PARTLY FACETIOUS: How many constitutional clauses are followed in letter and spirit?
'I heard Chaudhary Nisar was visited by the Prime Minister at his home.'
'Two things, first he is not born – or reborn for that matter, as he left the party but didn't join another.'
'So, you define rebirth as when one join's another party?'
'Yes, like Madonna the superstar, she has survived this long because she reinvents herself every few years and remains relevant.'
'One of our Madonnas' is Bugti sahib, then there is…'
'For your information our first amendment stipulates the right to change one's mind.'
'Not true…the first amendment…'
'Hey, how many constitutional clauses are followed in letter and spirit?'
'You are being facetious.'
'Going back to Chaudhary Nisar my question is did the First Uncle clear his visit first with the Chief Minister of Punjab and her daddy?'
'I reckon the choice became between a rock and a hard place and the rock seemed easier to move around what with the heavy lifters/movers…'
'Now who is being facetious? Besides, if the portfolio in question is the same as before; Chaudhary Nisar's contacts have long retired or passed away and…'
'May or may not be so. Anyway, when I said a star is born I wasn't referring to our local politicians because all, including the True Heirs, were born a long time ago.'
'You can't be referring to President Trump, surely - I mean, he too is into his second act.'
'I was referring to Mamdani the Democrat standing for New York mayoral elections, the Muslim who defeated Cuomo, a former governor who had access to money from the rich Jewish lobbyists in New York.'
'That's true, though now Trump is accusing him of……'
'Doesn't matter, the point is that if he wins New York, he will not be beholden to the powerful and rich Israeli lobby…'
'Mamdani is under 40 and as survey after survey reveals the under 40 Americans are overwhelmingly not pro-Israeli, and maybe he can spearhead a change in the Democratic establishment…'
'Speaking of establishment, Modi's actions post-Pahalgam relegated his country to a level below ours in regional and international politics, and the lesson learned is….'
'Lesson learned is; do not allow hatred, however justified, to dictate policy, for therein lies the eventual downfall.'
'What if the life span of…'
'Enough.'
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
44 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Gold up Rs6,600 on global jitters
Listen to article Gold prices in Pakistan extended their upward march on Tuesday, mirroring a strong rally in the international market, where the precious metal climbed over 1% amid a weaker US dollar and renewed economic uncertainty. International markets responded to rising investor caution ahead of US President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline for the possible reinstatement of higher trade tariffs, a move that has injected volatility and boosted demand for safe-haven assets like gold. According to the All Pakistan Sarafa Gems and Jewellers Association (APSGJA), the price of gold in the local market surged Rs6,600 per tola, settling at Rs356,800. Similarly, the price of 10 grams of gold rose Rs5,658 to Rs305,898. The previous day, gold had also posted gains, with the price per tola increasing by Rs800 to reach Rs350,200. Traders attribute the sharp price increase to both global cues and persistent currency depreciation, which continue to drive domestic gold prices upwards. Interactive Commodities Director Adnan Agar noted that gold prices edged higher amid renewed geopolitical and economic jitters, largely triggered by Trump's latest remarks on trade tariffs. "Gold has moved up slightly," Agar observed, "mainly because Trump resumed his aggressive rhetoric around tariffs. Since yesterday (Monday), prices have increased by around $70 to $80, with the metal trading near $3,350 and having touched the high of $3,357." He also pointed to fresh tensions between Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, suggesting that their escalating public spat may be contributing to market unease and further supporting gold's safe-haven appeal. "Their ongoing confrontation has added to the uncertainty, which in turn is pushing investors towards gold," Agar said, linking the rise in bullion to heightened volatility in US political and business circles. Gold delivered robust gains in the first half of 2025, particularly in US dollar terms, sparked primarily by the weakening of the greenback, according to Ole Hansen, Head of Commodity Strategy at Saxo Bank. Citing Bloomberg and Saxo data, Hansen noted that while dollar-based investors enjoyed strong returns – 25.9% – those holding other currencies, especially in Europe, saw much lower gains. Gold priced in Indian rupees topped the chart with a 26% rise, followed by the Chinese yuan (22.8%), Canadian dollar (19.1%) and Australian dollar (18.4%). In contrast, returns in the euro and Swiss franc stood at just 10.5% and 10%, respectively, reflecting how stronger local currencies dampened gold's performance for un-hedged investors. This disparity underscores the impact of currency dynamics, policy shifts and inflation expectations on commodity returns.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
US to revoke Bob Vylan's visas after Glastonbury chants
Bob Vylan called for death to the Israeli military on stage. Photo: AFP The United States said on Monday it was revoking visas for the British punk-rap group Bob Vylan which led a chant at the Glastonbury festival calling for death to the Israeli military. "Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country," Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau posted on X. British public broadcaster the BBC apologised on Monday for not pulling a live stream of a punk-rap group's performance at the Glastonbury festival when they made anti-Israel remarks. "With hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen," the broadcaster said of Bob Vylan's show, in which the group led the crowds in chants of "Death to the IDF", the initials of the Israeli military. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said afterwards there was "no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech". The BBC said that "millions of people" watched its coverage of the festival "but one performance within our livestreams included comments that were deeply offensive". "The BBC respects freedom of expression but stands firmly against incitement to violence," it added. "The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves." Media watchdog Ofcom warned Monday that it was "very concerned" and that the BBC had questions to answer. "We have been speaking to the BBC over the weekend and we are obtaining further information as a matter of urgency," it added. Kneecap recap Controversy descended on this year's event before it even began over the inclusion of Irish rap trio Kneecap, one of whose members was recently charged under terror legislation. During their show on Saturday, one Kneecap member wore a T-shirt dedicated to the Palestine Action Group, which is about to be banned under UK terror laws. The chants about Israel's military were led by Bob Vylan's frontman Bobby Vylan, and were broadcast live on the BBC. Glastonbury's organisers said the comments had "very much crossed a line". "We are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence," the festival said in a statement. Avon and Somerset police said Saturday that video evidence would be assessed "to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation". The incident has caused a diplomatic headache for the UK, with the Israel embassy issuing a statement saying "it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival". Kneecap, which has made headlines in recent months with its pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel stance, also led crowds in chanting abuse against Prime Minister Starmer. Starmer and other politicians had said the band should not perform after its member Liam O'Hanna, known by his stage name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence. He appeared in court this month accused of having displayed a Hezbollah flag while saying "Up Hamas, Up Hezbollah" at a London concert last year. A video of the concert resurfaced and caused controversy. The Iran-backed Lebanese group Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas are banned in the UK, where it is an offence to express support for them.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pivoting between geopolitics and geo-economics
Listen to article When Field Marshal Asim Munir walked out of the White House after the recent luncheon with President Trump, it was apparent that the Pak-US relationship was taking another tactical shift. This relationship has seen numerous highs and lows in the past. However, the recent war-like situation between Pakistan and India and President Donald Trump's role in the ceasefire have unfolded events unexpectedly. Lately, Pakistan seems to have navigated its relations well with both the US and China. The country now stands at a crossroads: whether to continue with a familiar path of transactional geopolitics or commit to geo-economics as mentioned in the National Security Policy (2022-2026). Not long ago, Pakistan was almost written off for its strategic importance by the policymakers in Washington, DC, after the fall of Kabul. From being a close ally, Pakistan had overnight become almost insignificant for the Biden administration to give a call back to the Pakistani authorities or even to get a mention in the US's National Security Strategy. So much so that Pakistan had to go through tougher conditions while seeking bailout packages from the IMF and was subject to harsher rhetoric. Nevertheless, the situation has changed significantly after the Indo-Pak military clash of May 2025. On April 22, 2025, a terrorist incident resulted in 26 tourists losing their lives in Pahalgam. Reports also claim that this attack was religiously motivated. Such a tragedy deserves utmost condemnation, and those responsible must be punished for their brutal actions. India's knee-jerk response was that Pakistan was somehow behind this attack, and therefore, the decades-long Indus Water Treaty, which had survived through the worst of the Indo-Pak relations, was suspended. Subsequently, India also launched a series of attacks on several Pakistani cities on the pretext of targeting the terrorist hideouts only. For the next two days, the situation between India and Pakistan remained extremely tense. Both attacked each other's multiple military facilities and neutralised drone incursions, while Pakistan, with the help of Chinese technology, downed multiple Indian fighter jets. Eventually, mediated by the US, both countries reached a ceasefire agreement, but the threat still looms as PM Modi has insisted that Operation Sindoor will continue if there is any other terrorist attack in India. Whether keeping South Asian peace a hostage with such statements is good or bad, one thing is clear: after the ceasefire, Pakistan's profile on the international political front has witnessed a significant rise, something totally against New Delhi's policy of isolating Pakistan internationally. Post-ceasefire, Pakistan's relations with China have reached new highs. For Pakistan, China has emerged as one dependable partner. China, on the other hand, fully supported Pakistan's retaliation against Indian attacks. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reiterated that Pakistan is an "ironclad friend" and vowed to deepen the "all-weather strategic cooperative partnership." It must also be noted that the use of Chinese defence technology appeared as free marketing, since after the ceasefire, China's defense stocks have surged. Presently, what still remains a matter of concern for both is the security of Chinese personnel and investments in CPEC. Pakistan, therefore, must ameliorate threats from sub-nationalist movements. Pakistan's relations with the US have also taken a stark turnabout. President Trump has taken the credit for the ceasefire a number of times, although India, the US's most allied ally in South Asia, has refuted such claims repeatedly. He then offered to mediate for the long-overdue Kashmir issue, again upsetting India. And lately, the US Department of State issued a travel advisory to "exercise increased caution in India due to crime and terrorism." All these developments, along with President Trump's invitation to Field Marshal Asim Munir, have left the Indian side quite disgruntled. Many argue that the lunch meeting was also crucial because of the Israel-Iran conflict, but whatever the reason may be, Pakistan must be in a state of euphoria over these happenings. One must also recall that Pakistan has served as US strategic partner in the past. During the Cold War, Pakistan was an active member of the capitalist camp against communism in South Asia; it played a crucial role against the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan; and it was the US strategic partner during the war on terror. But as denoted appropriately, the Pak-US relationship has remained 'transactional' in nature, and Pakistan has repeatedly complained of being abandoned as soon as US interests change. Following the same pattern, Pakistan was cast off after the fall of Kabul in 2021, too. Hence, it must remain wary in the future as well. Considering the post-ceasefire events, Pakistan may again be lured to find solutions to its internal and external crises in forming strategic partnerships, especially with the US. Previously, Pakistan has leveraged its geographical location for geopolitical gains, but apart from temporary relief, it has only guided towards much deep-rooted problems. The country gravely suffers from growing poverty, economic inequality, policy discontinuity, unemployment, poor education and healthcare facilities, etc. The current situation presents Pakistan with a dilemma: whether it would keep using its strategic advantage for temporary gains or realise the vision of geo-economics that the country's National Security Policy introduced in January 2022. Becoming a melting pot for global economic interests through strengthening regional connectivity and development partnerships will help Pakistan address its structural problems related to non-traditional security aspects. Additionally, it will also ensure that the country has enough resources in the pool to improve its traditional security apparatus. Certainly, now this is more important because Operation Sindoor is not over yet. Pakistan needs to build its economic muscle against India, which is reportedly set to become the fourth-largest economy in the world. It is also arguably correct that the path to geo-economics will be long, and considering the world today, which has almost become a war theater, Pakistan will have additional hindrances when anchoring geographic location for economic benefits. Nonetheless, with the alternate strategy, Pakistan has tried and failed again and again, and not changing the approach will not help address the deep-rooted structural issues the country has been suffering from since its inception in 1947.
