
Scottish Government must do more to bin our throwaway society
Gillian Martin, the minister with responsibility for the circular economy said: 'There are huge opportunities in having an economy which makes reuse and recycling the default choice.'
From mobile phones to fast fashion and plastic bottles, people are trapped in a system which is expensive and wasteful. The new law is meant to change the way we use materials for good, but a whole year has passed and the only significant policy change has been a backwards step to indefinitely postpone plans for a 25p charge on disposable cups.
READ MORE: SNP MPs join Labour rebellion in bid to kill off benefit cuts
We don't have time to fix the economy one product at a time, but this move would have shown an important shift that the Scottish Government has failed to achieve.
Disposable cups are an obvious symbol of our throwaway society. In Scotland, more than 380 million disposable cups are used every year. Many of them are made of a mix of materials like cardboard and plastic which means, contrary to what many people believe, they cannot be recycled. They are either sent to landfill or burned.
Studies have shown disposable cups are leaching hidden ingredients into our drinks – microplastics and toxic chemicals. One recent study suggests that more than 700 pieces of microplastic are ingested with every drink from a disposable cup. Microplastics have been linked to an array of diseases, from cancer to neurological, hormonal and immune diseases.
Despite the evidence of how harmful these products are, in 2019, when the Scottish Government first considered this issue, a 25p charge was favoured over a ban. Public consultations were conducted. Most of the public who responded supported a charge (66%), but more than half the businesses which responded favoured no charge at all. The policy was quietly shelved last month by the Scottish Government without announcement.
By giving in to corporate pressure like this, the Scottish Government has failed in its duty to protect the people of Scotland – knowingly allowing businesses to continue to use products that are harming people and the environment when better options exist, simply so they can boost their profits. And disposable cups are just one example of a product like this.
Looking at wider circular economy issues, things don't get much better – Scotland's recycling levels are the worst in the UK despite a £70m programme to improve them and new incinerators continue to be built despite a government ban on such technology.
READ MORE: Kelly Given: If Zohran Mamdani can do it, left must believe it can make it anywhere
To truly fight back against the throwaway society, the Scottish Government must use the circular economy law to stand up to corporate greed and tackle the root causes of the issue.
There needs to be a step change in investment for reuse and repair so that everyone in Scotland has access to these services, which have benefits for communities as well as reducing carbon emissions. Companies should be required to pay for the cleanup of the products they sell, from clothing to toys, rather than the costs coming from the public purse.
Burning rubbish in incinerators has got to stop – when you burn a resource, you can't reuse or recycle it ever again. So, it's vital that the Scottish Government acts now to close the vast loopholes in its incinerator ban too.
With changes like these, Scotland can move away from the throwaway society, towards a future that will protect people and the planet.
Kim Pratt is Friends of the Earth Scotland's senior circular economy campaigner

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
34 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Up to £18.5M dedicated to Scottish Charities Providing Housing from SASC's SASH II Fund
Social and Sustainable Capital (SASC) is calling on Scottish charities to apply for funding from its Social and Sustainable Housing Fund II (SASH II) Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Up to £18.5m from the fund has been dedicated to support Scottish charities, enabling them to provide vital housing alongside their support services. With the fund closing to new commitments in March 2026, SASC urges organisations to start discussions now to avoid missing out. Much of this dedicated funding has already been allocated so early engagement is strongly encouraged to ensure charities can take advantage of the remaining available funds. SASH II supports charities that provide both housing and support services by enabling them to buy and manage their own properties. This reduces their reliance on rented accommodation and offers long-term, stable homes for people they support, including those experiencing homelessness, survivors of domestic abuse, care leavers, individuals with learning disabilities, and others. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mark Bickford, CEO of SASC, said: 'At SASC, we see social investment as a catalyst for lasting change. Scotland's progressive government policies, strong commitment to social justice, and collaborative third sector make it an ideal place for place-based investment. Through SASH II, we enable charities to gain direct control over the homes they provide, improving outcomes for tenants and building financial strength for their organisation. We encourage any charity interested in supported housing to explore how this fund can support their work—before the investment window closes.' The Simon Community A Flexible Model for Charities SASH II offers 10-year loans of £1-5 million, covering up to 100% of the property purchase price along with associated costs. Crucially, SASC absorbs both void and negative equity risk, significantly reducing financial exposure for participating organisations. This model provides long-term security for vulnerable individuals while helping charities strengthen their balance sheets, speed up delivery of housing outside of local authority processes, and lower costs through energy efficiency opportunities. Strategic Investment Backing SASH II is supported by a group of investors committed to social impact. These include the Scottish National Investment Bank, the University of Edinburgh, the Garfield Weston Foundation, Church of England, and Skagen. New backers joining SASH II for the first time include the John Laing Charitable Trust, The Linbury Trust, and the 29th May 1961 Charitable Trust. Mark Bickford, CEO of SASC While SASC's investors ultimately bear the repayment risk, blended capital—through grants from government or charitable foundations—can further reduce financial risk for charities and improve access to this funding. Proven Impact in Scotland Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To date, SASC has deployed from this SASH II fund over £6 million in Scotland, with a further £5 million in progress. Among the beneficiaries is Simon Community Scotland, which used a £5 million loan from the first SASH fund to acquire 32 properties in Edinburgh as part of its Housing First programme. Blue Triangle, the first Scottish housing association supported by SASH II, secured £4.9 million to purchase more than 60 homes for vulnerable adults across the south of Scotland. Dave Gorman, Director of Social Responsibility and Sustainability at the University of Edinburgh, said: 'We are proud to continue our investment in SASC's innovative housing fund and to witness the remarkable work of Scottish charities empowering vulnerable individuals through supported housing. The impact and success of the SASH model has been inspiring.' Susan Campbell, Director of Market Creation (Housing) at the Scottish National Investment Bank comments: 'Like the Bank, SASC is an impact investor, which is why we were pleased to commit £15million to the SASH II fund. The housing shortage in Scotland is well-known, which is one of the reasons we are pleased to support this innovative approach to place-based investment. By de-risking housing investment for charities, we are enabling them to grow their stock and support those who are experiencing homelessness and other housing needs. I encourage the relevant charitable organisations to apply.' Final Call – How to Apply Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Charities must submit their applications by the end of 2025, with all loan agreements signed by 31 March 2026. SASC recommends starting discussions 3–6 months in advance to allow adequate time for due diligence and structuring. Funds can be drawn down after the agreement date if needed. SASH II is available to charities providing supported housing to Scotland's most disadvantaged individuals, including those affected by homelessness, domestic abuse, substance misuse, involvement with the justice system, or transitions from care. SASC is a member of the Commission for More Homes Scotland, a national initiative focused on delivering social investment solutions to address Scotland's housing challenges, which has become increasingly urgent in the face of growing demand for supported housing.


Daily Mirror
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
PM in talks with Labour rebels over DWP benefit cuts
Keir Starmer confirmed today the Government is locked in talks with rebellious backbenchers over welfare reforms. Here The Mirror looks at the PM's immediate options Keir Starmer confirmed today the Government is locked in talks with rebellious backbenchers over welfare reforms. In a Commons update on Thursday, the PM also addressed the growing rebellion and hinted at possible concessions in the coming days. He said he and his team "want to get this right". The PM said benefits claimants "are failed every single day" by a "broken system". Mr Starmer told MPs: "On social security, I recognise there is a consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform of our welfare system, because the British people deserve protection and dignity when they are unable to work and supported to work when they can. "At the moment, they are failed every single day by the broken system created by the Conservatives, which achieves neither.I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I. We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday." But with 126 Labour MPs signing an amendment that could torpedo the plan, the Government could face an embarrassing defeat if it goes ahead. Here The Mirror looks at the PM's immediate options. Press ahead with vote Keir Starmer could decide to press ahead with the vote even if concessions aren't reached. This would be perhaps the nuclear option. With over 120 Labour MPs now opposed to the plans, rebels have the numbers to wipe-out the government's majority and deliver a humiliating defeat. And it is likely there are many more backbenchers - possibly frontbenchers - who are opposed to the plans but have not said so publicly yet. A defeat on this scale - overturning the government's huge majority - would leave the government's welfare plans in tatters. It would also leave the Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a £5billion black hole in her plans. Concessions to rebels The most likely scenario is that Keir Starmer will thrash out concessions with rebels over the coming hours and days in an attempt to salvage the reforms. Under existing plans the eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) will be restricted. This is where most of the £5billion savings are being made. The benefit is paid to people both in and out of work and helps with daily tasks due to a long-term physical or mental health condition. Eligibility is calculated using a points-based system, based on how difficult someone finds it to perform tasks like washing themselves and getting dressed. But from the end of 2026 people would need to score a minimum of four points in at least one daily activity to qualify under the plans. Needing help to get in or out of the shower, or supervision to use the toilet are measures that don't meet this threshold. There have been suggestions this could be tweaked so people would need to score three points instead to make the new system slightly more generous. The Institute for Fiscal Studies suggests this could increase eligibility by 190,000 - at a cost of £0.8 billion. But even in this scenario it is extremely unlikely to satisfy all the rebels. There is a bloc of rebels opposed to the principle of taking away disability and sickness benefits full stop and will still vote against the proposals. Delay the vote - or pull the reforms If no concessions are reached, Mr Starmer may feel he has no other option but to delay the vote on Tuesday. This would allow time to speak to rebels and reach a compromise over the summer months, before a vote after the summer recess. It would be a screeching U-turn and politically messy. Over the last 24 hours both Mr Starmer and the Deputy PM Angela Rayner have insisted the vote will go ahead - a line repeated by No10 and a series of ministers. But it would mean avoiding a Commons defeat on one of the government's flagship policies almost a year to the date Labour won a historic victory at the general election. And if the rebels are not won over, pulling the reforms completely could also be on the cards.


STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Scottish Government warned someone could be killed by 'menacing gulls'
The Scottish Government has been urged to intervene in the 'extremely serious' issue of 'menacing gulls' in Scotland amid warnings that someone could be killed. Tory MSP Douglas Ross led a Holyrood debate about the 'dangerous seagull menace' in the north of Scotland on Thursday, right before Parliament broke up for summer recess. He warned that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'nuisance' gulls, and he called on the Scottish Government take urgent action. 'Some people do smirk when you say you're going to be debating in Parliament about the issue of gulls, but this is an extremely serious issue,' Ross said. He reiterated extreme examples of seagull attacks and aggression in coastal communities like Elgin, Nairn, Inverness, and more. In Hopeman, Ross said a retired couple are afraid to leave their own home because they are 'continually dive-bombed' by gulls every time they go down their street. In another case, he said an elderly Moray woman fell outside her house as a result of a gull attack, broke her leg, went to hospital, came back out of hospital, and was attacked again. Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton called for a nationwide summit to tackle the issue as she warned that Scots are being left 'scared, attacked and traumatised'. The Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP said 'aggressive' seagulls had attacked seven children in one month last year in Eyemouth, with one girl 'left with gashes to her scalp and blood running down her face'. Finlay Carson, Tory MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, said in his own constituency, the local council is 'spending upwards of £85,000 a year trying to manage gulls'. 'That money would be far better spent if the licensing system actually worked,' he said. 'When non-lethal methods fail, communities are left without any viable options. The result is growing frustration, rising costs, and a real risk to public safety.' Agriculture minister Jim Fairlie reiterated that he's already promised to hold a seagull summit in Inverness, where MSPs will examine all the issues raised to try to solve the problem. 'This is something we have to deal with,' Fairlie said. 'We have a joint responsibility to figure out how we are creating environments for these birds to thrive in our communities and manage that going forward. 'The figures I've seen show large increases in the numbers of urban gulls, but absolute crashing numbers in their natural environment. We've got to stop feeding them, stop creating nesting spaces, and find ways to displace them to go back to their natural habitat.' Labour MSP Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) also emphasised a need for balance. 'I think we need to be clear, the birds are not acting maliciously,' Grant said. 'They are looking for food and trying to protect their young. 'It may be the case that [gull populations are in decline] in their normal habitat, but it doesn't feel like that's the case in urban areas where the danger they cause to the public is increasing.' SNP MSP Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) also defended the 'clever and adaptable gull'. Grahame said words like 'mugging and menace' are 'not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food'. STV News is now on WhatsApp Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News