US Marine Corps creates attack drone team as arms race with Russia, China heats up
The U.S. Marine Corps established an attack drone team earlier this year to respond to the rapid development of armed first-person view (FPV) drone technology and tactics, offering a glimpse into the evolving landscape of modern warfare and how future battles could be fought.
The Marine Corps Attack Drone Team (MCADT) will be based at the Weapons Training Battalion, Marine Corps Base in Quantico, Virginia.
The FPV drones used will offer squad-level lethality at a range of up to 20 kilometers, nearly 12.5 miles, for under $5,000, compared to more expensive weapons systems with less capability, according to a press release from the service.
"MCADT is committed to rapidly integrating armed first-person view drones into the FMF [Fleet Marine Force], enhancing small-unit lethality and providing organic capabilities that warfighters currently lack," said Maj. Alejandro Tavizon, the headquarters company commander at Weapons Training Battalion and officer in charge of MCADT.
"By leveraging emerging technologies and refining drone employment tactics, we are ensuring that Marines remain agile, adaptive, and lethal in the modern battlespace."
Brett Velicovich, an Army veteran with extensive drone experience, told Fox News Digital that the creation of MCADT has been long overdue as the United States enters a drone arms race with adversaries like China, Russia and Iran.
Read On The Fox News App
"For a while now, we haven't had the needed technology, the needed expertise in low-cost, highly scalable, lethal drone technology that, frankly, is going to be the next part of every piece of the next war that we fight," he said.
Velicovich argued that the United States is far behind other countries, especially China, when it comes to the production of drone technology, and needs to start looking at drones not just as surveillance assets, but as a form of ammunition.
He pointed to Russia's war in Ukraine and the large-scale advancements in domestic drone production that have allowed Ukrainian forces to strike multi-million-dollar enemy tanks and vehicles with drones that cost a few hundred dollars.
Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov announced in December that Ukraine manufactured over 1.5 million FPV drones in 2024, including reconnaissance, kamikaze and long-range deep-strike drones. Domestically produced drones accounted for 96.2% of all unmanned aerial vehicles used by Ukrainian forces during the year.
"You have companies and manufacturing plants in Ukraine building 100,000 drones per month. One manufacturing plant is building 100,000 of these things per month. That's real scale. That's where we need to be," Velicovich told Fox News Digital.
The WSJ, citing one Department of Defense estimate, reported that the U.S. has the capacity to build up to 100,000 drones a year.
Us, European Allies Demand Action To End Russia's Use Of Iranian Drones In Ukraine
The number is far below what the United States' adversaries, such as Russia and China, produce in a year, raising national security concerns.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, speaking at a meeting of the Military-Industrial Commission in late April, said that almost all of the country's defense enterprises had met their orders in full last year, highlighting Moscow's efforts to ramp up its war machine.
"Over 1.5 million drones of various types were delivered, with about 4,000 so-called FPV drones equipped with virtual reality control systems supplied to the frontlines daily," Putin said, according to a transcript released by the Kremlin. "I know well, just as many of you here do, that these weapons are still in short supply. We need more of them."
Chinese technology company DJI is also making significant inroads in drone production, in both U.S. and Asian markets. It touts itself as the world's leading manufacturer of consumer and commercial drones.
Craig Singleton, a senior China fellow at the non-partisan Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital that the Shenzhen-based company dominates the global drone market, controlling more than 70% of the worldwide market share.
"That's alarming, because DJI drones are essentially data collectors for Beijing — giving China potential access to sensitive infrastructure imagery, flight patterns, and more. It's not just a market-share problem — it's a national security threat," he said.
Ai-powered Attack Drones Take Flight
Singleton added that the U.S. doesn't need to match China drone for drone, but it needs a production floor that's sustainable, somewhere around a minimum of 250,000 drones per year.
"We are absolutely in a drone arms race with China — and losing isn't an option. Success will depend on scaling production, protecting sensitive supply chains, and turbocharging innovation," he said. "It's not just about building drones — it's about fielding smarter, cheaper and more resilient swarms faster than Beijing."
The U.S. National Drone Association will host the Military Drone Crucible Championship in Florida later this summer, where the Marines and the Army's 75th Ranger Regiment will compete to demonstrate their drone skills and tactics in modern combat.Original article source: US Marine Corps creates attack drone team as arms race with Russia, China heats up
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Deliveroo and Manna introduce drone-based food delivery in Ireland
Deliveroo, in collaboration with Manna Drones, has introduced a drone food delivery service in Dublin, Ireland. This service will be available to Deliveroo customers in the Blanchardstown area of the city. Deliveroo is embarking on a test phase to evaluate the drone service in suburban areas. Manna Drones, an Irish company founded in 2019, has previously entered into a collaboration with Just Eat for drone deliveries in Dublin, to broaden the services across other European nations, as reported by Bloomberg. The initial drone delivery service will encompass a three-kilometre radius in the Dublin 15 area, with the option for drone delivery on the app for customers. Anticipated delivery time could be as low as three minutes, and there are plans to extend the service to more restaurants and introduce grocery and retail deliveries before the end of 2025. Set to be launched from Manna's hub in Blanchardstown, the drones reach speeds of up to 80 km/hour. Deliveroo chief business officer Carlo Mocci stated: 'We're excited to explore how drones can help us reach new customers, complementing our existing rider model and if successful, the prospect of expanding drone deliveries across Ireland and into other markets.' Manna has already completed 170,000 flights in Ireland and operates bases in the US state of Texas and in Finland. The company is also looking to expand its operations to the UK and to European Union countries besides Ireland by the end of 2025. Manna is also a member of a UK consortium that includes Wing and Lancashire Fire and Rescue, which is funded by the UK Civil Aviation Authority. "Deliveroo and Manna introduce drone-based food delivery in Ireland" was originally created and published by Verdict Food Service, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine can make way more weapons than the country can buy. Industry figures say there's a simple fix to unlocking its potential.
Ukraine's industry is growing rapidly amid Russia's invasion, and Ukraine is relying less on allies. But the industry says it has far more capacity that's unused as Ukraine can't spend that much. Industry leaders say there's a simple way that Ukraine's potential can be reached. Ukraine's defense industry says it is prepared to produce much more weaponry than it is currently making. The problem is that the Ukrainian government can't afford the multi-billion-dollar price tag for production. But it says there's a straightforward solution. Ukraine's defense industry has boomed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, with manufacturers ranging from huge outfits to small companies based in people's garages. These companies are crucial, especially at times when Western support is uncertain. The host of defense companies that have sprung up over the last three years of war has allowed Ukraine to innovate quickly and make weaponry that is well suited to the country's specific fight, and their insights into the demands of modern war have many Western companies keen to collaborate and learn from them. Ukrainian Minister of Strategic Industries Herman Smetanin shared earlier this year that "the capabilities of the Ukrainian defense industry have grown 35 times over the three years of the invasion," up from $1 billion in 2022 to $35 billion now. Industry bodies, each representing around 100 Ukrainian defense companies, told Business Insider that the country's industry is ready to make far more weaponry if someone can fund it, and said it would be a win-win for allies. Serhiy Goncharov, the CEO of the National Association of Ukrainian Defense Industries, which represents around 100 Ukrainian companies, told BI that Ukrainian producers' capacity is more than three times as large as their purchasing power from current budgets. He said Ukrainian defense companies get contracts worth around $11.5 billion, but they have the capacity to make as much as $45 billion in weapons. "We are ready to increase our production. We have the capacity to increase our production," Goncharov said. But for now, "we still work in the limit of the budget of Ukraine." Government officials have shared similar observations. For instance, Oleksandr Kamyshin, then Ukraine's minister of strategic industries, said in April 2024 that Ukraine's defense production capacity was three times as much as its defense budget. Ihor Fedirko, the CEO of the Ukrainian Council of Defence Industry, a body that represents more than 100 companies, told BI "there are huge spare manufacturing capacities." Ukraine's defense companies typically rely on money from the government buying their goods for the military. Units also buy some weaponry and items themselves, but that practice doesn't add up to the same scale or offer businesses the same confidence. Ukraine's government only has so much money, particularly during wartime. Ukrainian industry figures outlined a simple solution, one that is already underway on a smaller scale. It's a new way of supporting Ukraine that was launched by Denmark last year. The model, nicknamed the "Danish model," buys weapons for Ukraine directly from Ukrainian developers instead of purchasing them from European or US companies or taking them from other countries' stockpiles. Goncharov described actions similar to the Danish model as the "simplest" way partner nations can help Ukraine's industry and the one that gives the "fastest result on the battlefield." He said this approach allows Ukraine to increase its production by giving manufacturers financial assurances and confidence. Multiple countries have joined this model, and some others, like Germany, say they are working on their own version of it. The Danish model ensures weapons reach Ukrainian soldiers faster and typically for less money. It also means the weaponry Ukrainian forces need most is prioritized. Goncharov said it helps Ukrainians get "exactly what they need on the battlefield." Through this approach, even if a partner country has limited stockpiles or a limited defense production capacity, it can still "purchase the artillery for Ukraine from Ukraine." Around $550 million worth of weapons procurements were finalized last year and boosted the production of key weapons like the Bohdana self-propelled howitzer. Goncharov said Ukraine's industry has a list of weapons it is ready to increase the production of if it gets money through this type of model. That list includes artillery and armored vehicles. Fedirko said the Danish model is "the largest hope for the private sector." Other options include using frozen Russian assets and joint manufacturing opportunities with foreign companies. Goncharov said he has discussed the Danish model and other options for producing more Ukrainian weaponry with members of the European Commission. Another model he proposed is financing production in Ukraine that depends on a substantial amount of European components. He said many Ukrainian companies import some components from elsewhere in Europe, like some metals and vehicle chassis. He described this as "more complex" and more medium-term than the Danish model, but it's one solution that also benefits European industry, which is ramping up. Europe is watching the war in Ukraine closely, with many countries massively boosting their defense spending and warning that Russia could attack elsewhere on the continent. Countries are hesitant to drain their stockpiles, and new defense orders are creating backlogs in industry, limiting its capacity to produce weapons for others. Many European countries are studying Ukraine's defense industry and its speed, but it's a work in progress. Goncharov said many of Ukraine's international partners are not expanding their defense production fast enough, so Ukraine's industry "has no other options only to grow, to cover our demand." He said working with Ukraine is advantageous for other countries attempting to improve their defenses. They can learn from Ukrainian companies with the advantage of being in direct contact with soldiers and units, allowing them to stay up to date with what is needed against Russia and test their products. "We unfortunately face this situation when we have war on our territory, and it's not our choice, but it is what it is." Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Europe's biggest VCs are going to war over adopting China's 996 ‘always on' culture: ‘Don't listen to a jumped-up finance bro in a hoodie'
A war is brewing in Europe's startup community over three numbers that would have mass implications for tech workers, and perhaps beyond: 996. Stoked by an ongoing debate about Europe's competitiveness with other territories, leaders of some of the region's biggest VCs have waded into a battle startups should be working in order to compete with U.S. and Chinese tech firms. Harry Stebbings, founder of the 20VC fund, ignited the latest debate last weekend when he said Silicon Valley had 'turned up the intensity,' and European founders needed to take notice. '7 days a week is the required velocity to win right now. There is no room for slip up,' Stebbings said on LinkedIn. 'You aren't competing against random company in Germany etc but the best in the world.' His fellow venture capitalist, Index Ventures partner Martin Mignot, followed up in a lengthy post raising the idea of tech startups needing to work long, intense hours now more than ever. The fast-moving world of AI left no time for complacency, Mignot argued, in addition to the emergence of global competition and the need to maximize productivity among workers in a scarce talent pool. In his post, Mignot cited a 2018 Financial Times editorial by Michael Moritz, the Welsh billionaire chairperson of Sequoia Capital, who suggested Silicon Valley entrepreneurs adopt the then-little-known 996 model. It's where employees work from nine to nine, six days a week, adding up to a 72-hour work week, or double the average weekly working hours in the EU. Mignot credited Moritz with introducing the 996 model to a Western audience. A representative for Index Partners didn't respond to a request for comment. Stebbings' and Mignot's remarks caught the attention of both Amelia Miller, co-founder of Ivee, and Suranga Chandratillake, a general partner at Balderton Capital. 'Burnout [is] one of the top 3 reasons early-stage ventures fail. It is literally a bad reason to invest,' said Ivee's Miller on LinkedIn. Balderton's Chandratillake shared Miller's sentiment, and leveled his criticism at the messengers calling for a 996 culture: 'All the versions of this post I've read are from VCs who've never built a technology company themselves. I remember such 'advice' well when I was a founder. If you're a CEO, don't listen to a jumped-up finance bro in a hoodie who has never done your job telling you how to do it!' Chandratillake tells Fortune he felt compelled to wade into a public argument on the train home from work after reading what he thought were new versions of a 'dangerous' conversation on expected working hours. The former startup founder has seen the negative effects of that 'always on' mentality from some founders he has watched knowingly or unknowingly adopt the 996 model. Those founders tend to 'fail in a slightly depressing, sinking out of significance kind of way,' he said. 'You get addicted to this thing of, 'I'm just gonna make these incremental improvements in my company.' And you're growing a little bit every day, you're building a little bit every day, but you completely miss some big strategic shift that's going on around you, and as a result, you just don't make the right pivot.' The 'always on' narrative is compelling because it's an easy explanation for complex problems, Chandratillake believes. 'I always say Californians are great at telling stories, right? There's a reason why Hollywood is in LA,' said Chandratillake. 'If a thing takes 10 or 20 years to build, there's just no way you can sprint for that long without stopping.' Through Balderton, Chandratillake has been an investor in cutting-edge wellness programs for the founders of its portfolio companies, using methods practised by astronauts and athletes to ensure recovery and prevent burnout. While he advocates for more awareness of physical and mental health among founders, Chandratillake doesn't go as far as to support the idea of work-life balance. He admits he would frequently pull all-nighters at critical moments, like around funding rounds and quarterly deadlines, while building the startup Blinkx, which he eventually took public. 'You have to be smart about having moments to balance yourself, not because you're trying to create this wonderful work-life balance existence, but because you know that in a couple of weeks time, there's going to be a crunch.' The argument surrounding work culture in Europe isn't new, as opposing voices seek to support or dismiss the idea that a cross-Atlantic divergence in productivity growth is a result of differing work ethic. The sparse number of European tech companies populating the Fortune 500, or the list of the world's most valuable companies, has been used as a prime example of the fallout of this perceived shortfall. Last year, Nicolai Tangen, the CEO of Norway's $1.8 trillion wealth fund, Norges Bank Investment Management, claimed Americans work harder than Europeans owing to a higher 'general level of ambition.' Speaking on Stebbings' 20VC podcast last year, Monzo co-founder and serial entrepreneur, Tom Blomfield, took a more nuanced approach, singling out the U.K., where he felt the concept of the 'American Dream' was 'antithetical to British culture.' Chandratillake said he doesn't subscribe to the idea that Europe is being left behind, and envisions at least three European companies—Spotify, ASML, and Arm—he thinks can hit a $1 trillion+ valuation in the future. 'We might be behind from a timing point of view, but I don't think we're behind from a sort of effort or energy point of view right now.' As for whether he thinks a four-day week will be the norm in the future, Chandratillake was the bearer of bad news. 'Humans have a way of just making themselves more work. So I think the nature of the work will shift. I think the ways in which you can do it may be more flexible. 'But every 100 years or so, it seems like someone suggests that we're going to all work less, and unfortunately, they turn out to be wrong.' This story was originally featured on
