UN criticises Starmer's welfare reforms and warns measures will 'increase poverty rates'
In an intervention likely to be seized on by MPs seeking to further water down the government's measures, the committee asks ministers for answers on 10 issues surrounding the benefit changes - and says the reforms risk "regression" for disabled people.
The committee, which reports to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, asks about British politicians suggesting people are defrauding the benefits system.
One point on which it wants clarification is: "Public statements by politicians and authorities portraying persons with disabilities as making profit of social benefits, making false statements to get social and disability benefits or being a burden to society."
Other questions are on the impact the measures will have on "young persons, new claimants of disability benefits, women with disabilities, persons with disabilities with high level supports" and others.
They ask ministers about what measures they have taken to address "the foreseeable risk of increasing poverty rates amongst persons with disabilities if cuts are approved" and claim the welfare bill has had "limited scrutiny".
The letter claims that the committee has "received credible information" that the "will deepen the signs of regression" that the committee warned about in a report last year on the cost of living crisis and its impact on disabled people.
An intervention by will be an embarrassment to the government, which has promised its welfare reforms will help disabled people into work.
Liz Kendall, the welfare secretary, was criticised heavily earlier in the year for saying some people on benefits were "taking the mickey".
After a on 1 July, in which MPs succeeded in watering down the reforms significantly, the government now says its reforms will lift 50,000 people out of poverty. The bill was backed by 335 MPs, with 260 against - a majority of 75.
Read more:
The first version of the reforms would have - the government's assessment said - pushed 250,000 people into poverty.
Charities are urging MPs to continue to push for further changes - including on cuts to Universal Credit sickness payments.
A different UN committee heavily criticised benefit changes made by the Conservatives in 2016 and called on the UK to take "corrective measures" when Labour came into office.
The UN's committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) concluded that "welfare reform" measures introduced by Conservative-led governments in 2012 and 2016 had disproportionately affected disabled people, low-income families, and workers in "precarious employment".
The committee said this had led to "severe economic hardship, increased reliance on food banks, homelessness, negative impacts on mental health, and the stigmatisation of benefit claimants".
The Department for Work and Pensions has been contacted for comment.
Mikey Erhardt, policy lead at Disability Rights UK said: "The fact that the UN has yet again felt it needs to write to the UK government about our cruel and punitive social security system should be a national shame.
"We hope this letter is a wake-up call for MPs. Despite all the chaos of the last-minute climbdowns and concessions, the Universal Credit bill remains broken.
"There are still billions of cuts on the table, and we urge MPs to approach tomorrow's proceedings with caution as their vote will have serious implications for disabled people across the country.
"If disabled people feel unable to trust the government's promises on co-production and the UN needed to raise concerns over the bill's impact, how can MPs vote this bill through?"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP moves to establish long-delayed Jan. 6 committee
House Republicans are moving to create a long-delayed select subcommittee to investigate the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack — more than six months after it was initially announced. A resolution to create the subcommittee was filed on Wednesday, GOP leaders tell The Hill, after months of it being put on the backburner and lawmakers hashing out disputes over how much the panel would be authorized to investigate. Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), who is leading the effort, got direct support from President Trump in pushing to finally create the committee, The Hill has learned. It will still be weeks before the committee is established. With the House heading out of town over the August recess, a vote on the resolution to create the select committee is not expected until the chamber returns in September. As a select subcommittee, all the members will be subject to the approval of the Speaker. The select subcommittee will be tucked under the House Judiciary Committee and chaired by Loudermilk, who led probes into Jan. 6 matters in the last Congress under the banner of the House Administration Committee's subcommittee on oversight. Loudermilk's previous investigations included the Capitol security posture, as well as the activities of the Democratic-led Jan. 6 committee established after Trump supporters stormed the building in support of his fraud claims. 'House Republicans are proud of our work so far in exposing the false narratives peddled by the politically motivated January 6 Select Committee during the 117th Congress, but there is clearly more work to be done,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a statement first shared with The Hill. 'The resolution introduced today will establish this Select Subcommittee so we can continue our efforts to uncover the full truth that is owed to the American people. House Republicans remain intent on delivering the answers that House Democrats skipped over.' Loudermilk had secured a commitment to lead a select subcommittee to further investigate Jan. 6 issues in this Congress, and Johnson announced the panel in January. But months went by and no committee was established, frustrating Loudermilk. Matters from a government shutdown deadline to the crafting of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' took precedence. There were also disputes about what the legislative jurisdiction of the panel would be, with Loudermilk wanting to carry on all the lines of inquiry from his previous probes and being dismayed by the Speaker's office originally pitching a plan that would limit the jurisdiction to that of the House Judiciary Committee. Those jurisdictional issues were resolved, a source told The Hill. The panel has the Judiciary Committee's broad scope over law enforcement and more when investigating matters related to Jan. 6 — as well as a commitment from chairmen from other areas of jurisdiction and the White House to green-light probes into any other lines of inquiry. That could include more investigation into the original Democratic-controlled Jan. 6 panel. Loudermilk will also have full subpoena power. The panel will have eight members, three of whom will be members appointed by Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) subject to the Speaker's approval. It is instructed to release a final report by Dec. 31, 2026. Loudermilk said in a statement that while his previous probes 'uncovered that what happened at the Capitol that day was the result of a series of intelligence, security, and leadership failures at multiple levels within numerous entities,' there is 'still much work to be done.' 'It is vital that we continue to uncover the facts and begin the task of making needed reforms to ensure this level of security failure may never happen again,' Loudermilk said. House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) took a swipe at the previous Democratic-led Jan. 6 committee while commending Loudermilk. 'The partisan January 6 Committee failed to uncover crucial pieces of information for the American people, and Rep. Loudermilk has been the leader in getting to the bottom of the Democrat-run Committee's failures. Rep. Loudermilk will continue to work tirelessly to get everyone the truth,' Jordan said in a statement. The Democrats' previous Jan. 6 panel drew Trump's ire — and its members, which included now-Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), received a preemptive pardon from former President Biden on his last day in office amid threats of prosecution. Loudermilk and Jordan both have some personal beef with the original Jan. 6 committee. Jordan refused to comply with a subpoena it issued him, arguing it was not a legitimate inquiry. And the panel asked the Georgia lawmaker to appear voluntarily to explain a tour he gave in the Capitol complex on Jan. 5, 2021 — a request he said was meant to push a 'false narrative.' Loudermilk's previous panel released an 'interim report' in December 2024 that recommended a criminal investigation into Cheney, accusing her of witness tampering by being in touch with star hearing witness Cassidy Hutchinson.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
UN's top court says all countries have to act against climate change. Here are the key takeaways.
THE HAGUE, Netherlands — The United Nations' top court has issued a landmark advisory opinion on climate change, its 15-black-robed judges weighing in for the first time on what the court's president called 'an existential problem of planetary proportions that imperils all forms of life and the very health of our planet.'
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
A new golf course and old grudges await Trump in Scotland
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Michael Forbes, whose property is surrounded by President Trump's new golf course, in Menie, Scotland, on July 21, 2025. ANDREW TESTA/NYT Advertisement 'Everyone in Scotland hates him,' Forbes said, a claim that was thrown in doubt a few minutes later by John Duncan, a nearby contractor who clears ditches for Trump. 'I love the man,' Duncan said, noting that the president's resort, Trump International Scotland, employs 35 greenskeepers alone. Duncan likened Trump to Nigel Farage, the populist leader of the anti-immigrant party Reform U.K., and said Britain would benefit from their brand of take-no-prisoners leadership. Still, he conceded, 'There's folks who don't like Donald Trump, and nothing is ever going to change that.' Advertisement The police in Scotland are bracing for demonstrations against Trump during his visit, which will include a weekend at his other Scottish resort, Trump Turnberry, on the west coast about 50 miles from Glasgow. A survey in February by the market research firm Ipsos found that 71% of those polled in Scotland had an unfavorable opinion of Trump, compared with 57% of the broader British public polled. Farm buildings owned by Michael Forbes who uses them to send his neighbor a message in Menie, Scotland, on July 21, 2025. ANDREW TESTA/NYT Some of this antipathy may reflect his turbulent history in Scotland, which has been marked by feuds with noncompliant neighbors, breakups with political officials over his business plans, and long-standing grudges, like Trump's hostility toward the offshore windmills that turn lazily within sight of his guests in Aberdeenshire. The common thread is a belief that Trump never delivered on the promises he made in 2006 when he bought the Menie estate, 8 miles north of Aberdeen. Trump talked about putting up a sprawling hotel to supplement the manor house already there, as well as hundreds of vacation homes. With a total investment projected at 150 million pounds ($202 million), it would have created hundreds of jobs. A food trailer on Trump International Scotland, a golf resort in Aberdeenshire, Scotland, on July 21, 2025. ANDREW TESTA/NYT None of that happened, though the second golf course at the resort in Aberdeenshire, which Trump will dedicate this week, is evidence that the Trumps are still pouring money into the project. The resort reported losses of 1.4 million pounds ($1.9 million) in 2023, according to a financial filing. It is listed as having an asset value of 37 million pounds ($49 million) and 84 employees. 'President Trump is proud of his Scottish heritage and roots,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement. Trump's mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was a native of Lewis, in Scotland's western isles. Advertisement 'He has created projects that have a positive economic impact,' Cheung said, 'generating good jobs and boosting economic activity in the area.' There is no dispute that the resort has injected some money into a region that depends on its ties to the North Sea oil industry. Trump alluded to that when he told the BBC last week that he planned to meet Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain in Aberdeen, which he called the 'oil capital of Europe.' 'They should get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil,' said Trump, who fought for years to block the installation of the wind farm off the resort's coast. A road sign that says: Trump International Golf Links, in Menie, Scotland, on July 21, 2025. ANDREW TESTA/NYT 'Windmills,' he said, 'are really detrimental to the beauty of Scotland.' Analysts said Trump had the dynamics of the two industries backward. Oil production in the North Sea has declined steadily for the past 20 years, while offshore wind is one of Britain's fastest-growing industries. 'Trump's thinking would have been way more credible in the 1980s than it is now,' said Tessa Khan, the executive director of Uplift, a research group that campaigns for the transition away from fossil fuels. Trump's history with Turnberry is far less contentious than that with Aberdeen. Turnberry was a faded dowager when he bought it in 2014, and he is credited with restoring the luster of its three courses. But it, too, has become a target: A pro-Palestinian activist group recently painted the slogan 'Gaza is not 4 Sale' on the grounds, prompting calls from Trump to Starmer. During his first term, Trump lobbied the Scottish government to award the coveted British Open golf tournament to Turnberry, which has not played host since 2009, before he owned it. The R&A, a golf association in St. Andrews that runs the tournament, has signaled a greater openness to going back to Turnberry but said its lack of hotel rooms and transport links was a hurdle. Advertisement In Aberdeenshire, the tensions are environmental. The links there are carved between sand dunes, which were designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest because of the way they shift over time. A plaque behind the clubhouse, next to a vendor selling Trump Grab & Go sandwiches, declared that the dunes help make it 'the greatest golf course anywhere in the world!' But Scottish authorities withdrew the scientific site designation in 2020, saying the construction of the links had deprived the dunes of their special character. As technical as that might seem, it has registered with locals, who are proud of the dunes and relish walking among them. On a recent evening at the Cock and Bull restaurant, across the road from the resort, two men could be overheard discussing Trump and the dunes' lost 'SSSI status.' Not everybody is nursing grievances. Anas Sarwar, the leader of the Labour Party in Scotland, wrote this spring in The Times of London that 'President Trump's affinity for Scotland is real, regardless of what people think of his politics.' He said Scotland's first minister, John Swinney, leader of the Scottish National Party, had mismanaged his relationship with the president. A few days before last year's U.S. election, Swinney endorsed the Democratic nominee, Kamala Harris. He and Trump are still expected to meet during the president's visit. Advertisement Even Trump's most implacable foes recognize there are limits to the feuding. David Milne, who lives in a converted coast guard lookout bordering the Aberdeenshire resort, spent years theatrically protesting his neighbor. He flew the Mexican flag above his house in 2016, when Trump vowed to build a wall on the southern U.S. border. Milne's views on Trump have not softened any more than those of Forbes, with his Highland cows. Milne, too, said he had no plans to sell his house, which Trump once called 'ugly.' But he has had no run-ins with the resort for years, he said, and has no plans to fly his Mexican flag when Trump is in residence next week. 'Once the Mexican people told him where to go, there didn't seem to be any point,' Milne said. 'They're quite capable of taking care of themselves.' This article originally appeared in .
