
Elon Musk's extensive ties to China, explained
is a senior correspondent at Vox covering foreign policy and world news with a focus on the future of international conflict. He is the author of the 2018 book, Invisible Countries: Journeys to the Edge of Nationhood , an exploration of border conflicts, unrecognized countries, and changes to the world map.
Elon Musk has opinions on how a lot of the world's countries should be run.
But one country tends to get a pass from the world's richest man. He is, in his own words, 'kind of pro-China.' The self-proclaimed 'free-speech absolutist' has not applied that position to China's draconian censorship regime, and Musk has defended the Chinese government's positions on a range of other issues.
From a business perspective, this makes sense. China is vital to Musk's car company Tesla as both a producer of vehicles and as a consumer market. Musk is also hardly unusual among major global tech CEOs in defending China.
'Musk's comments on China aren't out of the norm for the CEO of a major Western business,' said Isaac Stone Fish, CEO of Strategy Risks, a consultancy focused on the risks of doing business in China. 'The distinction is that [Apple CEO] Tim Cook is not on Twitter talking about how awful USAID is or meddling in European politics.'
Musk's business interests in China and overall pro-Beijing attitudes also stand out among his new colleagues in the Trump administration. Trump's foreign policy team is generally united in its hawkish views on China. Trump himself has accused Beijing in the past of a policy to 'rape our country' and blamed it for the Covid pandemic, along with a host of other ills.
As the US and China appear to be hurtling headlong into a trade war, and even as Trump seeks a meeting with China's Xi Jinping in hopes of hammering out a new trade deal, Musk's ties to China — and the potential leverage they could offer Beijing in future negotiations — are getting more notice in both countries.
During the recent quasi-infomercial on the White House lawn, during which Trump purchased a Tesla and made a sales pitch for the slumping company, the president made clear that the profits of Musk's companies will be a priority for the administration. This raises questions about whether the interests of those companies will come into play as the administration shapes its policies toward its fellow superpower.
China and Tesla need each other
The symbiotic relationship between Tesla and China almost can't be overstated. In 2019, the company opened its Shanghai 'gigafactory' with hundreds of millions of dollars in loans from Chinese banks. It was the company's first factory outside the US, as well as the first wholly foreign-owned car company in China, where automakers typically enter into joint ventures with Chinese companies.
It is now Tesla's largest factory, producing half of the company's cars globally last year. Musk has praised workers at his Chinese factory for 'burning the 3 am oil…whereas in America people are trying to avoid going to work at all.' The remark came at a time when the factory was literally having workers sleep in the factory due to Covid restrictions.
Tesla has also benefited from selling cars in China's fast-growing electric vehicle market: Sales in China rose 8.8 percent in 2024, a year in which the company's global sales fell for the first time. (Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.)
'It's their second most important market and the only market that's continuing to grow,'' said Tu Le, an expert on the Chinese car market and director of the market research firm Sino Auto Insights.
Along the way, Musk has developed relationships with senior Chinese leaders, notably Premier Li Qiang, China's No. 2 official, who reportedly offered him a Chinese green card during a meeting in 2019.
Thanks to his real-life Tony Stark image, Musk has become something of a pop culture figure in China, as, perhaps more surprisingly, has his mother.
Elon Musk books displayed during the Shanghai Book Fair 2024 in Shanghai, China. Ying Tang/NurPhoto via Getty Images
The relationship between the Chinese government and Tesla has been mutually beneficial, Le told Vox. The company's investment in China came at a time when the Chinese government was trying to spur the creation of a local market for electric vehicles. That effort worked phenomenally well: more than half of cars sold in China now come with the distinctive green license plates marking them as EVs, and China accounted for more than 60 percent of EV sales globally last year.
This has also led to an explosion of new domestic Chinese EV producers, including Tesla's primary competitor BYD, a company which Musk once literally laughed at but which now outsells Tesla globally.
Tesla retains some cachet as a premium brand, Le says, but even in China, its sales are starting to slip. Musk is currently pushing to win approval from Chinese regulators for Tesla's 'full self-driving' technology. The company is currently hampered by rules which prevent data from Chinese drivers from being taken out of the country, which Musk says has forced them to use publicly available videos of Chinese streets to train their vehicles.
Tesla last month rolled out a partial self-driving mode on its Chinese models, though it costs almost $9,000, while BYD is offering similar technology for free on its vehicles.
'China is the linchpin to Tesla's overall long-term strategy,' said Le.
Musk's China ties are deeper than Tesla
Musk's activities in China had attracted controversy even before he took on his new political role. In 2022, Tesla was blasted by human rights groups and lawmakers for opening a showroom in China's Xinjiang region, where the government's treatment of ethnic Uyghur Muslims had been described as a genocide by both the Trump and Biden administrations.
The critics included then-senator, now Secretary of State Marco Rubio, sponsor of that year's Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, who described the showroom on Twitter as an example of 'Nationless corporations … helping the Chinese Communist Party cover up genocide and slave labor.'
Musk's China ties have also raised security concerns, given that another of his companies, SpaceX, is a major US military contractor and Musk himself has 'top secret' security clearance. In 2022, Rep. Chris Stewart (R-UT) pushed for closed-door intelligence briefings on Capitol Hill to determine whether SpaceX had any links to the Chinese government, telling the Wall Street Journal, 'I am a fan of Elon Musk and SpaceX, but anyone would be concerned if there are financial entanglements with China.'
Several companies with links to Musk's businesses have also been targeted by the US government. In January, the Pentagon added Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. (CATL), the world's largest producer of lithium-iron-phosphate batteries, and a major Tesla supplier, to its list of 'Chinese military companies' that produce both civilian and military goods. US firms are not prohibited from doing business with companies on this list, but the list is intended to raise reputational and compliance costs.
Another company on the list, the Chinese internet giant Tencent, at one point owned a 5 percent stake in Tesla, though according to media reports, it has since divested its holdings. Tencent is the parent company of WeChat, which was once often referred to as 'China's Twitter,' but has since become an all-encompassing app used for a wide variety of payments and communication. Musk has cited WeChat as a model for the 'everything app' he would like to build X into.
The true extent of Musk's links to Chinese companies may not be fully known. The Financial Times reported that Chinese investors have been funneling tens of millions of dollars into Musk's non-public companies, like SpaceX, Neuralink, and xAI, using opaque ownership structures that shield investors' identities.
China's man on the inside?
Why does any of this matter? Musk's influence may already be helping to shape US policy toward China. At the end of last year, he publicly opposed a bipartisan spending bill that included measures to regulate US investments in China. A stopgap bill was eventually passed without the provision, with Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) accusing House Republicans of caving because 'Elon had a problem.'
Experts say Chinese leaders are hoping to leverage their connections to the DOGE boss to influence the administration's policies. Chinese Vice President Han Zheng met with Musk on the eve of Trump's inauguration. TikTok CEO Shou Chew has also been in communication with Musk, viewing him as a conduit to the White House as the company tries to navigate concerns about its Chinese parent company ByteDance.
In February, the Financial Times reported that Chinese officials were considering using Tesla's question for approval for self-driving as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations with the Trump administration.
'They absolutely see him as an asset to them in any kind of negotiations, a way to bypass Rubio, a way to bypass [national security adviser Michael] Waltz, a way to bypass those whom they see to be less friendly to them on their issues, and they're going to use him as a conduit,' Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), ranking member of the House Select Committee on the CCP, told Vox at a recent event in Washington. (The White House's National Security Council did not respond to a request for comment.)
The committee's chair, Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI) didn't criticize Musk directly but agreed that 'they're going to use every bit of leverage they can.'
On paper, a national security team that includes Rubio and Waltz reporting to Trump seems like a China hawk's dream. And in some respects, such as Rubio's push to keep Chinese economic interests out of the Panama Canal, it has been. Chinese officials are reportedly concerned that the Trump administration will use tariffs to pressure other developing countries to reduce their ties with Beijing.
But in many respects, the administration has been less hawkish than many expected. It's true that Trump has slapped 20 percent tariffs on Chinese goods, ostensibly over China's role in the global fentanyl trade, though these are less than the 60 percent tariffs he proposed on the campaign trail, or the 25 percent tariffs he has now slapped on Mexico and Canada. (Canada and European countries have earned Trump's ire more than China, at least so far.)
Trump also backed off a move to close a tax loophole used by Chinese fast fashion brands like Temu and Shein to ship to the United States, and despite having once called for the banning of TikTok, his administration appears to be in no hurry to enforce the ban on the app passed by Congress last year.
Trump's foreign aid cuts have dealt a blow to dozens of nonprofits monitoring corruption and human rights abuses in China, as well as Tibet's government in exile. Statements by Trump and some of his senior officials, as well as the administration's treatment of Ukraine, have cast doubt on whether the administration would intervene to defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion.
Musk has said in the past that it would make sense for Taiwan to be a 'special administrative zone' within China. In an interview in Taipei last fall, Taiwan's deputy minister of digital affairs told Vox his government was seeking alternative satellite services to SpaceX because Musk 'could cut the service [over] his personal opinion, so we don't think this was a trustable partner.'
Musk has spoken out against tariffs in the past, and Tesla has warned it could be exposed to retaliatory tariffs from other governments, but because Tesla has built relatively self-sufficient supply chains within both the US and China, the measures announced by Trump so far may hurt Musk's competitors more than they hurt him.
Still, if US-China trade relations deteriorate further, not to mention the sort of 'decoupling' Rubio advocated as a senator, it's hard to imagine Musk's bottom line won't be affected, or that he won't have something to say about it.
'I cannot imagine the Trump administration actually being fully hawkish on China, until Musk greatly recedes from the scene,' said Stone Fish.
The administration's China policy, on both the economic and national security fronts, is still somewhat of a work in progress, and the hawks may still have their way, as they often did during Trump's first term. A test may come in June when, according to reports, a Trump-Xi summit is in the works, perhaps paving the way for formal trade talks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
11 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin dairy farmer alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that the Trump administration is illegally denying financial assistance to white farmers by continuing programs that favor minorities. The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture in federal court in Wisconsin on behalf of a white dairy farmer, Adam Faust. Faust was among several farmers who successfully sued the Biden administration in 2021 for race discrimination in the USDA's Farmer Loan Forgiveness Plan. The new lawsuit alleges the government has continued to implement diversity, equity and inclusion programs that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The Wisconsin Institute wrote to the USDA in April warning of legal action, and six Republican Wisconsin congressmen called on the USDA to investigate and end the programs. 'The USDA should honor the President's promise to the American people to end racial discrimination in the federal government,' Faust said in a written statement. 'After being ignored by a federal agency that's meant to support agriculture, I hope my lawsuit brings answers, accountability, and results from USDA.' Trump administration spokesperson Anna Kelly did not immediately respond to an email Monday seeking comment. The lawsuit contends that Faust is one of 2 million white male American farmers who are subject to discriminatory race-based policies at the USDA. The lawsuit names three USDA programs and policies it says put white men at a disadvantage and violate the Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment by discriminating based on race and sex. Faust participates in one program designed to offset the gap between milk prices and the cost of feed, but the lawsuit alleges he is charged a $100 administrative fee that minority and female farmers do not have to pay. Faust also participates in a USDA program that guarantees 90% of the value of loans to white farmers, but 95% to women and racial minorities. That puts Faust at a disadvantage, the lawsuit alleges. Faust has also begun work on a new manure storage system that could qualify for reimbursement under a USDA environmental conservation program, but 75% of his costs are eligible while 90% of the costs of minority farmers qualify, the lawsuit contends. A federal court judge ruled in a similar 2021 case that granting loan forgiveness only to 'socially disadvantaged farmers' amounts to unconstitutional race discrimination. The Biden administration suspended the program and Congress repealed it in 2022. The Wisconsin Institute has filed dozens of such lawsuits in 25 states attacking DEI programs in government. In its April letter to the USDA, the law firm that has a long history of representing Republicans said it didn't want to sue 'but there is no excuse for this continued discrimination.' Trump has been aggressive in trying to end the government's DEI efforts to fulfill a campaign promise and bring about a profound cultural shift across the U.S. from promoting diversity to an exclusive focus on merit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Business Wire
13 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Cirql Expands European Presence Through Strategic Partnership with Frasson
HO CHI MINH CITY, Vietnam--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Cirql®, a Vietnam-based innovation company focused on developing scalable, less impactful, finished midsole components and material solutions for footwear brands, announces a strategic agreement with Frasson Spa, an Italian solemakers company specializing in supercritical foaming and injection molding for footwear components. This partnership solidifies Cirql's presence in Europe and allows the company to supply European footwear brands with their cutting-edge recycled polymer (rTPU) technology for high-performance midsoles and outsoles. Under this collaboration, Frasson is now Cirql's certified, official partner in the EU for the development and production of technical shoe components. Frasson will serve as a key supplier and approved EU development partner, manufacturer, and OEM for Cirql midsoles and outsoles, enabling more sustainable solutions to footwear brands across Europe. 'This partnership is a significant milestone for Cirql as we expand into the European market,' said Matt Thwaites, Vice President and General Manager at Cirql. 'Frasson's expertise in supercritical foaming and injection molding perfectly complements our vision of providing sustainable and innovative materials to global footwear brands. Together, we aim to elevate the footwear industry with cutting-edge, eco-friendly solutions.' With this partnership, Cirql's recycled polymer (rTPU) will now be more accessible to European customers, ensuring that brands can seamlessly integrate sustainable materials and components into their products. Frasson, as an established manufacturer in Italy, brings decades of expertise and a deep understanding of the region's footwear industry, making them an ideal partner for Cirql's growth in Europe. 'Frasson is a company always looking for the best technologies in the world to offer to its customers. We were the first in Italy to purchase this type of machine to investigate this new material. Thanks to Cirql, we have completed the material package and with their cutting-edge recycled polymer (rTPU) technology can now also offer SCF with a significant portion of recycled material,' said Alberto Frasson, General Manager at Frasson. Cirql's innovative approach to sustainable materials focuses on reducing waste in manufacturing while providing a range of performance solutions for technical footwear components. Combined with Frasson's manufacturing capabilities, the partnership sets a new standard for eco-conscious collaboration in the footwear industry and minimizing environmental impact. For more information about Cirql and its sustainable materials, visit About Cirql® Cirql®, a subsidiary of OrthoLite®, is focused entirely on developing scalable and less impactful finished component and material solutions for footwear. Cirql offers finished components and premium materials that are either industrially compostable/biodegradable or fully recyclable made in the Cirql factory, which is GRS-certified. Cirql's mission is to keep shoes out of landfills and with Cirql rTPU30 and Cirql Zero, footwear brands and their factory partners have more material optionality to reach their own climate goals. Stay up to date with company news by visiting and following the brands on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. About Frasson Spa Frasson is a premier Italian manufacturer specializing in supercritical foaming and injection molding technologies. With decades of expertise in technical footwear components, Frasson is committed to delivering innovative and sustainable solutions to brands across Europe and beyond. The continuous investing in new spaces, equipment and high-tech machinery has allowed Frasson to increase its international competitiveness.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Paramount Global Are in 'Active Settlement Discussions' Over '60 Minutes' Lawsuit
President Trump and Paramount Global are in 'active settlement discussions' amid a lawsuit that Trump filed against the company over an interview that CBS' 60 Minutes aired last year with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. The revelation came in a motion filed Friday by Trump's attorneys asking for an extension in the deadlines in his lawsuit against Paramount Global, parent company of CBS. More from The Hollywood Reporter Mark Ruffalo, Jimmy Kimmel, Gracie Abrams, Kerry Washington and More Stars Participating in "No Kings" Protests Paramount to Cut Another 3.5 Percent of U.S. Staff As It Awaits Word On Skydance Deal Close Naveen Chopra Exits as Paramount Global CFO The motion states that both sides 'respectively submit that good cause to extend the deadlines set forth in the table below exists because the Parties are engaged in active settlement discussions, including continued mediation.' Trump alleges in the lawsuit that CBS News aired a 'heavily tampered interview' with Harris to help her in the election by editing certain answers in a way that misled viewers. Trump's team alleges that this constitutes a violation of Texas' consumer protection law covering deceptive advertising and the unfair competition prong of the Lanham Act, a trademark law. As previously reported, the two sides are currently in mediation talks to try and resolve the suit. Paramount reportedly previously offered $15 million to resolve the suit, which it also sought to dismiss earlier this year. Meanwhile, the FCC is reviewing the interview via its 'news distortion' filing comes two weeks after Paramount Global added three new board directors as it deals not only with the lawsuit, but also the proposed merger of Skydance Media and Paramount Global. Earlier this month, Paramount chair Shari Redstone revealed she had been diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire