logo
How lamprey control represents a cosier Canada and U.S. relationship

How lamprey control represents a cosier Canada and U.S. relationship

CBC2 days ago
When Red Rock fishing guide and angler Gord Ellis describes sea lampreys it sounds nightmare that would keep Ridley Scott awake at night.
"The worst part of them is they have this rasping mouth that has a series of teeth inside of it," Ellis told CBC News. "They'll cling on to a fish, they'll rasp a hole in it."
"If you've ever seen it, it's an awful thing to see. The fish has a huge hole in it and it's been drained... All the fluids are out of it and it's just literally bone dry."
Lampreys are not part of a science-fiction dystopia, but in fact pose a very real problem. These parasitic fish arrived in the Great Lakes in the early 20th century, after improvements to the Welland Canal in the previous century undermined Niagara Falls' role as a natural barrier to the Atlantic Ocean.
By the middle of the 20th century, according Ellis, lampreys had almost devastated the fishing industry in the Great Lakes.
"Your average lamprey kills 40 pounds of fish, which is why they just about wiped out the Great Lakes. In the '60s and early '70s they just ate them all, killed them all," Ellis says.
This destruction posed a huge problem for not only commercial fishing, but every day anglers.
"I remember as a kid in the '70s that you couldn't catch a lake trout in Lake Superior, there just weren't any," Ellis says.
Maintaining control
Back in 1957, a compound was discovered that is lethal to lamprey. Since then, the deployment of lampricides into the tributaries around the Great Lakes became a regular occurrence, with the goal being to kill larval sea lampreys before they can mature.
A large scale lampricide resumes around Lake Superior tributaries, starting August 5 to 22. Previous work had been completed last month.
The compound used specifically kills lamprey while leaving other animals unharmed due to a quirk in the fish's biology, according to Great Lakes Fishery Commission legislative affairs and policy director Greg McClinchey.
"Lamprey are a 360 million year old species of fish and they have not evolved certain enzymes in their body to process this compound," McClinchey says. "If you introduce this compound to a lake trout, they simply metabolize it and away it goes. If you introduce it to a sea lamprey, they die."
Lampricide is a very complex process — it's not as simple as pouring pesticides into lakes.
"They put only the minimum dose in that they need to to be lethal to lamprey," McClinchey says. "It's a constant process where they monitor downstream, they do water quality samples... [The compound] doesn't just become diluted, it actually degrades in sunlight and only kills sea lamprey."
Historic success
Since 1955, the commission has been a binational body monitoring these bodies of water.
Because the Great Lakes encompass both the Canadian and United States borders, there has been a multi nation effort to control lamprey levels.
If you take your foot off them for a second, they spring back. - Greg McClinchey
As an angling expert in the region, Ellis has noticed the difference in lamprey numbers in his decades of fishing.
"They're incredibly good at keeping track of how many lamprey there are," Ellis says. "If the program wasn't there, it wouldn't take very long for the Great Lakes fishery to collapse."
McClinchey agrees, stating that "if you take your foot off them for a second, they spring back."
Then COVID-19 came, a time that revealed the incredible strength with which lampreys spring back.
"In the year 2020 and 2021 we had to reduce sea lamprey control," McClinchey recalls. "Our data shows us that it will have cost the economy of the Great Lakes about $2 billion just from that reduction in sea lamprey control."
"We can't rest on our laurels in that fight."
Unity
As the relationship between Canada and the U.S. becomes more tumultuous, lamprey control works as a quiet antidote to friction at the border.
"During Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau's tenure as Prime Minister and President Richard Nixon's tenure as president, they didn't like each other... They didn't care much for each other and things in the national relationship were pretty rocky," McClinchey says. "During that time period, at the Great Lakes Fishery Commission every single thing we did during that time period was unanimous."
Ellis says that there is still a way to go as far as anglers are concerned.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than 400 deaths linked to L.A. wildfires, researchers say
More than 400 deaths linked to L.A. wildfires, researchers say

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

More than 400 deaths linked to L.A. wildfires, researchers say

The deadly wildfires that swept through Los Angeles this year likely contributed to hundreds more deaths, say researchers calling for better health tracking in the wake of natural disasters. As Canadian communities from B.C. to Newfoundland battle flames and drifting smoke, new research from JAMA medical journal published Wednesday draws attention to the long-term health effects associated with recent wildfires in L.A. and Maui, Hawai'i. A total of 30 people died directly from the L.A. wildfires, according to the study. Andrew Stokes of Boston University School of Public Health and Finnish researchers now estimate another 440 people died from health conditions related to the blaze. Stokes said these could be people with heart or lung conditions exacerbated by smoke. Mental health impacts and delays in care may have also contributed. In total, 6,371 deaths were observed compared with 5,931 expected from previous data, for a total of 440 "excess deaths." The researchers acknowledged the data was provisional and unmeasured factors could've played a role. WATCH | Harmful toxins can remain in structures that survive wildfires: Harmful toxins from wildfires linger in surviving homes 7 months ago "Each of these statistics is an underlying person with family that's now bereaved as a result," Stokes said. Getting a sense of the true burden of health impacts related to wildfires, including cancers among wildland firefighters that develop years later, may help prioritize disaster resources, he said. Need for proactive approach More than 100 people died directly from the Maui wildfire in August 2023, which also left one in five people tracked in the study with lung damage up to 14 months later. Dr. Sonia Angell, a professor in the epidemiology department at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, called for better tracking. "If we are lulled into the idea that the impact that climate has on health is really during the episodes then we're really getting behind the eight ball," Angell said."We're really missing out on opportunities to improve health and to prevent illness and death." Angell said most people see extreme weather events like wildfires, hurricanes or earthquakes as extreme shocks in the moment. But he health risks don't end there. "Our surveillance systems need to be improved to be able to really understand the impact of climate and health, so that our health departments and our governments can be more proactive rather than reactive," Angell said. Angell gave the example of compromised lung function after a wildfire that needs medical attention, but may never have been included in the formal counts. Dr. Courtney Howard, an emergency physician based in Yellowknife who treats patients harmed by wildfire smoke, said a new approach to showing the longer health impacts of wildfire from wildfires is important. "Too many Canadians have now had the experience of living within a smoky environment," Howard said from near Osoyoos, B.C. Smoke exposure can cause headache, runny nose, throat irritation and cough, she said. Provincial health officials say severe cough, shortness of breath, heart palpitations and wheezing are less common symptoms. "I don't want to scare people, but what is absolutely clear is that wildfire smoke is toxic," Howard said. "It's very bad for our lungs and we need to be decreasing our exposure as much as possible." Vulnerable at risk Health Canada estimated up to 240 annual deaths and $1.8 billion in healthcare costs are due to short-term health effects from wildfires. This week, health officials from B.C. to Newfoundland have warned vulnerable residents, such as those over age 65, pregnant, young children, people who have underlying medical conditions and those who physically exert themselves outside for work or sports, that they're considered at high risk of suffering health effects from smoke. Residents in smoky areas are advised to reduce their exposure: Keep windows and doors closed. Limit outdoor and strenuous activity. Turn off or use recirculation settings on HVAC systems to prevent smoke from entering. Use portable HEPA cleaners to filter air in one area of the home. Stay cool. Check in and care for those who are vulnerable. Howard said years of more intense wildfires in Canada reflect the impacts of climate change from fossil fuel combustion and other types of greenhouse gas emissions. "We still, I believe, have the ability to emergently decrease those greenhouse gas emissions and get ourselves onto a different track."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store