, these farmers were fleeing to America and other places, Trump added. His false claims have since been debunked; read it here.
To Ramaphosa's credit, he did not react explosively; instead, he asked Trump the location of these videos, and retaliated by pointing out that his Minister of Agriculture was a white man. While crime occurs, it is general, rather than against a specific race, he added.
Shouting match with Zelenskiy
After years of war, the Ukrainian leader visited Trump in hopes of bringing some relief to the country facing immense destruction, with a peace deal. But Trump and Vice President JD Vance responded with an almost team-like verbal assault on Volodymyr Zelensky, including questions about his clothing.
The spat started when Zelenskiy said "During the war, everyone has problems.... You don't feel now, but you will feel it in the future".
The US leader retaliated that Zelenskiy was not in any position to be making such statements and " was gambling with the lives of millions of people; gambling with World War 3."
It was at this moment that Vance jumped in to support the US President, asking the Ukrainian President: "Have you said thank you once?"
From then, it was the two US leaders talking over the Ukrainian President, pointing out the US military support, and repeatedly questioning Zelenskiy's apparent lack of gratitude.
The shouting match got intense reactions from across the political community, and saw Zelensky leaving in his motorcade shortly after, without holding a planned joint press conference.
Mocking leaders' reaction to tariffs
After Trump announced sweeping tariffs on several countries, stocks crashed, markets reacted, and a rippling effect took hold of the world economy. With countries hoping to make deals and broker trade agreements, Trump took to the mic to describe the leaders reactions.
And the US President did not mince his words. Although he did not specify names, he said countries are "kissing my a**".
The countries were calling him up and saying: "Please please sir make a deal, I'll do anything, I'll do anything, sir," he added.
Trump has since then announced a 90-day pause on tariffs, bringing market relief, although he continues to threaten duties on economies.
Trump's 'unpleasant call' with Malcolm
Immigration has always been a contentious issue with Trump. As far back as 2017, the US President had a heated exchange with the then Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull over what Trump termed a "dumb deal".
The former Australian Prime Minister spoke of a deal made with former US President Barack Obama, which included letting refugees on to US soil.
When Trump questioned why Australia did not let these refugees into their own community, Turnbull answered: "It is not because they are bad people. It is because in order to stop people smugglers, we had to deprive them of the product."
While Trump agreed with that style of thinking, saying: "That is a good idea. We should do that too. You are worse than I am," he did not however wish to honour the agreement Obama made.
He turned on Turnbull, calling this "a stupid deal that he brokered, and added that he "guarantees that [Turnbull] broke many a stupid deal."
Trump added: "I think it is a horrible deal, a disgusting deal that I would have never made. It is an embarrassment to the United States of America."
After the long back-and-forth, Trump told Turnbull, 'I have had it. I have been making these calls all day and this is the most unpleasant call all day. Putin was a pleasant call. This is ridiculous.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump says Putin could participate in Iran nuclear deal talks
US President Donald Trump spoke by phone with Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, with discussions focused on the war in Ukraine as well as the Russian leader's potential participation in nuclear deal talks with Iran. "President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion," Mr Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. Mr Trump added that the two leaders agreed Iran could not have a nuclear weapon. "Time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly!" he said in the post. Iran and the US have been engaged in negotiations on a new deal that would put limits on its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. The US wants Iran to cease enriching uranium under a possible new deal, but Tehran says its programme is for civilian purposes and it has the right to continue.
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Safe-haven gold rises on weaker dollar, simmering global uncertainty
Gold prices rose on Wednesday, buoyed by a softer dollar and persistent geopolitical tensions across multiple fronts, keeping investors alert amid a range-bound market awaiting fresh catalysts. Spot gold rose 0.9% to $3,381.32 an ounce, as of 10:43 a.m. ET (1143 GMT). U.S. gold futures were up at $3,406.80. The U.S. dollar index fell 0.5%, making gold cheaper for buyers holding other currencies. "There is considerable geopolitical uncertainty with Russia-Ukraine, Iran, Syria and China, driving people to buy gold. Market sentiment remains quite high, and although traders may not expect gold to rise as quickly, there is still plenty of upside," Daniel Pavilonis, senior market strategist at RJO Futures, said. Russia is concerned about rising tensions around Iran and the risk of the situation slipping into a full-scale confrontation, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said. However, "the market is just kind of sideways right now and we need some bigger signals, meaning an escalation geopolitically, that would open the path to buying more gold as an inflationary hedge," Pavilonis added. U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping is tough and "extremely hard to make a deal with," just days after accusing China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. In addition, Washington doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum imports and urged trading partners to submit their "best offers" to avoid more import levies starting in early July. Data on Wednesday showed U.S. private employers added the fewest workers in over two years in May, though this likely underrepresents the gradual easing amid uncertainty from the Trump administration's tariffs. All eyes now turn to Friday's U.S. non-farm payrolls report, expected to provide critical insight into the Federal Reserve's policy direction. Fed officials have maintained a cautious stance amid ongoing trade tensions and economic unpredictability. Gold, a safe-haven asset during times of political and economic uncertainty, tends to thrive in a low-interest-rate environment. Elsewhere, spot silver was steady at $34.50 an ounce, platinum rose 1.3% to $1,088.31 and palladium lost 0.9% to $1,000.94.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Red Cross booth at AI defence conference offers stark reminder of technology's potential threat to civilians
The exhibition booth for the International Committee for the Red Cross at the AI+ military defence conference in Washington definitely stands out – that's the whole point. 'When technology makes it into a battlefield, it's going to have consequences,' Jonathan Horowitz, legal adviser to the Red Cross, said at the ICRC 's exhibit, which focused on the potential problems in the use of artificial intelligence conflicts. The ICRC's booth at the Walter E Washington Convention Centre was surrounded by exhibits from some of the world's most influential companies with US military defence contracts, along with other entities from around the world. Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, Google and Microsoft all had a large presence at the AI+ event. The three-day conference was organised by the Special Competitive Studies Project, which describes itself as a group that 'seeks to recapture the competitive mindset and unifying national mission from past eras, and then adapt them to the age of AI and 21st-century strategic rivalry'. Proponents of AI on the battlefield say that it can help minimise casualties and enhance capabilities, but critics say the technology is far from perfect, missing nuances that get lost in the fog of war and often including developers' biases. Critics also point out that the fast-developing implementations of AI in military landscapes have the potential to disregard international standards. "Just because technology is new doesn't mean you can use it in unconstrained ways," Mr Horowitz said. "We want to remind people here what those rules are, and you can find the rules in the Geneva Conventions, in international humanitarian law." He said that while the ICRC is concerned about the use of AI in war, it also sees its potential in improving the lives of civilians amid conflict. "It could give militaries better awareness of where hospitals or critical infrastructure are located, and with that knowledge militaries should know not to attack those locations," he explained. Yet the concern raised in recent months is that once AI platforms are handed over to various militaries, there's little accountability for how they're used. Microsoft recently carried out an internal review in response to recent accusations that its AI technology was being used to harm civilians in the war in Gaza. While it found "no evidence" its products were being used in such a way by the Israeli military, it pointed out the potential for the software and platforms to be used on highly secure, independent military networks of militaries, limiting the company's investigation. The company is not alone in facing criticism over how its AI technology is used. Alphabet-owned Google, Scale AI and Palantir have faced similar accusations. At the AI+ conference, demonstrators echoed concerns over the potential harm the technology poses to civilians, particularly in Gaza, with protesters interrupting various speeches and panel discussions. Mr Horowitz added that in the months ahead, ICRC will continue working to "solve the puzzle" with AI and militaries to "for the embedment of civilians, who often are the ones that suffer the most in armed conflict." "We include a new set of recommendations on AI decision support systems and the top of our priorities is the need to retain human control and judgment within those systems," Mr Horowitz said of the ICRC's updated guidance on the technology. The organisation recently submitted its AI military recommendations to the UN Secretary General. In that document, the ICRC expresses concern about the use of AI in automatic weapon systems along with the implementation of AI to expedite military decision-making. It also seeks to raise awareness about the potential for AI to increase the speed at which misinformation and disinformation spreads, potentially contributing to and even encouraging violence. "This submission is intended to support states in ensuring that military applications of AI comply with existing legal frameworks and, where necessary, in identifying areas where additional legal, policy or operational measures may be required," the document concludes.
