logo
US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests

US appeals court keeps ban on LA immigration arrests

A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause.
Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on people's appearance, language and where they lived or worked.
President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States.
The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union, accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration.
A California judge in July blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention.
In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order.
The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day labourer pick up site, agricultural site, etc".
The Department of Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city.
"The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement.
Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff lawyer at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, also welcomed the ruling.
"This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," he said in a statement.
A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause.
Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on people's appearance, language and where they lived or worked.
President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States.
The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union, accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration.
A California judge in July blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention.
In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order.
The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day labourer pick up site, agricultural site, etc".
The Department of Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city.
"The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement.
Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff lawyer at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, also welcomed the ruling.
"This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," he said in a statement.
A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause.
Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on people's appearance, language and where they lived or worked.
President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States.
The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union, accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration.
A California judge in July blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention.
In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order.
The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day labourer pick up site, agricultural site, etc".
The Department of Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city.
"The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement.
Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff lawyer at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, also welcomed the ruling.
"This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," he said in a statement.
A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause.
Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on people's appearance, language and where they lived or worked.
President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States.
The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union, accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration.
A California judge in July blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention.
In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order.
The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day labourer pick up site, agricultural site, etc".
The Department of Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city.
"The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement.
Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff lawyer at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, also welcomed the ruling.
"This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," he said in a statement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sweeney registered as a Republican the day after Trump's criminal conviction
Sweeney registered as a Republican the day after Trump's criminal conviction

Sydney Morning Herald

time44 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Sweeney registered as a Republican the day after Trump's criminal conviction

Sydney Sweeney registered as a Republican the day after Donald Trump's criminal conviction. The White Lotus actress, who has provoked anger from Left-wing critics and social media commentators in a recent advert for American Eagle jeans, registered with the party in June last year, public records show. Two weeks earlier, Trump became the first president to be criminally convicted for what prosecutors said was a scheme to cover up an affair with an adult film star. A woman matching Sweeney's age, address and place of birth registered as a Republican on June 14 last year in Monroe County, Florida, according to state records. Her party affiliation is still active. Sweeney, 27, has been largely silent on her political views in public, but has recently been feted by Right-wing figures for an American Eagle jeans advert, which has been described as 'Maga-friendly' by critics. The camera zooms in on the actress's breasts and bottom during the advert, which ends with the slogan: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' Some critics on the Left have called it a sexist attempt to appeal to Mr Trump's 'Maga' base, while others – noting the pun on 'jeans' and 'genes' – claimed it promotes eugenics and 'Nazi propaganda'. 'It seemed clear to me that they [American Eagle] were aligning themselves with a white nationalist, Maga-friendly identity,' Shalini Shankar, an anthropology professor at Northwestern University, told CNN.

Sweeney registered as a Republican the day after Trump's criminal conviction
Sweeney registered as a Republican the day after Trump's criminal conviction

The Age

time44 minutes ago

  • The Age

Sweeney registered as a Republican the day after Trump's criminal conviction

Sydney Sweeney registered as a Republican the day after Donald Trump's criminal conviction. The White Lotus actress, who has provoked anger from Left-wing critics and social media commentators in a recent advert for American Eagle jeans, registered with the party in June last year, public records show. Two weeks earlier, Trump became the first president to be criminally convicted for what prosecutors said was a scheme to cover up an affair with an adult film star. A woman matching Sweeney's age, address and place of birth registered as a Republican on June 14 last year in Monroe County, Florida, according to state records. Her party affiliation is still active. Sweeney, 27, has been largely silent on her political views in public, but has recently been feted by Right-wing figures for an American Eagle jeans advert, which has been described as 'Maga-friendly' by critics. The camera zooms in on the actress's breasts and bottom during the advert, which ends with the slogan: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' Some critics on the Left have called it a sexist attempt to appeal to Mr Trump's 'Maga' base, while others – noting the pun on 'jeans' and 'genes' – claimed it promotes eugenics and 'Nazi propaganda'. 'It seemed clear to me that they [American Eagle] were aligning themselves with a white nationalist, Maga-friendly identity,' Shalini Shankar, an anthropology professor at Northwestern University, told CNN.

Russian, Chinese navies hold drills in Sea of Japan
Russian, Chinese navies hold drills in Sea of Japan

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Russian, Chinese navies hold drills in Sea of Japan

The Russian and Chinese navies are carrying out artillery and anti-submarine drills in the Sea of Japan as part of scheduled joint exercises, the Russian Pacific Fleet says. The drills are taking place two days after US President Donald Trump said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in "the appropriate regions" in response to remarks by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. However, they were scheduled well before Trump's action. Interfax news agency quoted the Pacific Fleet as saying Russian and Chinese vessels were moving in a joint detachment including a large Russian anti-submarine ship and two Chinese destroyers. It said diesel-electric submarines from the two countries were also involved, as well as a Chinese submarine rescue ship. The manoeuvres are part of exercises titled "Maritime Interaction-2025" which are scheduled to end on Tuesday. Interfax said Russian and Chinese sailors would conduct artillery firing, practise anti-submarine and air defence missions, and improve joint search and rescue operations at sea. Russia and China, which signed a "no-limits" strategic partnership shortly before Russia went to war in Ukraine in 2022, conduct regular military exercises to rehearse co-ordination between their armed forces and send a deterrent signal to adversaries. Trump said his submarine order on Friday was made in response to what he called "highly provocative" remarks by Russia's Medvedev about the risk of war between the nuclear-armed adversaries. Russia and the United States have by far the biggest nuclear arsenals in the world. It is extremely rare for either country to discuss the deployment and location of its nuclear submarines. Trump's comments came at a time of mounting tension with Moscow as he grows frustrated at the lack of progress towards ending the Ukraine war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store