Want Starlink? Get Ready to Pay a Lot More If You Live in These 2 States
Thinking about subscribing to SpaceX's satellite internet service provider, Starlink? Be warned: The company appears to have quietly jacked up a demand-based fee in certain states.
Redditors first began noticing the change this week while trying to get Starlink service in the Pacific Northwest, PCMag reported, finding that the "demand fee" at checkout was $500.
The outlet noted that this fee was previously set at $250 in April for areas where the service was nearing a preset customer limit. That $250 fee was itself increased from $100, back when it was known as the "congestion fee." That's all on top of the $350 price tag for the Starlink dish on its own.
A representative for Starlink did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
According to Starlink, the demand fee is charged in areas where its service is in high demand, and will be refunded if service is canceled within 30 days.
Locating local internet providers
"In areas with high demand, there is an additional one-time charge to purchase Starlink services," the company site says. "The additional charge depends on the location of your service address, the service plan you choose, and/or the Starlink kit you select. This charge will only apply if you are purchasing or activating a new service plan. If you change your service address or service plan at a later date, you may be charged the demand surcharge."
For now, it appears that the increase is active only in Oregon and Washington, particularly around the Portland and Seattle metropolitan areas. And for some customers, they may have no choice but to pay it.
"My house just happens to be on a road where the two options are either DSL or another company who refuses to extend their service to my address, even though they service the house across my street," one Reddit user wrote in a post. "What gives? $500 is INSANE! Seems like a ridiculous charge to take advantage of those who don't have other options."
Starlink first launched in 2019 and provides internet service to customers via 7,000 satellites in low-Earth orbit. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Elon Musk's SpaceX.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
WSU faces 'strategic' staffing cuts after regents adopt pared-down budget
Jun. 5—Washington State University is likely to face personnel cuts in the coming weeks after the school's Board of Regents adopted a budget that includes a $17.1 million reduction in spending for the upcoming fiscal year. On Thursday, the Board of Regents unanimously adopted a budget that includes $1.3 billion in spending across all funds, and approximately $661.3 million in spending in core funds. The plan includes a 4.1% reduction in spending. "This plan represents the economic pressures public universities now face, all of us, and the bold direction we've chosen to take at Washington State University," President Elizabeth Cantwell said in a video update Wednesday. The focus will shift in the coming weeks to implementing cuts in most of the university's 41 units, though the cuts will not be across the board. Six units — the College of Arts and Sciences, the Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, libraries, external affairs and government relations, research, and law enforcement — will not see any cuts under the plan, while the other 35 units may see cuts of up to 10% and will work over the next 30 days to formalize proposals to curb spending. According to Leslie Brunelli, the executive vice president and chief financial officer, more than 80% of the university's core funds budget is "tied up" in personnel spending. "So those are people at the other end of that, and we want to be very thoughtful about the loss of personnel," Brunelli said. "Some of those reductions will be made with vacant positions, but some will be people who are currently employed at Washington State." Brunelli said it's "a little bit too early" to know how many staff members could be impacted. "We have a ballpark, but I would really not feel comfortable sharing that until we know what that is," Brunelli said. "I don't want to create an agitation where it's not necessary." The staff reductions, however, are likely to be spread across the university, rather than focused on specific departments. The university, like many others in the country, has experienced turmoil in federal funding in recent months, although WSU's funding woes are compounded by the 1.5% across-the-board cut to higher education included in the recently passed state biennial budget. That translates to $9.9 million over the next two years, though the university also stands to lose other state funds. "We're pretty good at figuring out how to strategically take reductions and not harm academic core, not harm services to students," Cantwell said Thursday. The university, Cantwell said, is investing additional resources in student support services, and making other investments in the College of Arts and Sciences. "We have made it a priority to protect the student experience and student success," Provost Chris Riley-Tillman said. "That's our core, original mission, and it's one of our most important things, both existentially and fiscally." While students are not likely to notice many of the cuts and savings when they return to campus in the fall, they will see a 3.3% increase in tuition costs. The university, however, does not project an increase in the revenue received from tuition, as enrollment at Washington State, like many universities, has declined in recent years. The decline in enrollment, Riley-Tillman said, has a ripple effect, as cohorts of students work their way through the university. "As you get the dip down, and then you floor out and you start to go back up, you're now graduating large classes, and those very small classes from the subsequent COVID years are still in your system," Riley-Tillman said. "So this ends up being a five- or six-year recovery period." Since enrollment peaked during the 2019-2020 school year, the university has seen a 17% decline, and it is bracing for the potential for another decrease. "Truly, you don't know what the enrollment is until August when the students show up and pay their bills," Brunelli said. "There is something called the summer melt, and that happens for the first time, first-year students, our freshmen that come in the door, even transfers. But we also need to make sure our retention remains strong." As it navigated potential budgeting options, the university has modeled different scenarios over the past several months, Cantwell said during an interview Thursday. "There are a few places where we are investing," Cantwell said. "These are strategic ... cuts and additions, even in a year where we have to mostly reduce, we will make strategic investments so that we can do things like support the students that we have, make sure that they finish, and grow enrollment across the panorama of everybody who wants to come to us. Just sort of guardrails like that are in our thinking as we think about how we make these choices." The university, Brunelli said, has modeled what the potential impact of the loss of federal grants and indirect cost recoveries between 5% and 50% would be. Cantwell said the university has also modeled what impact cuts to the Department of Education would have on the school, particularly how cutting federal student aid will impact the ability of students to attend college. One silver lining from the session, Brunelli said, is that the state did not make cuts in the Washington College Grant, which many students rely on to help pay for school. The university also stands to see less impact from a potential decline in international students, as it is focused on students from Washington. Last week, the university announced the chancellor position for its Pullman campus would be dissolved, placing executive oversight of the campus back under the university president. "The president of the system, because I live in Pullman, can fully operate in that chancellor sort of role," Cantwell said. "So that's given us the opportunity to cut some costs there. We've combined offices, we've found some efficiencies there." Cantwell said she anticipates proposals for "kind of across-the-board" administrative cuts to be introduced in the coming weeks. "I'm guessing we're all asking ourselves, 'How do we do what we do at the administrative level a little bit more efficiently to deliver to results that we need to out of our offices?' " Cantwell said. "We need to walk the walk in addition to talking the talk. We can do what we need to do with less."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Polish foreign minister takes aim at Musk after Trump clash
WARSAW (Reuters) -Poland's foreign minister poked fun at Elon Musk late on Thursday, returning to a social media spat from March after the Tesla and SpaceX boss spectacularly fell out with U.S. President Donald Trump. Warsaw's top diplomat Radoslaw Sikorski found himself embroiled in an extraordinarily public clash with Musk and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in March after he said Ukraine may need an alternative to the Starlink satellite service. Amid a flurry of posts on his social media platform X, Musk had told Sikorski to "Be quiet, small man". On Thursday simmering tensions between Musk and Trump exploded into a public feud, as the president threatened to cut off government contracts to companies run by the world's richest man. Musk suggested Trump should be impeached. Sikorski took aim at Musk in a post on X, saying "See, big man, politics is harder than you thought." There was no immediate response to the post from Musk.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
How much damage could Donald Trump do to Elon Musk?
Tesla stock soared in the months after the November presidential election because investors were convinced Donald Trump was about to do massive favors for his largest financial backer, Tesla CEO Elon Musk. But Trump can also do great damage to Musk's many business interests. The risk of that damage is one reason that Tesla shares (TSLA) tumbled 14% in trading Thursday following the very nasty and public spat between Trump and Musk. But it's not just Tesla that could be at risk. SpaceX depends on government contracts for a significant share of its revenue. And Tesla, SpaceX and Musk's other companies, including social media platform X, artificial intelligence company xAI and brain-computer interface company Neuralink all face regulation from the federal government. In addition, Musk faces possible investigations of his own activities from agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is looking into whether he violated rules when purchased his initial stake in X, then called Twitter, ahead of launching his takeover bid for the company. Trump appeared to threaten that he would take such action against Musk, as he posted on his Truth social media platform Thursday that, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' To which Musk replied on his social media platform X: 'This just gets better and better,' followed by two laughing face emojis, along with 'Go ahead, make my day.' Tesla has relatively few government contracts. But there are numerous federal policies that directly affect its finances, including a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicle buyers that allows Tesla and other automakers to raise prices. That was likely worth billions to Tesla last year alone. In addition, Tesla reported more than $8 billion in sales over six years of regulatory credits to other automakers to help them comply with federal and state emission standards. Trump is in favor of rolling back those standards and stripping states of the power to set their own emissions rules, which would destroy the market for those credit sales. A note from JPMorgan to clients Thursday estimates the loss of the EV tax credit could cost Tesla $1.2 billion a year and the loss of regulatory credit sales another $2 billion. Musk has also pegged the future of the growth of Tesla on operating a self-driving taxi service without any driver on board. Tesla's current 'full self driving' offering (FSD) requires a driver to be present to take control of the car. The service is due to debut in Austin, Texas, later this month. He admits his ambitious growth plans could be constrained by regulations. In addition, the federal National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has also already announced investigations into accidents involving existing Tesla cars operating with FSD. Many Tesla fans assumed those investigations would be dropped under a Tesla-friendly Trump administration. SpaceX has received $15.2 billion in contracts from NASA, as well as $5.8 billion from the Department of Defense, along with a few million more from other agencies, according to Replacing SpaceX on those contracts, however, is not realistic. That's because there is no other company available to replace it. For example, Boeing, the only other company able transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS), had problems on its only crewed flight last year. That required its Starliner spacecraft to return to Earth without two astronauts, who were stranded at the ISS for nine months instead of the planned trip of a handful of days. But SpaceX also is subject to the oversight of both NASA and the FAA. Its Starlink satellite internet communication service is also seeking approval from the FCC to expand its service.
