logo
How Business Insider investigated the true cost of data centers

How Business Insider investigated the true cost of data centers

Tech companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars building data centers, racing to power an AI revolution they say will bring broad benefits and enormous profits.
The actual price, though, has never been fully measured. So a team of Business Insider reporters and editors set out to find the true cost of the US data center boom — in water, power, pollution, and tax incentives.
We pulled obscure state records, scoured corporate disclosures, and sought analysis and guidance from government researchers in Virginia and elsewhere. We spoke to engineering specialists who study data centers, including Shaolei Ren at the University of California, Riverside, and Vijay Gadepally of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We also spoke to researchers who study incentive packages, such as Kasia Tarczynska of Good Jobs First, a research group that advocates for transparency and equality in public subsidies. And we sought input from companies and industry groups.
The result is the most complete accounting yet of data centers' impact on our environment, economy, and lives.
Here's how we did it.
We started by identifying how many data centers there are, and who owns them
Data centers can never be without power. Developers build backup generators to provide emergency electricity. Since these generators emit air pollution, they are regulated by state environmental agencies and need permits.
We requested these air permits and applications from 50 states and Washington, DC, asking agencies to search permits using federal industry codes associated with data centers. To confirm state searches were complete, Business Insider cross-referenced permits against company disclosures, news articles, and data from datacentermap.com, Baxtel, and other trade websites.
Some of the permits we obtained were actually for other types of facilities. If public or corporate records confirmed the facility was not a data center, we removed it from our analysis.
We compiled permits for 1,240 existing or planned data centers across the country, the most definitive tally to date. Tracking the year each permit was first issued reveals a construction boom. Until 2010, companies had filed permits for 311 data centers. By 2024, that number had nearly quadrupled.
Often the permit holders are subsidiaries of Big Tech companies, with unfamiliar names like Nova Mango Farms. Business Insider determined the owners using emails, addresses, and other information on permit applications, secretary-of-state disclosures, county databases, and SEC filings.
Then we mapped those centers' locations and estimated the resources they consume
Business Insider mapped location information from the permits onto the Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas built by the World Resources Institute, a Washington, DC, group that advocates sustainability. The atlas measures a location's relative water stress — the ratio between demand and available, renewable supplies. Business Insider found that 40% of data centers were sited in areas of high or extremely high water stress.
Data centers can use staggering amounts of water. Business Insider requested metered water use records and water supply agreements from dozens of public utility agencies for every data center in areas with extremely high water stress.
Data center water use is a closely guarded secret. Many agencies denied our requests for facility-specific water use or released the records only in aggregate for all data centers in a water utility's service area. In Denver and Colorado Springs, Colorado, utility agencies sued Business Insider to prevent the release of metered water use records. Business Insider prevailed in both lawsuits.
Business Insider found that some of the largest data center facilities were permitted to use more water a day than you might expect nearly 49,000 Americans to use.
Companies also disclose little information on how much power their US data centers consume. Data center power use varies based on factors including the types and frequency of use of servers, cooling systems, and other infrastructure. To account for this, Business Insider calculated a range of estimated annual data center electricity use.
To calculate this range, Business Insider used air permit data to identify the total power-generation capacity of every backup generator at each facility. Companies rarely install generator capacity that is more than twice what a data center consumes — and often they install significantly less than that. So Business Insider, in consultation with experts, conservatively estimated that a data center's maximum electricity use is between half and 80% of its generators' capacity.
A 2024 federal report estimates that across the industry, data centers operate at just 50% of that maximum electricity use level, to avoid straining their equipment. So Business Insider multiplied the low and high ends of its initial range by 50%.
Business Insider's data includes permits for data centers that are not yet built and fully online, and therefore estimates expected electricity use in the near future. If all permitted data centers go online, we estimate, they will use between 149.6 terawatt-hours and 239.3 terawatt-hours a year. Business Insider's low-end estimate is roughly equivalent to the state of Ohio's electricity needs in 2023, and on the high end, is nearly as much power as the entire state of Florida used that same year.
Our estimates are conservative. The low end of our estimate is below the federal report's estimate for data center power use in 2023. The federal report estimates data center power use could reach the upper end of our estimate by 2026.
Business Insider used the range average to identify the 322 largest facilities in our dataset that, according to our estimate, consume 40 megawatt-hours of electricity or more an hour.
An Amazon spokesperson said the methodology "oversimplifies complex data center operations and is based on assumptions that do not account for important differences in how companies build and operate data centers."
Google and Meta did not respond to Business Insider's queries about data center power use estimates, and QTS declined to comment. A Microsoft spokesperson acknowledged that its data centers "do not always run at 100% of their installed capacity."
Nineteen permits across 10 states — including 12 held by Google — have their generator capacity information fully or partially redacted under public disclosure exemptions for trade secrets. Business Insider was unable to estimate the electricity use of these facilities, so our estimate likely undercounts the true total.
Next, we calculated data centers' likely public health and environmental impact
The US uses highly polluting fossil-fuel-fired sources for at least 60% of its electricity. Data centers draw power from a wide regional grid, so Business Insider needed to estimate the public health impact attributable to data centers' use of electricity generated from far-away power plants.
The US electricity grid is complex and does not map closely to state boundaries. To model the complexity of the US electricity grid, Business Insider used an Environmental Protection Agency tool called AVERT that splits the contiguous 48 states into 14 independent electricity regions that approximate grid regions.
Using our estimate for data center power consumption, along with US Energy Information Administration data and the AVERT tool, Business Insider calculated the likely share of total power use attributable to data centers in each of these 14 regions. Then, using another EPA tool with the acronym COBRA, Business Insider estimated the public health cost engendered by that share of total electricity-generation-related pollution in each region. Even a careful calculation like this is inherently imperfect, but in the absence of industry transparency about such emissions it provides a rare and well-founded estimate of the health costs of the data center boom.
Business Insider estimated that annual public health costs from electricity generation for data centers could reach between $5.7 billion and $9.2 billion.
Power plants are not the only source of data center air pollution.
The diesel backup generators installed at data centers emit volatile organic compounds, nitrous oxides, sulfur dioxides, and particulate matter — all regulated air pollutants the EPA labels as hazardous to human health. Air permits issued to these facilities set total annual pollutant emission limits that determine how frequently their generators can be used.
Data centers generally run their generators infrequently so emit only a fraction of the pollutants their permits allow. A 2024 report to the state legislature in Virginia — which is home to nearly a third of US data centers with permits — calculated that data center backup generators on average emit 7% of their permitted pollution limits each year. Business Insider used that percentage to estimate each county's air pollutant emissions from data center backup generators.
Business Insider then input these county-by-county totals into COBRA, which models how air pollution emitted in a county affects public health nationwide. The tool assigns a dollar figure to what it would cost to avoid negative health outcomes like premature deaths, asthma attacks, heart attacks, and missed school or work days.
The COBRA tool estimated that air pollutants emitted by data centers across the country could trigger nearly 20,000 asthma symptom cases a year and create a $385 million annual burden on public health.
Generator pollution is more harmful to communities already overburdened by environmental pollutants. A community that already has high levels of air pollution will experience greater negative health impacts from additional pollutants, for example, than a community that isn't already saturated with harmful pollutants.
To better understand their impact on these communities, Business Insider mapped all 1,240 data center locations onto a third EPA tool called EJ Screen that combines census and pollutant data within a mile radius of a specified location. We found that more than 230 data center locations were in communities highly overburdened by environmental pollutants.
Finally, we reported on data centers' impact on the economy
Business Insider requested and obtained the most detailed data-center-related economic development deals and annual tax incentive disclosures for facilities in and around Columbus, Ohio. Some of the oldest data center deals in the state are in Franklin and Licking counties, and companies are required to disclose how much they've saved from these tax exemption agreements each year, which made the state a useful case study for judging data centers' actual economic impact. Business Insider tallied these numbers, then used company-reported property investment totals to calculate total state and local sales and use tax savings (7.5% for Franklin County and 5.75% for Licking County).
We did not include personal property tax in our calculations, as Ohio eliminated that tax. Because of fluctuations in the number of jobs employed at data centers, Business Insider also did not include state or local job creation tax credits in the analysis.
We nevertheless found that these tax incentive packages given to tech companies were highly lucrative, amounting to as much as $2 million in tax savings per full time job at a data center.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Millennials, it's a good time to take a break from your manager era
Millennials, it's a good time to take a break from your manager era

Business Insider

time9 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Millennials, it's a good time to take a break from your manager era

Mary Monohan, 37, saw the signs when the powers that be started reorganizing teams and switching up her assignments: layoffs were coming. By the time she learned her manager role was being eliminated, she'd already been searching for new opportunities. Less than a month later, she's starting to realize that she may have to be willing to make a lateral professional move or even "a few thousand dollars less than I was making before," she told Business Insider. Millennials in management are in a tough spot. Caught somewhere between entry-level roles and the C-Suite, they're especially vulnerable to the Great Flattening, a trend of eliminating middle managers brought on by companies' desires to cut costs and bureaucracy. Those who are let go may have to accept lower pay or titles in their next role, while those who remain are left to take on extra responsibilities and reports. Daniel Radmanovic, 40, was laid off from his managerial position at Deloitte in October. He started actively job searching in January and said it was a "soul-sucking learning experience." However, on Friday, Radmanovic received a verbal job offer from a Fortune 500 company. He described it as a "pivot" because he'll be in a client-facing individual contributor role and not managing people, but it isn't a step back since he's excited to embrace the change. "I can just focus on my job and my clients," he told Business Insider, adding, "I can't tell you how excited I am to be getting this role." Are you a middle manager? Please fill out this quick Google form or reach out to these reporters at mhoff@ and allisonkelly@ Letting millennial managers go and giving the rest more reports Many older millennials have found themselves caught in the Great Flattening. Gusto, a payroll and benefits platform, found that 35- to 44-year-olds are being hardest hit by manager firings or layoffs at 8,500 of its small and midsize business clients. Layoffs among that age group of managers rose more than 400% between January 2022 and September 2024, compared to a decline of 48% for 55- to 64-year-olds. Managers who survive the layoffs face another problem: a growing pool of direct reports. Gusto data showed that individual contributors per people manager nearly doubled from 3.2 in January 2019 to 5.8 in September 2024, based on the sample of small and midsize businesses analyzed. This means that many of today's managers have to balance a growing slate of 1:1 meetings, staff questions, and paperwork. In Monohan's experience, having a good manager is important for people's experience at work, especially for an entry-level worker. "Your manager plays a huge role in getting you promoted, getting you seen, getting you a raise, a bonus," Monohan said. "I've worked hard as a manager to try and get people that worked under me recognized, and sometimes it could take six months or longer to get them the bonus or the recognition that they deserve." She added that she's not sure what will happen with some of her outstanding duties, like her former report's performance review. "There are these open threads," she said. "You're just hoping companies are going to be able to pick up the pieces and move forward with, when it comes to the people you were managing." There's still hope, even if it involves a pay cut or demotion The job market isn't all doom and gloom for millennials. The US rate of layoffs and discharges is still low. Plus, the unemployment rate for 35- to 44-year-olds continues to be lower than the overall unemployment rate — 3.2% compared to 4.1% in June. Monohan is confident her past experience will lead to a job, but is worried about how soon she can get one and the lack of opportunities available. "As a single person without a second income or healthcare plan to fall back on, I have to know my worth but also face the realities of how long I can be out of work without having to move in with family or make dramatic life changes," Monohan said. She said she can't be picky in the current job market. She's open to individual contributor roles, but would ideally get another manager job. In the meantime, she's been networking and might take on some contract work. Others in her position have told BI they are settling for work they feel overqualified for to pay the bills. Radmanovic recommends not going through the job search process alone, if possible. He said he frequently talked to another laid-off Deloitte worker. They gave each other advice, helped with interview preparation, and commiserated during the process. Radmanovic already told the former coworker the good news about the job offer and hopes they will land one soon. "Sometimes it's nice to just vent with somebody that's going through that as well," Radmanovic said.

5 reasons Wall Street is in chill mode
5 reasons Wall Street is in chill mode

Business Insider

time6 hours ago

  • Business Insider

5 reasons Wall Street is in chill mode

Stock markets are shrugging off major risks and smashing records — so much so that even seasoned investors are scratching their heads. On Friday, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 closed little changed after notching record highs on Thursday. Both indexes are hovering near the all-time highs they reached earlier this month, continuing a rebound after the post-"Liberation Day" sell-off. That rebound has stunned analysts, given the pile-up of macro risks, particularly President Donald Trump's ongoing threats to impose steep tariffs on key trading partners. Yet investors keep piling in — even if many are doing so with one eye on the exit. "In many ways, this is a rally that really no one's had much conviction in it," Andrew Pease, the Asia Pacific head of investments for Russell Investments, told Business Insider. He said the firm's analysis shows investors are neutral, not euphoric. "Everyone's very wary about this particular rally," Pease said. Wall Street veterans have spent months warning that investors may be underestimating the risks. "Unfortunately, I think there is complacency in the markets," JPMorgan Chase's CEO, Jamie Dimon, said earlier in July, referring to tariffs. Those concerns may soon be put to the test. Trump's proposed levies on trading partners — ranging from 10% to 70% — threaten to disrupt supply chains, fuel inflation, and slow global growth. "I think the market is too complacent about the damage of such high tariffs on both the US and the global economy," said Zhiwei Zhang, chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management. It's not just tariffs that suggest trouble could be brewing. China's economic slowdown, Middle East tensions, and softening US data all suggest trouble could be brewing. So why are stocks still surging? 1. The US economy still looks resilient Despite inflationary concerns tied to Trump's tariff threats, the US economy remains on solid footing. As BI's Jennifer Sor recently reported, recession fears are fading. Big banks kicked off earnings season on a strong note last week. The consumer "basically seems to be fine," JPMorgan's chief financial officer, Jeremy Barnum, said on an earnings call on July 15. That's despite some cracks in the data. US GDP contracted 0.5% in the third quarter, and consumer spending growth slowed to 0.5% in Q1 — down sharply from 4% in Q4 2024. But retail sales rose 0.6% in June from May and the job market remains robust. The US added 147,000 jobs in June, well above expectations, while unemployment dipped to 4.1% from 4.2%. American consumers are, as top CEOs said recently, "a little numb" to tariffs and "very resilient," even as inflation ticks up. 2. Betting on the TACO trade Some investors are leaning on the "TACO trade" — short for "Trump Always Chickens Out." Markets are increasingly assuming that Trump's tariff threats are more talk than action. "Finally, the market is not wrong in pricing in a good chance that Trump will not follow through with his latest tariff threats, instead settling for some deal by 1 August," wrote Davide Oneglia, the director of European and global macro at Global Lombard, on July 16, referring to the trade deadline. Daniela Sabin Hathorn, senior market analyst at agreed: "The prevailing view among investors seems to be that these tariff threats are more bark than bite — a negotiating tactic rather than a firm policy stance." That's created what analysts call "asymmetry:" Markets could keep rising if talks go well, but they are vulnerable to sharp corrections if discussions break down. 3. FOMO + MOMO = a runaway rally Even as risks loom, traders don't want to miss out. That's fueling what analysts describe as a combination of FOMO, or fear of missing out, and MOMO, or momentum-based trading. Retail traders have been jumping back in, chasing gains as indexes push higher, even if they missed the earlier run-up. "MOMO and FOMO" are likely to dominate until proven otherwise," wrote Steve Sosnick, the chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, in a June 30 note. "Newton's First Law applies: A body (market) that is in motion will stay in motion until acted upon by an external source," he added. Sosnick said that implied volatility remains low, even as risks mount, suggesting investors are choosing to look past potential trouble. Pease at Russell Investments agreed that momentum could unravel quickly — but only if there's a clear macro shock. 4. Fed cuts are back on the table The Federal Reserve has signaled it could cut rates another two times this year — a boon for stocks. Lower rates reduce bond yields, making equities more attractive. They also encourage borrowing and investment. But rising inflation could complicate that path. In June, US inflation climbed 2.7% from a year ago, up from 2.4% in May. Dimon warned that the Fed might still hike if inflation proves sticky. He sees a 40% to 50% chance of another increase this cycle. 5. AI continues to power tech gains AI hype continues to drive the market, especially Big Tech. "AI is still the dominant theme, particularly as the Big Tech companies are giving solid earnings guidance and other companies are joining in as well, then that's the world in which you could see that this rally has further to go," Pease said, while cautioning that gains could become overdone. Bank of America's latest global fund manager survey, published July 15, shows 40% of respondents already see productivity gains from AI adoption. Another 21% expect gains within the next year. Caution still lingers Despite the optimism, there's unease under the surface. Summer trading is thinner, meaning volatility can spike quickly. Last year's yen carry trade unwind is a fresh reminder that things can turn fast. Trump's tariff threats are still on the table, but Oneglia thinks markets are right to be relatively unfazed. "Negotiations have not broken down and the market is acting rationally — at least on this," Oneglia wrote. Still, others are more cautious. "Ultimately, markets are at a crossroads," wrote Hathorn. "The rally, particularly in US equities, has been driven by optimism and underpinned by assumptions about political behavior." Until August, market asymmetry remains, so there's "room to rise on good news, but the potential for a swift and severe correction if trade tensions escalate," Hathorn added.

The biggest tech shift in travel isn't AGI — it's real-time translation, says a luxury hotel mogul
The biggest tech shift in travel isn't AGI — it's real-time translation, says a luxury hotel mogul

Business Insider

time8 hours ago

  • Business Insider

The biggest tech shift in travel isn't AGI — it's real-time translation, says a luxury hotel mogul

Picture yourself in a tiny sake bar on Japan's Noto Peninsula, swapping stories with the chef in flawless, real-time translation. Such frictionless conversations, Banyan Group founder Kwon Ping Ho says, will "open up the boundaries of travel in a big, big way." Ho, who launched his first resort on an abandoned tin mine in Phuket, Thailand in 1994, has spent over 30 years in the hospitality industry. The 72-year-old told Business Insider that when it comes to AI, tools like simultaneous translation will make a big splash in his industry. "The one AI that I think will revolutionize our industry and travel is oddly enough, not AGI. That's science fiction because nobody can imagine what it's really going to lead to," Ho said on the sidelines of the International Conference on Cohesive Societies held in Singapore last month. AGI, or artificial general intelligence, is a theoretical form of AI that is capable of thinking and reasoning like humans. Experts are split on when exactly AGI will be achieved. Some say AGI will be ready in two years, but others say it is decades away. Real-time translation software, on the other hand, could have a similar impact on travel as budget carriers did, Ho said. "One of the biggest impediments to tourism travel is the language barrier, and the places you can go to. It's never been a problem for people to go on group tours and have a tour guide who speaks the language. But as you go deeper into experiential travel, you want to go and talk to people directly," he added. Ho said such software would make travelers more confident to venture into far-flung destinations even if they do not speak the local language. He compared it to the rise of budget airline carriers, which took off in the 1990s and 2000s and opened up lower-cost travel to more people. "When you get instant translation, that's going to make people go into so many areas they normally wouldn't go," he added. "People can go to the remotest village in Japan or Indonesia and not feel strange at all." Ho isn't the only hospitality mogul who said that AI will impact the industry, albeit in a limited fashion, given that the technology is still in its nascent stages. Brian Chesky, the cofounder and CEO of Airbnb, said on the company's earnings call in February that he didn't think AI is "quite ready for prime time." Chesky said Airbnb would implement AI in its customer service functions first before expanding it to other areas. "It's still really early. It's probably similar to like, the mid to late-90s for the internet. So I think it's going to have a profound impact on travel, but I don't think it's yet fundamentally changed for any of the large travel platforms," Chesky said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store