
Assisted dying: Esther Rantzen urges Lords not to block bill
Some peers have indicated they will attempt to amend the legislation to introduce more safeguards.Dame Esther, a prominent supporter of the bill, said she did not "need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job"."People who are adamantly opposed to this bill - and they have the perfect right to oppose it - will try and stop it going through the Lords."But she said the duty of peers was to make sure "law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons, who have voted this through".Even though MPs have approved the bill, peers in the Lords could stop it from becoming law by voting against it or not approving it quickly enough.Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, who will get a vote in the Lords, said that she had heard from "disabled people [who] are absolutely terrified" of the bill.The former Paralympian said she would put forward amendments to make it "as tight as possible" and prevent coercion.Baroness Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast that it was the "job in the Lords" to go "line by line" to ensure all amendments were fairly debated. "I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in," she said.
Under the proposals, mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with a life expectancy of less than six months would be eligible for an assisted death.They would need to make two separate declarations, signed and witnessed, about their "clear, settled and informed" wish to die, and satisfy two independent doctors that they are eligible and have not been coerced.There would be at least a seven-day gap between each assessment.The application would then go before a multi-disciplinary panel comprising a psychiatrist, a social worker and a lawyer.If the panel approved the application, there would be a further 14-day "period of reflection" which could be cut to 48 hours if the patient is likely to die within a month.
Pressed about concerns that vulnerable people could be coerced into an assisted death, Dame Esther replied: "We have got this right."She said the bill set out a "rigorous" process. An assisted death would only be available to those with six months to live who chose to ask for help with ending their lives, and had that request approved by doctors and a panel of experts.She added that that "disability will not qualify anyone for assisted dying, nor will mental disorder".Dame Esther said she was "deeply relieved" by Friday's vote - though she noted it was unlikely to become law in her lifetime."At least I know that for future generations, if life becomes intolerable, unbearable, and they are terminally ill with six months or less to live, they will be able to ask for a pain-free, swift death."
The Commons vote in favour of the bill came after a debate that saw MPs tell their personal stories of seeing friends and relatives die.It is likely, though not guaranteed, that the Lords will approve the bill later this year.If that happens, ministers would have a maximum of four years to implement the measures, meaning assisted dying may not become available until 2029.Conservative MP Danny Kruger, a vocal opponent of the move, said he hoped the Lords would either reject the proposed legislation or "substantially strengthen it".But Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who proposed the bill, said she hoped the would be "no funny games" in the Lords, "because the process has been extremely thorough".Any changes made in the House of Lords would also have to be approved by MPs before the bill could become law.The legislation was approved with a majority of 23 MPs - less than half the margin of 55 in favour when it was first debated in November.MPs were given a free vote on the bill, meaning they did not have to follow a party policy. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer backed the legislation, while Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Health Secretary Wes Streeting voted against it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why did BBC apologise to Robert Jenrick?
The BBC has apologised to Robert Jenrick after a refugee charity director suggested he was xenophobic during a Radio 4 programme. Krish Kandiah of Sanctuary Foundation claimed Jenrick had increased "fear of the stranger" and used the term " xenophobia" twice Jenrick accused the broadcaster of smearing "millions of worried citizens" as xenophobic for their "understandable fears" regarding illegal migration. Roger Mahony, BBC's head of editorial standards, stated the comments went "well beyond" the segment's expectations and removed the xenophobia references from BBC Sounds. The controversy stems from Jenrick's remarks on asylum seekers and public concerns, including protests at hotels housing asylum seekers.


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Rhyl's Royal Alexandra Hospital plans expected after 12-year delay
Scaled down plans for a long-awaited hospital development are due to be for a £22m new hospital with more than 30 beds on the site of the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Rhyl, Denbighshire, were approved in by 2018 the estimated costs had doubled. Plans were then halted by the Covid-19 pandemic, and Betsi Cadwaladr health board said spiralling costs meant the original proposal was no longer Welsh Conservatives said revised plans could mean half the original number of beds, which would not ease pressures on emergency departments health board has been asked to comment. In 2013, Mark Drakeford, the then health minister, approved initial proposals to develop a new hospital on the site of the Royal Alexandra - which was built in the integrated community hospital scheme was supposed to be completed in would include dental clinics, 30 in-patient beds and 18 in-patient beds for older people with mental health problems, as well as an x-ray department, ultrasound facilities and a years on, the site is still awaiting health board has said it intends to submit revised plans by the end of the month. The plans are expected to be scaled down from the original proposals. Local resident Christine Gardiner said: "I just think it should be used in conjunction with Glan Clwyd at Bodelwyddan, because the waiting times there are terrible, the parking's shocking, and it would be more handy for local people."Laura Everett, 41, said the Royal Alexandra was "extremely important, especially with the health system as it is at the moment"."I feel like the more local places we have... the better," she said. "I feel like it could be used a lot more to lessen the load off the actual main hospitals. We need it. It's vital."Lifelong Rhyl resident Michael Jones said: "It is frustrating. You don't know what's happening with the place. "You hear all these stories, the changes, the improvements, but nothing seems to be happening at the moment. We need to know what's going on." Darren Millar, Member of the Senedd for Clwyd West, said residents in Rhyl and surrounding areas were "fed up waiting" for the site to be developed, and believed the new proposal may be for 14 beds."We're expecting the announcement to say that there's going to be far fewer beds at the hospital than was originally anticipated, possibly fewer than half of the beds... and that means that we're not going to take the pressure of Glan Clwyd Hospital down the road, where we know that the problems have got even worse over the past 12 years," he said. He added that it was "not good enough" and it would be "too late"."What we need is to get back to those original plans and make sure that those promises to the people of north Wales are actually delivered." Mr Millar said any proposals short of the original plans "would show yet again the massive north-south divide and the fact that north Wales is being short-changed".He added the original 30 beds would help ease pressures elsewhere in the NHS, but "14 beds isn't a spittle in the bucket"."If anything, we need that original 30 beds to be increased, not decreased." The health board has been asked to comment. On its website, it said it hoped to submit plans, which will include a bedded unit and a minor injuries and ailments unit, by the end of this plans would need approval by the health board itself, and then the Welsh government would be asked for approval and Welsh government said it was awaiting a revised business case to be Cymru's health spokesperson Mabon ap Gwynfor said: "The need for a new Royal Alex [Alexandra] is plain for all to see and would help patients across the region, yet this government has twiddled its thumbs for far too long with patients suffering as a consequence."


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Who is Jimmy Lai, the HK media tycoon on trial for national security crimes?
Hailed by some as a hero and scorned by others as a traitor, Hong Kong's pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai is in the final stage of his national security trial. Closing arguments begin on Thursday for Lai, who is accused of colluding with foreign forces under a Beijing-imposed national security law. The trial has drawn international attention, with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for Lai's release. The 77-year-old has British as well as Chinese citizenship - though China does not recognise dual nationality, and therefore considers Lai to be exclusively Chinese. Lai has been detained since December 2020 and faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment if he is say Lai's case shows how Hong Kong's legal system has been weaponised to silence political opposition. Lai has been a persistent thorn in China's side. Unlike other tycoons who rose to the top in Hong Kong, Mr Lai became one of the fiercest critics of the Chinese state and a leading figure advocating democracy in the former British territory."I'm a born rebel," he told the BBC in an interview in 2020, hours before he was charged. "I have a very rebellious character." He is the most prominent person charged under the controversial national security law which China introduced in 2020, in response to massive protests which erupted in Hong Kong the year before. The legislation criminalises a wider range of dissenting acts which Beijing considers subversion and secession, among other says the national security law is necessary to maintain stability in Hong Kong but critics say it has effectively outlawed dissent. Over the years, Lai's son Sebastien has called for his release. In February, the younger Lai urged Starmer and US President Donald Trump to take urgent action, adding that his father's "body is breaking down". Rags to riches Lai was born in Guangzhou, a city in southern China, to a wealthy family that lost everything when the communists took power in was 12 years old when he fled his village in mainland China, arriving in Hong Kong as a stowaway on a fishing working odd jobs and knitting in a small clothing shop he taught himself English. He went from a menial role to eventually founding a multi-million dollar empire including the international clothing brand chain was a huge success. But when China sent in tanks to crush pro-democracy protests in Beijing's Tiananmen Square in 1989, Lai began a new journey as a vocal democracy activist as well as an started writing columns criticising the massacre that followed the demonstrations in Beijing and established a publishing house that went on to become one of Hong Kong's most influential. As China responded by threatening to shut his stores on the mainland, leading him to sell the company, Lai launched a string of popular pro-democracy titles that included Next, a digital magazine, and the widely read Apple Daily a local media landscape increasingly fearful of Beijing, Lai had been a persistent critic of Chinese authorities both through his publications and has seen him become a hero for many in Hong Kong, who view him as a man of courage who took great risks to defend the freedoms of the on the mainland he is viewed as a "traitor" who threatens Chinese national recent years, masked attackers firebombed Lai's house and company headquarters. He was also the target of an assassination none of the threats stopped him from airing his views robustly. He was a prominent part of the city's pro-democracy demonstrations and was arrested twice in 2021 on illegal assembly charges. When China passed Hong Kong's new national security law in June 2020, Lai told the BBC it sounded the "death knell" for the influential entrepreneur also warned that Hong Kong would become as corrupt as China. Without the rule of law, he said, its coveted status as a global financial hub would be "totally destroyed".The media mogul is known for his frankness and acts of 2021, he urged Donald Trump to help the territory, saying he was "the only one who can save us" from China. His newspaper, Apple Daily, published a front-page letter that finished: "Mr President, please help us."For Lai, such acts were necessary to defend the city which had taken him in and fuelled his once told news agency AFP: "I came here with nothing, the freedom of this place has given me everything... Maybe it's time I paid back for that freedom by fighting for it." Lai has been slapped with various charges - including unauthorised assembly and fraud since 2020. He has been in custody since December of that prosecution of Lai has captured international attention, with rights groups and foreign governments urging his the years, Sebastien Lai has travelled the world to denounce his father's arrest and condemn Hong Kong for punishing "characteristics that should be celebrated"."My father is in jail for the truth on his lips, courage in his heart, and freedom in his soul," he had said.