logo
Why Americans Support Unions And Distrust Big Business

Why Americans Support Unions And Distrust Big Business

Scoop13-06-2025
Justin Arango said support for a union built over the years among workers at JSW Steel in Mingo Junction, Ohio, as the company repeatedly failed to deliver fair pay, sufficient sick time, and safety improvements.
The workers ultimately beat back management's nasty anti-union campaign and voted in March to join the United Steelworkers (USW), winning a long-overdue voice at the prosperous company.
Their victory reflects the nation's growing consensus on the only real way to ensure a fair shake on the job. More Americans support unions and feel disillusioned with big business than at any time since the 1960s, according to a study by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a think tank in Washington, D.C.
Support for unions versus big business soared to a record 16-point margin in recent years, according to EPI's analysis of survey data from the federally supported American National Election Studies initiative.
Just as important, EPI researchers found the pro-union sentiment surging across educational, ethnic, geographic, and racial groups, as increasing numbers of fed-up workers demand their fair share and stand up to exploitation on the job.
Workers waging high-profile fights against out of touch owners at Amazon and Starbucks helped to drive the widening support for labor, EPI concluded. In addition, the pandemic underscored workers' need for unions to provide a bulwark against bosses who put them in harm's way.
And runaway corporate greed, such as the padding of CEO salaries and shareholder dividends on workers' backs, fueled rampant economic inequality and left ordinary Americans struggling to make ends meet. It would take the average worker two lifetimes to make what the highest-paid CEO racks up in a year.
'It's the corporations that have let the people down,' noted Arango, a millwright at JSW for about five years.
Two previous organising efforts at JSW fell short. But in 2025, Arango said, workers understood that collective action represented the only path forward.
'It was just a matter of time before it happened,' Arango said, noting he and many of his coworkers grew up in union families and knew the USW's record in empowering workers across numerous other industries.
'I think everybody's tired of the lies and broken promises that JSW told. We all banded together and got the vote. Now it's on to the next step,' added Arango, referring to upcoming negotiations for a first contract.
He and his coworkers manufacture components for offshore wind turbines. It's their skill that generates wealth for JSW, the U.S. wing of a $22 billion conglomerate headquartered in India.
In 2024, the U.S. Department of Energy awarded JSW $43.5 million in assistance for capital upgrades through the USW-backed Inflation Reduction Act—support that boosted the company's prospects and also fueled the workers' drive for fair treatment.
'If they're willing to take the money the union helped to provide, why not turn it back to the people who are part of that union?' Tyler Stillion, an inspector in JSW's logistics department, recalled thinking.
Stillion reflects on the EPI study's finding about union support expanding among workers of all backgrounds.
He never belonged to a union before. But trusting in coworkers with union experience, and recalling the stories of relatives who praised the benefits of union membership, he embraced the USW as a means of helping everyone at the plant move forward.
'We have a lot of good people there. We have a lot of smart people there,' he added, noting a union contract ensures equitable treatment and gives all members an opportunity to advance.
That's exactly what vigilant USW members achieved at Kaiser Permanente, a giant health care system in Southern California.
A few years ago, Local 7600 learned that many of its members in the Inland Empire received significantly lower pay than counterparts doing the same jobs in the system's Los Angeles and Orange County facilities. They fought for parity and won a contract earmarking millions in catch-up raises.
'It makes a difference,' observed Maggie Gamboa, one of those who received a big wage bump. 'I'm a single mom. My kids rely on me for everything.'
Gamboa helps to conduct orientation meetings for new coworkers. 'Congratulations!' she tells them about landing a USW-represented job with the health care system. 'This is the best step you've made.'
By empowering workers, she noted, workers also help their patients. Local 7600 members use their voice to advocate for safer working conditions and other improvements at the facilities they operate.
'When you have a happy workforce, when you have a competent, well-trained workforce, that translates to better care for patients,' Gamboa said.
She expects support for unions to continue to grow in the wake of sociopathic billionaire Elon Musk's attacks on the federal government's unionised workers and contempt for the ordinary Americans who keep the country running every day.
In addition to EPI, Gallup and other researchers documented soaring support for unions even before anti-labor President Donald Trump took office and gave Musk permission to decimate the federal workforce.
'It's not real surprising, but it's impressive to see the strength that unions are developing,' Gamboa observed. 'As people become more educated as to what unions mean, I feel that's drawing more people in.'
Stillion considers the union at JSW to represent a new chapter ultimately benefiting not only the workers but also the company and community.
'We're excited to start this,' he said, noting he and colleagues not only desired a change but also wanted to find out 'what could be' by moving forward together. 'We're excited to see where it brings us.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's answer to numbers he doesn't like is to change them or throw them away
Trump's answer to numbers he doesn't like is to change them or throw them away

NZ Herald

time4 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Trump's answer to numbers he doesn't like is to change them or throw them away

The President's manipulation of government data threatens to erode public trust in facts that leaders of both parties have long relied on to guide policy decisions. A breakdown in official government statistics could also create economic instability, restrain lifesaving healthcare and limit forecasts of natural disasters. Trump has routinely spread misinformation since the start of his political career, but his efforts in his second term to bend data to support his agenda have invited comparisons to information control in autocratic countries. 'What he's trying to do is to present the best possible picture of what he's doing, even if that means he has to cook the numbers, even if that means he has to distort the data,' said Robert Cropf, a political science professor at St Louis University. 'It's basically a page from the authoritarian playbook.' Trump has also tried to use his social media megaphone to influence data produced by private companies. On Tuesday, he called for Goldman Sachs to replace a veteran economist who produced reports that warned that tariffs could cause inflation. But he may find himself in a game of whack-a-mole. Today, a benchmark that measures the prices producers get for goods and services showed hotter-than-expected inflation, partly because of tariffs. Trump has not commented yet on the report. Risk of undermining stats Other countries have demonstrated the risk of undermining statistics, which can erode citizens' trust in their government and nations' standing in the international community. China has been widely accused of inflating economic figures, prompting other countries to seek alternative data sources for a more trustworthy picture of the nation's financial situation. In Greece, the government produced false deficit numbers for years, and the government repeatedly sought to criminally prosecute the statistician who produced accurate budget figures. Argentina manipulated economic statistics for years to minimise the extent of inflation, even as consumers paid for significantly more expensive groceries and goods. The false deficit numbers in Greece contributed to the country's debt crisis. The cooked numbers in Argentina made it more difficult for the government to enact policies that could limit inflation, and citizens lost faith in the ability to trust the government data to inform major purchases. Need for accurate picture White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said that the President's actions are intended to 'restore' Americans' trust in data so they can make their own decisions. 'President Trump is preserving – not eroding – democracy by ensuring that the American people can rely on Government data that actually reflects reality,' Rogers said in a statement. Government statistics have traditionally been considered more reliable and comprehensive than those collected by private sector companies motivated by profits, said Paul Schroeder, the executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics. The data is needed to provide an accurate picture of what is happening. Without it, governments, corporations and individuals lack information that can inform decisions about everything from mortgage rates to weight loss. 'It's almost like an airline pilot losing his instrument panel when driving the plane,' Schroeder said of the erosion. Trump's decision to fire Bureau of Labour Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer was widely condemned by statisticians and economists, who warned that the move could have a chilling effect on the work of federal number crunchers who produce reports the President doesn't like. Trump claimed without evidence that the nation's job statistics were 'rigged', following a revision to the May and June jobs figures that showed the labour market was weaker than previously known. Revisions to job reports are common, but many economists have acknowledged falling response rates to government surveys, and long-standing budget strains have made it harder for economic agencies to collect and analyse reliable data. 'President Trump believes that businesses, households, and policymakers deserve accurate data to inform their decision-making, and he will restore America's trust in the BLS,' Rogers said. US President Donald Trump throws pens to the crowd after signing executive orders during the inaugural parade inside Capital One Arena, in Washington, DC, on January 20, 2025. Photo / Jim Watson, AFP Plan to overhaul census Trump's attempts to change how the Government collects data have invited backlash, especially his proposal to overhaul the census amid a fight over redistricting. Civil liberties groups have said they would challenge any attempt to change the census, warning that the President's proposal to eliminate undocumented immigrants from the count could erode the political power and financial resources of diverse communities. The census is used not only to determine congressional seats but also to distribute federal funding and decide where to build schools. Washington DC crime Trump justified his decision to deploy federal law enforcement and the National Guard on DC streets with claims that crime is surging in Washington, but violent crime in DC has been on the decline since 2023. The White House has cast doubt on the accuracy of local statistics, citing a July NBC News report that said that the District suspended a police commander accused of manipulating crime numbers in his district. Rogers added that the data 'doesn't change the on-the-ground reality that many DC residents and visitors have experienced on our streets'. In other instances, the Administration has halted the collection of data that advocates and experts warn is essential for Americans' wellbeing and safety. Collection of health data At the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, scientists are now forbidden to collect gender data on any programmes. That includes abortion data and information for sexually transmitted disease prevention, violence prevention and mental health programmes. The lack of data could undermine efforts to prevent the spread of STDs and prevent school shootings and suicides. Federal collection of abortion data stopped on April 1 following widespread layoffs across the Department of Health and Human Services. Most states put out their own abortion data, but no other federal agency collects abortion data, according to a former CDC employee familiar with those programmes. The Government uses the data to predict birth rates, a crucial statistic that governments and businesses use to make decisions about the health system, education and the economy. CDC staff members are also no longer collecting concussion data for the creation of a concussion surveillance system, which has had strong bipartisan congressional support. The agency is also no longer analysing data to prevent drowning – the leading cause of death in children aged 1 to 4 – because all of those staff members were laid off. Tracking the drug crisis Researchers have warned about the diminishing of data programmes that are key to understanding the ever-evolving drug crisis in the US – and to building the best prevention and treatment programmes. In June, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration stopped updating the Drug Abuse Warning Network, a nationwide surveillance system of drug use trends and insights drawn from emergency department visits. The loss of that data will make it more difficult for researchers such as Daniel Ciccarone, a professor at the University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, to track street drugs and overdoses. Ciccarone studies trends in the fentanyl supply, which kills tens of thousands of Americans each year, as well as new synthetic drugs seeping into regional supplies. 'We need surveillance data at a historic time of an undulating drug supply – we don't know what's going to happen next,' Ciccarone said. Vaping might seem safer than smoking, but the long-term risks are starting to show. Photo / 123RF Stats on smoking, vaping Public health advocates have raised concerns about the future of the National Youth Tobacco Survey, an annual report that measures how young people are using nicotine products. The report helped alert the country to the epidemic of teen vaping and led to stricter controls on the industry. The programme has long been run through the Food and Drug Administration and the CDC's Office on Smoking and Health, which was shut down in the northern spring. An HHS spokesperson did not respond when asked about the future of the survey, saying only that the CDC 'remains deeply committed to tobacco prevention and control and … continues to support this critical public health priority through a range of efforts, including outreach, education, and surveillance'. Research on climate The Trump Administration has also discontinued dozens of climate databases and government-funded studies, including efforts to quantify the damage caused by natural disasters and to understand how the heaviest rainfall will intensify as the planet warms. Officials have removed key climate data and reports from the internet. The Administration took down the website of the US Global Change Research Programme, which shared congressionally mandated reports about climate change impacts across the country. And it deleted a repository for research and forecasts, though it said such information would continue to be posted on a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website. Trump's budget proposal for Noaa would eliminate nearly all of the agency's labs focused on climate, weather and oceans – institutions whose studies are key to weather and climate forecasting and improving our understanding of everything from summer thunderstorms to the El Nino climate pattern. Businesses rely on this data to inform plans for tourism, fisheries and shipping. Education staff cuts The changes reflect the Administration's commitment to 'eliminating bias and producing Gold Standard Science research driven by verifiable data,' Rogers said in a statement. As the Trump Administration attempts to shut the Education Department, its ability to publish accurate and timely data was thrown into question after deep cuts to the department's staff. Virtually the entire staff of the National Centre for Education Statistics was laid off, and while much of the work is done by contractors, researchers worry that there are no longer enough government workers to check and disseminate collected data. The centre's work is critical to researchers, policymakers and journalists, with a wide range of data including the demographics of students and schools, courses offered, crime on campuses, and school spending. Already, the Education Department missed its June deadline to publish the annual Condition of Education report, the authoritative source for education data from preschool through into university. The agency has continued to publish some data tables, but far fewer than in past years. Information on race The Trump Administration has also called for more information about the consideration of applicants' race in college admissions. 'Greater transparency is essential to exposing unlawful practices and ultimately ridding society of shameful, dangerous racial hierarchies,' Trump said in a memorandum issued last week, as he ordered the Education Department to begin collecting detailed data from all colleges that receive federal financial aid. That includes grades and test scores for both applicants and students, broken down by race. The White House has argued that a lack of data has hindered enforcement of a 2023 Supreme Court ruling that the use of race-conscious admissions is unconstitutional. A higher education leader argued that the information requested won't provide good data: applicants don't disclose their race, and while colleges do survey students who enrol, participation is voluntary, and even those who respond may choose not to disclose their race. 'They're going to gather a bunch of information and try to make sense of it,' said Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education. 'I worry that they're not going to be able to make much sense of it.' Legacy of changes The impact of these changes could affect the nation long after Trump leaves office, Cropf said. Even if the Government resumes collecting data, there will be gaps from the Trump era, and the public may view the figures as more politicised. 'It taints the waters,' he said. 'It seriously undermines faith in our institutions if we can't have any guarantees the institutions are providing us with reliable data or that they're making decisions based on reliable data.'

Departures are often due to return-to-office policies and caregiving responsibilities
Departures are often due to return-to-office policies and caregiving responsibilities

NZ Herald

time7 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Departures are often due to return-to-office policies and caregiving responsibilities

'It's become harder for women, particularly those with caregiving responsibilities, to thrive in this job market,' she said, likening the moment to the Barbie movie when Ken takes over the feminist land of Barbie with masculine ideals. 'It's clear that we're backsliding in the Ken-ergy economy, that the return-to-office chest-pounding is having a real ripple effect.' In some cases, mothers say they are giving up jobs happily, in line with Maga culture and the rise of the 'traditional wife' (#tradwife on social media), which celebrates women choosing conventional gender roles by focusing on children instead of careers. The Trump Administration has doubled down on its message that Americans should be having more babies, with Vice-President JD Vance promoting the benefits of having a parent at home, saying 'young children are clearly happier and healthier' in such arrangements. Emily Santoni plays with her children at their home in Houston earlier this month. Photo / Lexi Parra, The Washington Post This year's pullback among mothers is part of a broader shift: some 212,000 women over 20 have stopped working or applying for jobs since January, with particularly pronounced drops for black women and those ages 25 to 34, Labour Department data shows. And while the unemployment rate, at 4.2%, remains low, the share of women in the workforce has fallen since January. In interviews with more than a dozen women who've recently left the workforce, many cited a confluence of factors – from layoffs to waning work-from-home flexibility while caring for children or ageing parents. Many also noted a discernible shift in workplace attitudes, including return-to-office mandates and discarded diversity policies, that made it feel like they were less valued at work. Several said they struggled to find new work after losing their jobs and decided to go back to school instead, or stay home with their children. Almost all of the women said the decision to stop working felt uncharacteristic for them, and wasn't something they would've considered a year ago. 'Work was a big, big part of my identity, but all of these little things added up,' said Isabelle Beulaygue, 37, a sociologist in Santa Fe, New Mexico, who left her job as a university professor earlier this year to stay at home with her infant. 'I was always super career-focused, but it started feeling like women were expendable at work, like they weren't really respected anymore.' There wasn't any one thing that led her to quit, she said, but rather a culmination of small changes – including a move for her husband's job, growing pressure to be in the office for long hours and worsening morale because of federal budget cuts. When she had to leave work early a few times to care for her sick baby, it was difficult to co-ordinate. 'Flexibility feels like a thing of the past,' she said. The pullback comes at a time when the broader labour market is cooling after years of hefty post-pandemic growth. US employers added 106,000 jobs between April and July – less than one-third of jobs added in the same period last year, according to the latest Labour Department data. 'The US is the only advanced economy that's had declining female labour force participation in the last 20 years, and a lot of that is because of lack of social safety net and caregiving supports,' said Kate Bahn, chief economist at the Institute for Women's Policy Research. 'It's a long-term trend that appears to be getting worse.' Although black women are more likely to be in the workforce than white or Hispanic women, Bahn said they have been disproportionately hit by recent overhauls, including federal government cuts and the dismantling of diversity, equity and inclusion programmes. The labour market has slowed down considerably for all workers, but the unemployment rate for black women over 20 has risen by nearly an entire percentage point so far this year, to 6.3% in July, its highest level in almost four years. After six months of job-searching, Jovanna, who was laid off from her healthcare copywriting job in early February, is changing course entirely. The mother-of-two, who is black and lives in the Midwest, recently enrolled in a 15-week project management certification programme in the hope of switching careers. 'I sent out at least 500 applications, worked with three different career coaches, and networked as much as I could,' said Jovanna, who asked to be identified by her middle name only, because she worries about jeopardising future employment. 'I am depleting my savings and ended up having to borrow against my 401(k), so it got to the point where I had to make a bigger change.' Economists say they worry that the latest labour force departures could indicate a longer-term setback for women, especially if they decide to return to work. Historically, breaks in work history have coincided with lower pay and fewer opportunities for advancement, said Heggeness. 'There are huge implications for the women themselves,' she said. 'Their lifetime earnings will be lower, they will most likely come back to a job that does not pay the salary they were making when they left. It'll be harder for them to get back in, harder to move up the ladder to senior management positions because they've had this gap in employment.' Emily Santoni left her position as a chief marketing officer at an energy consulting firm in Houston to stay home with her children, ages 1 and 3, this year. It wasn't a decision she made lightly – she and her husband spent months lining up their finances and preparing for the transition. Last year, the couple spent more than US$140,000 on a fulltime nanny and other childcare. It was financially doable, Santoni said, but she couldn't shake the feeling that she was missing out. 'I worked hard, I had a great career, we were both making great money,' the 39-year-old said. 'But I was working so much, there were weeks when I saw my kids for maybe 30 minutes a day. Finally it was like, 'Let's slow this down so I can be a present mother.'' Santoni said she felt like she was missing out on spending time with her children before she left her job this year. Photo / Lexi Parra, The Washington Post Plus, her workplace was doing away with a policy that allowed parents to work from home two days a week. That wasn't a 'major deciding factor', Santoni said, 'but it was one more thing that was like, 'Blargh, this sucks.'' Major corporations around the country, including JP Morgan, AT&T and Amazon, as well as large swathes of the federal Government, have begun mandating that employees clock in to the office five days a week. Although enforcement has been uneven, labour economists say those requirements have added extra strain for many workers, particularly those with young children. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post.) Santoni says leaving the workforce has been a refreshing change. She's spending a lot more time with her children, and is also going to more workout classes and happy hours with friends. Although it took a few months to find her rhythm, she's now encouraging other women in her circle to consider stepping back from the labour force. 'My decision to leave my corporate role had nothing to do with politics or a movement telling women to stay home. It had everything to do with what success looks like for me right now,' Santoni said. 'I've worked relentlessly since I was young, and now I choose to give my best energy to my kids while they're little. 'For mums choosing to leave the workforce for this same reason, it's not weakness or submission – it's power.'

China's automakers using Red Sea route shortcut -while others take the slow boat to Europe
China's automakers using Red Sea route shortcut -while others take the slow boat to Europe

NZ Herald

time11-08-2025

  • NZ Herald

China's automakers using Red Sea route shortcut -while others take the slow boat to Europe

The Chinese cargo ship BYD Explorer No.1. While other Asian automakers are still shipping to Europe by the longer, more expensive route around Africa, car-carrying ships to Europe from Chinese ports through the Suez Canal and Red Sea have continued at an unabated clip, leading shipping analysts to assume that the Chinese Government reached an understanding with Iran or the Houthi rebels, who sunk two cargo ships in July. Photo / Ore Huiying, The New York Times Chinese automakers are shipping cars to Europe through the Red Sea and Suez Canal, nearly two years after the Iran-backed Houthi militia in Yemen started attacking vessels in the critical Middle East transit route. Other automakers are still shipping cars from Asia by way of a much longer, and expensive,

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store