Rayan Cherki was not Manchester City's priority after Florian Wirtz collapse, reveals journalist
Manchester City had a priority side from Lyon's Rayan Cherki after withdrawing interest in Bayer Leverkusen's Florian Wirtz, it has been claimed.
The France international has seemingly emerged as a potential first arrival through the Etihad Stadium doors this summer, as Manchester City prepare for life without arguably their club's greatest-ever player from next season; Kevin De Bruyne.
Advertisement
Club officials took the difficult decision not to renew the Belgian's contract beyond it's existing expiry date of the end of June, and as such have found themselves looking for direct replacements within the European market.
The priority for the role was initially understood to be Bayer Leverkusen's Florian Wirtz, although reservations over the finances involved in a deal meant that City withdrew interest and left the door open for the German to join Bayern Munich, Liverpool, or Real Madrid.
As such, Manchester City swiftly moved on to other targets within their shortlist this summer, and that now appears to have led the club to Olympique Lyonnais' Rayan Cherki, although a new report has indicated that the Frenchman has only come after another name.
Advertisement
That is according to the information of Sky's Sacha Tavolieri, who reveals that Pep Guardiola and City's priority beyond Wirtz was FC Barcelona's Dani Olmo, but gauged an understanding that a deal for the Spaniard would be drawn out and complex throughout the summer.
It is explained that discussions between City and Barcelona gave the former the understanding that should an agreement be reached, then such negotiations would be 'long, complex, and bitter' while an arrival was wanted ahead of the FIFA Club World Cup.
As such, all involved at Manchester City decided to set their sights on bringing Rayan Cherki to the club this summer, knowing that Lyon urgently need cash to balance accounts before the end of June as they eye a sale of around €40 million.
The arrival of Cherki at the Etihad Stadium will no doubt raise question marks over the club's interest in Nottingham Forest's Morgan Gibbs-White, with the England international believed to be high among the targets coming into the summer window.
Advertisement
At one stage, the line of reporting was that City officials would be frontrunners in the chase for Nuno Espirito Santo's star-man in the middle of his set-up, with the player likely to command a fee north of £70 million this summer.
It also remains to be seen what the future holds for a number of existing playmaker options within the Manchester City squad, namely James McAtee – who is expected to leave the club permanently or on loan – as well as Phil Foden, who is hoping to bounce back next campaign.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
28 minutes ago
- Vox
The fascinating backstory behind a bizarre State Department Substack post
is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy,, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here. 'The global liberal project is not enabling the flourishing of democracy. Rather, it is trampling democracy,' a State Department employee wrote on Substack. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images Last week, the State Department published a strikingly radical screed on its official Substack. Titled 'The Need for Civilizational Allies in Europe,' the piece accused Europe's governments of waging 'an aggressive campaign against Western civilization itself.' These Western nations, according to author Samuel Samson, have turned on their own heritage: abandoning democracy in favor of a repressive liberalism that threatens to snuff out the heart of their own civilization. 'The global liberal project is not enabling the flourishing of democracy. Rather, it is trampling democracy, and Western heritage along with it, in the name of a decadent governing class afraid of its own people,' Samson writes. Samson asserts that German and French criminal investigations into far-right factions are politically motivated repression, but provides no evidence to support this extraordinary claim about the internal politics of key allies. He inflates the (real) problems with free speech law in Britain, while whitewashing the only authoritarian state in the European Union (right-wing Hungary). He presents a bizarre intellectual history of the Declaration of Independence, replacing Jefferson's chief influences (Enlightenment liberals) with Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas. The essay isn't just poorly argued: It has policy implications. Samson both insults and threatens allied governments, implying there will be some kind of US punishment if European states do not change their policies on free speech, election administration, and (for some reason) migration. 'Secretary Rubio has made clear that the State Department will always act in America's national interest. Europe's democratic backsliding not only impacts European citizens but increasingly affects American security and economic ties, along with the free speech rights of American citizens and companies,' he writes. 'We will not always agree on scope and tactics, but tangible actions by European governments to guarantee protection for political and religious speech, secure borders, and fair elections would serve as welcome steps forward.' Samuel Samson's title is 'Senior Advisor for the Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor,' but he is not an experienced diplomat. In fact, he is a 2021 college graduate with no background in European affairs or foreign policy. His last job was 'Director of Strategic Partnerships' (a fundraising position) for American Moment, a right-wing organization dedicated to identifying Trump-aligned young people for junior staff jobs. But while Samson's path to shaping US-European relations is unconventional, it is hardly unintended. His own publicly available writing suggests that it is the result of a deliberate strategy — an effort to seed the US government with radical opponents of philosophical liberalism who aim to replace it with a form of illiberal Christian government. Samson described this strategy, in a 2021 essay, as 'the infiltration of liberalism's powerful institutions by right-wing post-liberal agents.' He said the strategy was worth pursuing, and that American Moment was an organization dedicated to turning the basic idea into 'tangible action.' (Neither State nor American Moment responded to requests for comment.) His ascent in the State Department is concrete evidence that this radical right strategy of 'entryism' — a small group trying to join another organization with the attempt of changing it from within — is yielding dividends. So when the State Department published Samson's piece on its Substack, it sent an unmistakable message not just to Europe but to likeminded right-wing radicals: They could begin more openly planting their flag atop conquered territory. The far-right's successful entryism About a decade ago, Harvard Law School professor Adrian Vermeule became famous for advocating an idea called 'integralism:' basically, a right-wing Catholic doctrine that calls for the abolition of the barrier between church and state. He viewed liberalism, in the philosophical sense, as an abomination, its obsession with rights and freedoms fundamentally corrosive of the 'traditional' moral values that Vermeule believes are essential for human flourishing. The only solution was to infuse the state with religious values — specifically, conservative Catholic ones. But how could you possibly get to such a society in the United States, where 20 percent of the population is Catholic — most of whom are themselves not Vermeule disciples? His answer, which he calls either 'ralliement' or 'integration from within,' is an entryist campaign targeting the bureaucracy. You get a few key people into positions of power, and then they quietly nudge the citizenry toward a place where they will accept some kind of 'postliberal' state. On the Right The ideas and trends driving the conservative movement, from senior correspondent Zack Beauchamp. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 'The vast bureaucracy created by liberalism in pursuit of a mirage of depoliticized governance may, by the invisible hand of Providence, be turned to new ends, becoming the great instrument with which to restore a substantive politics of the good,' Vermeule wrote in a 2018 essay. These arguments helped make Vermeuele a leading voice in the so-called postliberal movement: a loose group of right-wing religious conservatives who shared his radical critique of our current political institutions (if not his integralist solution). Postliberal ideas became particularly popular among young conservatives, who felt that the pre-Trump conservative consensus was exhausted and out of date. Samuel Samson was one of them. After graduating from the University of Texas at Austin in 2021, he took a one-year junior fellowship at the Thomistic Institute — a Catholic think tank in Washington, DC, associated with the Dominican order of monks. During that fellowship, he penned a piece for the American Spectator in which he endorsed Vermeule's strategy for taking liberalism down. Calling Vermeuele's ideas 'the popular blueprint for America's burgeoning post-liberal right,' Samson wrote that 'I believe the offensive strategy is…worth our effort.' His concern, however, is that the strategy risks corruption: that young bureaucrats and Hill staffers residing in Washington will be corrupted by living in a place defined by liberal values. 'The strategy's offensive nature requires its agents to dwell for extended periods, even lifetimes, within the nucleus of American liberalism,' he writes. 'As such, the strategy brings agents into full contact with the temptations of liberalism — sirens singing alluring songs of pleasure, sexual license, material gain, power, prestige, and social inclusion — beckoning the agent to direct the project to new, less-wholesome ends.' It is a sign that a truly radical ideological movement has begun successfully executing on its stated strategy for entering the political mainstream. Samson's solution to this danger is for radical entryists to engage in study. 'Read great books of the Western, Christian, and Classical traditions — as well as those that oppose them,' he writes. 'Yes, the practical skills of networking, legislating, and orating are important too, but detached from speculative truth, they are all functionally worthless.' Somewhat ironically, Samson's next move was to become a fundraiser. But the organization he would work for, American Moment, was one that Samson believed furthered the Vermeule mission. Founded in 2021 by three young conservatives — Saurabh Sharma, Nick Solheim, and Jake Mercier — American Moment was inspired by an essay written in 2020 by now-Vice President JD Vance. Vance argued that the conservative movement was trapped by its own donors: that the entire professional infrastructure of the right was forced, by power of money, into organizations who supported the open approach to trade and migration that the Trump movement opposed. 'Real change,' Vance wrote, would require that we come to grips with the fact that so much of Conservatism, Inc. depends on the status quo.' Sharma, Solheim, and Mercier built American Moment to try and end that dependence: to build a cadre of populist junior staffers. With Vance on their board, they created a database of like-minded young people to hire for early career positions, a fellowship program to bring young right-wing populists to DC, and even hosted social events to create a more robust right-wing youth culture in the capital. Their efforts have been reasonably successful. American Moment worked on Project 2025, and Sharma is currently serving as a special adviser to the Presidential Policy Office (which supervises hiring of executive branch political appointees). American Moment is not exactly as Samson described it before he worked there. While his 2021 essay claimed it was built to implement Vermeule's integralist ideas, its leaders took a more ecumenical approach. They elevated conservatives from all sorts of different right-wing subcultures, not just Catholic postliberals, so long as they had the right Trump-friendly policy views. 'The basic approach of, 'Well, we're going to do our -ism and do politics that way' falls apart,' Sharma told Politico's Ian Ward in 2023. 'You're basically signing yourself up to be a loud but ultimately defeated minority.' Yet the fact that an integralist like Samson was able to succeed there, and then use it as a jumping-off point to a senior position in the Trump administration, suggests it facilitated the success of Vermeule-inspired righties. Attempts to build a more Trump-friendly set of conservative cadres would invariably create opportunities for radical young right-wingers, especially if they were already thinking about entryist strategies for politics. That elements of the top leadership were sympathetic — most notably Vance, a self-described 'postliberal' deeply influenced by Vermeuele's ideological allies — surely helped things along. The State Department op-ed, in short, is not a one-off. It is a sign that a truly radical ideological movement has begun successfully executing on its stated strategy for entering the political mainstream.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Head of Nato suggests alliance should look to ‘equalise' US defence contribution
The head of Nato has piled further pressure on the UK to up defence spending, as he suggested members of the alliance should be looking to 'equalise' the US contribution. Secretary-general Mark Rutte said allies will find themselves 'in great difficulty' in the coming years if they stick with the current 2% GDP alliance spending target. The former Dutch prime minister is thought to be pushing for members to commit to spending 3.5% on the military, with a further 1.5% on defence-related measures. America currently spends around 3.4% of its GDP on defence, and Nato members are expected to spend 2%. Sir Keir Starmer has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034. However, he and the Defence Secretary have already come under pressure to explain how the 3% target could be met. Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, Mr Rutte said: 'The expectation is that on the European side of Nato and the Canadian side of Nato, if we think that we can keep ourselves safe sticking with the 2%, forget it. 'Yes, the next three to five years, but then we are in great difficulty. And the US rightly expects us to spend much more to defend ourselves with their help, but also to equalise, which is only fair with what the US is spending on defence.' Leaders from Nato will meet in The Hague later this month, and Mr Rutte said a new 'investment plan' will be 'at the heart' of the summit. Defence Secretary John Healey said on Tuesday the UK already 'makes a huge contribution to Nato' amid speculation about what the body will call for. 'Britain already makes a huge contribution to Nato,' he told reporters. 'We've published a defence review that has Nato at its heart and I'm announcing today the new spending in this Parliament, £4 billion, doubling the amount that we'll put into drones. 'We'll make a bigger contribution to Nato through that, and £1 billion over this Parliament to develop laser weapons, the first European nation in Nato to have laser weapons on our destroyers and then with our land forces. 'This is Britain leading in Nato, contributing more to Nato, just as we do, for instance, with our nuclear deterrent, the only country with a nuclear deterrent that commits it in full to other Nato nations.'
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Barcelona star picks between Lamine Yamal and Ousmane Dembélé for Ballon d'Or
Barcelona star Gavi has this week provided his take on the ongoing battle for this year's Ballon d'Or award. The subject of the next 'Golden Ball' has of course dominated the headlines across Europe over the course of recent days. Advertisement This comes after a change at the top was noted, owing to developments in the Champions League final between Paris Saint-Germain and Inter Milan. After Ousmane Dembélé played a starring role en route to the former's 5-0 rout, the Frenchman was positioned by many as the new favourite to be named world football's best player. Dembélé's main competition for the award comes in the form of his long-term replacement at Barcelona, in the form of Lamine Yamal. Speaking to the media early this week, the subject of the Ballon d'Or race was therefore put to a player who has spent time lining out alongside both players. Advertisement During an interview with Catalunya Ràdio's 'Tot Costa', as cited by Diario Sport, Gavi appeared to give the edge to Lamine, in responding: 'Ballon d'Or? Dembélé is like my brother and he had a great season. For me, he should absolutely be in the top three, and I will be really happy for him. However, Lamine's season is unique…' Conor Laird – GSFN
