Digital Future Daily Special Edition: Introducing ‘California Decoded'
Presented by
Hello Digital Future Daily readers! Below is the very first edition of POLITICO Pro Technology: California Decoded from our colleagues on the West Coast. We thought you would enjoy a one-day preview of their new daily newsletter. If you like what you read, you can subscribe here.
QUICK FIX
— The lawmaker spearheading a major AI safety effort tells us why he's feeling confident this year.
— Exclusive interview with California AG Rob Bonta reveals his thinking on Trump's tech crusade.
— What a major tech lobby group is eyeing in Sacramento this year.
Hello and welcome to the first edition of California Decoded, the flagship daily newsletter from POLITICO's brand-new California tech team. I'm Chase DiFeliciantonio, your anchor for today, bringing you the latest from the AI and automation beat, which will be my main focus. My partner Tyler Katzenberger will be bringing you all things tech policy, from social media to privacy debates. We'll announce the final member of our team, who will cover Silicon Valley politics, tomorrow. Glad you're with us.
Send feedback, tips and story ideas to chasedf@politico.com and tkatzenberger@politico.com.
Driving the day
ANALYSIS: AI SAFETY IS BACK — A marquee AI safety bill loathed by Big Tech, lauded by Elon Musk and slammed by leading congressional Democrats including Rep. Nancy Pelosi is back in Sacramento. The measure from state Sen. Scott Wiener is one to watch not just because of the controversy it generated last time around, but also for what its slimmed-down look says about who gets to regulate AI in the Golden State, and beyond.
Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat widely believed to have his eye on Pelosi's seat when she retires, relaunched the bill Friday after the failure of the notorious, at least in tech circles, measure known as SB 1047 last year. But the battle lines have been redrawn with the retooled proposal, which for now is a far cry from the sweeping effort that generated headlines and a Big Tech backlash.
If Wiener wants to succeed this time, he will have to avoid a veto from Gov. Gavin Newsom, which felled his previous measure, and placate a governor who has shown little appetite for regulatory broadsides against one of California's most-profitable industries. He will also have to convince and cajole Big Tech players like Meta to OpenAI to hold their fire, something he tried mightily — and ultimately failed to do — before.
Wiener appears to be taking a page out of the tech playbook of failing fast, resurrecting two key ideas from last year in the new bill to expand whistleblower protections for AI workers and to build out public computing resources for AI research.
'I would be very surprised if the bill drew meaningful opposition from tech,' Wiener told California Decoded on Friday after the bill language was first released. 'But I've been surprised before.'
His revamped approach says plenty about who will be holding the reins in the effort to prevent runaway AI programs from using too much electricity or, as the naysayers fear, killing us all. Here's a look at the key players Wiener faces with his latest effort on AI:
Musk: A long-time AI doomer, Musk somewhat grudgingly supported Wiener's prior bill focused on pre-release testing of AI models in a surprise post last year. He did not put muscle or money behind his position, however. And with the new bill focused on making it easier for AI developers to sound the alarm from within their companies, it's difficult to see Musk — who has shown himself to be no fan of whistleblowing and press leaks at Tesla — coming down on Wiener's side again.
Newsom: The California governor not only vetoed Wiener's SB 1047, but also charted an alternative path by appointing a who's who of AI and legal experts to produce a report on how to best handle the safety risks posed by the technology. That writeup is expected imminently, within this first quarter of 2025. Wiener told California Decoded he hasn't been privy to the group's work, but is open to expanding his bill to include the panel's recommendations.
That puts him more in the waiting room than the driver's seat with a smaller and more-focused measure potentially awaiting the input of Great Minds like Stanford's Fei-Fei Li, whose oft-repeated moniker, The Godmother of AI, carries weight.
Democrats in Congress: Although Pelosi came out against Wiener's prior proposal, whether she supports the slimmed-down version, or takes notice at all, remains to be seen. That intra-party scuffle was back when President Joe Biden was leading the White House instead of Musk — I mean, President Donald Trump. Under Biden, executive actions and Kumbaya international AI safety meetings were the order of the day. With Democrats firmly out of power in Washington, those in the party might be more inclined to notch wins on a key tech policy issue wherever else they can find them.
Big Tech: Last year, AI model makers OpenAI and Meta opposed Wiener's more-sweeping measure, which drew some tepid support from Anthropic, the San Francisco maker of the Claude chatbot. Wiener is betting the new bill will draw less wrath from tech companies by focusing on whistleblower protections instead of the expansive vetting regime of the previous bill. It's too early to know whether that happens, but we figured we'd ask anyway.
Anthropic declined to comment to California Decoded when asked about the bill, and OpenAI did not respond to questions. A representative for the San Francisco startup incubator Y Combinator, which opposed the previous version of the bill, similarly could not be reached for comment.
Among the Big Tech players last year, Meta strenuously opposed the bill, saying its testing rules created too much liability for startups using its free AI programs and hosting events to whip up opposition among Bay Area tech types. Meta spokesperson Jamie Radice told California Decoded that the company is reviewing the legislation. It's not uncommon for industry to take their time reading through the legalese of a new bill before taking a side — or not.
Wiener said stripping out the testing provisions should allay much of the opposition. But replacing them with whistleblower protections is not a total olive branch in a tech industry where leaks can be tantamount to corporate treason that can cost significant cash and reputation loss.
None of the companies contacted by California Decoded gave a flat 'no,' however, meaning tech still could come into the fold this time.
HAPPENING TODAY
3:30 p.m. PT — The California Assembly's Banking and Finance Committee will meet, including to hear testimony on Republican Assemblymember Phillip Chen's bill aimed at saving cryptocurrency traders thousands of dollars on state-imposed licensing costs.
In the Courts
EXCLUSIVE: BONTA'S TECH PLAYBOOK — California Attorney General Rob Bonta isn't losing sleep over Trump and Big Tech's crusade against strict AI rules and data privacy protections, he told California Decoded in an exclusive, in-person interview today just hours before our launch.
It comes as Trump wages a pressure campaign against tech rules in Europe, whose approach often inspires California legislation.
'We expect that maybe Trump will want to sue. Maybe he won't. No idea,' he told us when asked whether the president might expand his pressure campaign to California. 'We'll take him to court ... and as we usually do, we presume we have a high likelihood of success.'
The Trump administration has threatened tariffs in response to European taxes and fines on U.S. tech firms, with FCC boss Brendan Carr today lashing out at what he called Europe's social media 'censorship.'
Heard that line before? Us too. Tech industry groups — including Musk's X — have filed a string of lawsuits arguing California's social media and AI deepfake regulations violate the First Amendment.
Trump hasn't implicated California, but both he and Musk have regularly made the state's left-leaning policies a political punching bag.
Bonta told us his office isn't waiting for Trump to pull the trigger.
'The laws that we engage on — either we sponsor or that we provide technical assistance on — we're doing deeper dives on all of those,' he said. 'We know the playbook.'
Influence & Industry
GOLD RUSH — The liberal, pro-tech interest group Chamber of Progress is watching Golden State lawmakers like a hawk this year after opposing some of the state's most ambitious efforts to regulate social media and AI regulations last year.
CEO Adam Kovacevich shared a rundown today of the group's top legislative fights in statehouses, and Sacramento features prominently.
Atop the watchlist are proposals to mandate warning labels on social media platforms, including Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan's AB 56, which would force platforms to display unskippable, 90-second health warnings to users at least once per day.
Bauer-Kahan also made the Chamber's shortlist for her first-in-the-nation bid to stop tech companies from undercutting Hollywood creatives by using copyrighted works to train AI models without prior consent.
Kovacevich said the Chamber of Progress is monitoring scaled-back versions of legislation that failed last session, including Wiener's revived AI safety effort and Assemblymember Cecilia Aguiar-Curry's third try at sticking human safety operators behind the wheel of some autonomous delivery vehicles.
Byte Sized
— Apple is reportedly struggling to keep up in the AI race, despite a partnership with OpenAI (Bloomberg)
— Anthropic is now valued at $61.5 billion (CNBC)
— Alongside California, lawmakers in other states like Texas are grappling with energy demand for data centers (E&E News)
— John Bostic, who prosecuted Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, says her case is a reminder to Silicon Valley to be cautious and honest about new technologies (Mercury News)
With help from Nicole Norman
Have a tip, event or AI chatbot prompt to send us? Do reach out: Emma Anderson, California tech editor; Chase DiFeliciantonio, AI and automation reporter; and Tyler Katzenberger, Sacramento tech reporter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Immigrants Are Embracing Trump's Crackdown on Immigration
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. New data shows a growing number of immigrant voters are backing Donald Trump and his hardline immigration agenda—marking a dramatic reversal from past elections. Why It Matters The Trump administration has pledged to carry out the largest mass deportation in U.S. history and has conducted numerous ICE raids, some of which have swept up people with proper documentation. Trump's aggressive stance on immigration has resulted in widespread protests, especially in Los Angeles, where Trump authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles after reported violence against law enforcement, specifically ICE agents carrying out deportation raids in the city. But despite the unrest, data suggests that Trump's messaging on border enforcement and immigration control may be resonating with segments of the immigrant community. President Donald Trump speaks during an event to sign a bill blocking California's rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, in the East Room of the White House, Thursday, June 12, 2025,... President Donald Trump speaks during an event to sign a bill blocking California's rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, in the East Room of the White House, Thursday, June 12, 2025, in Washington. More Alex Brandon/AP What To Know According to an analysis of the American National Election Studies (ANES) by CNN's Harry Enten, immigrant voters, who favored Democrats by 32 points on immigration policy in 2020, now trust Republicans more on the issue by 8 points—a staggering 40-point swing. Trump's share of the immigrant vote has steadily increased—from 36 percent in 2016 to 39 percent in 2020 and now to 47 percent in 2024, based on Cooperative Election Study (CES) data analyzed by Enten. Perhaps even more telling is how immigrant voters feel about immigrants who are in the country illegally. In 2020, their net favorability stood at +23 points. This year that has flipped to -6—a 29-point decline in support for undocumented immigrants among immigrants themselves. Enten did not specify which demographics were included in his aggregate. It comes as polls suggest that Trump's hardline immigration stance is resonating with much of the public. In a sharp turnaround from his first term, Trump now holds a net positive approval rating on immigration, rising from -21 in June 2017 to +1 today, according to CNN's Harry Enten—his biggest gain on any issue. A YouGov/CBS News poll conducted June 4-6 found 54 percent of Americans support Trump's deportation program targeting undocumented immigrants, surpassing his ratings on the economy (42 percent) and inflation (39 percent). Additionally, 51 percent approve of ICE conducting searches. An RMG Research poll echoed that result, with 58 percent backing the deportation efforts. And in an Insider Advantage survey, 59 percent approved of Trump's decision to send National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to the protests. But the support has limits. Some polls show that Trump's handling of deportations is broadly unpopular. A survey conducted by YouGov/Economist found that just 39 percent of respondents approve of how the former president is managing deportations, while 50 percent disapprove, giving him a net approval rating of minus 11. A separate Quinnipiac poll showed even deeper dissatisfaction, with 40 percent approval and 56 percent disapproval—netting a negative 16-point rating on the issue. Meanwhile, 56 percent disapprove of how Trump's mass deportation program is being implemented, according to the CBS/YouGov poll. A separate YouGov survey found only 39 percent approve of the administration's overall approach to deportations, while 50 percent disapprove. The issue remains deeply polarizing as 93 percent of Republicans support the deportation plan, compared to just 18 percent of Democrats. Independents are divided. Nearly half of Americans believe Trump is going further than he promised during his campaign. His military deployment is even more controversial. A June 9-10 YouGov poll found only 34 percent of Americans support sending Marines to Los Angeles, while 47 percent disapprove. A majority—56 percent—say state and local governments, not the federal government, should handle the situation. But among immigrant voters, Trump's immigration policy appears to be resonating. Experts say that immigrants are increasingly backing Donald Trump's hardline immigration stance due to frustration over what they see as a broken and unfair system. Thomas Gift, a political science professor at University College London, told Newsweek that many immigrants feel betrayed by current immigration policies, especially ones created under President Joe Biden. "Part of this shift likely stems from frustration among immigrants who feel they 'followed the rules' and now resent those who entered the country unlawfully," Gift explained. Jeremy Beck, co-president of the immigration reduction group NumbersUSA, told Newsweek that more immigrants came to the U.S. between 2021 and 2025 than during any other period in history—"more than half of them illegally." Between 2021 and 2024, there were over 10.8 million total illegal border encounters, according to the Department of Homeland Security, far exceeding the 2.8 million total from 2017–2020. That surge, he said, has spurred a backlash even among immigrant voters who helped form Trump's "winning coalition in November." These voters, he added, sent a "decisive message" to Washington: "Manage immigration at levels we can sustain, and credibly enforce the limits." The shift is also visible in the broader electorate. Beck pointed to Latino-majority districts in Texas and Colorado where Trump or immigration hardliners performed strongly. Trump made historic gains among Hispanic voters in 2024, with only 55 percent supporting Kamala Harris to Trump's 43 percent—an 8-point increase from 2020 and the highest percentage for a Republican presidential candidate since such data has been tracked. Beck concluded that Trump's "willingness to enforce immigration laws gives him a clear advantage" with voters—especially immigrants who went through the legal process. "After the border crisis, voters are aware of how important it is to manage immigration policy in the national interest," he said. But Maria Cristina Garcia, Professor of American Studies at Cornell University, cautioned against drawing broad conclusions from polling on immigrant views toward immigration enforcement and support for Donald Trump. "This poll as represented here in the video doesn't really tell me much," she said, emphasizing that Latino and immigrant communities are far from monolithic. Garcia argued that attitudes on immigration vary significantly depending on national origin, geography, and personal history. "People of Mexican ancestry who live in border counties along the Rio Grande... are likely more hawkish on immigration than, say, a Dominican American in Washington Heights in NYC," she explained. Similarly, Cuban Americans differ in outlook depending on when and why they migrated to the U.S. But she noted that economic conditions strongly influence immigration attitudes, which could explain their support for Trump: "Historically, U.S. citizens (including the foreign-born) have been more likely to demand bars to immigration when the economy sputters and they experience more pressure on their day-to-day lives." Gift echoed this, explaining that, like other Americans, immigrants are feeling the economic pressure from illegal immigration, including "stresses on public services, housing shortages, and rising competition in certain labor markets." Beck, meanwhile, noted that immigrants are often the first to feel the impact of mass migration: "They tend to work in the same occupations. They feel the downward pressure on their wages, and witness the degradation of workplace conditions for themselves as well as new arrivals." According to a 2024 report, approximately 36 percent of immigrants lived in lower-income households, compared to 29 percent of U.S.-born individuals. And a recent survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) indicates that 43 percent of immigrants anticipate their financial situation will worsen in the coming year, compared to approximately 33 percent of U.S.-born individuals. Trump has sought to attribute economic pressures like this to illegal immigration. During a June 2024 presidential debate, Trump claimed that illegal immigrants were "taking Black jobs" and argued they were "killing" working opportunities for minority communities. "His big kill on the Black people is the millions of people that he's allowed to come in... They're taking Black jobs now... and they're taking Hispanic jobs," he said. And in a March 2025 speech to Congress, Trump blamed "open-border" policies for causing widespread strain—implying economic stress on hospitals, schools, and communities, which often correlates with inflation concerns. "Joe Biden didn't just open our borders—he flew illegal aliens over them to overwhelm our schools, hospitals and communities," he said. For Beck, this is why immigration resonates so strongly with immigrant voters grappling with economic anxiety. "The party that can set enforceable limits on immigration that serve the interests of immigrant voters could achieve a lasting realignment," he said. What People Are Saying Enten said: "There is no bloc of voters that shifted more to the right from 2020 to 2024 than immigrant voters." Thomas Gift said: "Part of this shift likely stems from frustration among immigrants who feel they "followed the rules" and now resent those who entered the country unlawfully or are seen as having bypassed the legal process. Like other Americans, immigrants themselves are affected by many of the same perceived challenges associated with illegal immigration, such as stresses on public services, housing shortages, and rising competition in certain labor markets. These numbers show just how far Biden's alleged "open border policies" have shifted immigrants toward supporting the Republican Party." Maria Cristina said: "This poll as represented here in the video doesn't really tell me much, though. "Let's say these pollsters just focused on Latinos who are foreign-born citizens. You're likely to find differences across Latino groups and geographic regions. People of Mexican ancestry who live in border counties along the Rio Grande, for example, are likely more hawkish on immigration than, say, a Dominican American in Washington Heights in NYC. A Cuban American who arrived in the 1960s and has no family left in Cuba might be more hawkish than a Cuban-born US citizen who arrived in 1996 and hopes to one day sponsor a family member. The more interesting question (to me) is why are some groups more hawkish than others? What is it about their experience that has led them to hold certain perspectives? "For many foreign-born citizens (like all citizens in general), perspectives on immigration are tied to the state of the economy. Historically, US citizens (including the foreign-born) have been more likely to demand bars to immigration when the economy sputters and they experience more pressure on their day-to-day lives. "As for why some immigrants voted for much depends on the group. Immigrants that fled a communist country, for example, might believe the MAGA-GOP's falsehood that Democrats are socialists or communists and worry about it. Or they might worry about the culture wars and feel that the Democratic party disregards their more religious or patriarchal values. There are many different reasons for the shift to the GOP. If so, voting GOP doesn't necessarily mean they liked Trump. Indeed, I'd like to see a polling question of GOP voters on whether they actually liked Trump." "But in the end, immigrants are most concerned about the economy and the opportunities they believe will be available to them." Jeremy Beck said: "Those are remarkable findings, although not entirely surprising. Whenever immigration levels spike, recent immigrants are among the first Americans to feel the impact. They tend to work in the same occupations. They feel the downward pressure on their wages, and witness the degradation of workplace conditions for themselves as well as new arrivals. They see the exploitation. They live in communities overwhelmed by unsustainable numbers. Mass immigration's strain on infrastructure, hospitals, schools, and homeless shelters affects foreign-born citizens directly and indirectly. "More people came to the U.S. between 2021-2025 than in any other period in history; more than half of them illegally. The shift in immigrant voters is part of a broader shift in American voters who live off of their wages as opposed to their stock portfolios. These immigrant voters were part of Trump's winning coalition in November and they delivered a decisive message to Washington, D.C. last November: Manage immigration at levels we can sustain, and credibly enforce the limits. Enten's polling should not be surprising to anyone who remembers the shift toward Trump in majority-Latino districts in South Texas. Or in Colorado's 8th district, which is 40 percent Latino, where two candidates campaigned on who was tougher on immigration enforcement. The border crisis was tied with inflation for the top reason voters did not vote for Vice President Harris; and thirty six percent of Latino voters cited immigration as a top concern. One out of four Democratic voters believe the Party deliberately open the border. President Trump willingness to enforce immigration laws gives him a clear advantage with these voters. Many immigrant voters who themselves work through a sometimes difficult legal process understandably rejected policies that led to a crisis in which millions of people who should not have been admitted to the U.S. were released into the country outside of the legal system established by Congress. "After the border crisis, voters are aware of how important it is to manage immigration policy in the national interest. The party that voters trust to fully enforce the law within the limits of the law has an advantage. The party that can set enforceable limits on immigration that serve the interests of immigrant voters could achieve a lasting realignment." What Happens Next Trump's approval rating among immigrant voters is likely to fluctuate. Meanwhile, coordinated nationwide protests against Trump and his administration's policies are also planned to take place in cities in all 50 states on the president's birthday on June 14.
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Ex-New York Assembly Candidate Charged With Campaign Finance Fraud
A former New York State Assembly candidate used fake donations and forged signatures to fraudulently inflate the share of public matching funds he received in last year's election, federal prosecutors said on Friday. The former candidate, Dao Yin, was charged with wire fraud in a federal criminal complaint. He was scheduled to make his initial appearance before a magistrate judge in Federal District Court in Brooklyn on Friday afternoon. The charging of Mr. Yin, a Democrat who ran for a State Assembly seat in Queens, came a year after The New York Times published an investigation that found he appeared to have listed dozens of fake donors to increase his allotment of money under a new state matching-funds program meant to increase the power of donors making small political contributions. Prosecutors said Mr. Yin, 62, had abused the system by using a scheme that The Times found yielded him $162,000 in matching funds. It was one of the largest sums received by an Assembly candidate last year, despite Mr. Yin's relatively unheralded status. He ultimately received just 6 percent of the vote in the Democratic primary, in which he challenged Ronald Kim, an incumbent assemblyman. Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn opened a criminal investigation focused on Mr. Yin in November. A lawyer for Mr. Yin could not immediately be reached for comment. Mr. Yin's campaign filings contained glaring red flags, The Times found. Half of the money he raised directly from individuals came in cash, the least traceable form of donation. It was a much higher proportion than the 5.2 percent average for all other Assembly candidates who participated in the matching program. Only nine of 300 contribution cards he turned in contained the required contact information for the donors, including phone numbers and email addresses. Even so, the state Public Campaign Finance Board granted him matching public funds, records show. Candidates must disclose certain information about their donors. But in Mr. Yin's case, the board permitted waivers via 'good-faith letters' that supposedly documented his efforts to obtain the missing information from donors. After The Times published its investigation into Mr. Yin, the Public Campaign Finance Board unanimously adopted an emergency resolution meant to tighten its rules and prevent future abuses. More than two dozen donors listed as contributors to Mr. Yin's campaign told The Times they had given money to it. Many expressed outrage that their names had been used. This is a developing story and will be updated. William K. Rashbaum contributed reporting.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Jersey congresswoman LaMonica McIver charged with assault after clash at detention center
The US congresswoman LaMonica McIver, a Democrat, was charged with assaulting federal agents after a clash outside an immigration detention center in New Jersey, the state's top federal prosecutor announced on Monday. Alina Habba, the interim US attorney for the district of New Jersey, said in a post on social media that McIver was facing charges 'for assaulting, impeding and interfering with law enforcement' when she visited the detention center along with two other Democratic members of New Jersey's congressional delegation on 9 May. 'No one is above the law – politicians or otherwise,' Habba said in a statement. 'It is the job of this office to uphold justice impartially, regardless of who you are. Now we will let the justice system work.' McIver on Monday blamed federal law enforcement for escalating the situation, saying that it was the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents who 'created an unnecessary and unsafe confrontation' with lawmakers. 'The charges against me are purely political – they mischaracterise and distort my actions, and are meant to criminalise and deter legislative oversight,' she said. At the same time, Habba announced her office was dismissing a misdemeanor trespassing charge against Ras Baraka, the Democratic mayor of Newark, whose arrest instigated the clash with federal agents. Baraka, the mayor of New Jersey's largest city and a candidate for the Democratic nomination for governor, was arrested and charged with trespassing as he sought to join the congressional delegation at Delaney Hall, a privately run federal immigration detention center. Habba, who served as Trump's personal lawyer before being named to the post, said she had dismissed the charge 'for the sake of moving forward' and offered to personally accompany Baraka on a tour of the facility, declaring the government had 'nothing to hide'. Kristi Noem, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, wrote on X that McIver was being charged after a 'thorough review of the video footage and an investigation'. Body-camera footage released by the agency and shared with Fox News shows a chaotic scene outside the facility's chain-link fence as the mayor is arrested. During the scuffle, McIver walks through the gate and appears to make contact with a law enforcement officer wearing fatigues and a face covering. It is unclear if the contact is intentional, accidental or the result of being caught in the scrum. Meanwhile, footage from witnesses on the scene appears to contradict the government's claim that members of Congress stormed the facility. Paul Fishman, an attorney for McIver called the decision to charge the congresswoman 'spectacularly inappropriate', arguing she had the 'right and responsibility to see how Ice is treating detainees'. 'Rather than facilitating that inspection, Ice agents chose to escalate what should have been a peaceful situation into chaos,' Fishman, the former US attorney for the district of New Jersey, said in a statement. Democrats and legal advocates reacted with alarm on Monday, casting the prosecution of the congresswoman as an attempt to deter legislative oversight and stifle opposition to the Trump administration's immigration policies, which have included raids and deportations without due process. In a joint statement, House Democratic leaders on Monday condemned the charges as 'extreme, morally bankrupt and [lacking] any basis in law or fact'. Related: Newark mayor says prosecutors tried to 'humilate' him by forcing redo of fingerprints and mugshot 'There is no credible evidence that Rep McIver engaged in any criminal activity,' the Democrats said, noting that after the incident, Trump administration officials led the members of Congress on a tour of the facility, which they said would not have been permitted 'had she done anything wrong'. In a statement on Monday, Bakara welcomed the dismissal of charges against him, but said he would 'continue to advocate for the humane treatment of detainees' and 'continue to press the facility to ensure that it is compliant with City of Newark codes and regulations'. He also made clear that he stood with McIver, whom he called a 'daughter of Newark'. 'I fully expect her to be vindicated,' he said. Mike Zamore, the national director of policy and government affairs at the ACLU, and Amol Sinha, the executive director of ACLU-NJ, warned that the charges against a sitting member of Congress were 'more suited for authoritarianism than American democracy'. 'If the Trump administration can target elected officials who oppose its extreme agenda, it can happen to any one of us,' they wrote. 'We demand that they drop the charges against Rep McIver, and we implore her fellow members of Congress to call for the same.'
