In the Arizona desert, a farm raising fish raises questions about water use
It's time to feed the fish.
Mohring fires up the machine and the food flies out in a rainbow arc. Then the water comes alive. Hundreds of thrashing, gobbling barramundi wiggle their way to the surface, all fighting for a piece. Until, in a few months, they will become food themselves.
In the desert of landlocked Arizona, where the Colorado River crisis has put water use under a microscope, Mainstream Aquaculture has a fish farm where it's growing the tropical species barramundi, also known as Asian sea bass, for American restaurants.
Mainstream sees it as a sustainable alternative to ocean-caught seafood. They say chefs and conscious consumers like that the food has a shorter distance to travel, eliminating some of the pollution that comes from massive ships that move products around the world. And they and some aquaculture experts argue it's efficient to use the water twice, since the nutrient-rich leftovers can irrigate crops like Bermuda grass sold for livestock feed.
'We're in the business of water,' said Matt Mangan, head of Australia-based Mainstream's American business. 'We want to be here in 20 years', 30 years' time.'
But some experts question whether growing fish on a large scale in an arid region can work without high environmental costs.
That question comes down to what people collectively decide is a good use of water. In Arizona, some places manage water more aggressively than others. But the whole state is dealing with the impacts of climate change, which is making the region drier and water only more precious.
The farm uses groundwater, not Colorado River water. It's a nonrenewable resource, and like mining, different people and industries have different philosophies about whether it should be extracted.
'As long as groundwater is treated as an open resource in these rural parts of Arizona, they're susceptible to new industries coming in and using the groundwater for that industry,' said Sarah Porter, director of the Kyl Center for Water Policy at Arizona State University's Morrison Institute.
Some scientists believe aquaculture can play a role in protecting wild ocean ecosystems from overfishing. And it might play at least a small role in smoothing any supply problems that result from the Trump administration's tariffs on imports from dozens of countries, including those that send the U.S. about 80% of its seafood, per the United States Department of Agriculture.
A two-for-one deal?
In the greenhouses at University of Arizona professor Kevin Fitzsimmons' lab in Tucson, tilapia circle idly in tanks that filter down into tubs full of mussels and floating patches of collard greens and lettuce. Fitzsimmons mentored the student who started the tilapia farm eventually bought by Mainstream about three years ago where they now raise barramundi.
'I don't think desert agriculture is going away," he said. 'Obviously, we want to do it as water-efficient as possible."
But not everyone agrees it's possible.
'Artificial ponds in the desert are stupid,' said Jay Famiglietti, a professor at ASU and director of science for the Arizona Water Innovation Initiative. He worried about heavy water losses to evaporation.
Mangan says that evaporation hasn't been an issue so much as the loss of heat in the wintertime. That has required pumping more water since its warmth when it arrives at the surface helps keep the barramundi cozy. But Mangan says they've been improving pond design to retain heat better and have found, after the last year of research and development, that they can cut their water requirement by about half as a result.
Plus, he argues, the water coming out of the fish ponds is "essentially liquid fertilizer," and though it's slightly salty, they use it for crops that can tolerate it, like Bermuda grass dairy cows can eat.
But that's supporting the cattle industry, which contributes more than its share of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, Famiglietti said.
'Doing two suboptimal things doesn't make it better,' he said.
Defining a 'reasonable' use of groundwater, a finite resource
Purple flowers sprout alongside paddle wheels. Fish bones crunch underfoot. The faint odor of brackish water and ammonia catches in the breeze.
Without groundwater, none of it would be possible.
Some farmers in Arizona rely on water from the Colorado River, but many others use well water to irrigate crops like alfalfa for the dairy industry or the lettuce, cucumbers and melons shipped nationwide year-round.
Arizona has seven areas around the state where groundwater is rigorously managed. Dateland doesn't fall into one of those, so the only rule that really governs it is a law saying if you land own there, you can pump a 'reasonable' amount of groundwater, said Rhett Larson, who teaches water law at ASU.
What might be considered 'reasonable' depends from crop to crop, and there's really no precedent for aquaculture, an industry that hasn't yet spread commercially statewide.
Using numbers provided by Mainstream, Porter calculated that the fish farm would demand a 'very large amount' of water, on par with a big ranch or potentially even more than some suburbs of Phoenix. And she noted that although the water use is being maximized by using it twice, it's still depleting the aquifer.
When the company scoped out Arizona to expand, Mangan said they didn't see nearly the same kinds of regulations as back in Australia.
As part of its growth strategy, Mainstream is also hoping to work with other farmers in the area so more can use nutrient-rich fish pond wastewater to produce hay. They say a few have expressed interest.
An alternative to wild-caught fish
The seafood industry needs to reduce its reliance on catching small wild fish to feed bigger farmed ones that humans eat, said Pallab Sarker, an assistant professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who studies sustainability in the aquaculture industry. He said seabirds and mammals rely on small species like anchovies and mackerel commonly used in fish meal.
'We should not rely on ocean fish to grow fish for aquaculture to meet the demand for humans,' Sarker said.
Mainstream gets its fish feed from two suppliers, Skretting and Star Milling, but Mangan and Mohring said they didn't know for certain where those suppliers got their base ingredients from.
Fitzsimmons, of the University of Arizona, also pointed out that between pollution, overfishing and oceanfront development for recreation, the commercial fishing industry had already been facing problems. He doesn't think that Trump's moves this spring to open up marine protected areas for commercial fishing will improve that situation the way aquaculture could.
'We can't keep hunting and gathering from the ocean,' Fitzsimmons said.
___
Follow Melina Walling on X @MelinaWalling and Bluesky @melinawalling.bsky.social. Follow Joshua A. Bickel on Instagram, Bluesky and X @joshuabickel. Follow Annika Hammerschlag on Instagram @ahammergram.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Suncorp Group Ltd (SNMCY) Full Year 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Profit Growth and ...
Net Profit After Tax: $1.823 billion, supported by the sale of Suncorp Bank and New Zealand Li operations. Cash Earnings: $1.486 billion. Underlying Insurance Trading Result: Increased by 20% to $1.566 billion, or 11.9% on a ratio basis. Natural Hazard Costs: $1.355 billion, $205 million below allowance. Gross Written Premium (GWP): Growth of 7% in consumer and commercial portfolios. Final Ordinary Dividend: $0.49 per share, bringing the full year dividend to $0.90 per share. Share Buyback: $400 million announced for FY26. Total Shareholder Return: 33% for the year. Underlying ITR: Improved by 80 basis points to 11.9%. New Zealand Underlying ITR: 19%. Operating Expense Ratio: Reduced by 100 basis points to 18.6%. Capital Position: CET1 of $997 million above the midpoint of target. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with SNMCY. Release Date: August 14, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Suncorp Group Ltd (SNMCY) reported a net profit after tax of $1.823 billion, supported by the sale of Suncorp Bank and New Zealand Li operations. The underlying insurance trading result increased by 20% to $1.566 billion, reflecting strong business performance. The company announced a $400 million buyback, demonstrating confidence in its financial position and commitment to returning capital to shareholders. Investment returns were significant contributors to the financial results, showcasing the resilience of investment markets and the outperformance of the manager panel. Suncorp Group Ltd (SNMCY) declared a final ordinary dividend of $0.49 per share, bringing the full-year dividend to $0.90 per share, the highest since 2008. Negative Points Natural hazard costs were $1.355 billion, although $205 million below the allowance, they remain a significant expense. The company experienced deteriorating loss ratios in both the Queensland and New South Wales CTP portfolios. Elevated fire and water claims in the home insurance segment impacted margins. The New Zealand commercial market faced competitive pressures, impacting growth. The company noted ongoing challenges with insurance affordability and the impact of natural hazard claims. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you discuss the quarterly trends in Home and Motor insurance, particularly in the third and fourth quarters? A: Steven Johnston, CEO, explained that the company maintained a disciplined approach to pricing, ensuring they stayed ahead of inflation. In Q3, they observed a moderation in inflationary factors, especially in motor insurance, which allowed them to adjust pricing and increase marketing in Q4. This led to a positive response in the portfolio, with volumes picking up and continuing into FY26. Q: How did the reinsurance renewal impact your strategy, and what are your future plans regarding reinsurance? A: Jeremy Robson, CFO, noted that the reinsurance market was bifurcated, with favorable conditions for main covers but constrained and expensive aggregate covers. The company benefited from lower costs and maintained similar risk retention. They remain open to future reinsurance opportunities if they align with their strategic framework for optimizing capital and shareholder value. Q: What is the breakdown of the 13% growth in the natural hazard allowance? A: Jeremy Robson explained that half of the increase is due to exposure and inflation, while the other half is an increase in sufficiency. The changes in reinsurance did not impact the natural hazard allowance. Q: Can you provide insights into the inflation environment and your assumptions for next year? A: Steven Johnston highlighted that motor insurance inflation is moderating due to improved supply chain and repair shop capacity. However, home insurance faces challenges with fire and water claims, driven by factors like lithium batteries and flexi pipes. Jeremy Robson added that home inflation was in the high single digits last year and is expected to decrease, while motor inflation remains in the mid-single digits. Q: How do you view potential M&A opportunities, and what areas would you prioritize? A: Steven Johnston stated that while their bias is towards organic growth, they are open to inorganic opportunities, particularly in the commercial and New Zealand sectors. They will consider opportunities that align with their strategic goals and offer potential for growth. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Origin Energy Ltd (OGFGF) Full Year 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Customer Growth and ...
Energy Markets EBITDA: $1.404 billion, ahead of guidance. APLNG Production: 682 petajoules at a cost of $4.20 per gigajoule, in line with guidance. LNG Trading Gains: $441 million, at the top end of guidance. Octopus EBITDA: Loss of $88 million, within guidance. Customer Accounts Growth: Increased by 104,000. Cost to Serve Reduction: Decreased by $50 million. Dividends from APLNG: $797 million received during the year, plus $335 million on July 3, 2025, fully franked. 2P Reserves Increase: Up by 298 petajoules before production. Underlying Profit: $1.49 billion, up from $1.18 billion last year. Underlying EBITDA: $3.41 billion, lower than previous year. Net Debt-to-EBITDA: 1.9 times. Return on Capital Employed: 14.6% over 24 months. Total Dividends for the Year: $0.60 per share, fully franked. Dividend Yield: 5.1% before franking benefit. Net Debt: Increased to $4.6 billion. Dividend Payout Ratio: 86% for the fiscal year. Kraken Contracted Customers: Grew by 45% to 74 million. UK Energy Customers Growth: Increased by 13% to 7.6 million. Non-UK Energy Customers: Doubled to 2.7 million. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with OGFGF. Release Date: August 13, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Origin Energy Ltd (OGFGF) reported an Energy Markets' EBITDA of $1.404 billion, exceeding guidance. The company achieved a significant increase in customer accounts, growing by 104,000. Cost to serve was reduced by $50 million, indicating improved operational efficiency. APLNG production was in line with guidance, and LNG trading reached the top end of guidance with trading gains of $441 million. The company declared a final fully-franked dividend of $0.30 per share, supported by a strong balance sheet and cash flow outlook. Negative Points Octopus' EBITDA was at a loss of $88 million, attributed to investment in global growth and unseasonably warm weather. Integrated Gas' APLNG's EBITDA decreased by 3% due to lower production and realized LNG prices. Net debt increased to $4.6 billion, driven by investments in battery projects. The company faces challenges in predicting market volatility and plant availability, which could impact future earnings. There is uncertainty regarding the future capital requirements and potential equity contributions for the separation of Octopus and Kraken. Q & A Highlights Q: Just on the guidance for Origin's share of Octopus Energy EBITDA. It's been a little bumpy the last year or two. Can you just please share a little bit more color on the drivers of the wide range for fiscal '26, including the potential draw from the growth being pursued in the UK in the Energy Services division? A: Tony Lucas, Executive General Manager - Future Energy and Technology: There's been a few ups and downs this year with the weather, the settlement of the energy price guarantee, and some accounting adjustments. We increased the range compared to last year to account for increased investment in non-UK Retail and improvements in the Energy Services business. The non-UK Retail can adjust based on market performance, driving growth spend. Energy Services aims to optimize field force, increase sales, and unit margins. Q: Could you comment on how Origin is minded to deploy any proceeds it might receive from a potential value realization opportunity relating to Origin's interest in Kraken? A: Frank Calabria, CEO: We're focused on the separation of those businesses, which leads to choices and opportunities. We will assess investments based on the best choices for allocating capital. If Kraken becomes a separate entity, it will present choices, and we'll keep the market informed. It's early to predict how we might realize value, but we're supportive of the separation. Q: You've achieved electricity portfolio margin through the top end of that medium-term target range. Do you still expect this margin to grow during the period you continue to operate Eraring and the additional battery earnings into the business? A: Tony Lucas, Executive General Manager - Future Energy and Technology: With Eraring continuing to run and as we bring the batteries in, we expect to be near or above the top end of that medium-term target. The key risks are plant availability and market volatility. Q: Just wondering how you're thinking about further equity contributions, net to Origin, before a possible IPO of Kraken? A: Frank Calabria, CEO: Separating out Kraken needs to ensure both groups have capital for growth. We continue to assess each on their merits. If an equity raise occurs, it will depend on the purpose and merits. No firm decision has been made yet. Q: Could you share your latest thoughts on how electricity margins could change over the next few years when Eraring closes? A: Tony Lucas, Executive General Manager - Future Energy and Technology: We originally set the $25 to $40 per megawatt hour range, expecting to stay within it post-Eraring. Eraring's contribution is stronger than forecasted due to slower renewable transition. Batteries will make a material contribution by FY26. Coal earnings may fall as more renewables come in, but we're confident in staying within the range. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Upturn
6 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
SBC Exports secures Rs 17.56 crore export order from Dubai-based HUXXE Readymade Garments Trading LLC
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on August 14, 2025, 13:02 IST SBC Exports was in the spotlight on Thursday after the company announced that it has secured an export order worth approximately ₹17.56 crore from HUXXE Readymade Garments Trading LLC, a Dubai-based company specializing in ready-made garments. The deal, which was finalised on August 14, 2025, involves the supply of various garment articles including t-shirts, trousers, and shorts. The execution period for the order is set at one year from the purchase order date. According to the company, the payment will be made in US dollars within 90 days of goods receipt, with insurance and freight costs covered by HUXXE. SBC Exports stated that the order is expected to contribute to revenue within the current financial year and support its projected 15–20% annual growth in export turnover. The company believes this strategic engagement will enhance profitability, diversify market exposure, and strengthen its position in the international apparel sector. Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Stock market investments are subject to market risks. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. Author or Business Upturn is not liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.