
His Ford F-150 downshifted on a highway — just after recall service. Then his real problems began
Curtis Mabee had just merged onto the highway in his newish Ford F-150 when the pickup started downshifting.
With cars whizzing past and honking their horns, Mabee said he could feel his truck 'pulling itself back' when the speedometer hit 80.
He took the next exit and circled back to Thor Motors Orillia, the Ford dealership where he just had the pickup in for a safety recall service to deal with that very problem.
'What the heck happened to my vehicle?' he asked.
Last summer, a few weeks before Mabee bought the rebuilt 2014 SuperCrew F-150 with nearly 300,000 kilometres on it, Ford issued a safety recall, warning about a transmission problem.
Mabee said he didn't know about the recall when he bought the truck from Norfolk Fine Cars in Orillia for $10,622 all in.
In a
July 1 2024 letter to 2014 F-150 owners, Ford warned
that 'an intermittent failure of the output shaft speed sensor in the transmission may result in an unintended downshift to first gear.'
The company also noted that the 'sudden downshift can cause the rear tires to slide until the vehicle speed slows … and could result in a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.'
Ford advised owners to book a free recall service with a dealership that would update powertrain software and perform a diagnostic test to see if additional repairs to the transmission were needed.
On Oct. 22, Mabee did just that. Thor Motors, he said, told him the service could take all day so he was surprised to receive a text 17 minutes later notifying him the truck was ready.
When Mabee reported the downshifting problem to Thor after returning to the dealership, he asked a service manager to accompany him on a test drive.
'It dropped right down into low gear on him,' Mabee explained. 'He said, 'It's doing exactly what it was recalled for.''
Thor Motors and Ford, Mabee said, initially pointed fingers at each other.
The manufacturer told him to go back to the dealership while the dealership, he said, advised him to escalate his concerns with the manufacturer.
I thought I could help mediate. But the case took an interesting twist I didn't foresee.
Thor Motors notified Ford of Canada about the problems with Mabee's truck soon after the initial safety recall service seemed to go awry.
On Oct. 24, 2024, Kenneth Britt, a service manager at the dealership, wrote to Ford's technical support staff.
'After completing
recall 24S37 the transmission is downshifting erratically while driving
… I road tested the vehicle with the customer and the concern happens at about 80/kmh, the transmission feels like its slips into a neutral gear … and then back up again without any throttle application.'
Britt noted the truck wasn't 'throwing any codes,' when running a digital analysis.
Thor Motors gave Mabee a loaner, a Ford Bronco, while its mechanics continued to troubleshoot and seek help from Ford.
Thor Motors told Mabee his truck needed a whole new transmission, which would cost about $8,700 — almost as much as he originally paid for the vehicle.
Mabee, who hasn't worked in three years due to a disability, didn't have that kind of money. The issue dragged on for five months.
On March 4, Thor's service manager wrote Ford again.
'The concern is a result of the program installed during the 24S37 recall. We feel the vehicle requires a transmission. The SSSC and the customer assistance centre have offered no assistance with the repair costs. We need assistance in
determining what happened during the recall update. We have installed a known good lead frame and valve body and the concern is not resolved.'
When I reached out to Thor Motors and Ford Canada on Mabee's behalf, both companies said there was nothing more they could do to help.
When I emailed Thor Motors' General Manager Nathan Brown some followup questions about a written statement he sent me, a Ford spokesperson got back to me instead.
'This transmission concern is not related in any way to the recall, which was performed fully and correctly,' Matt Drennan-Scace wrote in an email. 'These concerns suggest there may be additional wear and tear, or damage, to the transmission based on vehicle age, mileage, and how it has been driven and serviced.'
Emails from both Thor Motors and Ford noted that the truck had not been serviced at any Ford dealership in Canada since 2017, until Mabee scheduled the safety recall service last October.
'Based on the information available, all service technicians agree that this vehicle likely requires a transmission replacement,' Drennan-Scace wrote. 'Thor Motors went above and beyond the scope of this recall to try and address these concerns at no cost to the customer.'
Six months after reporting the spontaneous downshifting problem with his Ford F-150, Mabee's truck is still sitting in the parking lot Thor Motors in Orillia.
He's still driving the dealership's loaner.
Was Ford right? Could Mabee's problem have been an issue since he bought the truck in August?
Using the truck's VIN, I paid $79 for the
vehicle's history from CARFAX
— which revealed a troubled past.
It showed me the truck had been regularly serviced since it first took to the road in June 2014.
In 2021, however, an insurance company wrote off the pickup for $16,600 after a collision that resulted in 'moderate damage' to its front and sides.
The report also noted the truck had since been branded as 'rebuilt.'
Norfolk Fine Cars confirmed the truck passed structural and safety inspections on Aug. 12, 2024, the day Mabee took it home.
But neither of these inspections, which are provincially mandated for all used vehicles that have been rebuilt after insurance declares them a writeoff, act as a warranty or guarantee of the vehicle's condition.
A structural inspection assesses the vehicle's frame while the safety check reviews components like brakes, suspension, airbags, headlights and wipers, said Gaetan Legace, owner of Gater's Auto Refinishing in Welland, Ont., which is provincially licenced to do this work, though did not do the inspection on Mabee's vehicle.
Ontario's safety standards certification program for used vehicles
includes a test drive, but there's no requirement for how that should be done so different shops might take different approaches, Legace said.
But one thing is certain.
'They won't tear apart the tranny,' Legace said of a vehicle's transmission.
'That's a little bit of a grey area,' added Rob Black, owner of BRD Motorsports in Orillia, which is also provincially licenced to perform safety inspections on used vehicles. He did not certify Mabee's truck.
'Obviously the transmission has to function,' he said. 'You want to make sure there's no cracks or damage to its mounting and that its operation is OK. But (after an accident) some internal components could be hurt and you wouldn't notice it until you put another 10 or 15 (thousand) kilometres on it. You just don't know. That's the problem with buying a used vehicle.'
Both Legace and Black suggested Mabee's best bet would be to go with a used transmission which would likely run him no more than $1,000.
Legace urges consumers to purchase an extended warranty from the dealer, especially on used vehicles with high mileage.
Mabee, who used to work for the Ministry of Transportation, and thought he had done all the homework he needed to ensure he got a reliable used truck, is worried.
'I gotta funny feeling that I'm just going to be stuck with a piece of crap.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
8 Hybrid Vehicles That Last Longer Than You Think and Are Worth the Money
As the technology behind electric vehicles (EVs) continues to evolve, the mileage range of EVs is growing too, with the electric rides able to go farther than ever before between charging sessions. For the most part, though, no battery-powered vehicle matches the range of a hybrid ride, which combines an internal combustion engine with an electric motor for more efficient fuel economy, fewer emissions, added power and greater affordability to fit your budget better. Read Next: For You: Perhaps most importantly, hybrid vehicles can quite simply go much, much farther than EVs before needing to refuel or recharge. To that end, GOBankingRates compiled a listing of some of the farthest-reaching hybrids on the market, cars with long-enough range to justify their occasionally steep prices. Range: 704 miles The Ford F-150 is currently the longest-range hybrid on the American market, per Kelley Blue Book, making it to just over 700 miles. The hybrid truck — which also comes in standard internal combustion models, as well as a full EV model — also gets 22 miles per gallon (mpg) in the city, 24 mpg on the highway and 23 mpg combined with its 30-gallon full tank alone. Discover More: Range: 688 miles Car and Driver wrote that, while not cheap, this hybrid Benz not only comes with a big batter and incredible fuel economy, but with amazing speed as well — hitting 60 mph in 4.2 seconds. Range: 686 miles Kelley Blue Book clocked the 2024 Toyota Camry as both the longest-range hybrid sedan on sale in America and the top-ranking Toyota. Range: 670 miles The Elantra comes in just under the Camry in both range and price, per Kelley Blue Book. Range: 655 miles Kelly Blue Book reported that the Sorento's 2025 interior has received a massive tech upgrade compared to prior models, but warned consumers to stick with the front-wheel drive model (FWD), as the All-Wheel Drive (AWD) model only has a 602-mile range, while the FWD manages 655 miles total. Range: 648 In addition to comfortable interior space and style, Kelly Blue Book touted the Sienna as the longest-range hybrid minivan available in America. Range: 644 There's a reason you always see a Prius on the road — they're reliable and have an incredible range. Kelly Blue Book offered one small caveat: while the FWD Prius has a range of 644 miles, the AWD model only reaches 567 miles. Range: 644 While the LC 500h is extremely pricey — starting in the six-figure range — it more than makes up for it with a sleek body design, very high-technology interiors and a range of 644 miles, making it the longest-range luxury coupe in America, according to Kelley Blue Book. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives 7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025 This article originally appeared on 8 Hybrid Vehicles That Last Longer Than You Think and Are Worth the Money


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Ford Sets Bold Condition to Stay in Formula One Amid V8 Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ford Performance has laid out a bold condition to remain in Formula One as it partners with Red Bull Powertrains for the new era of regulations beginning in 2026. Next year marks a big reset in F1, as new cars powered by an equal ratio of electric power and internal combustion on sustainable fuels will zip through Grand Prix circuits. Given Ford's expertise in the electrification department, its partnership with Red Bull is a result of the new regulations. Though the plans for 2026 are on course, and as teams develop their challengers in full swing, discussions about the return of cars powered by V8 engines running on sustainable fuels have led many to question whether F1 cars will rely on electric power in the distant future. Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 and Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 battle for track position during the F1 Grand Prix of Spain... Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 and Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 battle for track position during the F1 Grand Prix of Spain at Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya on June 01, 2025 in Barcelona, Spain. MoreWhile the developmental path ahead seems unclear at this stage, Ford has made it clear that it will stay in the sport as long as the cars remain electrified. Ford Performance global director Mark Rushbrook said: "For Ford Motor Company, we believe there should be some form of electrification in there. "That's part of what attracted us to the 2026 rules. It's all about that balance between the ICE and electrification. Does it need to be 50-50? No, not necessarily. "As long as we have the opportunity to contribute, to learn and to bring knowledge to our road cars, then that's ideally what we're looking for." Rushbrook confirmed that the American brand was committed to the future of the sport. He added: "That is definitely our intent. We're committed to working with all the other stakeholders for what is the right thing for the future of this sport. "Is it going to be exactly what any single manufacturer wants? No. But that's part of the process, because at the end of the day, if that discussion is exactly what we want and every other manufacturer leaves, then it's not a healthy sport either. "We know that and the other manufacturers know that as well. So you've got to work together for the good of the sport, the health of the sport and that basically means being partners off the track. "You want to race each other fiercely on the track, but you need to work together off the track." 2026 marks the first year when Red Bull will roll out its own F1 engines in collaboration with Ford, after ending a successful partnership with Honda. The Japanese automaker joined hands with Aston Martin to develop power units for cars of the new era.

Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
IIHS Crash Tests: The Toyota Prius Is Officially Safer Than The Ford Bronco
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has released the results of its latest crash tests, and while most models achieved the organization's 2025 Top Safety Pick+ award - indicating the highest possible safety standards - Ford won't be pleased with the outcomes for two of its best SUVs. The Bronco and Bronco Sport SUVs both missed out on a Top Safety Pick+ award following new ratings, while at least three much smaller cars achieved better safety scores. While this does not mean that the SUVs are unsafe, they each failed to protect occupants according to the agency's highest standards. Here, we'll look at exactly where the Bronco and Bronco Sport fell short. To qualify for the Top Safety Pick award, a vehicle has to achieve the following in IIHS crash tests: Good ratings for the small overlap front and update side testsAcceptable or Good ratings in the pedestrian front crash prevention testAcceptable or Good ratings for headlights, applicable to all trimsAcceptable rating for the updated moderate overlap front test Furthermore, the Top Safety Pick+ award is only achievable if a Good rating for the updated moderate overlap front test is received. The IIHS regularly updates its testing procedures with tougher tests, so a vehicle that qualified for a Top Safety Pick+ award a few years ago may not get one now. The Bronco may look like a safe place to be in a crash, given its tall stance and beefy bodywork, but it didn't do enough to ace its crash tests. Marginal ratings for the moderate overlap, pedestrian front crash prevention, and headlight tests held the SUV back. For the moderate overlap test, the IIHS noted a higher risk of chest injuries when the rear crash dummy was assessed. Then again, even minivans were found to do an inadequate job of protecting second-row passengers, and those are dedicated family movers. The Bronco still received Good ratings for the small overlap front, updated side, and seat belt reminder tests, though. Its vehicle-to-vehicle crash prevention system got an Acceptable score, as did the ease of using the LATCH system. It must be noted that the LATCH system, seat belt reminder, and vehicle-to-vehicle crash prevention scores are not factored into the award criteria. Overall, the Bronco could be improved, but previous tests show it's still safer than its Jeep Wrangler rival. Thanks to LED projector headlights instead of the Bronco's LED reflector headlights, the Bronco Sport gets off to a better start than its bigger sibling, with a Good rating for its headlights. The Bronco Sport's pedestrian crash prevention system also performed better, with a Good rating. In the updated moderate overlap front test, the Bronco Sport got the same Marginal score as the Bronco. The post-crash analysis showed that the rear dummy's lap belt slid up onto its abdomen, which poses a higher risk of internal injuries. This is in addition to elevated chest, neck, and head injuries for rear-seat passengers. The Acceptable rating in the side test was due to a risk of injury to the driver's pelvis. Interestingly, smaller cars like the Toyota Prius, Hyundai Elantra, and Kia K4 achieved better ratings than the Ford SUVs, proving that vehicle size has nothing to do with occupant protection. Take the Prius, for example. Besides an Acceptable rating for its headlights, it received a Good score in every crash test. However, since no two accidents are exactly the same, the Bronco and Bronco Sport still have every chance of adequately protecting occupants in a crash. Both come with a decent roster of passive and active safety features. These IIHS tests do, however, show that there is some room for improvement in this area for the Ford twins. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.