Trump U-turn may have saved stocks, but ECB council member says U.S. is killing world confidence in the Dollar: ‘Thank God Europe created the Euro'
Donald Trump's dramatic Wednesday U-turn on tariffs was a predictably unpredictable move from the U.S. president that set U.S. stocks up for their best day since 2008. But, while equities were pulled out of the firing line, the head of France's central bank isn't sure the rest of the world will continue to buy whatever Trump and the U.S. are selling.
On Tuesday, Trump announced a 90-day pause to tariffs leveled against several countries on April 2's 'Liberation Day,' relenting on his grand plans as equity and bond markets fell into bear market territory. China, however, was hit with increased import tariffs of 125%.
Speaking on France Inter radio, Bank of France chief and ECB policymaker Francois Villeroy de Galhau warned Trump that his maneuvers hadn't gone unnoticed by global investors. And while equity and bond markets lick their wounds in preparation for the next bend in the roller coaster, the biggest victim in the long run could be the U.S. Dollar.
"The big element of constancy in US policy of the past decades is the attachment to the central role of the dollar. I believe that the Trump administration also has that view, but it is very incoherent in the way it practices that. What has happened in recent days and weeks plays against the confidence in the US currency," Villeroy said.
The U.S. Dollar is the world's reserve currency, thanks to its dominance as a currency for global transactions and as reserves for central banks.
That mantle started to be questioned after Trump put pressure on Ukraine and Europe to defend themselves against the threat of Russian overreach, threatening to pull out of NATO. As the influence of China grows, some investors fear the U.S. turning its back on its allies could accelerate 'de-dollarization' efforts.
Villeroy's comments are reflective of a wider investment sentiment around the U.S., for so long regarded as the protector of the Western international order and more importantly, a reliably stable location for the flow of capital.
As Fortune's Shawn Tully reported in the wake of Trump's tariff pause, the president appears to have been moved into action by rapidly accelerating bond yields from April 5. The 10-year Treasury bond, a key debt metric used to set things like car loans and mortgage rates, began to rise after initial signs of a dip linked to expectant interest rate cuts.
The reason behind the rise in bond yields, economists told Tully, was that tariffs appeared to shatter investors' perception of the U.S. as a welcoming and lucrative destination for foreigners to plant their money.
Meanwhile, a slowdown in global trade would by definition reduce global demand for the Dollar through lower transactions. Trump himself has publicly stated his intention to weaken the Dollar hoping it will improve U.S. export competitiveness. Combined with lower confidence in U.S. assets, Trump's economic agenda could very well achieve his aim.
While Villeroy denigrated the appeal of the U.S. Dollar in the wake of a fraught geopolitical climate, the ECB policymaker was keen to talk up the pros of the European alternative.
"Thank God that Europe, 25 years ago, created the Euro. We have created our own monetary autonomy, we can manage our interest rates in a way that is different from the Americans, that was not the case before," he said on France Inter.
The Euro's introduction in 1999 set the Eurozone currency up for a battle with the greenback for global dominance. It hasn't quite played out that way, with the Eurozone's debt crisis causing the currency to lose track against the Dollar.
However, Trump's isolationism push has worked in the Euro's favor. The currency has risen in value against the Dollar since Trump's inauguration.
In its quest to dethrone the Dollar, however, the Eurozone's currency will face challengers. The BRICS nations have a yearslong head start in 'de-dollarization,' taking more opportunities to use alternative currencies in cross-border transactions.
While the U.S.'s dominance leaves it with plenty of headroom for disruption, more weeks like the one that followed Trump's tariff yo-yo could help the Euro compete.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Russia's Pearl Harbor' Fuels Fears Over Chinese Cargo Ships at US Ports
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Sunday's Ukrainian drone ambush on a Russian airbase more than 3,000 miles from the front lines has intensified a growing debate among U.S. military analysts over the plausibility of a similar attack launched from Chinese merchant vessels docked at American ports. The scenario has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers and security analysts alike following confirmation that COSCO Shipping—China's state-owned shipping giant—operates across key U.S. ports, despite being designated by the Department of Defense as a Chinese military company. At issue is whether drones or cruise missiles could be hidden in shipping containers aboard these vessels, activated remotely or after offloading, and used in a preemptive strike. "This is a very plausible form of attack in the U.S.," said Bryan Clark, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former U.S. Navy officer. "But the attack would need to overcome several challenges," he told Newsweek. "The drones need to get out of the container, and that's hard to control aboard a ship. A more feasible approach would be to deploy the drones from a container once it's offloaded and moved on a truck." In this image taken from video released June 1, 2025, by a source in the Ukrainian Security Service shows a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. In this image taken from video released June 1, 2025, by a source in the Ukrainian Security Service shows a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. AP Retired Navy commander Thomas Shugart, now a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, has voiced a more urgent warning. "It is becoming borderline-insane that we routinely allow ships owned and operated by DoD-designated Chinese military companies to sit in our ports with thousands of containers onboard and under their control," Shugart said in a conversation with Newsweek. Shugart said the concept isn't speculative—it mirrors Chinese military writings. "Their Science of Campaigns is full of references to 'sudden' and 'surprise' strikes," he said, referring to a core text that Chinese military officers are expected to study. "They explicitly discuss hitting first, especially against what they call the 'powerful entity,' which is clearly a reference to the United States." The concerns are not just theoretical. In January, members of the House Committee on Homeland Security asked the U.S. Coast Guard for a classified briefing, citing COSCO's access to "major U.S. ports" and warning of risks including "espionage, cyber intrusions, sabotage, and supply chain disruptions," according to a letter sent in January. Vulnerabilities Can Be Exploited Zak Kallenborn, a researcher of drone and asymmetric warfare, acknowledged the technical possibility but questioned the timing. "A similar Chinese drone attack is definitely plausible and worth worrying about," he told Newsweek. "However, a Chinese attack is unlikely to come completely out of the blue. If China were to do this, we'd likely already be at war." Shipping containers, including those from COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics company await transportation on a rail line at the Port of Long Beach on July 12, 2018 in Long Beach, California. Shipping containers, including those from COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics company await transportation on a rail line at the Port of Long Beach on July 12, 2018 in Long Beach, California. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Still, the lessons from Ukraine's recent drone strike on Russian airfields linger heavily in the minds of U.S. analysts and war planners grappling with the warp-speed progress of battlefield technological advancements like drone warfare. The operation on Sunday exposed how even hardened military targets can be neutralized by low-cost drones—deep inside a nuclear-armed adversary's territory where an enemy's conventional air power would be difficult to penetrate. For some of these experts, it raised uncomfortable parallels to U.S. vulnerabilities. Shugart said the U.S. shouldn't assume distance offers safety. "We've hardened some overseas air bases," he said. "But we still park billion-dollar aircraft in the open on our own soil. That's a risk." According to a March report from the Atlantic Council, China has developed and demonstrated containerized missile and drone platforms that can be covertly transported aboard commercial vessels. The report warned these systems could enable Beijing to establish "a covert way to establish anti-access/area denial nodes near major maritime choke points." A Regulatory Blindspot Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb demonstrated how swarms of inexpensive, off-the-shelf drones—slightly modified to carry explosives and smuggled in wooden containers to be deployed remotely—can inflict billions of dollars in damage on strategic military assets, including long-range bombers. The contrast has fueled criticism of more traditional defense approaches, such as President Donald Trump's proposed "Golden Dome" missile shield, which analysts say may be poorly matched to emerging low-cost threats. What if I told you that as I type this there was a vessel, associated with the Chinese PLA, that *could* be equipped with many dozens of anti-ship cruise missiles—and was parked less than 4 miles from the bulk of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet. Well guess what: it's happening—for real. — Tom Shugart (@tshugart3) August 22, 2024 The regulatory environment surrounding drones is also a major factor in the growing risk, experts say. "We don't have a drone transportation and logistics system," military theorist John Robb wrote on X. "The FAA strangled it in the crib a decade ago. If the FCC had regulated the internet the way we've handled drones, we'd still be using AOL." Robb advocates for a national drone framework with built-in security measures: "Monitoring, kill switches, no-fly zones, hardware and software rules, maintenance requirements, and corporate certification." In Congress, lawmakers continue to press the Coast Guard to ensure more stringent vetting of foreign vessels, crew members and cargo. "The vetting process must be consistent and comprehensive across all U.S. ports," the Homeland Security Committee wrote in its January request. The committee also raised concerns about Chinese political officers allegedly embedded aboard COSCO vessels, which it argued underscores direct Chinese Communist Party influence over ostensibly commercial operations. For analysts like Clark, the technology is only part of the equation. The more pressing concern is readiness. "If China believes it can use relatively small drones to cause major damage, and we've done nothing to detect or deter it, that's a vulnerability we can't afford to ignore," he said.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Abrego Garcia lawyers blast ‘shocking proposition' behind Trump admin resistance
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is still imprisoned in El Salvador after the U.S. government illegally sent him there in March. According to the latest filing from his lawyers, the Trump administration is still resisting facilitating his return, despite having been ordered to do so by judges at every level of the court system. 'The Government asks this Court to accept a shocking proposition: that federal officers may snatch residents of this country and deposit them in foreign prisons in admitted violation of federal law, while no court in the United States has jurisdiction to do anything about it,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers wrote Monday in their opposition to the government's motion to dismiss. The motion, filed last week, is pending before U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, who ordered the government to facilitate his return nearly two months ago. The Supreme Court largely backed her order in April, but instead of approving it completely in a way that could've ended the matter, the high court's order left open questions while sending the case back to the Maryland judge for further litigation. The Supreme Court said on April 10 that Xinis' order 'properly requires the Government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.' And yet, the government has not done that. Since then, the lower court litigation has been unfolding too slowly to the liking of Abrego Garcia's lawyers, who said in their opposition filing that the administration is just trying to rehash 'recycled arguments' in its dismissal motion. The government can now file a final reply brief before Xinis rules, and that reply would ordinarily be due in two weeks; but Abrego Garcia's lawyers have asked the judge to cut that due date to one week. 'Further briefing on recycled arguments should not prolong a case that has already dragged on far too long for Abrego Garcia and his family,' they wrote. So while news has emerged of yet more immigrants the government has wrongly sent to other countries since Abrego Garcia's illegal removal, his return is still not in sight. Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's Reign of Corruption Chronicled in Elizabeth Warren Report
As Elon Musk departs the Trump White House — at least officially — a new Senate report examines how the world's richest man leveraged his access to the levers of federal power to boost his myriad personal businesses including his electric vehicle company Tesla, aerospace contractor SpaceX, social media platform X, and brain chip firm Neuralink. Musk is leaving his post as a 'special government employee' — a status that limited his stint in the executive branch to 130 days. As Donald Trump made clear in a press conference, where he gave Musk a 'key' to the White House, the billionaire's influence will live on, as will his crusade against his own regulators. Issued by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the report is titled 'Special Interests Over the Public Interest: Elon Musk's 130 Days in the Trump Administration' and features a list of 130 actions by Musk, his companies, and family members that 'raise questions about corruption, ethics, and conflicts of interest.'Musk, of course, was Trump's biggest benefactor in the 2024 campaign, spending nearly $300 million to put Trump and Republican candidates into office. He then camped out at Mar-a-Lago during the presidential transition and moved to Washington with the 47th president. At times appearing to be the nation's true chief executive, Musk commanded the forces of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and sent critical agencies like USAID (the U.S. Agency for International Development) through the 'woodchipper,' likely condemning millions of vulnerable people across the globe to death by preventable diseases. The Warren report is focused on Elon's use of political power to boost his businesses, or secure special benefits — from regulatory relief to rich new contracts — that favor his fortunes and his family. The report clarifies that 'Not every action listed… represents a violation of federal law,' but argues instead that 'Musk has violated norms at an astonishing pace' while engaging in and supporting actions that are 'hurting the American public.' It labels this 'scandalous behavior regardless of whether it subjects him to criminal prosecution.' The Warren report divides its list into 15 categories, which Rolling Stone can exclusively preview below: The report highlights the time, when Tesla showrooms were increasingly beset by public protests, that Trump turned the White House lawn into a Tesla lot. The report highlights more than 20 instances of Musk or DOGE helping Musk's enterprises secure new contracts on an inside track on rich lines of business. For example, it highlights Rolling Stone's report about how staff at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) were instructed to find 'tens of millions' of dollars for a rich new Starlink contract. As well as a new $100 million NASA contract for SpaceX to launch an asteroid monitoring space telescope. When Trump took office, Musk companies faced federal penalties and enforcement actions totalling up to $2.4 billion, according to the report. Warren highlights CNBC reporting that the federal government has allowed nearly 40 cases against Musk companies to effectively go dormant, while others, including a Department of Justice case against SpaceX for alleged anti-immigrant discrimination in hiring, have been dropped. The report describes how Musk and the administration have targeted agencies with powers to regulate Musk businesses — including 'gutting their staff, throwing sand in the gears of their operations, and embedding DOGE staff loyal to Musk.' A key example of this is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has authority to police Musk as he turns X into a payment platform. 'Delete CFPB,' Musk has posted, and the administration has tried to bring the agency to its knees. (Read Rolling Stone's interview with Warren on this topic.) Musk operates in many highly regulated areas, from launching rockets to biomedical brain implants. The FAA has, under Trump, become a service agency for SpaceX, clearing the way for rocket launches despite frequent catastrophic failures. In Trump's auto tariff battles, the administration announced that cars with 85 percent domestic content were spared the levy — a category that reportedly only includes Teslas. Never before has a presidential megadonor had so much unfettered access to government data, insight, and decisionmakers. The report highlights Musk's role as a dominant participant at Trump cabinet meetings, despite having no cabinet-level post, who was 'privy to upcoming policy changes at the highest level of government,' many of which could boost his bottom line. Musk has been deeply enmeshed, through DOGE, in the HR decisions of the federal government — firing tens of thousands of employees while installing loyalists throughout the bureaucracy. Many of these lackeys now have permanent government gigs, and will be able to carry out Musk-aligned policy without his active direction, including the head of the Federal Communications Commission, which has oversight of radio spectrum needed by Starlink, SpaceX's satellite internet business. The report links Musk to the Trump administration's sudden, curious interest in the cause of white Afrikaaners from South Africa, who have been granted refugee status amid Musk's trumped-up allegations that they face a 'genocide' — even as other truly vulnerable people from around the world are being denied admission to the United States. The report highlights a Wall Street Journal investigation into perceived threats from X execs who intimated that a planned merger between ad conglomerates might face trouble if ad clients didn't ramp up their spending on the social media platform. The report links Musk to the Trump Federal Trade Commission's 'seemingly baseless' investigation into whether Media Matters colluded with advertisers. X sued the watchdog in late 2023, after Media Matters reported that ads on the platform were being served up against 'pro-Nazi' content, leading large brands to suspend campaigns on the platform. The report links Musk's White House influence to favorable provisions of the House budget bill, including funding for the 'Golden Dome,' a space-based missile defense program that seems ready-made for Starlink. Warren's report highlights dozens of deals that Musk companies have inked with countries that are under tariff threat from the administration, as well as Musk accompanying Trump's tour of Persian Gulf countries, where the DOGE chief announced deals of his own — including that Neuralink had inked a deal to begin clinical trials in the United Arab Emirates. The report highlights how Musk's power is translating to deals for family members, including his brother recently inking a deal with Gulf states to mount drone light shows while his dad is reportedly in talks to build a Musk Tower in Dubai. Musk's fruitless effort to finance a conservative takeover of the Wisconsin state Supreme Court is highlighted in the report, as is his call for judges who oppose Trump to be impeached. Despite his pledge of 'maximum transparency' by DOGE, Musk himself has hidden his norms-busting activities behind a veil of secrecy, the report concludes, failing to make public his vast financial holdings, or what if any waivers of federal ethics requirements he may have received. More from Rolling Stone Trump Has 'Broken' Musk, Jon Stewart Roasts Tech Billionaire After White House Departure Crypto Bros Celebrate Themselves at Bitcoin's Most MAGA Convention Yet Trump Tries to Blame Biden for Colorado Attack Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
