
US bishops halt aid partnerships with government due to funding cuts
The break will inevitably result in fewer services than Catholic agencies were able to offer in the past to the needy, the bishops said.
'As a national effort, we simply cannot sustain the work on our own at current levels or in current form,' said US military services archbishop Timothy Broglio, president of the USCCB. 'We will work to identify alternative means of support for the people the federal government has already admitted to these programs. We ask your prayers for the many staff and refugees impacted.'
The decision means the bishops won't be renewing existing agreements with the federal government, the bishops said. The announcement did not say how long current agreements were scheduled to last.
Catholic bishops sued Donald Trump's administration in February over its abrupt halt to the funding of aid provided to newly arrived refugees, saying they are owed millions already allocated by Congress to carry out resettlement aid under an agreement with the federal government.
But a federal judge ruled that he couldn't order the government to pay money due on a contract, saying a contractual dispute belongs before the court of federal claims. The bishops have appealed that ruling.
Beyond that specific funding dispute is the Trump administration's halt to all new refugee arrivals. The Catholic bishops oversaw one of 10 national agencies, most of them faith-based, which contracted with the federal government to resettle refugees who come to the US legally after being vetted and approved by the federal government.
Broglio's announcement didn't specify what the children's services program was.
The bishops have overseen Catholic agencies resettling displaced people for a century. In recent decades they had done so in a partnership with the US government, receiving grants that covered much, though not all, of the expenses.
The Trump administration's 'decision to reduce these programs drastically forces us to reconsider the best way to serve the needs of our brothers and sisters seeking safe harbor from violence and persecution', Broglio said.
Despite Broglio's asking for prayers for the 'many staff and refugees impacted', the announcement did not specify whether the cuts would lead to any layoffs.
JD Vance, a Catholic convert, accused the bishops conference in January of resettling immigrants who are in the US illegally in order to get millions in federal funding – an apparent reference to the resettlement program, which actually involves legally approved refugees.
The bishops noted that rather than making money on the program, they receive less in federal aid than the programs cost and need to supplement the funding with charitable dollars.
The vice-president followed up his criticisms by appealing to Catholic teaching as justifying immigration restrictions. That drew rejoinders not only from US bishops but an implicit rebuke from Pope Francis, who said Christian charity requires helping those in need, not just those in one's closest circles.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ITV News
24 minutes ago
- ITV News
As Europe's leaders head to Washington, Trump could shift to favouring Russia
They are travelling with a mood of collective concern — presidents, prime ministers, and a secretary general, descending on Washington today in a flotilla of flag-draped planes, uneasy that this is what it takes to help ensure their path towards a fair deal isn't thrown off course. As one European official told ITV News: "If we assume that Trump only hears the last person in the room, we should make sure that we are the last people in the room." For the United States, this is a moment of growing alignment — yes, alignment. But not with Britain, Germany, or France, as you might expect. Because, as European leaders travel to the White House with the transatlantic alliance on Ukraine sounding shaky - and their declarations of allegiance at times insincere - it's Washington and Moscow that emerged from Anchorage on Friday showing signs of agreement. Donald Trump is, in some ways, echoing Vladimir Putin's framing of the conflict at least as much as Volodymyr Zelenskyy's. And Putin has already set the trap: to portray Europeans and Ukrainians as the true obstacles to peace. On Friday, he warned Europe not to 'torpedo progress.' Yesterday, Kirill Dmitriev — a Kremlin negotiator and one of Putin's closest allies - went further, tweeting that 'European and British warmongers/saboteurs are in full panic mode. They should not stay in the way of Peace,' punctuating his message with a dove emoji. This was Russia draping itself in the robes of peacemaker, its critics cast as potential saboteurs. For European leaders, the danger isn't subtle - a narrative in which Putin gets to play statesman while they are painted as the wreckers. It's Donald Trump who Moscow hopes will buy that story. But what was agreed in Anchorage is still unclear, besides an agreement that Ukraine should be able to receive security guarantees like those it would receive if it was a member of Nato, the specifics are unclear. Trump himself was evasive on Friday: 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' What has since emerged is that Putin demanded Ukraine withdraw from Donbas — the Donetsk and Luhansk regions — as the price of ending the war, while offering a freeze along the rest of the frontline. Trump signalled willingness to back a plan that would see Russia handed not just occupied areas, but unoccupied Ukrainian territory too, in return for what he could present as peace. Whether Ukraine freezes the conflict or cedes land outright is more than a technical distinction; in practice, it is the difference between a country catching its breath or being permanently diminished. Last week, Trump assured Europeans that Moscow had made concessions which, it turned out, were never on the table. That ambiguity is exactly why Europeans are wary of Trump negotiating with Putin alone — and equally unwilling to leave Trump and Zelenskyy alone, mindful of the Oval Office humiliation in February when Trump berated the Ukrainian president in front of cameras. No European leader is prepared to risk a repeat of that scene. Meanwhile, Washington's tone has softened. Where the administration once threatened severe consequences if no ceasefire was reached, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Sunday that fresh measures would take time to bite and would only drive Russia from the table. The result: no new punishment for Putin, no clear cost for saying no. He left Alaska without agreeing to a ceasefire, but with a photo op, a red carpet, and a round of applause — prestige without compromise. It was against that backdrop that Zelenskyy and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen appeared together yesterday. Their message was blunt: Donetsk will not be handed to Russia, because Putin has failed to take it in twelve years of fighting. Talks cannot take place while Russian missiles still fall — 'it's impossible to negotiate under the pressure of weapons,' Zelenskyy said. This was a clear attempt to fix the terms of debate before heading to Washington. Two kinds of unity now shape this moment. The anticlimax in Alaska revealed the American president drifting closer to the Russian one. Washington could now reveal another — Europe's leaders rallying behind Ukraine not as bystanders, but as counterweights.


The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Marco Rubio denies Zelensky is being ‘bullied' by Trump amid European leaders meeting
Marco Rubio dismissed the "stupid media narrative" that Donald Trump would bully Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into a disadvantageous deal with Russia. Rubio clarified that European leaders attending the meeting with Zelensky were invited by Trump and are not present as "backup" against bullying. Trump recently held a nearly three-hour meeting with Russian President Putin in Anchorage to discuss the war in Ukraine, but no ceasefire agreement was reached. The article references a past contentious meeting in Washington D.C. where Trump accused Zelensky of gambling with "World War Three" and Vice President JD Vance questioned Zelensky's gratitude. Rubio refused to disclose any potential concessions Trump might seek from Russia, stating that revealing such details could jeopardise the negotiations.


Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Take Five: From Anchorage to Jackson Hole
Aug 18 (Reuters) - There seems to be very little standing in the way of stock-market bulls right now, but what follows a U.S./Russia summit in Alaska, a central bank shin-dig in Wyoming and the outcome of Bolivia's election may imbue them with some caution. Here's your week ahead from Rocky Swift in Tokyo; Suzanne McGee and Rodrigo Campos in New York and Dhara Ranasinghe and Naomi Rovnick in London. Following Friday's meeting between Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, it's the turn of Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders to meet the U.S. President later on Monday, opens new tab to map out a peace deal. The fear is Trump could try to pressure Kyiv into accepting a settlement favourable to Moscow. Zelenskiy has already all but rejected the outline of Putin's proposals, including for Ukraine to give up the rest of its eastern Donetsk region, of which it currently controls a quarter. No doubt, markets will be hesitant to price in an end to the war until a ceasefire, at least, is agreed. Europe, meanwhile, is unlikely to embrace Russia, even if peace returns to Ukraine. Defence stocks are likely to remain an investor favourite for now. It's officially summer in financial markets. Q2 earnings are out, the next crop of major economic data isn't until early September and many money managers and traders are heading out to the beaches for a break. There is just one thing to worry about: Jackson Hole. The Wyoming resort plays host to the annual central bankers' schmoozefest and will include Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell among its attendees. The conference takes place as stocks hover near record levels, and Trump continues to take pot-shots at Powell. Jackson Hole has the potential to be disruptive. Any hint from Powell that a September rate cut isn't happening and markets could sell off hard, while an overly upbeat tone from the Fed chair may feed more euphoria. 'And bull markets die in euphoria,' says Steve Sosnick, strategist at trading firm IBKR. As global stocks rally, everything from weak U.S. jobs data to trouble at the top of the Federal Reserve has been a reason to bet on U.S. rate cuts, meaning it's not been profitable to be bearish. About 60% of global investors surveyed by BofA think U.S. stagflation could be the dominant global market regime within three months. A basket of stocks that do well in stagflationary environments, where growth slows as inflation accelerates, has been outpaced by Wall Street's benchmark S&P 500 index (.SPX), opens new tab this year, Societe Generale strategists reckon. Next week's business surveys, which can show economic trends months before they appear in official data, will offer more clues about whether U.S. tariffs are driving the world's largest towards stagflation. SocGen, however, expects Fed rate cuts to inflate a stock-market bubble that might not pop until at least next year. With nearly every central bank looking to cut rates to give their economies a soft landing, the Bank of Japan stands apart in its mission to raise borrowing costs - in theory. So, next Friday's inflation data will be in focus for any sign of when the BOJ's long-pledged tightening cycle will resume. The previous reading of the core consumer price index (CPI) showed an annual 3.3% increase in June, remaining above the BOJ's 2% target for over three years. No bank went harder or longer with quantitative easing than the BOJ. But the long road towards normalisation has been complicated by uncertainty over U.S. tariffs and concerns about whether Japan was seeing the right kind of price increases. BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda has justified slower rate hikes because underlying inflation, which focuses on domestic demand and wages, remains below the central bank's target. Centrist senator Rodrigo Paz was leading Bolivia's presidential election late on Sunday. The election kicks off a string of national and local votes across Latin America that extends into late next year, when behemoth Brazil votes to elect a new (or sitting) president. After 2022's "pink tide" brought left-leaning governments to power in Chile, Colombia and Brazil, investors want to see if voters will return to more market-friendly right-wingers. Ahead of the Bolivian election, the country's bonds rallied on hopes that political change could bring the economy back from the brink. Argentina's local elections in September and October are seen as a gauge of the popularity of President Javier Milei's radical economic transformation. Chile votes for a president in November, while next year Colombia elects its congress in March and president in May. Peru holds a presidential election in April and Brazil does so in October 2026.