UK government spends over $700k on minor website makeover
The work on the website, performed by global ad agency M&C Saatchi, resulted in the black header of the website turning blue. The logo received minor changes as well, with the dot in the 'gov.uk' moving up and turning turquoise.
The cost of the seemingly minor tweaks has been harshly criticized by various parties, who accuse the government of grossly mishandling taxpayer money and not following its own proclaimed policy to save more.
Zia Yusuf, head of Reform UK's newly formed efficiency body, for instance, branded the makeover a 'joke.'
'The disrespect for taxpayers' money continues to be astounding. Spending more than £500,000 on changing a logo on a government website is a joke at the taxpayer's expense, quite literally,' he said, claiming that the questionable work on the website 'is just the kind of thing we have been uncovering in county halls on a daily basis.'
The government, however, has defended the changes, insisting they were only a part of a broader effort to 'brand refresh' websites of various institutions. It also appeared to point fingers at its predecessors, stating that the lucrative contract was approved before the Labour Party came to power.
'This was committed to by the previous government, with two of the three contracts signed and delivered by July 2024,' a government spokesman said in a statement to British media.
'The new government then chose to turn the rebranding and research work into consumer-friendly digital products, including our upcoming gov.uk App, gov.uk Chat and more,' he added without providing any further detail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
UK to return remains of war heroes to African nation
The UK has agreed to repatriate the skeletal remains of Zimbabwean freedom fighters killed by British colonial forces during a 19th-century uprising against white settlers, local media have reported. The skulls belonging to Zimbabwean rebel chiefs, including spiritual leaders Mbuya Nehanda and Sekuru Kaguvi, who led the revolt known as the First Chimurenga between 1896 and 1897, were taken to Britain as war trophies. Talks over their repatriation began more than a decade ago. In 2015, Zimbabwe's then-president, Robert Mugabe, condemned Britain for keeping decapitated heads as war trophies in a national history museum, calling it one of 'the highest forms of racist moral decadence, sadism, and human insensitivity.' On Sunday, The Herald quoted Raphael Faranisi, permanent secretary at Harare's Ministry of Home Affairs and Cultural Heritage, as saying that British museums have agreed to return the remains to Zimbabwe. At least 11 are believed to be held at the Natural History Museum in London, two at the University of Cambridge's Duckworth Laboratory, and others at an unspecified museum in Switzerland. 'We have started the first phase of the process, which we hope will be done in the shortest time possible,' Faranisi told the outlet, adding that authorities have discussed building a storage facility to preserve the skulls. The report came weeks after the Ministry of Home Affairs and Cultural Heritage said it had convened a meeting on the 'possible repatriation of Zimbabwean human remains still dotted in British museums.' In a post on X last month, the ministry said a road map had been established for the recovery process. Zimbabwe, then Southern Rhodesia, was a British colony from 1923 until independence in 1980, marked by land seizures, forced labor, and brutal crackdowns on resistance, including massacres during the First Chimurenga. The country now marks Heroes Day each August to honor those who fought to end colonial rule. On Monday, in a speech marking the 45th Heroes Day since independence, Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa committed to protecting national sovereignty, declaring that neo-colonialism will never gain a foothold in the country.
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
UK releases 26,000 inmates early due to lack of prison space
Over 26,000 prisoners, some serving lengthy terms, have been freed in the UK as part of a soft-justice program aimed at easing the overcrowding of jails, the Daily Mail has reported, citing government data. Among those released between September 2024 and March 2025 were 248 convicts sentenced to 14 years or more for committing serious crimes, the paper said in an article on Sunday. The majority of the criminals freed by the cabinet of Prime Minister Keir Starmer were British citizens, but there were also over 2,600 foreign nationals, the figures show. An average of 3,461 prisoners have been released each month under the scheme, which allows some inmates to leave after serving 40% of their sentences. Based on this rate, the Daily Mail estimates that the total number of those freed could reach 45,000 by the end of the program's first year. According to the paper, the prisoners thanked Starmer after being let out and vowed to be 'lifelong Labour voters.' However, some of them committed new crimes just hours after being released, according to the report. When asked about the program, a Justice Ministry spokesman said the Labor cabinet 'had no choice but to take decisive action to stop prisons overflowing and leave police unable to make arrests' after the previous Conservative government left the UK's penitentiaries in a dire straits. 'We are building 14,000 prison places and reforming sentencing so jails never run out of space again,' he said. Tory justice spokesman Robert Jenrick said that the number of the freed criminals was 'shocking,' adding that it explained 'why Britain feels lawless.' The British public is 'sick of soft justice,' Jenrick told the Daily Mail. The leader of Reform UK, Nigel Farage, claimed last month that the crime rate in the UK had spiked 50% since the 1990s and that the country is 'facing societal collapse' as a result. According to Interior Ministry data, knife crime in England and Wales rose 87% over the past decade, with almost 55,000 incidents in 2024 alone. In July, a study suggested that 39% of all mobile phone thefts across Europe now occur in the UK.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Europe ‘lacks strength' to support Kiev
Europe does not have the capability to help Ukraine in any meaningful way, whether in pushing for better negotiating terms or enforcing a future ceasefire, according to The Times. Over the weekend, US Vice President J.D. Vance told Fox News that Americans were 'sick' of spending tax dollars on Ukraine and that Washington was 'done funding' Kiev. He suggested that if European nations 'care so much about this conflict' they should play a more direct role 'in funding this war yourself.' The Times noted that despite its unwavering diplomatic support for Ukraine, Europe 'lacks the strength to back Kiev' in negotiations or in guaranteeing settlement terms. The outlet recalled that the 'coalition of the willing,' led by the UK and France, had previously planned to send a European contingent to Ukraine to monitor a future ceasefire. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a target of 64,000 troops, despite Russia opposing any Western military presence, warning it could trigger a world war. However, Starmer's target looks 'highly unlikely,' The Times noted, adding that European defense ministers say there is 'no chance' of meeting it and that even 25,000 troops as a joint effort would 'be a push.' 'Russia has 800,000 [troops],' Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene told European counterparts earlier this year. 'If we can't even raise 64,000…that is weak.' In January, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky called for a foreign force of 'at least 200,000 European peacekeepers' as a 'baseline for security.' The Times also stated that while Kiev's European backers have overtaken the US in total military aid, spending over $78 billion compared to Washington's $70 billion, most of Ukraine's advanced weaponry still comes from the US. Although the EU has launched an €800 billion ($867 billion) readiness plan to modernize its military, The Times said progress has been slow and 'hindered by fragmented industries, political divisions and lack of a shared strategy.' Russia has repeatedly criticized continued Western military aid to Ukraine, saying it prolongs the conflict. Moscow has also criticized Europe's increased military spending, accusing it of pursuing 'rabid militarization' threatening regional stability.
