logo
Hobbling Rishabh Pant showed that cricket is in dark ages on substitutes

Hobbling Rishabh Pant showed that cricket is in dark ages on substitutes

Telegraph4 days ago
A few Test batsmen have returned to the wicket when more badly injured than Pant but not many. He re-appeared on the second morning at Old Trafford at 314-6, marked his guard with his left foot, and added two runs off the eight balls he faced before lunch, both of them hobbled singles.
Australia's Rick McCosker batted with a broken jaw in the Centenary Test of 1976-7 against England at Melbourne. He would never have passed the concussion Test prescribed now after being hit on the head, helmetless as it was.
Lord Cowdrey, or Colin as he was in 1963, walked out to bat with a broken arm in the Lord's Test against West Indies, though he did not actually face a ball, while Malcolm Marshall, with a broken thumb, scored a boundary with one hand against England at Headingley in 1984. But nobody injured has resembled Pant, if only because nobody when fit has resembled Pant, the most maverick of Test cricketers to date.
Never mind that the injury was self-inflicted to all intents - any sensible person would not have tried to reverse-sweep Chris Woakes. Still, it was a valiant act when he hobbled out half-an-hour before lunch on day two, his right shoe bigger and more substantially padded than his left. Fainter hearts would not have fancied a bat against Ben Stokes operating at full throttle in grey light.
Pant had scored 37 off 48 balls before being carted off to hospital on the first evening, his right foot broken. Chivalrously - and there is a distinct chivalrous streak in Stokes - England's captain pitched the last three balls of his over fullish and widish. Pant had no runner of course: that gentleman's agreement was abused so often that runners are forbidden now in the professional sport.
Before the lunch interval, Pant managed to hobble a single when he forced a ball square off Stokes: it would have been two had he been able to run. He somehow pushed another single square of the wicket off Brydon Carse, taking him to 39, before reverting to type and trying his first yahoo.
What makes Pant attempt these shots, shots which normal batsmen never attempt in a Test match, even in this era of T20? He might get bored easily: a few dot balls and he indulges in something outrageous. Often a rationale lurks beneath the surface: it was predictable that Carse was going to bowl outside off stump, so a yahoo was a free hit, which Pant happened to miss. But the next ball from Carse was similar, if not identical, and Pant chose to let it pass through to the wicketkeeper.
The essential key to Pant being the inimitable Pant is that he is an all-rounder with the licence that his role involves. He can always do a good job for his side by keeping wicket, if he happens to get himself out to something wild - like the shot in the Test series in Australia last winter which had the watching Sunil Gavaskar shouting: 'Stupid! Stupid! Stupid!'
If anyone today comes close to Pant in the ambitiousness of his strokes, it has to be England's Harry Brook. Some of his shot-selection in the third Test at Lord's was Pant-ian, but it did not get him beyond 23. And for all his attempts at medium-pace, he is no all-rounder.
Joe Root has an imp on his shoulder, but he has kept it under control since being castigated for a reverse-sweep in India against, of all bowlers, Jasprit Bumrah. He only indulges his impulse now when England are in control of a game. And before helmets, nobody was insane enough to attempt such shots as Pant did on the opening day at Old Trafford when he swept Jofra Archer.
The right balance between risk and reward, in Pant's case, would probably have been if he had played normally against England's pace bowlers, including Woakes, and gone after the spinners Liam Dawson and Root.
Method does lie in Pant's apparent madness. If he is injured in the course of executing some of the most astonishing shots that Test cricket has ever seen - if he suffers an impact injury, that is - then he can be replaced when the time arrives for India to field. In this instance he handed over to Dhuv Jurel, by common consent the better wicketkeeper.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prendergast helps Ireland to ODI sweep over Zimbabwe
Prendergast helps Ireland to ODI sweep over Zimbabwe

BBC News

time9 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Prendergast helps Ireland to ODI sweep over Zimbabwe

Second one-day international, StormontIreland 182-6 (38.5 overs): Prendergast 67, Lewis 44; Tshuma 4-35Zimbabwe 178 (49.1 overs): Mugeri-Tiripano 56, Mupachikwa, 45; Dalzell 4-36, McBride 3-22Ireland won by four wicketsScorecard Orla Prendergast hit an unbeaten 67 as Ireland secured a two-game sweep in their one-day international series against Zimbabwe at a 97-run victory at the Belfast venue on Saturday, as well as a 3-0 win in the T20 series between the sides this month, the hosts won by four wickets on Monday. Zimbabwe won the toss and elected to bat but lost their first three wickets for only 38 Dalzell bowled opener Kelis Ndlovu for a first-ball duck before getting Loreen Tshuma to edge to wicket-keeper Amy Hunter for just Chiedza Dhururu was caught lbw by Ava Canning, the tourists' innings looked to be teetering on the brink of Chipo Mugeri-Tiripano steadied the ship with 56 from 92 balls, while Modester Mupachikwa chipped in with 45 to set Ireland a target of 178. While Ireland lost an early wicket of their own, with Sarah Forbes caught by Biza off the bowling of Chigora for only three runs, captain Gaby Lewis provided 44 off 59 stumped her fellow wicket keeper Amy Hunter for just 14 but what felt at the time like a potentially key wicket instead brought Prendergast to the 67 included seven boundaries and marked her second consecutive half-century in the one-day format as Ireland eased to victory in the 39th over. Ireland return to action in a three-game T20 series against Pakistan in Dublin next month.

Ben Stokes' handshake antics show why other teams hate England
Ben Stokes' handshake antics show why other teams hate England

Telegraph

time39 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Ben Stokes' handshake antics show why other teams hate England

England's sullen and ungracious conduct at the end of an Old Trafford Test match they dominated served up easy half volleys for their critics, quick to leap on perceived double standards. But it also gave England a glimpse of what awaits in Australia. The headlines overnight said it all: Spare us the whinging England, Moral hypocrites England decide tons are anti-cricket and Spirit of what? How pompous England exposed Bazball's great double standard. Meanwhile, Australia has some thoughts... #ENGvIND #AUSvENG — Andrew McGlashan (@andymcg_cricket) July 28, 2025 A familiar storm is gathering and England gave it plenty of energy. A barrage of this stuff awaits in November, more so than any Ashes tour since 2013-14 when Alastair Cook's team were the first to follow the 2010-11 winners. Then Kevin Pietersen and Stuart Broad were public enemies No 1 and No 2. This time it will be Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum. The Australians respect Stokes but fear what he can do. McCullum they see as someone who always failed on their turf when it mattered. There is nothing England can do to prevent the inevitable attacks, but they can at least make them harder to justify. What England did on Sunday night was lame but the theory that Indian teams play for personal milestones is one shared by Australia. In fact, England's reaction was very Australian. Matthew Hayden once picked up on the 'milestone culture' in Indian cricket. 'We don't really play for stats. We play for wins. That's the Aussie way,' said Steve Waugh, but it could just as easily have been Stokes. England's mistake was making it look petty rather than pointed. 'I thought England behaved badly' @NHoultCricket gives his thoughts on England's behaviour during their draw with India in the fourth test Watch the Telegraph Cricket Podcast ⬇️ — Telegraph Cricket (@TeleCricket) July 28, 2025 Managing individuals is part of a captain's job. Shubman Gill recognised the importance of a maiden Test hundred for Washington Sundar and the great spade work Ravi Jadeja put in for his team throughout the series. He also revelled in sticking up two fingers at England after how they finished the Lord's Test. But England are not a pompous bunch, they are generally great ambassadors for the sport. It is only this summer we have really heard them say anything on the field. They showed a mean side at Lord's after deciding they had been too nice for too long and it served them well. In Manchester, they learnt they need to be better at picking their moments. It is one thing to try to unsettle opponents by playing hard, another to be boorish and look like sore losers. Would Stokes have hauled Jacob Bethell off had he been close to a maiden century or Joe Root in sight of his first in Australia? Currently, the verbals do not quite align with this team. It appears somewhat performative rather than natural. 'I had plenty to say when I played – and copped plenty back,'' said Mitchell Johnson. 'But that came with a bit of purpose. Sledging only works when you are dominating. And to be honest, right now England aren't. Their Bazball model has some punch but it's flimsy when conditions swing or spin. So maybe talking tough is a cover. A bit of theatre while they figure out the actual cricket.'' Bazball has been modified this summer but still has to prove itself in tough batting conditions. India's rearguard highlighted England's weakness. When presented with the challenge of batting for 108 overs at Edgbaston, they were all out inside 69, losing by 336 runs. Jamie Smith was caught on the boundary going for a third six in an over, a shot that showed England were still unwilling to change tack or simply did not know how to play the situation because of how they regard draws. That is what they can take out of the Old Trafford Test. Because they have seen how wound up they were by a team frustrating the hell out of them. It can make a draw feel like a win.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store