
Public outrage as China woman told to make in-person withdrawal dies outside bank
There is public outrage following the death of an elderly Chinese woman outside a bank after she was instructed to withdraw funds in person. -- Photo: SCMP composite/Sohu/X
A bank in China is under scrutiny following the death of a gravely ill elderly woman outside one of its branches, where she was instructed to withdraw money in person.
The incident occurred on May 14 at the Agricultural Bank of China branch in Zhuzhou, Hunan province. The sick customer was brought by her daughter and son-in-law to withdraw 50,000 yuan (US$7,000) to cover her medical expenses.
The 62-year-old woman, known as Peng, had been suffering from diabetes for years. Recently, she had been hospitalised after falling and fracturing her leg, according to Dahe News.
One of Peng's daughters arrived at the bank that afternoon with her mother's identity card and deposit book but was unable to complete the transaction due to entering the password incorrectly several times.
Despite telling the bank clerk that her mother was unwell, the clerk insisted that Peng must be present in person to resolve the issue.
The daughter subsequently called her sister, who, along with her husband, transported Peng to the bank in a wheelchair. However, after an hour, they were still unable to withdraw the funds.
Notably, Peng, who was reportedly not fully conscious with her head leaning to one side, could not comply with the face recognition requirements, which required her to perform movements such as nodding and blinking.
Peng's daughters later took her outside the bank for fresh air, but tragically, she passed away at the entrance.
The case is currently under police investigation, with officials reporting that Peng died from 'a sudden outbreak of illness.'
An anonymous bank employee informed news portal Sina that Peng's relatives had not disclosed her medical condition to the staff.
When Peng arrived at the bank and struggled to cooperate with the procedures, employees suggested that her daughters take her home to rest, a proposal that was rejected by the family.
Local police authorities stated they would soon release their findings regarding the investigation.
On May 16, Peng's nephew announced that the family had reached an agreement with the bank to resolve the matter. The bank will cover Peng's funeral costs and provide the family with 100,000 yuan (US$14,000) as 'consolation money'.
'The agreement is signed between the bank and my cousin [Peng's daughter],' the nephew said. 'We will not pursue the matter any further. We are preparing to return to our rural hometown.'
This incident has sparked intense online discussions regarding the bank's actions.
'Why did not the bank release its surveillance footage to the public? I am sure it has high-quality cameras installed. Instead of sharing the footage, it chose to offer 100,000 yuan to settle the issue. Does this indicate a guilty conscience?' one online commentator argued.
Conversely, another individual raised questions about Peng's family: 'Could it be that her daughters were complicating matters at the bank by bringing their mother despite her health condition?' - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Four charged over suspected involvement in ‘blessing' scams
A gold necklace, S$1,311 in cash and 10,050 yuan (S$1,800) were seized. - SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE SINGAPORE: Three women and a man have been charged in court over allegedly cheating victims of cash and gold in 'blessing' scams. Chinese nationals Zhong Weifeng, 58, Huang Ximing, 61, Huang Meiling, 56, and Huang Qinyan, 47, were charged with conspiracy to cheat on Friday (June 6). On June 2, Zhong and Huang Meiling approached one of the victims and led her to Huang Qinyan, who claimed to be a Chinese physician. The victim was told she was experiencing misfortune due to 'negative spiritual elements', the police said on June 6. To ward off misfortune, the woman was said to have handed $700 in cash and a gold necklace to Huang Qinyan, who placed the items in a plastic bag. Huang Qinyan performed a 'cleansing ritual' on the valuables, and the victim was told to keep the plastic bag, untouched, under her bed for a month. The woman checked the bag the next day and found that her valuables had been replaced with leaves. On June 4, the police received a report of another scam with a similar modus operandi. According to the police, the second victim was approached by two of the accused and convinced to place an envelope with cash into a black rubbish bag for safekeeping. She later discovered that her money had gone missing. Police investigations found that Huang Ximing was working together with the three women to cheat the victims. All four were arrested on June 5. A gold necklace, $1,311 in cash and 10,050 yuan (S$1,800) were seized. If convicted of conspiracy to cheat, an offender can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined. - The Straits Times/ANN


Focus Malaysia
9 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Gaza hunger crisis: US-backed aid becomes ‘death trap' under Israeli fire
Gaza's civilians face impossible choices: risk Israeli drone strikes at US-backed aid sites or starve as food prices soar and markets empty. The new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, replacing UNRWA, is accused of weaponising aid, with distribution points becoming 'death traps.' Hospitals battle malnutrition-induced anaemia, leaving even blood donors too weak to contribute.


Focus Malaysia
9 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Landlord locks house with tenant's car, belongings over unpaid rent; is this legal in Malaysia?
'SAYA mau tengok wang saja.' (literally, 'Just show me the money'). It is surely not easy to be a strict houseowner; just ask this landlady who was forced to take drastic action over unpaid arrears in rental. In a video shared on X by Tony Montana (@Brohascomeback), a tenant was purportedly locked out of his rented premises and was trying to gain access by removing the locks. It was then that he (and the movers) were rudely greeted by a rather loud and irate woman believed to be the landlady. Obviously at the end of her tether, she simply exclaimed that the tenant can remove his belongings AFTER he has settled the arrears. Owner rumah cina tahan kereta dan barang sbb lambat keluar rumah setelah tamat penyewaan. 🤔 — Tony Montana 🦀 (@Brohascomeback) May 27, 2025 The post has already generated over 533.2K views at time of publication with netizens divided over the actions of the landlady. One commenter contended that landlords need to be cold and stone-hearted lest they be taken for a ride by unscrupulous tenants. If one is unable to pay rent, 'just go live by a cemetery or under a bridge' was his advice. Another netizen observed that it appears many netizens sided with the tenant simply because the landlady was a 'Type C' (slang for Chinese). Putting aside racial issues, is the landlady's action legal? It was argued that the landlady was well within her rights to lock the premises given the landlord's rights over the non-payment of rent would have been clearly spelt out in the tenancy agreement More than a few highlighted that the landlady had no right to take such action. One warned that the landlady could be spending time behind bars should the tenant make a police report. In Malaysia, landlords cannot legally lock up a rented property and seize a tenant's belongings if rent is unpaid without a court order or warrant. What remedies are available to the landlord? Under the Distress Act 1951, a landlord can apply to the court for a Writ of Distress (or Distress Action) to seize the tenant's removable property to recover unpaid rent. The seized property can then be sold to cover the rental arrears. Landlords are generally prohibited from using self-help methods like changing locks or shutting off utilities to evict a tenant or recover the property. The Specific Relief Act 1950 requires landlords to obtain a court order to evict a tenant and recover possession of the property. A landlord who illegally locks a tenant out or seizes their belongings without due process may face legal action from the tenant, potentially for trespassing or wrongful eviction. The law is clear on this. While it may be time-consuming and tedious, it cannot be side-stepped even if 'it does have a soft spot for the tenant compared to the landlord'. Such disputes are common and it must be incredibly frustrating. Apart from demanding larger deposit amount or carefully screening potential tenants, there is little landlords can do to avoid such pitfalls. Dealing with such tenants may be stress-inducing but that doesn't justify the landlady taking matters into her own hands. The law is crystal clear on that. – June 5, 2025