
Patients would rather see a GP than pharmacists and nurses, study finds
The review of 33 existing studies, from the University of Southampton, also found patients often like to choose a specific doctor to maintain continuity of care.
Trust and confidence decreased when patients wanted to see a GP but were directed to a nurse or other health worker instead, it added.
The study noted people also wanted easier ways to book GP appointments, clearer phone options, shorter recorded messages, and simple online routes with quick responses.
It comes after the Government published its 10-year health plan which intends to massively increase use of the NHS App, as well as recruit more GPs.
An improved app will give patients more control over booking, moving and cancelling appointments, as well as quicker access to medics and other forms of care.
The new study, published in the British Journal of General Practice, suggested confidence and trust scores appeared to be lower when people wanted a face-to-face appointment and received a call instead.
The public also wanted clear details on the roles of different NHS workers, it found.
Lead author Helen Atherton, professor of primary care research, said: 'Patients want a deeper connection with their doctor's practice, better communication, and the choice to see the right professional in the best way for them.
'The NHS needs to better understand what people want so it can shape its services to work for patients.
'Ignoring these fundamental needs will only exacerbate the issues it currently faces.'
Writing in the journal, Prof Atherton and colleagues added: 'Patients wanted a nearby practice, with clean waiting rooms, easy appointment booking using simple systems and with short waiting times, and to be kept informed about the process.'
In particular, researchers found that, for medication reviews and long-term conditions, patients preferred seeing someone they were familiar with.
The research also suggested that, where a patient's condition was worsening, 69.5% of patients reported preferring to consult a GP than a pharmacist and 42.7% strongly agreed or agreed that they would prefer to consult with a GP rather than a pharmacist.
Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said: 'It's really encouraging to see how much patients value the care, and continuity of care, their GP provides – there are some things that only a GP can do for their patients, but it's also important that patients don't feel somehow short-changed if they're offered an appointment with another member of our highly-skilled multi-disciplinary team.
'Not all patients need to see a GP. Procedures such as blood tests, routine management of non-complex long-term conditions, the monitoring of repeat prescriptions, or assessment of a painful joint, for example, can be carried out by some of the various other members of the team who now work in general practice, such as nursing staff, mental health professionals, clinical pharmacists and physiotherapists.
'This also alleviates workload on GPs, allowing us to spend time with those patients with complex health needs who really do need our expert medical attention.
'However, we know that even when working as part of multi-disciplinary teams, patients often struggle to access their GP when they need to – and we share their frustrations.
'This is due to decades of under-funding of general practice and poor workforce planning, which has meant patient need for our care has escalated in recent years, while GP numbers have sadly not risen in step.
'We need thousands more GPs, and the recently published 10-Year health plan commits to providing these.
'We're now looking ahead to the revised long-term workforce plan, due later this year, to see how the Government plans to recruit more GPs and keep more GPs in the profession for longer – but also address some of the nonsensical issues GPs are reporting that they can't find appropriate employment upon qualification.'
Henry Gregg, chief executive of the National Pharmacy Association, said: 'It's not surprising that people want to see a GP when they go to a GP surgery but all our research and experience shows that people are very happy to visit a pharmacy if they can access treatment or advice quickly without having to wait to see a GP.
'Pharmacists are highly trained medical professionals who offer first-class care for a range of ailments quickly and conveniently and will send patients to a GP or hospital if needs be.
'Increasingly people will be able to pop into a community pharmacy and see a highly qualitied pharmacist for things like screening, check-ups, HRT, weight management or ongoing care without lengthy waits, freeing their NHS colleagues in hospitals and GPs to do more and offering patients the choice and convenience we all want to see.'
Royal College of Nursing chief nursing officer, Lynn Woolsey, said: 'Nursing staff are an integral part of any general practice delivering a range of services to patients.
'They lead public health clinics, run screening and vaccination programmes, support patients in the management of chronic disease and can diagnose and prescribe.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
32 minutes ago
- STV News
Almost £2bn spent on temporary nurses and midwives over five years
The Scottish Government has been accused of taking a 'sticking plaster' approach to health staffing after analysis found nearly £2 billion has been spent on agency and bank nurses and midwives over the last five years. Scottish Labour analysis of NHS workforce data found that between April 2020 and March this year £1,904,286,884 was spent on such temporary staff. The spending was across all of Scotland's 14 health boards, as well as specialist services including NHS 24, the Scottish Ambulance Service, the State Hospital and the National Waiting Times Centre. The bill rose from £235,881,479 in the year ending March 31, 2021 to a height of £489,997,556 in the year to March 31, 2024 before falling in 2025, according to the analysis. Scottish Labour health spokeswoman Dame Jackie Baillie called for a long-term solution. She said: 'The SNP has spent almost two decades mismanaging our health service, opting for short-term fixes, rather than coming up with a solution to address long-term challenges. 'The use of temporary staff is an expensive sticking plaster and cannot be a substitute for a proper plan aimed at tackling the significant problems facing the NHS. 'This is an unsustainable way of managing our health service and ministers must listen to calls for a workforce plan to meet recruitment needs.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'NHS Scotland's overall workforce, including nursing and midwifery staffing, has increased over the last year, whilst the latest workforce statistics show a 62% reduction in nurse agency usage and spend across 2024/25, decreasing for the second year in a row. 'These figures show the progress being made to reduce NHS Scotland's reliance on agency workers and focus resources on frontline services, which has enabled boards to reinvest upwards of £94 million in the delivery of those services most valued by the Scottish public. 'The use of temporary staff in an organisation as large and complex as NHS Scotland will always be required to ensure vital service provision during times of unplanned absence, sickness or increased activity.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Experts lift lid on drugs crisis in prisons
Experts warn that the drug crisis in British prisons is at an unprecedented level, making jails "almost impossible to run positively". Annual drug seizures by prison officers have reached record highs, with over 21,000 recorded in the year to March 2024, marking a 35 per cent increase. The widespread availability of illicit substances has led to a surge in medical emergencies, violence, and debt within prisons, with "blue-light" ambulance responses now a regular occurrence. The crisis significantly worsened during austerity years due to cuts in staffing and addiction treatment programmes, compounded by the emergence of new synthetic drugs and drone deliveries. Despite government claims of a "zero-tolerance approach" and new security measures, experts confirm that drugs remain the biggest challenge facing many prisons, driving criminality and undermining safety.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NHS bosses fear fresh strikes in England as resident doctors seek 29% pay rise
Hospitals are bracing for a fresh round of strikes by resident doctors seeking a 29% pay rise, amid warnings that stoppages could lead to hundreds of thousands of appointments and operations being cancelled. NHS leaders fear that a ballot of resident doctors, formerly junior doctors in England, which closes on Monday will produce a majority backing renewed industrial action. If so, the health service will face prolonged disruption from tens of thousands of resident doctors once again staging a series of strikes in an attempt to secure a 29% pay rise. Huge numbers of outpatient appointments and procedures were cancelled when junior doctors went on strike for a total of 44 days between March 2023 and July 2024. Soon after Labour took power last year, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, gave them a 22% pay rise for 2023-24 and 2024-25, which ended their stoppages. But they are threatening to stage six months of strikes, from this month into next winter and up to January 2026, after he awarded them a 5.4% pay rise for this year – the highest in the public sector. The British Medical Association, which is balloting the 55,000 resident doctors it represents, described that sum as 'derisory' and 'woefully inadequate'. It says they deserve a pay rise of 29% over the next few years in order to ensure that resident doctors receive 'full pay restoration' to make up for a 23% loss in the value of their salaries since 2008. The result of the ballot is expected on Tuesday. If the BMA members vote to strike again, that will make it hard for the government to cut the backlog for hospital treatment and restore the 18-week waiting-time target by 2029 – its main NHS pledge. Streeting is acutely concerned about the impact of a yes vote. He has asked resident doctors to shun strikes. 'We can't afford to return to a continuous cycle of standoffs, strikes and cancellations,' he wrote in the Times in May. Danny Mortimer, the chief executive of NHS Employers, which represents England's 215 health trusts in annual pay negotiations with NHS staff, said: 'The last thing health leaders want is more industrial action, which will likely lead to tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of appointments and operations being cancelled, leaving patients in pain and frustration. A decision to strike after the largest series of pay awards in the public sector would be a troubling development.' He added: 'While we fully understand the genuine grievances resident doctors have over their pay, conditions and training, going on strike will have a huge impact on the NHS and patients.' Rachel Power, the chief executive of the Patients Association, said she supported the right to strike but hoped to avoid stoppages. 'With the 10-year health plan promising to rebuild the NHS and restore public trust, we must ask how this can be achieved amid the risk of continued industrial action. The government and the BMA must find a solution urgently,' she added. Hospital bosses' apprehension about the outcome of the ballot was heightened recently when Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, the co-chair of the BMA's resident doctors committee, said members were 'excited' at the prospect of going on strike again. 'In general, and what we're hearing overall, the vast majority of people are excited to go again. Ultimately, doctors are still very upset and looking for change.' Nieuwoudt and his co-chair, Dr Melissa Ryan, have urged members to vote yes. 'By voting yes they will be telling the government there is no alternative to fixing pay. This cannot wait for different fiscal circumstances and a healthier NHS,' they have said. Daniel Elkeles, the chief executive of the hospital group NHS Providers, said strikes would result in trusts 'dealing with disruption rather than devoting all their time to improving patient care. 'With a government review into training for resident doctors under way, this will help us to get back to resident doctors feeling as valued as much as we value their contribution to the success of the NHS,' he added. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We want to work constructively with all unions to avoid disrupting services for patients. The secretary of state has always been clear on his priority to avoid strike action and he met with the resident doctors committee on his very first day in government. 'We are on a journey to improve conditions for resident doctors, and they have received a pay rise of 28.9% over the last three years. Our 10-year health plan will also slash bureaucracy across the health service, reducing burdensome administrative tasks and making use of technology so doctors can spend time on what they do best – caring for patients.'