House Democrats resume infighting after Trump speech humiliation
One full day of embarrassment over the party's response to Donald Trump 's speech to Congress was insufficient for Democrats, who delivered a second helping on Thursday.
Despite House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declaring a censure of Rep. Al Green not worth the paper on which it was printed, nearly a dozen members of his party broke ranks to vote for it.
Green, who was escorted out of Trump's speech Tuesday evening by the sergeant-at-arms, is not exactly worse off. He'll likely receive a fundraising boost resulting from the rebuke.
'I would do it again,' he told reporters on Thursday.
Whether the same can be said for his 10 colleagues who flirted with what Jeffries called a 'political and partisan game' is less obvious, as is the actual strategy that Democratic leadership is pursuing. The group included New York swing-district Democrat Tom Suozzi, who said on Thursday that he believed Democrats should show 'deference' to the same president who'd a day earlier attacked a member of the Senate from the floor of the House, dubbing her 'Pocahontas' — a racist dig at her claims of Native American ancestry.
Jeffries, at a caucus meeting before the president spoke to Congress, had urged his members not to become the center of a media story by causing disruptions.
Their Republican colleagues spent Wednesday and Thursday concocting a scandal around Green's conduct. Despite the recent historical examples of Republican members like Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene heckling Joe Biden (and going wholly unpunished) during his addresses to Congress, Speaker Mike Johnson seized upon Green's shouted remarks during Trump's speech to play an old trick: dividing Democrats with a censure resolution.
Now with Green in the crosshairs of the Republican majority after the fact, the minority leader and his colleagues remain at odds over a path forward. Thursday's vote to censure Green, joined by a number of centrist Democrats closer to the minority leader than many on the progressive left, shows a total absence of a prevailing voice of leadership among the House Democratic caucus.
On social media, the minority leader continually faces accusations of failing to meet the moment.
' Hakeem Jeffries didn't even attempt to fight for one of his own from a censure. Why should we expect him to fight for us?' wrote the progressive-aligned 'Dear White Staffers' account, through which left-leaning congressional staff often vent their disgust.
Many more have echoed this sentiment, frustrated with a caucus leader who as of Thursday afternoon had not issued a statement about the official campaign arm of the GOP House caucus, the NRCC, falsely labeling a member of Jeffries's leadership team (Adriano Espaillat) with the 'illegal immigrant' slur — he was beaten to the punch by the new chair of the DNC, Ken Martin, who said that the NRCC's tweet was racist.
'With Speaker Mike Johnson leading the charge, they wear their bigotry like a badge of honor—absolutely despicable!', said the DNC chair.
There's no sign that Jeffries has any control over the true renegades in his caucus — the conservative members of his caucus who threaten to erase his leverage on key votes and frequently side with Republicans to hand the president's party messaging victories. As a result, the opposition party appears weaker than ever in a moment when Democratic voters are increasingly demanding the emergence of a vocal leader.
One senior House Democrat on Thursday summed up the situation succinctly to Axios: 'Everyone is mad at everyone."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
'Incredibly petty': Sen. Rand Paul says he was 'uninvited' to White House picnic over breaks with Trump
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he was "uninvited" to an annual White House picnic typically attended by members of Congress and their families, framing the move to reporters on Wednesday as retribution for his opposition to key components of President Donald Trump's agenda. 'They're afraid of what I'm saying, so they think they're going to punish me, I can't go to the picnic, as if somehow that's going to make me more conciliatory,' Paul said. 'So it's silly, in a way, but it's also just really sad that this is what it's come to. But petty vindictiveness like this, it makes you — it makes you wonder about the quality of people you're dealing with.' Paul, who said he attended picnics hosted by Presidents Biden and Obama, told reporters he called the White House earlier today to secure tickets to the annual picnic but was told he was not invited to the event. He said he had family members flying to Washington D.C. to attend the event, including son, daughter-in-law and six-month old grandson, whom he noted owns a "Make America Great Again" hat. 'I just find this incredibly petty,' Paul told reporters."I have been, I think, nothing but polite to the President. I have been an intellectual opponent, a public policy opponent, and he's chosen now to uninvite me from the picnic and to say my grandson can't come to the picnic." The White House did not immediately respond to a series of questions, including whether Paul was ever invited to the event and if Trump was directly involved in the decision to "uninvite" him. As Trump pushes Republicans to pass a package of measures to fund much of his domestic agenda by Independence Day, Paul is among the Senate Republicans poised to make that milestone unreachable, joining fiscal hawks in the party to balk at legislation the Congressional Budget Office estimates said would add $2.4 trillion to the national deficit. In addition to his belief that the funding package would "explode the debt," the three-term senator has criticized spending cuts in the bill as "wimpy and anemic," called planned Medicaid changes in the legislation "bad strategy" and proposed cutting billions in funding from the bill for Trump's border wall. 'In private, there's quite a few people in there who actually do think we could save some money and are open minded to it, and believe the administration should justify the numbers,' Paul told reporters after a two-hour meeting on the bill Wednesday. 'Even if you're supportive, and I am supportive of border security, but I'm just not supportive of a blank check.' Paul said this week he plans to vote "No" on the legislation and speculated today it may be among the reasons for the rescinded invitation. 'I'm arguing from a true belief and worry that our country is mired in debt and getting worse, and they choose to react by uninviting my grandson to the picnic,' Paul said. 'I don't know, I just think it really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' Trump has frequently lashed out at Paul in response to the sustained opposition, deriding the senator on Truth Social for his criticisms. "Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not," Trump wrote last week. Paul has emerged as a chief critic to Trump's fiscal policy, and has intensely criticized his decision to place tariffs on major U.S. trading partners, arguing they will push the country into a recession. The libertarian conservative was one of four Republican senators to back a Democratic resolution to block the implementation of Trump's Canadian tariffs, predicting at the time that the import penalties would "threaten us with a recession" and calling Trump's decision to place tariffs on major U.S. trading partners "a terrible, terrible idea." The effort has so far stalled in the House. Paul also joined Democrats in introducing a bipartisan resolution to undo the reciprocal tariffs Trump placed on dozens of countries, this time by terminating the national emergency he declared to implement the global penalties, arguing that Trump had exceeded his presidential authority. 'Tariffs are taxes, and the power to tax belongs to Congress—not the president. Our Founders were clear: tax policy should never rest in the hands of one person,' Paul said in a statement on the bipartisan effort. 'Abusing emergency powers to impose blanket tariffs not only drives up costs for American families but also tramples on the Constitution. It's time Congress reasserts its authority and restores the balance of power.' That effort failed to pass the Senate. Paul's differences with Trump even extend to the military parade taking place on Saturday, which the lawmaker likened to parades in countries led by dictators. "I wouldn't have done it," Paul said on Tuesday. "The images you saw in the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that." But still, in the face of his criticisms of Trump, Paul appeared to view the rescinded invitation as a shock, noting that even Democratic lawmakers remain invited to the White House picnic. "I think I'm the first senator in the history of United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Rand told reporters. "Literally, every Democrat is invited, every Republican is invited, and to say that my family is no longer welcome, kind of sad actually.'
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Newsom v Trump holds promise and peril for California governor
In a televised address on Tuesday night, California Governor Gavin Newsom accused President Donald Trump of a "brazen abuse of power". The Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts were terrorising his state's immigrant neighbourhoods, he said. "California may be first, but it clearly will not end here," he warned. "Democracy is under assault before our eyes."Newsom's speech was the latest salvo between the US president and the Democrat who heads America's most populous state. The clash between the two leaders presents a formidable challenge to the 57-year-old governor. But it also offers a political opportunity for a man whose term in office ends next year and has his own presidential ambitions."This is unquestionably an opportunity for Gavin Newsom," said Darry Sragow, a long-time California Democratic strategist. He adds, however, that as the state's governor, Newsom has an obligation to defend California - whether it's in his political interests or not."It's a call to duty," he has accused Newsom of being "grossly incompetent" and of failing to adequately respond as some of the Los Angeles protests turned violent. He's dusted off an earlier derisive nickname for the governor, "Newscum", and said on Tuesday that he believed arresting him would be a "great thing".According to media reports, the White House is considering whether to cut off federal aid to California, including billions of dollars of education grants."Gavin Newsom's feckless leadership is directly responsible for the lawless riots and violent attacks on law enforcement in Los Angeles," White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson said in a statement. "Instead of writing fundraising emails meant to score political points with his left-wing base, Newsom should focus on protecting Americans by restoring law and order to his state."Newsom called the arrest threat a step toward authoritarianism and said Trump's deployment of military personnel to secure federal buildings and protect immigration officials had inflamed protests that had been isolated and controlled."The rule of law has increasingly given way to the rule of Don," he said in his Tuesday night address. Hundreds arrested as calm returns to Los AngelesEverything we know about the demonstrationsVoters divided on Trump's LA protest crackdownTrump's deportation drive is perfect storm in city of immigrantsWhere else are people protesting in the US? Over the past few days, Newsom has become the face of a Democratic Party that has often struggled to present a clear and unified alternative to Trump's Republican administration on the national stage. The governor's set-piece speech, delivered in a suit while standing in front of California and US flags, received widespread press coverage and attracted well over a million views on assorted YouTube press team has also been active on social media, comparing Trump to the evil Emperor Palpatine from the Star Wars films. According to the Washington Post, the TikTok followers on his official governor's account have doubled to 897,000 in the past few days."There is a very real possibility that Newsom will come out of this with a significant and favourable national profile," Sragow said. He says that the more Newsom can outline a story of Trump against California - a state with whom the president has a very clear grudge - the better the chances for the governor to benefit."Don't make this into a mano-a-mano shootout between two gunslingers on the streets of Laredo," he and Newsom have always presented a contrast in stories and styles – the brash outer-borough New Yorker versus the polished San Francisco was elected to office in 2018, in the Democratic mid-term wave election that marked the first major voter pushback against Trump's first presidential term. He promised to make his state a counterpoint to Trump's national right-wing populism, but his political journey hasn't always been a smooth flirted with controversy during the Covid pandemic, as he backed aggressive lockdowns of public spaces – but gathered for a birthday celebration at a posh French restaurant in November 2020. His political opponents, sensing weakness, triggered a recall election in September 2021 – but Newsom won the vote by a comfortable margin. Newsom won re-election to a second four-year term in 2022 and became more involved in national Democratic politics, fuelling speculation that he harboured presidential ambitions. He became a high-profile surrogate for Joe Biden's re-election campaign and took to Fox News for high-profile debates with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who was at the time running for the Republican presidential nomination, in December Trump's re-election last November, Newsom made a noticeable tack to the political centre. He expressed new discomfort with transgender athletes in women's sports, called for curtailing health benefits for undocumented workers, and hosted conservative guests like former White House senior adviser Steve Bannon on his political podcast – provoking the ire of some in the Democratic January 2024, he toured the devastating fire damage in a Los Angeles suburb with Trump and pledged to work with the new Republican administration in recovery Los Angeles protests have brought a sudden and decisive end to that detente, as the two men square off across a deep political has frequently benefitted from having a political foil with which to contrast himself – whether it was Hillary Clinton in 2016, Nancy Pelosi in the latter years of his first presidential term or Joe Biden during his drive back to there are risks for Newsom in this fight – suspension of federal aid to California and the threat of arrest being just two notable ones – it is also a clash he seems more than willing to embrace.
NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
DNC will redo party elections for David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta's posts after procedural error
The Democratic National Committee has voted to hold new elections for two of its vice-chair positions after a procedural challenge, meaning Florida activist David Hogg and Pennsylvania state Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta, who were elected to the party's executive committee in February, have to run again in order to keep their positions. They won't have to wait long: A new, virtual, election between Hogg and Kenyatta begins Thursday. And the loser will be able to run in a subsequent election for the final vice-chair slot. The challenge that triggered the new election isn't directly related to Hogg's public spat with the DNC and its chairman, Ken Martin, over Hogg's decision to support primary challenges to Democratic incumbents. But the weeks-long episode, with Martin and other leaders backing a neutrality pledge for party officers, has inflamed tensions among members and kept the debate between Hogg and the party in the headlines. Last month, the DNC's Credentials Committee voted to recommend that the party hold two new vice-chair elections because it found that the DNC mistakenly created an advantage for the two male candidates, Hogg and Kenyatta, as it managed the internal elections at the end of a marathon February party meeting in Washington, D.C. Wednesday evening the DNC announced that 75% of the votes cast in a virtual election by its members voted in favor of approving that recommendation. Because DNC rules require equal gender representation on its executive committee, not including the party chair, the results of previous elections in February meant the DNC had to elect at least one man to its final two vice-chair slots. But instead of holding individual votes for each position, one to be filled by a man and one by a candidate of any gender, the party decided to hold one single vote to decide who took the final two slots. Oklahoma Democratic Committeewoman Kalyn Free, who unsuccessfully ran against Hogg and Kenyatta in the February vice-chair race, petitioned the DNC for a redo, claiming the decision to combine the ballots unfairly benefitted Hogg and Kenyatta over the female candidates who were eligible to win the final vice-chair slot. Though Free's challenge was filed well before his public spat with Martin, Hogg framed the decision last month as proof the party was trying to strip him of his title over his support for primary challenges to Democratic incumbents. Both Martin and Kenyatta vehemently disagreed with his framing: Martin blamed a 'procedural error' from 'before I became chair' for the episode, and Kenyatta criticized Hogg for distracting from the party's work by arguing the vote amounted to personal retribution. Tensions between Hogg and the party have been brewing for months, since the activist telegraphed his decision to back Democratic primary challenges. Ahead of the vote, Politico published a short clip of an internal Democratic Party call on which Martin vented his frustration with Hogg, saying the fight has 'essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to.' The leak prompted another round of finger-pointing, with prominent DNC members accusing Hogg or his allies of orchestrating the leak. Hogg vehemently denied that and published a screenshot he said showed his text messages with the reporter who published the story. An election for the first vice-chair position between Hogg and Kenyatta will run virtually from Thursday morning through Saturday afternoon. Then, the party will hold another virtual vote Sunday morning through Tuesday afternoon featuring the four remaining candidates who were eligible at the end of the February elections.
