This Beverly JCG Insider Increased Their Holding By 93% Last Year
Looking at Beverly JCG Ltd.'s (Catalist:9QX ) insider transactions over the last year, we can see that insiders were net buyers. That is, there were more number of shares purchased by insiders than there were sold.
While insider transactions are not the most important thing when it comes to long-term investing, we do think it is perfectly logical to keep tabs on what insiders are doing.
We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free.
The Last 12 Months Of Insider Transactions At Beverly JCG
The insider Mark Jones made the biggest insider purchase in the last 12 months. That single transaction was for S$500k worth of shares at a price of S$0.0087 each. Although we like to see insider buying, we note that this large purchase was at significantly below the recent price of S$0.011. While it does suggest insiders consider the stock undervalued at lower prices, this transaction doesn't tell us much about what they think of current prices.
Mark Jones bought 119.20m shares over the last 12 months at an average price of S$0.0084. The chart below shows insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction!
View our latest analysis for Beverly JCG
Beverly JCG is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find small cap companies at attractive valuations, this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
Does Beverly JCG Boast High Insider Ownership?
Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. Usually, the higher the insider ownership, the more likely it is that insiders will be incentivised to build the company for the long term. It's great to see that Beverly JCG insiders own 57% of the company, worth about S$5.8m. This kind of significant ownership by insiders does generally increase the chance that the company is run in the interest of all shareholders.
What Might The Insider Transactions At Beverly JCG Tell Us?
It's certainly positive to see the recent insider purchase. And an analysis of the transactions over the last year also gives us confidence. But on the other hand, the company made a loss during the last year, which makes us a little cautious. Along with the high insider ownership, this analysis suggests that insiders are quite bullish about Beverly JCG. Looks promising! So these insider transactions can help us build a thesis about the stock, but it's also worthwhile knowing the risks facing this company. Our analysis shows 5 warning signs for Beverly JCG (4 make us uncomfortable!) and we strongly recommend you look at them before investing.
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Raymond James Reiterates Outperform on Arm Holdings (ARM), Raises PT to $165
Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) is one of the AI Stocks Analysts Are Watching Closely. On July 31, Raymond James analyst Srini Pajjuri raised the price target on the stock to $165.00 (from $140.00) while maintaining an 'Outperform' rating. The rating affirmation follows Arm's fiscal first-quarter results, which were in-line with expectations. However, fiscal second-quarter outlook was weaker than anticipated. Royalty revenue grew 25% year-over-year backed by strong data center performance. This was, despite weakness in smartphone and IoT units. The firm also talked about royalty rate expansion. A financial analyst looking at a monitor filled with stock market charts of U.S. listed semiconductor companies. 'Secular royalty rate expansion remains on track driven by continued ARMv9 adoption. We are also encouraged by early CSS progress (including at Samsung, MSFT, Xiaomi), which essentially doubles the royalty rate. Licensing declined slightly y/y but was better than our model while annualized contract value (ACV) grew 28%.' Looking ahead, the firm is optimistic on the back of strong v9/CSS adoption and growing Data Center opportunity. 'Management also alluded to expanding into chiplets and full end solutions, which could significantly expand SAM, although margin impact remains unclear. We are lowering EPS partly due to higher OpEx but are raising price target from $140 to $165 on recent peer multiple expansion. Reiterate Outperform.' Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) is a semiconductor and software design company that designs and manufactures semiconductor technology and other related products. While we acknowledge the potential of ARM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Must-Watch AI Stocks on Wall Street and Disclosure: None.
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Walmart's Stock Price Is Up Despite New Transshipment Tariffs
Walmart prides itself on its everyday low prices. Being a low-cost retailer has been a key contributor to Walmart's status as the world's largest retailer. A key reason for Walmart's 'everyday low prices' is the procurement of goods from low-wage, low-cost nations, such as China or India. In 2023, goods from China accounted for 60% of product sales. India is the second largest source of imports. Between January and August 2023, 25% of Walmart's U.S. imports originated in India. Higher tariffs, of course, threaten the EDLP strategy. But the new tariffs on transshipments are even more painful for retailers relying on low-cost foreign imports. The New York Times points out that ever since President Trump began raising tariffs on goods from China during his first term, Chinese companies have raced to set up warehouses in Southeast Asia and Mexico to bypass US tariffs through the use of indirect shipments. On July 31st, Trump signed an executive order targeting transshipments. Goods deemed by the Customs and Border Patrol to have been transshipped to evade applicable country of origin duties are now subject to an additional 40% import tax on top of the applicable country of origin tariff rates. These rates will take effect on August 7th. The legal definition of transshipment is a good that did not undergo a 'substantial transformation' in the country through which it passed. For example, the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement requires that at least 75% of cars be manufactured in North America based on North American-sourced components to qualify for duty-free treatment. So, for example, goods that flow to Mexico from China, where final consumer packaging is done, would be a light form of value-add. These goods would almost certainly be considered transhipped products. The executive order did not go into detail on the exact amount of value-add needed to avoid the 'transshipment' designation. Surprisingly, the new transshipment tariffs have not led to a decline in Walmart's stock price. On July 31st, when the new rules were announced, Walmart's stock closed at $97.98. Today, the stock opened at $99.67. Walmart's ability to pass these higher tariff costs on to consumers may be somewhat constrained. In May, Walmart said that it planned to increase prices, possibly by June, to pass along the higher tariff costs. 'We have always worked to keep our prices as low as possible, and we won't stop. We'll keep prices as low as we can for as long as we can, given the reality of small retail margins,' a Walmart spokesperson explained. Trump strongly disagreed with that idea. He wrote on Truth Social that Walmart needs to stop using tariffs as an excuse for increasing prices across its stores. And said that with Walmart having seen enormous profits last year, Walmart should absorb the costs associated with tariffs, instead of passing them on to customers. Walmart has worked to get its foreign suppliers to absorb some of the higher costs. Walmart asked several Chinese apparel and kitchenware suppliers to cut prices by up to 10% per tariff round. For many of these suppliers, Walmart is by far their largest customer and thus has substantial negotiating leverage. But these price decrease requests are much larger than what suppliers are used to. Further, the Chinese government is pushing back. According to The Wall Street Journal, Chinese officials summoned Walmart executives following complaints from suppliers. Authorities criticized the retailer's demands as unfair, warning that forcing suppliers to absorb tariff costs could breach contracts and disrupt market stability. Legal consequences were reportedly mentioned during the discussions. China can help exporters by devaluing its currency, which lowers the price of exports. They're also giving tax breaks and other incentives to their exporters, trying to keep them afloat. These tactics are something they have done in the past. But these things have been roundly criticized by the US and other Western nations. Experts on retailing say that, despite the President's call for retailers to 'eat the tariffs,' retailers will not be willing to absorb all of those increased prices. 'This idea that the president says, 'Listen, retailers, eat the tariffs.' That's not going to happen,' Kevin O'Leary of Shark Tank explained. Suppliers, retailers, and customers will all absorb some of the higher costs driven by tariffs. Even before the transshipment announcement, Walmart was struggling to forecast results. The retail giant did not release a profit outlook for the first quarter of the year due to the uncertainty surrounding the economy and tariff-related costs. Walmart on Thursday shared that its profits slipped in the first quarter of the year to $4.45 billion. It's difficult to understand why Walmart's stock price did not slump. Was it because many don't fully understand the potential impact of the transshipment tariffs? Or is it because Walmart has a strong history of growth despite headwinds? Or do some believe this transshipment rule will be difficult to enforce? How could US Customs and Border Patrol detect transshipments? If we take Walmart as an example, and assume they wanted to avoid transshipment tariffs (which I do not assume), the CBP would look for changing patterns in shipment origins. Walmart operates 20 distribution centers in Mexico. These warehouses are advertised as supporting the Mexican market. If shipments from these DCs started flowing across the border to the US, that would be evidence that Walmart is looking to avoid transshipment tariffs. What would be more challenging for the CPB to detect is a shift from FOB at origin to FOB at destination. FOB stands for "freight on board." The term is used to describe the point in a transaction where a product being shipped becomes the property of the buyer. In an FOB Origin shipping arrangement, the buyer is the owner of the product as soon as it leaves the point of origin. In an FOB Destination shipping arrangement, the shipment becomes the property of the buyer when it reaches a specified destination in the shipping process. In general, in an FOB destination contract, the seller of products plans all the logistics. In FOB origin arrangement, the buyers often designate which shipping company to use and even which lane a shipment should move on. Large companies frequently believe that by taking responsibility for logistics, they can save money. But a shift to FOB at origin contracts could allow suppliers to more easily evade transshipment duties by adding an extra port to the end-to-end shipment and thus sell prices to a retailer at a lower price.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hong Kong Strikes Back: Billion-Dollar Insurers Face Pressure to Pull Capital Out of Singapore
Hong Kong regulators are dialing up quiet pressure on life insurers like AIA Group Ltd. (AIAGF) to shift investment decision-making back homeafter years of watching it gradually migrate to Singapore. People familiar with the situation say the Hong Kong Insurance Authority (HKIA) began engaging with insurers in early 2024, concerned about growing talent drain and concentrated capital risk as more firms favored Singapore's tax perks and flexible fund structures. While the relocations were allowed, the regulator has become increasingly active behind the scenesrequesting more visibility into where and how investment decisions are made. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with AAIGF. At the center of this capital tug-of-war is AIA's Singapore-based unit, AIA Investment Management Private Ltd., which managed $139 billion at the end of 2024. The VCC structure gave it an operational edge, allowing AIA to shift global equities and private equity strategies south while keeping pensions anchored in Hong Kong. Insiders say high-level investment principles still come from Hong Kong, but it's the Singapore team that selects funds and talks to managers. The HKIA, invoking a guideline known as GL14, has begun examining whether ultimate mandate control remains in the cityand has privately discouraged at least one insurer from moving assets into Singapore's structures. There's no law forcing insurers to run portfolios from Hong Kong. But the HKIA has made its message clear: asset concentration overseas could raise red flags, especially if capital can't move easily in a crisis. Meanwhile, Singapore's Monetary Authority has defended the city-state's growth, attributing it to global demand and operational flexibility, not jurisdiction shopping. Still, with Hong Kong's regional HQ count dropping from 1,457 to 1,410 between 2021 and 2024, and Singapore gaining momentum, the pressure may be just beginning. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
