Laid-off Iowa military vet says DOGE job cuts are ‘just the start' — and pain will be felt 'in corporations as well'
As Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) continues cutting federal jobs, concerns are growing about the broader economic impact.
Terri Wollenberg, a 30-year military veteran, was hired to help fellow veterans at the Iowa City VA, reports ABC's KCRG-TV. However, she's now out of a job due to DOGE layoffs, which have included thousands of probationary government employees like her. Wollenberg fears these cuts will extend beyond government agencies and into the private sector, further destabilizing the job market.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Home prices in America could fly through the roof in 2025 — here's the big reason why and how to take full advantage (with as little as $10)
Americans with upside-down car loans owe more money than ever before — and drivers can't keep up. Here are 3 ways to cut your monthly costs ASAP
'The second or third order effects of what is happening in the government will happen in corporations as well, and Americans are gonna feel it.' Wollenberg told KCRG.
Wollenberg served in the military for 30 years before taking a role at the Iowa City VA. She was still a probationary worker, meaning she was still in her two years of a new role. The term probationary worker can refer to recent federal hires, but it also includes seasoned employees who recently switched positions.
Wollenberg says she was abruptly laid off and received an email citing 'poor performance.' She is now worried not just about herself, but also about the veterans she served and the economy as a whole.
'There is no one now to meet our clients at the door, there's no one to confirm schedules, no one to help and assist with our counselors,' she said.
While there is no official count on how many federal workers have been laid off, The Associated Press reports that data from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which serves as the human resources arm of the federal government, shows 220,000 federal employees had less than a year on the job as of March 2024 — leaving them vulnerable to termination.
The Trump administration has indicated that deeper staffing and spending cuts could follow, leading many to be concerned about how the layoffs could impact the broader economy.
However, economists say these layoffs alone are unlikely to trigger a recession on their own.
'It puts the variable of uncertainty into the equation. And uncertainty is really bad for the economy and for labor markets, because uncertainty means everybody pauses,' said Ron Hetrick, senior labor economist at Lightcast, in an interview with CNN.
'That's what the biggest (economic) risk is in the short run right now.'
Stephanie Roth, chief economist at Wolfe Research, echoes Hetrick's thoughts.
'It's not going to tip the economy into recession by itself,' she told CNN.
Read more: Jamie Dimon issues a warning about the US stock market — says prices are 'kind of inflated.' Crashproof your portfolio with these 3 rock-solid strategies
While these federal layoffs may not directly cause a recession, they can create ripple effects that affect everyday Americans in several ways.
The sudden influx of laid-off federal workers means more competition for open positions, especially in fields like contracting, health care and administration — industries that closely interact with government agencies. If you work in an industry that does, you may see an increase in job applicants, making it harder to land a role.
These layoffs come as private sector job cuts are already rising. More than 19,000 jobs have been lost in the tech sector in 2025, according to Layoff.fyi. Companies like HP, Grubhub, eBay, Meta and Expedia have all reported workforce reductions in recent months.
When workers are laid off, they generally cut back on spending — whether that's dining out, home renovations or major purchases like cars and appliances. That decline in consumer spending can slow economic growth and impact business growth.
A reduction in spending may be felt even more keenly due to boycotts, as Americans push back against policies with their wallets. Companies like Target and Walmart are already seeing a decline in traffic and sales — though it's unclear if the dips are due to boycotts, layoffs or inflation.
One of the most significant risks isn't the layoffs themselves — it's the uncertainty they create. When businesses and consumers feel unsure about the stability of the economy, we can see things like delayed hiring, postponed investment and cuts to discretionary spending.
In the stock market, investors react strongly to labor market trends. Layoffs, especially in government or major industries like tech, can create what experts call "market jitters" — fluctuations in stock prices based on anxiety and fear.
The layoffs in the federal workforce won't single-handedly push the U.S. into a recession, but they do add stress to an already uncertain economy. For workers outside of government, this could mean longer job searches, increased competition and general economic uncertainty.
For now, economists remain cautious but not alarmed. However, if consumer confidence drops further and layoffs continue, the economic picture could become more unstable in the months ahead.
Jamie Dimon issues a warning about the US stock market — says prices are 'kind of inflated.' Crashproof your portfolio with these 3 rock-solid strategies
'I like this stuff': Self-made $500M mogul and YouTuber reveals his 'essential' US portfolio that he says Amazon 'can't hurt' — here's his secret formula and how you can copy it in 2025
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Bob Costas rips mainstream media for doing ‘MAGA Media': ‘There really isn't two sides'
Famed sportscaster Bob Costas slammed the mainstream media for cowing to President Trump during his second term while accepting a leadership award. Costas, attending the Mirror Awards in New York City on Monday night, singled out ABC News and CBS News for rolling over after Trump sued both networks. In a long-winded speech that covered his career in broadcasting and the state of the media business, Costas criticized ABC parent Disney for paying $15 million to settle a defamation lawsuit against the network over star anchor George Stephanopoulos saying Trump was found guilty of raping E. Jean Carroll. 4 Bob Costas slammed the mainstream media over its handling of President Trump's second term. Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP A New York court had found Trump guilty of sexual assault — not rape, a key legal difference — in the civil case. Trump has denied wrongdoing in that case. 'All they should've said was, 'George misspoke. The president, that paragon of virtue, was only found guilty of sexual assault, not rape. So we stand corrected,'' Costas said of the decision to settle. 'They didn't have to pay a $15 million ransom.' The Post had previously reported that Stephanopoulos had been told repeatedly by producers to not use the word 'rape' but he ignored the warnings. Costas then turned to CBS parent Paramount Global, which is controlled by Shari Redstone, over its attempts to settle another Trump suit over the alleged biased editing of a '60 Minutes' sit-down with then-vice president Kamala Harris. 4 Costas said outlets like ABC News, CNN, and CBS News have pandered to President Trump and his worldview instead of challenging it. REUTERS Paramount is currently looking to close an $8 billion merger with Skydance Media in a move that would require the greenlight from Trump's Federal Communications Commission. The network has denied it deceptively edited the '60 Minutes' interview to make Harris sound more cogent. Under pressure from Trump's lawsuit and higher-ups at Paramount, longtime '60 Minutes' boss Bill Owens exited the company, citing waning editorial dependence. 4 The veteran sportscaster ripped ABC after it paid Trump $16 million to settle his defamation lawsuit over George Stephanopoulos' use of the word 'rape.' ABC via Getty Images 'And did Shari Redstone, because she wants to affect a merger that Trump's FCC can stand in the way of, did she have to besmirch and undercut the gold standard in our lifetime of broadcast journalism, '60 Minutes?'' Costas said. 'Paying $20 million in ransom to Trump is just the cost of doing business when there's billions of dollars at stake. These are ongoing assaults on the basic idea of a free press.' Costas also took a jab at CNN, which he claimed has 'valorized' Trump 'in the name of being balanced,' dubbing such work as 'MAGA media.' CNN brass has pushed for anchors to try to remain objective when covering the Trump administration. 4 Costas also called out Shari Redstone, who has pushed for Paramount to settle Trump's lawsuit over '60 Minutes'' sitdown with Kamala Harris. FilmMagic 'But if the answer to that is MAGA media, if the answer to that is Donald Trump's view of the world, which is only through a prism of what benefits him, there are no higher ideals. There are no principles at work other than what benefits him,' he said. 'I'll stay with where we are without correction if the correction is what Donald Trump represents.' 'If someone says – and the idea that you have to find somebody who will not just defend Donald Trump, but valorize it, even on CNN or wherever else, just in the name of being balanced– look, if someone is contending that the Earth is flat, in order to appear objective, you are not required to say, 'Well, maybe it might be oblong.' No, it's not,' Costas said. 'Certainly things are just true.' He concluded: 'And regrettably, something that's true in America right now is that the President of the United States has absolutely no regard, and in fact has contempt, for basic American principles and basic common decency.' Mediaite first reported on Costas' comments.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CEO who sees Bitcoin hitting $1M now favors Tesla
CEO who sees Bitcoin hitting $1M now favors Tesla originally appeared on TheStreet. ARK Invest's CEO, Cathie Wood, conservatively estimates that Tesla's (TSLA) stock will reach $2,600 per share by 2030, representing a 744% increase from its current price. Wood's prediction is primarily tied to the forthcoming robotaxi platform, on a podcast called The Diary of a CEO. She refers to Tesla as potentially redefining its original model of selling electric vehicles for a one-time fee to customers who may rarely or never recharge, a major source of revenue. Instead, Wood argues that the major source of revenue for Tesla will now come from its autonomous vehicles, generating active recurring revenue. Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, stated on a recent earnings call that Tesla's self-driving cars could function like Airbnb, allowing owners to generate passive income by renting out their cars when they're not in use. Owners could list their vehicles for short-term rentals, converting their idle assets into money-making machines. This model aligns well with the concept of decentralization underlying blockchain, which suggests that the two could work together. Crypto-based payments and smart contracts could facilitate the easy management and automation of transactions on this type of sharing platform, resulting in precise and quick settlements. Tesla could generate even more revenue by incorporating blockchain technology and utilizing cryptocurrency for ride payments or subscriptions. Tesla CEO Elon Musk also partnered with Polymarket, a cryptocurrency-based prediction market, for his other company, X. Wood sees Tesla and its customers having the potential to generate revenue in two ways: through subscription or pay-as-you-go models, depending on the vehicle's usage. If blockchain is incorporated, crypto could exist with both payment structures. "You could subscribe to the network. It could be either or subscription or à la carte if you don't think you're going to use it that much," said Wood. Cathie Wood's ARK Invest has made big crypto predictions in the past. She predicts Bitcoin will be worth $1.5 million by 2030 and supports a base case of $700,000. In the most optimistic scenarios, it could be worth $1 million. ARK's spot Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) now manages over $2.2 billion, indicating that large institutions are very interested in it. Wood's company also invested $373 million in Circle's initial public offering, which provided access to USDC and blockchain payments. Interestingly, Kraken has announced that users can now access tokenized stocks of Tesla around the clock, providing investors outside the U.S. with the chance to purchase stocks, bridging the gap between traditional finance and cryptocurrency. At press time, Tesla is trading at 318.35, up 3.17% over the last 24 hours. CEO who sees Bitcoin hitting $1M now favors Tesla first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
Southern Baptists vote to seek repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling
Southern Baptists vote to seek repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling Show Caption Hide Caption The Southern Baptist Convention in 2025: The key issues The Southern Baptist Convention is the nation's largest Protestant denomination denomination. It is headquartered in Nashville. The resolution approved seeks to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges as the historic U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage. The June 10 vote by the nation's largest Protestant denomination represents a doubling down on issues of gender and sexuality. DALLAS − The Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution supporting a concerted effort to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges as the historic U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage approaches its 10-year anniversary. The June 10 vote by the nation's largest Protestant denomination represents a doubling down on issues of gender and sexuality as the predominant group of evangelical Christians continues to move sharply to the right and signals the SBC's hopes of replicating the successful campaign to overturn Roe v. Wade. Whether the latest vote will move the needle on gay marriage, a right backed by a strong majority of Americans, remains to be seen. Last year, the SBC passed a resolution condemning the use of in-vitro fertilization, only to see President Donald Trump sign an executive order earlier this year seeking to protect IVF access and reduce its out-of-pocket and health plan costs. Related: He was at the center of a Supreme Court case that changed gay marriage. Now, he's worried. Reversing the Obergefell ruling is one of numerous issues related to sex, gender and marriage encompassed by the resolution. Among other things, the resolution affirms that there are only two genders, defines marriage as between a man and a woman, says families are designed for procreation and that human life is sacred 'from conception to natural death.' The measure describes these declarations not just as Christian convictions but as 'universal truths' 'essential for a healthy, just and free society.' 'Our culture is increasingly rejecting and distorting these truths by redefining marriage, pursuing willful childlessness which contributes to a declining fertility rate, ignoring and suppressing the biological differences between male and female, encouraging gender confusion, undermining parental rights, and denying the value and dignity of children,' the resolution says. The resolution also opposes commercial surrogacy and normalization of 'transgender ideology,' saying policies that deny the 'biological reality of male and female' are legal fictions. It opposes laws and policies compelling people 'to speak falsehoods about sex and gender' and calls for the permanent defunding of Planned Parenthood. Last year, the convention narrowly rejected a constitutional ban on female pastors, a measure that required a two-thirds majority to pass. The SBC has disfellowshipped seven churches – including Southern California's megachurch Saddleback Church – for embracing egalitarian views on women in ministry as opposed to the complementarian position espoused by the convention, which holds that men and women have different roles. The Supreme Court's rightward swing and the election of President Donald Trump have emboldened the convention's more conservative factions and Christian political activists, who see the moment as ripe for a shift in American jurisprudence. 'It's time for us to take back our nation,' said Chad Connelly of Faith Wins, an organization focused on getting out the Christian vote. 'I believe we've been given an opportunity and the time is now.' Resolutions are non-binding statements expressing the convention's views on social and cultural issues. Other resolutions at past SBC annual meetings have reasserted Southern Baptist opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, though this year's resolution was the most forceful articulation of their rebuke of the Supreme Court precedent protecting same-sex marriage. Delegates, called messengers, overwhelmingly approved the resolution after little debate on its language. A strongly traditionalist voice in the SBC, Denny Burk, proposed the language in the resolution that messengers ultimately approved. Burk is the president of Louisville-based Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, an advocacy group that was behind two well-known, cross-evangelical statements opposing LGBTQ+ rights. The first statement was the Danvers Statement in 1987 and the second was the Nashville Statement in 2017. 'It is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness,' the Nashville Statement said. 'Approval of homosexual immorality or transgenderism is a matter of moral indifference about which otherwise faithful Christians should agree to disagree.' The new resolution approved by the SBC is another iteration of the Nashville Statement, but more forcefully attacks the U.S. jurisprudence protecting the LGBTQ+ rights that evangelicals oppose. Contributing: Liam Adams of The Tennessean This is a developing story. Check back for updates.