logo
The expert guide to taking control of your emotions

The expert guide to taking control of your emotions

BBC News27-02-2025
Ethan Kross is a world expert in the psychology of emotions, and he has identified a set of tools that can help us to tend our wellbeing.
Ever since he was a child, Ethan Kross has been "an observer of emotion" and the often counter-productive ways that we deal with difficult feelings. "It seemed as if we were all just stumbling along, occasionally finding an accidental or Band-Aid solution to help us manage our emotional lives. Sometimes our improvised tools helped. Sometimes they made things worse. It seemed so haphazard, isolating, and inefficient," he says.
As a psychologist at the University of Michigan and director of the Emotion and Self-Control Laboratory, Kross hopes to change this sorry state of affairs. In his new book Shift: How to Manage Your Emotions So They Don't Manage You, he aims to equip us all with a set of tools that will help us to navigate our ups and downs more constructively.
Kross spoke to science writer David Robson about the benefits of "negative" feelings, creating safe spaces and emotional oases – and the surprising upsides of distraction.
What are the most common misconceptions about emotions?
One big misunderstanding is that there are good emotions and there are bad emotions and that we should strive to live our lives free of all the bad emotions. This is an error, as far as I'm concerned: we evolved the ability to experience all emotions for a reason. Anger can motivate us to correct an injustice if there's still an opportunity to fix things. Sadness can lead us to introspect and make new meaning out of situations that have fundamentally been altered. Envy can motivate us to strive for things that we want to achieve. In the right proportions – that is such a key phrase – all emotions are useful.
One way of driving this point home is to think about physical pain, which is about as negative an emotional state as we can imagine. Many of us yearn to live lives free of any kind of physical pain. But some people are born without the capacity to experience pain, due to a genetic anomaly, and those kids end up dying younger than people who can experience pain. If they get their hand stuck in the fire, there's no signal that tells them to pull the hand away. The same principle is true for all our negative emotions.
People often find it liberating to know that they don't have to strive to live a life without negativity. What you want to strive to achieve is just keeping these emotional experiences in check, and I think that's a much more tenable goal.
Many people believe that their emotions are beyond their control. Where do you think this defeatist attitude comes from? And what are the consequences?
I think it depends on the facet of our emotional experiences that we're talking about. We often don't have control over the thoughts and feelings that are automatically triggered as we live our lives throughout the day, but we can control how we engage with those thoughts and feelings once they're activated, and that's where the promise of emotion regulation resides.
But if you don't think you can do something, then you're not going to make the effort to practice it. If you don't think exercising is going to make you more fit, for example, why on Earth would you devote effort to exercising? And if you don't think that you can use different strategies to manage your emotions, why would you ever avail yourself of them?
So how can we change our responses to difficult feelings?
Listening to music is one example of a tool that's underutilised. If you ask people why they listen to music, almost 100% of participants will say that they like the way it makes them feel. But if you then look at what people do when they are struggling with their emotions – such as the last time they were angry, anxious or sad – only a small minority report using music.
It's just one category of what I call "shifters", which are the tools that can push our emotions around. And once you know how they work, you can be a lot more strategic in how you use them in your life.
You also describe how a change in environment can boost our wellbeing. We might have experienced this on holiday, but how can we apply this principle to our day-to-day lives?
As you say, a lot of people feel restored when they go to an entirely different place that is free of associations with work. But we can't always take that vacation, and what I like to remind people is that there are often places locally that can shift our mood.
We talk a lot about getting attached to other people, and when things aren't going well, being in the presence of that figure can be a source of comfort and resilience. But it turns out we also become attached to places in our environment. Mine include the arboretum near my home, the tea house where I wrote my first book and one of my offices on campus. From the moment I am in that space, I have positive associations that help me manage my emotions.
I think that they're not unlike the safe houses you have in spy movies or books. We all have these safe houses in our lives, and we want to be strategic about going to them when we're struggling. It's a way of managing ourselves from the outside in.
You can also curate your environment. We know that plants and images of green spaces can be restorative. So can photos of loved ones. We've done research where we expose people to pictures of loved ones while they're struggling with a problem. We find it speeds up the rate at which they "repair" following the experience.
Is the aim to be more conscious of what we can do to change how we're feeling – rather than just leaving it to chance?
One of my hopes for this book is that we can get people to be much more deliberate about incorporating these tools into our lives.
I was surprised to find that distraction and avoidance can be a productive way of dealing with emotions. How so?
Avoidance – trying actively not to think about something by distracting yourself or engaging in other behaviours – is generally derided as an unhealthy tool. And there's no question that chronically avoiding things has been linked with negative outcomes; it's not an approach that I would advocate for anyone to adopt.
But we do not have to choose between either approaching or avoiding our emotions; we can be flexible and do both. There's research showing that people who are effective at both approaching and avoiding their emotions, expressing and suppressing, often fare well in the long term.
What might that look like in our lives? Well, let's say you're triggered by something. You get emotional about an argument you have had with someone. One approach might be to address it right there at that moment, but it might make sense to take some time away from thinking about that problem or confronting it. I say that as the kind of person who, in general, does like to confront things right in the moment, just get to the bottom of it, and move on. But sometimes I've benefited from immersing myself in something totally unrelated for a day and then coming back to the problem. I might come back and realise it's not a problem at all, or I'll find that the intensity of the problem is diminished, and I can approach it from a broader perspective.
How should we deal with that killer of joy, social comparison?
We often hear that we shouldn't compare ourselves to other people. Good luck! We're a social species; part of the way we make sense of ourselves and our place in this world is to compare ourselves to others.
It is true that we often engage in the kinds of comparisons that lead us to feel bad about ourselves, but you can reframe it in ways that make the comparison work for you rather than against you. If I find out that someone is outperforming me, I can say to myself, well, they were able to achieve that, so why can't I? Now it's almost like a target for something that I can shoot towards.
More like this:• Why we need to be more emotional to save the world• The untranslatable emotions you never knew you had• How climate change effects mental health
Do you have a favourite strategy that you would typically turn to in times of difficulty?
Oftentimes, those tools get me to where I want to be emotionally, but if they're not sufficient, I'll go to my emotional advisors, people in my network who are pretty skilled at empathising with me and advising me. And I'll go for a walk in a green space, or visit one of my emotional oases.
*Ethan Kross's new book Shift: Managing Your Emotions So They Don't Manage You is published by Vermilion (UK) and Crown (US).
** David Robson is an award-winning science writer and author. His latest book, The Laws of Connection: 13 Social Strategies That Will Transform Your Life, was published by Canongate (UK) and Pegasus Books (US & Canada) in June 2024. He is @davidarobson on Instagram and Threads and writes the 60-Second Psychology newsletter on Substack.
--
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Neurologist issues warning about popular post-exercise practice: 'It could trigger a stroke'
Neurologist issues warning about popular post-exercise practice: 'It could trigger a stroke'

Daily Mail​

time2 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

Neurologist issues warning about popular post-exercise practice: 'It could trigger a stroke'

A leading neurologist has issued an urgent warning over using a massage gun to relieve neck tension as this could trigger a potentially life-threatening stroke. Dr Baibing Chen, from the University of Michigan shared the warning with his 163,000 Instagram followers, stating that this is one of three common activities he would never do to protect his brain health. In the video, which has been viewed over 8million times, he also urged his followers to stop blasting loud music through headphones and warned against holding in a sneeze. 'I would never use a massage gun on my neck,' the neurologist said. 'This is because the vertebral and carotid arteries in the neck are vulnerable to damage from the repetitive shear forces from a massage gun.' These arteries make up a vital part of the circulatory system and supply the brain with blood and life-giving oxygen. Dr Chen added that this repetitive damage can increase the risk of an artery tearing, encouraging the formation of blood clots, restricting blood flow and triggering a stroke. A stroke is a serious medical event that can cause permanent brain damage or even death. Dr Chen added that using a muscle gun with direct pressure can also dislodge hidden plaques that line the artery wall. 'This can cause a clot to travel to the brain and lead to an ischemic stroke.' This happens when a blockage cuts off blood supply to part of the brain. According to the NHS, around a quarter of strokes in the UK are caused by a narrowing or blockage of the carotid arteries. The main symptoms of a stroke can happen suddenly and include facial weakness where one side of the face may fall making it hard to smile; arm weakness which impacts a person's ability to lift both arms; and speech problems. Anyone who thinks they are having a stroke are urged to call 999 immediately. Other symptoms include weakness or numbness down one side of the body, blurred vision, confusion and memory loss, headaches and nausea or vomiting. Stroke is a leading global cause of death and disability. There are more than 100,000 strokes in the UK each year, about one every five minutes. For this reason, Dr Chen also warned against holding in a sneeze. He said: 'This is because sneezing generates high internal pressure that's higher than car tire pressure. 'Holding [a sneeze] in forces this pressure into delicate areas and may lead to ruptured ear drums, torn throat tissues and even air leaking into the chest. 'In rare cases the sudden spike in pressure can rupture blood vessels in the brain leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral bleeding—especially in individuals with aneurysms or weakened arteries.' This type of hemorrhage is an uncommon type of stroke caused by bleeding on the surface of the brain which can be fatal. In this instance, there are usually no warning signs but according to the NHS this type of stroke can happen during physical effort or straining, such as coughing, holding in a sneeze or lifting something heavy. Common symptoms include a sudden excruciating headache, stiff neck, nausea and vomiting, sensitivity to light, blurred vision, typical stroke-like symptoms and loss of consciousness. A subarachnoid haemorrhage is considered a medical emergency. Finally, Dr Chen advised turning down the volume before plugging in headphones. 'Loud music isn't just bad for your ears it's actually bad for your brain as well,' he said. Tackling hearing loss early could delay the development of dementia for a number of years, promising new research suggested this year. Studies have long suggested that around four in 10 cases of the memory-robbing condition could be preventable. Now experts believe that up to a third of cases could be attributed to hearing loss. 'This is because when the brain struggles to process sound it reallocates resources away from memory and thinking, increasing cognitive decline,' Dr Chen explained. Dementia affects around 982,000 people in the UK and studies show that those with untreated hearing problems may be up to give times more likely to develop the condition. 'Sounds over 85 decibels, similar to city traffic, can cause damage over time whereas exposure to 100 plus decibels, like a concert or many earbuds at max volume can cause permanent hearing loss in as little as 15 minutes,' he added.

A third of vaping teenagers likely to take up smoking cigarettes, study finds
A third of vaping teenagers likely to take up smoking cigarettes, study finds

The Independent

time4 days ago

  • The Independent

A third of vaping teenagers likely to take up smoking cigarettes, study finds

British teenagers who vape today are just as likely to start smoking tobacco as young people growing up in the 1970s, new research has found. A long-term study found that teenagers who vape now are 33 per cent more likely to take up tobacco compared to those who don't, despite decades of falling smoking rates. The study, published in the journal Tobacco Control, showed a decline in teenage smoking prevalence, falling from 33 per cent in 1974 to 25 per cent in 1986, and to 12 per cent in 2018. This is due to tougher tobacco control laws and a greater awareness of smoking's dangers, the researchers said. However, the research also revealed that among today's teens, those who vape remain just as likely to smoke cigarettes as their peers half a century ago. The study, led by the University of Michigan, found that only around 1.5 per cent of non- vaping 17-year-olds reported current smoking, compared with 33 per cent of those who currently vaped. 'This probability is especially concerning given the recent increases in e-cigarette use prevalence among UK youth, despite some initial assurances that e-cigarettes would have little appeal to [them],' the researchers said. In the UK, an estimated 1.1 million young people between the ages of 11 and 17 vape and 100,000 smoke, according to figures from Action on Smoking and Health (Ash). The researchers analysed intergenerational data from three major British cohort studies – the 1958 National Child Development Study, the 1970 British Cohort Study, and the 2001 Millennium Cohort Study. The researchers looked at several risk factors that can influence teen smoking. This includes early alcohol use, parental smoking, mothers' education, and children's engagement with school. They found that some of these factors have changed over time, such as parental smoking rates, which have dropped from more than 70 per cent in the 1970s cohort to 27 per cent among the most recent group. Despite these changes, vaping appears to undermine progress, the researchers said. They found that among current teen vapers, the likelihood of also smoking cigarettes has effectively reversed the declining trend. 'Youth who had never used e-cigarettes had an estimated less than one in 50 chance of reporting weekly cigarette use at age 17, while those who had previously used e-cigarettes had over a one in 10 chance,' the researchers said. 'Youth who reported current e-cigarette use had an almost one in three chance of also reporting current cigarette use.' The study's authors cautioned that the findings do not prove vaping directly causes smoking. However, they warned that efforts to reduce smoking among young people must now also address vaping. 'Among contemporary youth, efforts to reduce cigarette smoking should focus both on those who are currently using e-cigarettes and on the prevention of e-cigarette use among youth, to maintain the promising declines in youth nicotine use in years to come,' they concluded. A ban on disposable vapes came into force in the UK at the beginning of June as the government attempts to crack down on youth nicotine addiction as well as the litter the single-use devices create.

Pizza and burgers increase lung cancer risk by 40pc
Pizza and burgers increase lung cancer risk by 40pc

Telegraph

time4 days ago

  • Telegraph

Pizza and burgers increase lung cancer risk by 40pc

High levels of ultra-processed foods can significantly increase the risk of lung cancer, academics have warned. An international team of researchers tracked the health and food habits of more than 100,000 US adults, with an average age of 63. After an average of 12 years, the team identified 1,706 cases of lung cancer. Food survey questionnaires revealed the consumption of UPFs, including ice cream, fried foods, bread, cakes, pastries, salty snacks, breakfast cereals, instant noodles and soups, margarine, confectionery, soft drinks, sweetened fruit drinks, hamburgers, hot dogs, and pizza. Smoking intensity The research team, led by academics in China, found that average UPF consumption was nearly three servings a day, but ranged from 0.5 to six. The types of food that featured the most were lunch meat and soft drinks. People who consumed the highest amounts of UPFs were 41 per cent more likely to develop lung cancer compared with those who consumed the least amount, academics wrote in the journal Thorax. They found an increased risk for both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. The authors said that they did make adjustments to their findings based on whether or not people smoked, but they did not make adjustments for smoking intensity, which may have an impact. 'The burden of lung cancer' They stress that 'causality cannot be determined' from their findings, and the data should be interpreted with caution. 'Although additional research in other populations and settings is warranted, these findings suggest the healthy benefits of limiting UPF,' the authors said. They added: 'Limiting trends of UPF intake globally could contribute to reducing the burden of lung cancer.' It comes as a separate study examined teenage smoking rates over 50 years in the UK. Researchers, led by academics from the University of Michigan in the US, looked at data on smoking among 16 and 17-year-olds in 1974, 1986 and 2018. 'Prevention of general youth nicotine use' They found that teenage smoking dropped from 33 per cent to 12 per cent during the study period. The 2018 study found that 11 per cent of older teenagers used vapes. The study authors estimate that teenagers who vape are more likely to go on to be smokers. Writing in the journal Tobacco Control, they said that the likelihood of smoking was 1.5 per cent among teenagers who do not vape, but 33 per cent among those who do. 'Tobacco control efforts should continue to focus on the prevention of general youth nicotine use and to specifically target youth who use e-cigarettes because their risk of cigarette smoking is similar to youth in the 1970s,' they wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store