Exclusive-Under Trump, Saudi civil nuclear talks delinked from Israel recognition, sources say
RIYADH (Reuters) - The United States is no longer demanding Saudi Arabia normalise ties with Israel as a condition for progress on civil nuclear cooperation talks, two sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's visit next week.
Dropping the demand that Saudi Arabia establish diplomatic relations with Israel would be a major concession by Washington. Under former President Joe Biden, nuclear talks were an element of a wider U.S.-Saudi deal tied to normalisation and to Riyadh's goal of a defence treaty with Washington.
The kingdom has repeatedly said it would not recognise Israel without a Palestinian state, frustrating Biden administration attempts to expand the Abraham Accords signed during Trump's first term. Under those accords the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco normalised relations with Israel. Progress towards Saudi recognition of Israel has been halted by fury in Arab countries over the war raging in Gaza. The nuclear talks had also stumbled over Washington's non-proliferation concerns.
In a possible sign of a new approach, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said that Saudi Arabia and the United States were on a "pathway" to a civil nuclear agreement when he visited the kingdom in April.
"When we have something to announce, you will hear it from the President. Any reports on this are speculative,' U.S. National Security Council spokesman James Hewitt told Reuters in response to a request for comment.
Saudi Arabia's government media office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Even without the normalisation requirement for civil nuclear talks to progress, and despite unpacking the issue from a wider defence treaty, a deal is not yet in close reach, one of the sources said.
One sticking point is Section 123 of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act that allows cooperation with other countries developing civil nuclear capabilities but specifies nonproliferation criteria including limiting uranium enrichment.
Saudi Arabia's energy minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman has said that the kingdom would seek to enrich uranium and sell the product.
One of the sources said the kingdom was still not willing to sign a so-called 123 agreement, which would prevent enrichment or reprocessing of plutonium made in reactors - two routes that have the potential to culminate in nuclear weapons.
Secretary Wright previously told Reuters a 123 agreement would be a prerequisite to any deal.
However, there are several ways to structure a deal to achieve both countries' objectives, Wright has said.
One solution being discussed is a "black box" arrangement where only U.S. personnel would have access to a uranium enrichment facility on Saudi soil, the same source said.
SELL MORE OIL
Riyadh wants to build nuclear generation capacity as it seeks to diversify its economy away from oil. Nuclear power could also help free up more crude barrels for export.
Arms control advocates have previously expressed concern about a Saudi nuclear programme because de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said the kingdom would seek to quickly develop nuclear weapons should its regional rival Iran do so.
The U.S. and Iran are currently holding talks over Tehran's nuclear programme, which Washington and Western allies say is geared towards producing weapons. Iran insists it is purely for civil purposes.
U.S. Vice President JD Vance on Wednesday described the talks with Iran as "so far, so good" and said there was a deal to be made that would reintegrate Iran into the global economy while preventing it from getting a nuclear weapon.
Saudi Arabia and the United States are set to discuss a number of blockbuster economic deals during Trump's visit next week, with the U.S. poised to offer Saudi Arabia an arms package worth well over $100 billion, sources have told Reuters.
Trump has said Riyadh should "round up" a planned investment package in the U.S. to $1 trillion from an initial $600 billion.
The trip is Trump's second visit abroad, after a short trip to Rome for the pope's funeral, since he returned to office in January. In his first term a lavish trip to Saudi Arabia marked his first overseas stop.
Trump fostered close ties with Gulf states including Saudi Arabia during his first term.
The country invested $2 billion in a firm formed by Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and former aide, after Trump left office, and there are plans to build two Trump towers in Jeddah and Riyadh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homeless who refuse to cooperate with Trump crackdown may go to jail, White House says
By Colette Luke and Julio-Cesar Chavez WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Homeless people in Washington, D.C., could face jail time if they do not comply with President Donald Trump's efforts to crack down on crime and rid the U.S. capital of homeless encampments, the White House said on Tuesday. "Homeless individuals will be given the option to leave their encampment, to be taken to a homeless shelter, to be offered addiction or mental-health services, and if they refuse, they will be susceptible to fines or to jail time," White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters. Leavitt said the administration was exploring strategies to relocate homeless individuals "far from the capital." She said U.S. Park Police have removed 70 homeless encampments from federal parks since March and are set to clear the remaining two encampments in the city later this week. Andy Wassenich, director of policy at Miriam's Kitchen - an organization offering services to the homeless - said his team was out trying to warn people. He said there was still a lot of confusion about what the crackdown may bring. Their best advice, he said, was: "Go to shelter if you can, if you can stand it. If you have anybody you can stay with, get off the street, and seek safety and let us know what we can do for you." Trump said on social media that he wanted the homeless out of Washington even before he announced the extraordinary step of temporarily taking over the District of Columbia's police department and deploying 800 National Guard troops as part of a crackdown on crime there - an effort that also includes another 500 federal law enforcement agents. A billionaire real estate developer, Trump described the homeless as one of several groups who have "overtaken" Washington that include "violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs." He likened his intended crackdown to his administration's actions to secure the U.S. border with Mexico. HOMELESSNESS REACHED A RECORD HIGH NATIONWIDE IN 2024 U.S. communities have long experienced seemingly intractable problems with homelessness, which reached an all-time national high of over 771,000 men, women and children on a single night in 2024, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development's latest homelessness report to Congress. The HUD report estimated Washington's homeless population at 5,616, a 14.1% increase from the year before. That made Washington, a city of just over 700,000 people, the 16th out of the 20 U.S. cities with the largest homeless populations, according to the website USA Facts. The top five cities are New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Seattle and Denver. But the District of Columbia had the highest prevalence of homelessness among U.S. states, with 83 homeless individuals for every 10,000 people, HUD data showed. Homeless people did not appear to be caught up in a Monday night sweep by 850 officers and federal agents, who the White House said made 23 arrests across the city, an operation which Leavitt announced at a press conference on Monday. The District of Columbia operates under the Home Rule Act, which gives Congress ultimate authority but allows residents to elect a mayor and city council. Trump bypassed the city's elected leaders by declaring a "public safety emergency" and invoking a section of the act that allows the president to take over the police force for 30 days under emergency conditions. On Sunday night, a small group of federal agents arrived at Union Station - a gathering place for homeless people - and briefly questioned a person standing there, according to a man who was outside the building at the time. After about 15 minutes, the agents, who were from a variety of federal agencies, left with little fanfare. Jacob Adams, a political activist with FLARE USA, a self-described anti-Trump group, was sitting at the organization's table set up near the fountain outside the station. He said the agents did nothing to disperse the people who had gathered there, and in fact told them they could stay overnight. "I don't know if it was a show of force or photo ops. But it didn't come off as very forceful," Adams said. Wassenich said on Tuesday that so far there was little evidence of the unhoused population being directly affected by the surge in law enforcement. "If they are caught up in other things, that's certainly possible," he said. "The tents are still standing. The people are still sleeping on whatever bench they might be on."
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Intel CEO 'must resign immediately' as US senator questions Lip Bu Tan's China ties
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Intel really can't catch a break. With momentum building around the idea that the company will probably have to spin off its ailing chip factories to survive, now the President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump, has called for the immediate resignation of Intel CEO Lip Bu Tan. Trump's post earlier today on Truth Social reads in full, "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!" While that is a pretty shocking message for the Intel CEO and Intel more broadly, it is perhaps not entirely surprising. That's because US Republican Senator, Tom Cotton, recently raised questions with Intel's board regarding Lip-Bu Tan's associations with Chinese firms and a criminal case involving his former company, Cadence Design. According to Reuters, "Cotton asked in the letter to Intel chairperson Frank Yeary whether the company's board was aware of the subpoenas sent to Cadence during Tan's time there as CEO before Intel hired him. Cotton asked what measures were taken to address those concerns." In reply Intel told Reuters, "Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem," and indicated that it would address the matters raised by Senator Cotton, though it's not clear when or how. Cotton reportedly also asked whether Intel's board had required Tan to divest any holdings linked to the Chinese military or Communist Party, and likewise if Tan had fully disclosed his Chinese ties as part of Intel's involvement in the Secure Enclave programme, which is designed to ensure the secure supply of microelectronics for defence. Exactly what happens from here and how serious this will turn out to be is anyone's guess. At best, Trump's Truth Social diktats come and go with dizzying velocity. Is this one that the 47th President will stick with or quickly forget? Either way, it definitely comes at an absolutely terrible time for Intel, with the company itself admitting that it hasn't won any significant customers for its new 18A chip production tech and conceding that if things don't go better for the node that follows, known as 14A, then it may have to give up on cutting-edge chip production altogether. So, the last thing Intel needs right now is a scandal involving its CEO and perhaps even his forced departure. Quite how the company and its workforce can be expected to stay focussed on the very challenging technical tasks at hand with this chaos going on, one can only speculate. But you have to worry for Lip Bu Tan's longevity at Intel, that's for sure.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Salah challenges UEFA after the death of the Palestinian Pelé
Salah challenges UEFA after the death of the Palestinian Pelé Mohamed Salah has spoken out following the news of the death of Suleiman Obeid, the "Palestinian Pelé," who was killed at the age of 41 while waiting for humanitarian aid. According to the Palestinian Football Association, Suleiman Obeid was shot by Israeli forces as he awaited humanitarian assistance. UEFA announced his passing with a solemn message, paying tribute to a player who gave hope to countless children despite adversity. This announcement prompted a swift reaction from Mohamed Salah, the Egyptian Liverpool star. On X, he directly addressed UEFA: Tell us how he died, where, and why? The death of Suleiman Obeid highlights the ongoing tensions in the region and has triggered a strong emotional response in the football world, where he was recognized not only for his talent but also for his symbolic role. Salah's message thus expresses profound pain and a demand for truth in the face of a tragedy that goes far beyond the football pitch.
