logo
Dear Supply Chain: Consumers Want Love, Not Logistics

Dear Supply Chain: Consumers Want Love, Not Logistics

Forbes5 days ago
Shekar Natarajan is the founder and CEO of Orchestro.AI.
If you've ever ordered a package online only for it to end up lost, you know how frustrating the experience is. You're left wondering where your package disappeared to, and when you contact the company, the best answer they might be able to give you is, 'We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience. We're actively investigating your missing package by tracking it through our system and coordinating with our shipping carrier. Please wait until the end of the week to see if the package arrives.'
So, you wait until the end of the week. The package seems to have disappeared into the ether. You contact the company again and push for a reshipment or refund.
Lost packages are one of the many examples of poor customer experiences resulting from the siloed, reactive and disconnected state of supply chains. Wrong packages being delivered and package tracking issues are other examples of poor customer experiences. These issues already leave a bad impression on customers, but they're often magnified, I've observed, by poor, inconsistent, impersonal customer service.
The mistake I believe many supply chain leaders make is thinking that logistics alone will improve the lives of their customers—that as long as the right package is delivered to a customer within the correct time period, then everything is fine. But these days, consumers arguably want love in the form of personalized customer experiences, not merely logistics. By leveraging AI, supply chain leaders can personalize the customer experience.
Why Many Supply Chains Still Haven't Caught Up To Consumer-Centric Thinking
From my observations, many supply chains are still behind when it comes to customer-centric thinking, and in my view, that lag stems from the business-to-business (B2B) origins of the supply chain world.
Before Amazon entered the scene, many of the stakeholders in the supply chain world were primarily geared toward serving other businesses, not individual consumers. FedEx, UPS and DHL, for instance, originated as B2B companies.
In the B2B supply chain world, unit economics and efficiency are king. And part of driving down unit economics? Offering standardized services, including a one-size-fits-all approach to the customer service experience. This tends to work well in B2B contexts but less so in business-to-consumer (B2C) ones. For instance, when a business reports a missing package, it expects to work through standard channels to resolve the issue, such as filing claims and waiting for an investigation. However, when a consumer reports a missing package, they typically want an immediate response and a faster resolution.
Research has shown just how much a good customer experience matters. A 2022 survey of 1,000 Americans by omnichannel solutions provider Mitto found the following: 'In the past year, 80% of respondents said they experienced at least one delivery delay. A majority (55%) of consumers have canceled a delayed shipment because of a bad customer experience. And when asked whether bad CX or a product delay is worse, over three-quarters (76%) of respondents indicated bad CX.'
How AI Can Help The Supply Chain World Move Toward B2Me
Today, many stakeholders in the supply chain industry have adapted their customer experiences and services to the B2C context. But the pace of change is fast, and I believe that a B2C approach to the customer experience no longer cuts it. To keep up with consumers' preferences, the supply chain world should take another big step—shift to a business-to-me (B2Me) mindset for crafting customer experiences.
B2Me is about personalization at scale. It's about catering to the unique needs of individual customers, rather than offering the same product or service to segments of customers over and over again. It's the difference between going to a tailor to get a custom-made outfit versus buying one off the rack at a department store, the difference between getting a stilted, rote customer service message and one that's specifically crafted to address your needs and concerns.
Achieving personalization has historically been easier said than done, because, overall, it's been a costly and friction-filled process. However, that's where AI can step in. AI can help supply chain leaders create personalized, predictive and proactive customer experiences. Specifically, leveraging AI, leaders can bridge the gap between their customers and their supply chain systems, thanks to real-time tracking, personalized communication and automated issue resolution.
For example, say you order a package from a company that uses AI to refine the customer experience. Your package gets lost. You go to the company's website and enter your tracking number. On the backend, the AI-powered technology can gather various data points, such as the carrier assigned to the package, geographic data and traffic conditions to determine what likely happened to your package.
The AI-powered solution can also highlight your purchasing history with the company—you happen to have a high customer lifetime value, having made 100 different purchases in the past two years. With that information, the AI-powered solution can begin investigating the issue with your package and working toward the correct resolution.
Simultaneously, through the AI-powered customer service interface, the company can send you an apology, acknowledge that it knows you're a long-time customer and offer you the option of either shipping you a new package or giving you store credit worth the value of the missing package. Moreover, it can adjust its communication style based on its inference of your preferences from past interactions. In turn, you, the customer, receive a more streamlined, friendlier experience that's likely to leave you with a good impression of the company.
How Companies Can Navigate The Risks AI Poses
AI, however, is not without its risks. Supply chain and other company leaders need to consider data privacy concerns, the potential for AI solutions to hallucinate and the possibility that their teams will misapply AI. Rather than viewing AI as an all-encompassing solution, supply chain and other company leaders need to carefully think through its limitations and risks and ensure they're in compliance with all applicable regulations.
Additionally, given that implementation is often expensive and time-consuming, it's important that supply chain and other company stakeholders carefully think about the problems they're trying to solve, rather than focusing on potential solutions. By doing so, leaders can evaluate potential vendors through the lens of those problems.
When I look at the world today, I'm seeing more and more factors become commoditized. I predict that in the future, companies will have little but their reputations to differentiate themselves on. And in a world where a brand can be destroyed with just one post online, it's vital that companies strengthen their reputations by offering consumers great experiences. Despite the risks that AI poses, I believe it stands to help positively change the customer experience in the supply chain world—and by extension, help companies strengthen their reputations.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Grade A' Apple Watches Are Selling for as Much as 62% Off
‘Grade A' Apple Watches Are Selling for as Much as 62% Off

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Grade A' Apple Watches Are Selling for as Much as 62% Off

The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. 'Grade A' Apple Watches Are Selling for as Much as 62% Off originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. If you loathe paying retail, listen up. A company owned by Amazon is rewarding those who don't immediately buy new tech, and instead wait for a good deal. "Grade A Refurbished" Apple Watches are selling for as much as 62% off at Woot. The Apple Watch Series 8, 41mm, GPS Only (Grade A Refurbished) is on sale for $150. That's 62% off its original price of $399. This means you're getting an Apple Watch for a third of the price it was when released in September 2022. Apple Watch Series 8: Models and Sizes and Colors, Oh My! Just because this Apple Watch isn't brand-new, doesn't mean you don't have choices. Woot is offering both the GPS and GPS + Cellular models of this watch. You can get it in two sizes, 41mm and 45mm, and four color combinations. The Red is bold, but I might grab the Midnight because of its versatility. What are the details for a "Grade A Refurbished" watch? Woot says, "Hey, you there! These items have been inspected and guaranteed to have minimal cosmetic damage, which is not noticeable when the device is held at arm's length, and have successfully passed a full diagnostic test, which ensures like-new functionality and removal of any prior user's personal information. Batteries are tested to function at minimum 85% capacity." This purchase comes with a one-year limited warranty from Woot. Apple Watch Series 8, 41mm, GPS Only (Grade A Refurbished), $150 (Comp. $400) at Woot Apple Watch Series 8 "Grade A" Refurbished, 62% Off More purchasing options for Apple Watches, you can grab at a sizable discount: Apple Watch Series 8 (2022), (Refurbished): As Low as $200 (Comp. $400) at Best Buy Apple Watch Series 9 (2023), 41mm, GPS (Grade A Refurbished): $220 (Comp. $400) at Woot Apple Watch Series 9 (2023), (Refurbished): As Low as $220 (Comp. $430) at Best Buy Apple Watch Ultra 1st Gen (2022), 49mm, GPS + Cellular (Grade A Refurbished): $380 (Comp. $800) at Woot Apple Watch Ultra 1st Gen (2022), (Refurbished): As Low as $430 (Comp. $800) at Best Buy At the time of publishing, Woot has a sizable selection of "Grade A" Apple watches listed. Check them out before they sell out. What Shoppers Are Saying: 'Love a Refurbished Deal' Woot pulled in over 2,600 Amazon ratings from buyers for the Apple Watch Series 8. The average star rating from Amazon is 4.2 out of five. One satisfied buyer says, "Very happy with this refurbished Apple Watch Series 8. Looks and works like new with no visible scratches or issues. Battery life is great, and all features function perfectly. Setup was quick and easy. Great value compared to buying new. Highly recommend if you're looking to save without sacrificing quality." Another five-star reviewer says, "This watch has all the bells and whistles of a new Apple Watch but without the price tag. Love a refurbished deal. Felt good rehoming this beauty. Battery life is okay (had to get used to charging it every two days). I went from a Fitbit to an Apple Watch, and there is for sure a learning curve. Both with the functionality and the user interface. I used it as I was training for a marathon. It monitored all my health metrics and alerted when I was in need of a rest day." Another reviewer says, "Love, love, love it. One tiny scratch and you can't see it unless you put it right in front of your eye. I'm so in love. Looks brand new. Works very well. Only problem is that when I had gotten it, it was super dead. Charged it for about two hours, and everything was great." Deals on Apple iPhones: As Much as 41% Off Are you in the market for more than just a great deal on an Apple Watch? Woot is also selling "Grade A Refurbished" Apple iPhones. Below are a few they have listed, but be sure to check out all the listings for their "Grade A" iPhones before they're gone. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (2024), 256GB, Fully Unlocked (Grade A Refurbished): $980 (Comp. $1,199) at Woot Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024), 128GB, Fully Unlocked (Grade A Refurbished): $730 (Comp. $999) at Woot Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (2023), 256GB, Fully Unlocked (Grade A Refurbished): $720 (Comp. $1,199) at Woot Apple iPhone 15 Pro (2023), 128GB, Fully Unlocked (Grade A Refurbished): $590 (Comp. $999) at Woot Shipping, Returns, and Woot Perks Woot offers $6 flat rate shipping for all purchases, but since it's an Amazon company, Amazon Prime members get free shipping with no order minimums. Woot does offer returns, but be sure to check the details for the particular product you're purchasing. 💰 Bottom Line Some buy new tech as soon as it drops, and some wait patiently for a good price. If you're in the latter group, snatching up one of these refurbished deals is a no-brainer. Woot listings frequently sell out, so be sure to grab your new-to-you Apple device before it's gone. 'Grade A' Apple Watches Are Selling for as Much as 62% Off first appeared on Athlon Sports on Aug 2, 2025 This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Aug 2, 2025, where it first appeared.

I Asked ChatGPT How Long It Would Take for Jeff Bezos To Spend All His Money
I Asked ChatGPT How Long It Would Take for Jeff Bezos To Spend All His Money

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

I Asked ChatGPT How Long It Would Take for Jeff Bezos To Spend All His Money

Jeff Bezos has an estimated net worth of $214 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. It's such an outrageous number that it doesn't feel real. Read More: Find Out: So naturally, I asked ChatGPT: How long would it take for Jeff Bezos to spend all his money? The answers were both enlightening and absurd. Wait, Isn't Most of His Wealth Tied Up in Stock? Yes, exactly. The majority of Bezos's fortune comes from Amazon stock and other assets, and not from piles of cash in a bank account. If he wanted to spend it all, he'd have to liquidate assets, deal with taxes, and probably move markets in the process. But for the sake of this thought experiment, I asked ChatGPT to treat Bezos' $250 billion as fully liquid. No taxes. No asset sales. Just pure, spendable wealth. Scenario 1: Spending $1,000 a Day 'If Bezos spent $1,000 every day, it would take him roughly 685,000 years to go broke,' ChatGPT calculated. That's longer than the entire existence of Homosapiens. He could buy a new iPhone every morning for the next 600,000 years and still have money left over for dinner. Discover More: Scenario 2: Spending $1 Million a Day Let's say he took it up a notch and started spending $1 million a day, luxury jets, gold-plated everything, villas on every continent. 'At that rate, it would take 685 years to run out,' ChatGPT said. That means he'd still be spending in the year 2710. Long after we've colonized Mars or uploaded our consciousness to the cloud. Scenario 3: Giving Away $1 Billion Per Year Now we're in philanthropic territory. If Bezos committed to giving away $1 billion every year, how long would that last? 'About 250 years,' ChatGPT said. To put that in perspective: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation spent about $7 billion in 2022. Bezos could do that every year for two and a half centuries. Scenario 4: Giving It All Away Tomorrow Let's say Bezos liquidated everything and gave away $250 billion in one giant act of generosity. Here's what that could cover, according to ChatGPT: End world hunger for 7.5 years, based on UN World Food Programme estimates of $33 billion a year. Wipe out all U.S. out-of-pocket medical expenses for 2023, which totaled around $505 billion, according to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Give every household in the U.S. a $1,750 check (based on ~143 million households). Pay for one year of tuition for 22 million public college students, based on national averages. That's real-world, tangible impact. And yet, he'd still likely make some of it back. So … Could Bezos Ever Go Broke? 'Not unless he really tried,' ChatGPT said. Even a billionaire-level spending spree encounters a bigger problem: Jeff Bezos' wealth continues to grow. In 2023, Amazon's stock surged about 80%, according to Investor's Business Daily, driven by renewed momentum in cloud, advertising, and AI. With most of Bezos's fortune tied to Amazon stock, that massive return added tens of billions to his net worth without him doing a thing. At that scale, wealth becomes self-sustaining, and it compounds. 'Let's say he spends $1 billion a year,' ChatGPT explained. 'Even that would be hard to keep up with. If his investments earned a modest 7% return annually, a pretty average stock market gain, he'd still come out ahead. On a $200 billion fortune, that's $14 billion in growth a year. So even after spending $1 billion, he'd be $13 billion richer.' In other words, he would be earning faster than he could spend it. So asking, 'Could Bezos ever spend it all?' overlooks the central fact: it's not just the size of his fortune, it's how fast it regenerates. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How Long It Would Take for Jeff Bezos To Spend All His Money Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Former Treasury Secretary Says Trump Is Trying to 'Scapegoat' Jerome Powell
Former Treasury Secretary Says Trump Is Trying to 'Scapegoat' Jerome Powell

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Former Treasury Secretary Says Trump Is Trying to 'Scapegoat' Jerome Powell

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers warned that President Donald Trump may be trying to "scapegoat" Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell in the event the economy slows down enough to hit a recession. "He's looking to set up a scapegoat if the economy performs badly," Summers said during an appearance on ABC News' This Week. "That's what this attacking chairman Powell is really about. It's not really about trying to change policy." Newsweek reached out to the White House by email outside of normal business hours on Sunday morning for comment. Why It Matters Trump has made tariffs the centerpiece of his economic and foreign policy plans, using trade negotiations to try and end conflicts and completely reshape the international trade landscape to more heavily favor the United States. However, many economists and business leaders have warned that Trump's plan will cause a recession as the tariffs raise prices for Americans, which could deter buying and prompt more Americans to hold onto their money. Trump has therefore urged Powell to cut the interest rate in order to spur the economy and get people to spend more money, but Powell has resisted—much to Trump's frustration. What To Know The stock market took a hit on Friday after Trump signed a series of executive orders to impose tariffs on over 90 countries, ranging from 10 to 41 percent. The July Jobs report showed that growth had slowed, showing just 73,000 new jobs—well under the projected 100,000 that the Dow Jones had estimated. Additionally, the jobs reports for May and June were hit with significant revisions that showed very weak growth across those months. Trump fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), and accused her of manipulating the reports for "political purposes." Summers, who served in former presidents Bill Clinton's and Barack Obama's administrations, suggested on Sunday that Trump is likely also trying to line up Powell as a scapegoat should the economy continue to struggle, even though Trump appointed Powell during his first term in office. "I think that this kind of political Fed bashing is a fool's game," Summers said. "The Fed doesn't listen, so short-term interest rates aren't going to be different because of it." He continued: "The market does listen, and so longer-term rates are going to go higher, which is going to make it more expensive to buy a house. This is hurting the economy, not helping. I think the president understands that and what the president is doing is recognizing that, for all kinds of reasons, of which his policies are very important ones, the economy is at a lot of risk." Summers also expressed surprise that more people hadn't responded within the administration to McEntarfer's firing, saying that the decision to remove her "is way beyond anything that Richard Nixon ever did." When Nixon dismissed special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the Watergate Scandal, it prompted several officials to resign rather than fire Cox, causing what was known as the "Saturday Night Massacre." Trump faced a similar issue in February, which has been likened to Nixon as the "Thursday Night Massacre," when Department of Justice (DOJ) officials resigned rather than execute an order to dismiss federal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. No one has yet resigned in response to McEntarfer's firing, but Summers indicated that he sees the firing as a scapegoating as well, saying: "These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals." "There's no conceivable way that the head of the BLS could have manipulated this number," he added. "The numbers are in line with what we're seeing from all kinds of private sector sources." Summers remains cautious about suggesting the economy is headed for a recession. Instead, he said the economy is at "stall speed," which "could tip into recession," but that "wouldn't be my prediction right now." Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers speaks during the World Economic Summit in Washington, D.C., on April 17, 2024. Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers speaks during the World Economic Summit in Washington, D.C., on April 17, 2024. Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump in a post on Truth Social on Saturday wrote: "'Too Late' Powell should resign, just like Adriana Kugler, a Biden Appointee, resigned. She knew he was doing the wrong thing on Interest Rates. He should resign, also!" In a post from Friday, Trump wrote: "Jerome 'Too Late' Powell, a stubborn MORON, must substantially lower interest rates, NOW. IF HE CONTINUES TO REFUSE, THE BOARD SHOULD ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!" Ernie Tedeschi, the former head of Yale University's Budget Lab, wrote on X on Friday about McEntarfer's firing: "I've worked closely with Erika. I know of no economist who is more data-focused & devoted to truth in statistics. She never shied from speaking truth to power when the data were disappointing. Nothing would be worse for US credibility than political meddling in our economic data."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store