
The message from Trump's tirade against India
The US signalling its distancing from India and its aspiration for a decisive strategic role in South Asia could not be clearer.
To get his way, Trump is trying to bully and humiliate India almost on a daily basis. He is unlikely to stop until India bends.
Starting with public humiliation and chaining illegal Indian migrant deportees, Trump has repeated claims (30 times so far) of how he successfully brokered the ceasefire after the four-day Pakistan-India war following Operation Sindoor.
He also claimed that it was his trade deal threats that calmed both nations. He is thus continuously challenging India's long-standing position of no foreign intervention in India's bilateral matters.
To make matters worse, Trump has been on a tirade against India's economic policy calling India the ' king of tariffs '.
This has been followed by the imposition of 25% tariffs on all Indian exports with the threat of additional penalties unless India stops importing Russian oil and military hardware.
These actions were accompanied by humiliating and derogatory language: ' I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care '.
Thereafter, President Trump declared the US and Pakistan had concluded a deal to work together to develop Pakistan's oil reserves, saying 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India someday! '.
General Asim Munir's White House lunch with Donald Trump, just as India was pushing to label Pakistan a sponsor of terrorism, was clearly to show that the US would again use the Pakistani army to bolster US policies in Central and West Asia. That is a game at which Pakistan is adept.
In addition, India's attempt to have the US and the West in its corner was shattered, for instance when India lost the election post of vice chair of the Executive Board of UNESCO to Pakistan.
False hopes
For decades the Indian leadership and its strategic community has been promoting closer strategic relations with the US.
India did whatever it took to do this – from developing an Indian NRI lobby in the US and maintaining strict neutrality on US support for Israel's genocidal war on Gaza to issues that the US promoted globally. However, now President Trump wants much more.
The US has once again started viewing the Pakistani army as a reliable instrument for its policy of interventions in the Asia-Pacific region and it seems it will continue to be privileged as such. Pakistan has a time-tested relation as the US's favoured gendarme.
The Pakistan army has run Pakistan's foreign policy since its very formation. Unlike India it was always aligned. Pakistan was part of US military pacts of South East Asia Treaty Organization and the Central Treaty Organizations (now defunct) in the 1950s and 60s. It was instrumental along with the US in developing the Taliban and Mujahideen that led the revolt which overthrew the Soviets during their occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s.
In the post 9/11 decade of US military interventions and forever wars in Afghanistan and the Middle East, Pakistan was a key base for US manoeuvres even as it housed the wanted terrorist Osama Bin Laden near its own national military academy. The General Munir-Trump lunch revived this partnership. The US will not allow India to isolate Pakistan internationally. So, India's years of effort have been side-lined.
The US has also once again started pairing India and Pakistan. This is something that India does not favour, given the scale of differences especially in the economic sphere – India is a rising medium level market economy and Pakistan has taken and rescheduled its International Monetary Fund debt 25 times.
However, the US interest is clearly to revive its empire-like reach, project power globally and retain its dominance. This is what Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) is about. In this agenda, India can be a market for US products and Pakistan, one of its many strategic arms. The US will, therefore, play both India and Pakistan – something that India will have to accept.
The US also seeks to be the main balancing power and geopolitical influencer in the South Asia region. It was with this in mind that the US supported the Pakistani Army when they conducted a regime change ousting Pakistan's popular prime minister, Imran Khan.
The former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had also claimed a US hand in the populist student unrest and overthrow of her regime and the installation of the pro-American but hostile to India NGO-economist Mohammad Yunus.
The US is also aware of the Pakistan-China alliance and how Pakistan has used this to its advantage. It was Pakistan that brokered the US-China détente in the 1970s with Henry Kissinger at the helm. Perhaps once again, as Trump wants an invite from President Xi Jinping, Pakistan may be expected to facilitate it.
Time for rethink
What does this signify for India, who for the last three decades since its shift to globalisation in the early 1990s, prioritised its relations with the United States while turning a blind eye to US proximity with Pakistan, often at the cost of other relations especially to the Global South?
One, that hyper-nationalism will not work in foreign policy especially when one must counter the hyper-imperial superpower.
Two, that India has put on the back burner several long-standing beliefs of the country's time-tested foreign policy. These included being pro-development but with awareness that colonialism will always take on new forms of extraction; a focus on peace and disarmament; and not getting obsessed and viewing all foreign policy through the lens of one militarised neighbour. This allowed India to diversify its foreign relations and not give up its traditional relations, while building new ones, but always emphasising that it was an integral part of the Global South.
The Indian elite, however, is still committed to the US and views it as an important partner. Nearly 18% of Indian exports are to the US and Indian students crowd US universities. India also respects US soft power and has no interest in disrupting US progress.
However, the US needs to do the same. While efforts will have to be made to undo the current humiliating phase, the Indian leadership, hopefully, has also understood that the US would like to promote and facilitate American imperial interests in South Asia.
These are usually not in India's interest.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Stupidest tactical move in US foreign policy': Jeffrey Sachs slams Trump's tariffs on India
United States economist Jeffrey Sachs slammed US President Donald Trump's additional tariffs on India, calling them 'the stupidest tactical move'. Sachs highlighted that the tariffs had resulted in deteriorated diplomatic relations between the US and India.(Hindustan Times podcast) 'The imposition of thee 25 per cent penalty tariff on India was the stupidest tactical move from US foreign policy for a long that's saying a lot by the way,' Sachs said in an interview with Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti on the Breaking Points show. Sachs highlighted that the tariffs had resulted in deteriorated diplomatic relations between the US and India, one that had been cultivated for years. The economist further said that the Indians had learned their lesson that they could not trust the US. 'Going after India, a country that the US has been cultivating for strategic and diplomatic relations, and Trump ended it overnight. Because by the way, even if this 25 per cent penalty is removed, and I think it probably will be, the Indians learned a lesson that I was trying to tell them for years, you cannot trust the United States,' Sachs said. Trump was the great unifier for BRICS, says Sachs Sachs said that Trump had been the 'great unifier' for the BRICS countries. The BRICS is a forum for cooperation among a group of emerging economies. It includes ten countries – Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Iran, Russian Federation, South Africa, United Arab Emirates. 'What it (additional tariffs) did overnight was unify the BRICS countries as never before. Within 24-48 hours there was a flurry of calls – Brazil with India, Brazil with Russia, Brazil with China, China with India, China with Russia. Donald Trump was the great unifier of the BRICS,' Sachs said. The economist said that Trump, Senator Lindsey Graham and the US President's trade adviser Peter Navarro had unified the BRICS countries. 'There is no ability to have a trusting relationship with the US. This is improv land and you are not gonna get the kind of relationship that you think. Everybody in India understands that,' Sachs said.


India.com
3 minutes ago
- India.com
Dream11, MPL, My11Circle to be banned? Cricket market worth Rs 983,000,000 will now be..., IPL's earning may now get...
IPL Trophy 2025 Online Gaming Regulation Bill: In a significant development on Thursday, the Union Parliament passed the Online Gaming Promotion and Regulation Bill-2023 which seeks to regulate real-money online gaming. As per media reports, the bill could directly impact cricket sponsorships and fantasy sports platforms. While the bill is being welcomed as a step toward curbing illegal betting and protecting consumers, many media reports quote experts as saying that it may disrupt cricket's financial ecosystem, where companies like Dream11 and My11Circle are major sponsors. How big is India's online gaming industry? Notably, Dream11 is the the Indian cricket team's title sponsor (≈$44 million about Rs 358 crores), and My11Circle, the IPL's official fantasy gaming partner (Rs 625 crore for five years). Here are all the details you need to know about why the government is bringing the Online Gaming Promotion and Regulation Bill-2023. The decision of the government is expected to impact the massive online cricket business of Rs 983,000,000. What Union Minister said on Online gaming in India? 'Online gaming is an important sector of Digital Bharat. There are three segments of online games — e-Sports (training-based, often played between teams); Online Social Games (fun, educational, community-based), and Online Money Games (involve financial stakes, addictive, and harmful,' Railways and Electronics and IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said in a series of posts on social media platform X about the 'Online Gaming Promotion and Regulation Bill-2023'. Story highlights: The Rajya Sabha has passes the Online Gaming Regulation Bill. The Bill seeks to regulate real-money online gaming in India. It might affect the massive online cricket business of Rs 983,000,000. Notably, Dream11 is the the Indian cricket team's title sponsor. Why government choose society's welfare over revenue? 'There are thousands of complaints and grievances from across the country. The government chooses the safety of families over any other interests. When it comes to choosing between society's welfare and government revenue, PM Narendra Modi has always chosen middle-class families,' Vaishnaw added on the bill. Add as a Preferred Source (With inputs from agencies)


Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What does the story of India's rural development say?
— Ritwika Patgiri The government's decision to cap the spending under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) at 60 per cent for the FY 2025-26 came even as the Ministry of Rural Development sought an increased outlay of Rs 5.23 lakh crore for the MGNREGS till 2029-30. Data shows that India has been witnessing a decline in budget allocation for essential social sectors. For instance, the budget allocations for different programmes under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) have seen a steady decline since before 2019. While MGNREGS has seen a minimal increase in its allocated budget, the number of families working under the scheme has come down from 7.25 crore in 2021-22 to 5.79 crore in 2024-25. With around 65 per cent of the country's population living in rural areas, alongside the ongoing rural distress, such declining welfare allocations have serious implications for rural development. Rural development as a concept gained traction in the 1970s with renewed emphasis on rural policies and programmes. This stemmed from the failure of state-led modernisation projects and industrialisation policies that fell short of expectations. With growth concentrated in certain areas and widespread rural poverty persisting in the 1970s, it was recognised that the dispersion of basic services is central to equitable distribution of resources and poverty alleviation. Thus, rural development can be understood as a package of policies that aim to foster socio-economic development in rural areas. Notably, agriculture is crucial to both rural growth and development. According to economic theories on development, agricultural development is a pre-requisite for rural industrial growth. These theories further suggest that as agriculture grows, the relative size of farms declines. Hence, a high growth agricultural sector along with a declining farm size are seen as markers of agricultural development. Structural transformation is, thus, shaped by the movement of both output and labour away from agriculture to the modern industrial sector. In the Indian context, it is often noted that the nature of the structural transformation has been slow and has been linked to 'premature' service-led growth. At the same time, the employment share of the manufacturing sector has failed to increase. According to the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) data, this is primarily because of the rapid growth of the service sector, which has restrained the growth of the secondary sector. Another interesting observation about the Indian economy is that most of the service sector is led by self-employment rather than wage employment. Rural development policies need to be understood against this backdrop. Two important schemes – the Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP) and the National Rural Employment Programme (later became MGNREGS) – can be discussed in this context. The IRDP was launched in 1978-79 and implemented from 1980 until it was merged with five other rural development programmes in 1999. As a self-employment programme for poverty alleviation, the core objective of the IRDP was to enable identified rural poor families to increase their incomes and cross the poverty line through the acquisition of credit-based productive assets. The MGNREGS, on the other hand, provides a one-off wage payment to the workers for developing infrastructure such as roads and irrigation works that can generate long-term benefits for the propertied classes. While IRDP was focused on self-employment, MGNREGS emerged as a guarantor of 100 days of wage employment to rural individuals. MGNREGS, however, has faced an inadequate budget allocation in the last few years, even as there has been a renewed interest in policies and schemes around self-employment. Examples of some schemes and initiatives include: — The Pradhan Mantri Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP): It offers subsidies to establish micro-enterprises. — The Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY): It facilitates self-employment through loans to micro and small businesses. — Initiatives like the Rural Self-Employment and Training Institutes (RSETIs) and the Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Grameen Kaushalya Yojana (DDU-GKY): Here, the focus is on skill development and entrepreneurship training, etc. States like Assam have also launched schemes like the Chief Minister's Atmanirbhar Asom Abhijan (CMAAA) to promote self-employment among youth through grants. In the context of such rural policies, self-employment is perceived as dynamic and capable of generating further employment. However, the other side of the debate views India's persistent reliance on self-employment as a sign of distress, not very different from wage-employment, and an alternative in the absence of wage or other gainful employment. Rural development can also be understood in terms of social indicators like access to electricity, drinking water, health, and education. While data from the National Family Health Survey 2019-21 suggests improvement in these indicators compared to 2015-16, a deeper analysis shows a different picture. For instance, rural health care is often marked by informal private doctors or providers, which national-level data sets often fail to capture. While numbers suggest that people in rural areas do visit doctors and seek medical care, the quality of this healthcare needs to be discussed. Similarly, a comparative analysis of indicators for rural and urban India shows a higher prevalence of stunting among children (37.3%) in rural areas as compared to urban areas (30.1%). Children from Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes are more likely to be seen as disproportionately affected in these indicators. Education presents similar challenges. The findings of the Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2023 reflect serious structural and quality issues in rural education. The report shows that many students in rural India are more likely to have progressed through the education system without acquiring foundational learning skills. Huge shortage of teachers and human resources further exacerbates the problems. Moreover, PLFS data also suggests that despite the focus on skill-building and training programmes in rural India, meaningful rural employment generation has yet to materialise. What then can be understood from India's story of rural development? While skill and entrepreneurship development are important, they cannot deliver full benefits without adequate investment in social sectors such as health, education, and nutrition. Livelihood generation needs to be aligned with a deeper understanding of the rural economy's structure. A sustainable rural policy must integrate welfare and employment generation by strengthening budgetary support for social infrastructure. At the same time, investments in rural infrastructure can expand economic opportunities, support human development, and promote more inclusive and equitable growth. How did the early modernisation projects shape the rural development policies in India from the 1970s onwards? Can rural development be effectively measured through social indicators such as health, education, nutrition, or through purely economic growth metrics? The welfare schemes like MGNREGS and self-employment schemes like PMEGP, Mudra Yojana reflect different models of rural development. Discuss. What do persistent gaps in health and education outcomes between rural and urban India reveal about the existing rural development programmes? (Ritwika Patgiri is a doctoral candidate at the Faculty of Economics, South Asian University.) Share your thoughts and ideas on UPSC Special articles with Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.