Miami power grab: It took a judge to remind city leaders they can't cancel democracy
What a relief. For a while, Miami, known for government dysfunction, was once again making headlines for the wrong reasons.
Fortunately, Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Valerie Manno Schurr ruled against this power grab. She said Monday that commissioners violated the Florida Constitution when they decided last month to extend their own terms a year by postponing the November 2025 election to November 2026. In a split 3-2 vote, commissioners pushed back the election to align with midterm and presidential elections, which they said would likely lower election costs and lead to higher voter turnout.
Those are worthy goals but this was an audacious move. There's no way not to see it as self-serving. It would extend the terms even of those who are term-limited out of office this year, including Mayor Francis Suarez and Commissioner Joe Carollo, who voted against the measure. Moving the election to even-numbered years may be a plus for voter participation, but doing it by extending the commission's terms without voters deciding? That's the eyebrow-raising part.
The ruling came in a suit filed by Miami mayoral candidate Emilio González. In the suit, he compared the commission's decision to what happens in 'regimes in Venezuela, Nicaragua, Bolivia, or Cuba — the very places so many of Miami's people come from — [where] those in power, while in power, forced upon those voters what they think is best for elections going forward — and secured for themselves additional time in power, without a vote of the electorate. That cannot stand.'
It's not as if commissioners weren't warned. Both Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Attorney General James Uthmeier told them not to delay the election.
Commissioner Damian Pardo, who sponsored the proposal, cited worthy reasons for moving the elections. Voter participation in particular has been a problem in Miami for a long time. The city needs greater civic engagement. By moving the election to even-numbered years, when more people generally vote, Miami could see a spike in turnout. That would be great.
But voters should be the ones to decide if the election should be moved. The ends do not justify the means.
Coral Gables confronted a similar issue earlier this year — with a different conclusion. The commission voted 3-2 to shorten the terms of commissioners and of Mayor Vince Lago by over four months in order to move up the date of the next election from April 2027 to November 2026.
There's a fundamental issue at play here: Voters should be able to trust that, when they elect their representatives, it's for the agreed-upon amount of time. Those who are elected shouldn't be able to change the length of their terms at will.
In arguing that changing the election date is legal, the city of Miami is relying on three Florida statutes that allow municipalities to move an election date via ordinance. North Miami recently changed its elections to even years, and the decision was appealed but, in the end, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's ruling that the city had the authority to make the change.
Will that hold up in Miami's case? The city has appealed the judge's ruling and asked for a decision by Aug. 8. Complicating matters, there are other issues politically linked to the election postponement, including lifetime term limits for the commission — an idea the Editorial Board supports — and the need to expand the city commission from five seats to seven or nine, which needs to be done as well.
But no matter how the legal arguments settle out in this case, a judge has called commissioners' decision unconstitutional. That should pull them up short. In their purported zeal to put election participation on a better path, commissioners can't forget that they work for voters.
Click here to send the letter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Miami health care workers rally in support of immigrants, speaking out against "big, beautiful bill" cuts
Immigration, health care and President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" were on the minds of Florida's Harare Workers' Union on Saturday, where they rallied at Miami's Jackson Memorial Hospital to speak out against the policies and cuts in the bill that they feel are unjust. Eighteen-year-old Elli said her father was deported years ago, and now she is worried that her mom will be next. "If my mom ever gets deported, my family will be devastated because I'm the eldest of the daughters taking care of my five siblings," Elli said. That's why she went to a rally at Jackson Memorial, where immigration was a key topic. Roxey Nelson of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) said that immigrants are losing temporary protected status, or TPS, and that is trimming down staff in the health care sector. "I got a call that a nursing home that's like 100 beds, 80 or so workers," Nelson told CBS News Miami. "Thirty of them were laid off because of TPS." One of the main topics was the president's spending bill, which he called the "big, beautiful bill." Health care workers are also worried about the bill's cuts to Medicaid. According to the Florida Health Justice Project, Florida could lose about $4 billion annually in Medicaid funds. Union leaders are worried that it may impact services. Union leaders told CBS News Miami that Medicaid accounts for a noticeable chunk of Jackson Memorial's budget. "$325 million a year in Medicaid at Jackson," said Martha Baker of SEIU 1991. "They have about a $2 billion budget." "How are we gonna be coming to work every day thinking that we may be laid off?" asked Martha Wydra, an RN at University of Miami Hospital. CBS News Miami reached out to Jackson Memorial Hospital several times about this protest, but did not get a response. Meanwhile, the Florida Decides Healthcare organization is attempting to put Medicaid expansion on the next election ballot. "We have been collecting this whole year, and we are looking to complete the collection of petitions by December," said Mitch Emerson, the executive director of Florida Decides Healthcare. Florida Decides Healthcare cited a public opinion poll showing that 67 percent of likely voters support putting a Medicaid expansion on the ballot.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive: Trump-ally says he is ‘proud to sue' Powell
Exclusive: Trump-ally says he is 'proud to sue' Powell originally appeared on TheStreet. Azoria Capital, a Miami-based investment firm, has filed a federal lawsuit against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, alleging that the Fed's closed-door policy meetings violate federal 'transparency laws' — and that the decision not to lower interest rates is politically motivated. The lawsuit, filed on July 24 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenges the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) practice of holding private deliberations. Azoria argues these violate the Government in the Sunshine Act, a 1976 law requiring transparency in federal decision-making. 'Azoria is proud to bring this federal lawsuit against Jerome Powell,' CEO James Fishback said in a statement to TheStreet Roundtable. 'We are not going to sit idly by and allow Jerome Powell's Federal Reserve to undermine the duly elected President of the United States and hurt millions of Americans with artificially high interest rates.' Crypto markets watching closely Fed policy shifts ripple across the economy — and crypto markets. Rate cuts tend to boost liquidity and risk appetite, lifting risk assets like Bitcoin. Currently, Bitcoin trades near $119,137.96, up 13% in the past month, per Kraken. Though Powell has called Bitcoin 'digital gold,' he's emphasized it's not a rival to the dollar — and that the Fed is barred from holding it directly. As a result, traders closely monitor every Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting for clues that could impact pricing, leverage, stablecoins, and valuations across the global crypto CEO takes a dig at Powell's leadership "Inflation is now at a four-year low under President Trump's leadership," Azoria CEO James Fishback told FOX Business on July 24. "Yet Jerome Powell refuses to lower interest rates from a 20-year high. That is a life-altering decision that affects Americans all over the country—from families unable to secure a mortgage to small businesses delaying growth." James Fishback has also emerged as a vocal advocate for crypto. In a recent interview, he stated that 'the rising economy of crypto lifts all boats,' emphasizing that greater access to digital assets enables Americans to 'avoid being debanked' or financially penalized by traditional financial institutions. Fishback also warned over the broader economic effects of prolonged high interest rates. "Every percentage point above the natural rate is costing American taxpayers $315 billion a year,' he said. "That's nearly $3 trillion over the next decade — or $31,000 for every U.S. taxpaying household." The Federal Reserve declined to comment when reached by TheStreet anti-DEI ETF strategy Azoria Capital has also drawn attention for its ETF, the Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The fund tracks companies within the S&P 500 but excludes those with explicit diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring mandates. "We start with the full S&P 500, then kick out companies like Nike, which mandates that 35% of its U.S. corporate workforce must be ethnically diverse,' Fishback added. 'Ethnic diversity has nothing to do with selling a pair of running shoes at a profit.' Fishback, an ardent Trump supporter, also had previously floated the idea of mailing taxpayers $5,000 "DOGE dividend" checks to symbolize the supposed savings from the Department of Governmental Efficiency, briefly led by Elon Musk. He has also formed the Full Support for Donald, a Political Action Committee to support President Trump. Exclusive: Trump-ally says he is 'proud to sue' Powell first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 24, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 24, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
Federal education funding to be released, offering relief to Florida schools
Close to $400 million in federal grants promised to Florida school districts will be released by the Trump administration, according to reports. As of yesterday, the $35 million in funds promised to Miami-Dade County Public Schools remained frozen. Earlier this month, the figure was $10 million higher, but some funds were released for after-school programs. In Broward, at least $30 million in funds were promised to the school district and then frozen. Nationwide, more than $5 billion in public school funding had been placed on hold. The freeze began June 30, just one day before the grants were expected to arrive. The White House Office of Management and Budget has been reviewing the funds to determine whether they were being used to support a 'radical leftwing agenda.' 'It is incredible, encouraging news that we do not have to hold back on certain areas,' said Miami-Dade Superintendent Jose L. Dotres. 'It will allow us to continue improving the trajectory of the school district and the services we provide to our community.' Dotres had been lobbying lawmakers in Tallahassee and Washington, D.C., to release the funding for the past few weeks, and had already started making cuts for the upcoming year, such as cutting purchases on textbook, supplies, and delaying certain teacher training programs. Now, the district will be able to proceed as usual. In Miami-Dade, the grants fund programs such as English language learning, science and technology innovation, teacher training, migrant education and adult education. John J. Sullivan, chief communications officer for Broward schools, said he is grateful the funds will soon be released. 'These critical resources allow us to continue providing essential services and supports for our students, families, and schools,' said Sullivan. Ron Steiger, the Miami-Dade school district's chief financial officer, said he received multiple texts with links to news articles announcing the release of funds. Though he has not yet received formal notice from the U.S. Department of Education, he said he was relieved. 'Nothing actually ended up harming anything,' he said, adding that he believed this outcome was the most likely all along. Two lawsuits related to the funding freeze are still active. One, brought by 24 states and the District of Columbia, asked a federal judge in Rhode Island to order the release of the funds. Florida was not a party to that suit. A second case was filed by a coalition of organizations—including the Florida Parent Teacher Association and P.S. 305, a Miami education advocacy group—in the same court. On Wednesday, a judge agreed to consider the two cases together. A hearing for emergency relief is scheduled for Aug. 13. Despite the administration's announcement, Florida PTA President-elect Jude Bruno said the legal challenge remains necessary. 'The harm still exists until school districts actually receive the funds or, at the very least, are issued award and grant issuance letters with clear timelines for when to expect them,' Bruno said in a text message to the Miami Herald. Mina Hosseini, executive director of P.S. 305 agreed that this is not the end of what she says is a school 'system chronically starved of resources.' 'The future of public education cannot be left vulnerable to political whims—it must be protected by the people,' she told the Miami Herald. An administrative assistant for Mari Tere Rojas, the chair of the Miami-Dade school board, said in a statement, 'These programs, which enjoy bipartisan support, are vital for the operation and functioning of our local public schools for this upcoming school year.' Ray Hart, executive director of the Council of the Great City Schools, a coalition of school districts, said in a statement that he is 'relieved' the Education Department has released the remainder of the funds authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 'for the benefit of schoolchildren throughout our nation.' School board member Steve Gallon also welcomed the news—but issued a warning. He expressed frustration that some elected leaders had remained silent 'in the face of what could potentially devastate the learning and lives of children and families… Seemingly shackled by fear and partisanship,' he said in a text message. 'I am concerned that this is not the end,' he added.