Parents sent urgent vaccine warning amid cancer red alert
Uptake of a vital vaccine is still well below pre-Covid pandemic levels, experts have warned
Young people in one area of the UK are at an 'increased risk' of a certain cancer, as health experts warned parents. According to the latest data from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), people in parts of the country are more likely to develop cervical cancer.
This is due to the fact that coverage of a potentially lifesaving vaccine, the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) jab is not the same across the country. Figures from the UKHSA show that there are 'inequalities' in vaccination uptake in different areas and regions across the country.
Uptake of the HPV jab is still below what it was prior to the Covid pandemic, the UKHSA warned. It not only protects against cervical cancer, but other forms of the disease such as anal, penile and head and neck cancer.
The vaccine is offered to children aged 12 to 13. Research has shown that receiving the HPV vaccine before age 16 provides significantly stronger immune responses and greater protection against HPV-related cancers. Dr Sharif Ismail, consultant epidemiologist at UKHSA, said: 'The HPV vaccine, now just a single dose offered in schools, is one of the most powerful tools we have for cancer prevention. Every vaccination represents a young person with better protection against the devastating impact of HPV-related cancers and we must do more to ensure that no teenage girl or boy, young woman or man is denied that protection no matter where they live.
'Although we have seen some increase in the number of young people being vaccinated, uptake is still well below pre-Covid pandemic levels. Over a quarter of young people, many thousands, are missing out on this potentially life-saving vaccine, which protects not only against cervical cancer but all young adults, men and women, against genital warts and some genital cancers, as well as mouth and throat cancers.
'We're calling on all parents to return their children's HPV vaccination consent forms promptly. This simple action could protect your child from developing cancer in the future.'
Worst-affected areas
The latest HPV vaccine data, which was taken between 2023 to 2024, shows that Lambeth in south London has the lowest uptake of the jab:
HPV coverage for female year 10 students by NHS commissioning region was lowest in London (64.9 per cent) and highest in the South East (82.7 per cent)
HPV coverage for male year 10 students by NHS commissioning region was lowest in London (58.9 per cent) and highest in the South East (77.3 per cent)
HPV coverage for female year 10 students at local authority level ranged from 38.7 per cent (Lambeth) to 97.6 per cent (Northumberland)
HPV coverage for male year 10 students at local authority level ranged from 28.2 per cent (Lambeth) to 92.2 per cent (West Berkshire)
Data provided by Cancer Research UK on cervical cancer incidence statistics report that rates in England are 65 per cent higher in the most deprived quintile compared with the least.
Dr Amanda Doyle, national director for primary care and community services at NHS England, said: 'The NHS HPV vaccination programme has already helped save thousands of lives and we need to go further to boost uptake of HPV vaccines and cervical screening to help eliminate cervical cancer in England by 2040.
'If we can ensure that almost every Year 10 girl in some areas is protected and extremely unlikely to ever develop cervical cancer, we need to match this in every part of the country. It's vital for boys and young men to be vaccinated too. Rates in boys still lag behind girls and HPV causes thousands of cancers in men as well as things like genital warts.
'I would urge all parents to give their consent for their child to be vaccinated and it's important to remember that those that remain unvaccinated and have left school can still get vital protection by contacting their GP practice to catch up before their 25th birthday. With vaccination being just one dose, it is easier than ever to ensure young people get protection.'
Getting the HPV vaccine
For those who missed their school HPV vaccinations in year 8 and 9, catch-up options remain available and are highly effective. Anyone who missed their HPV vaccination, now just a single jab, can still receive it for free until their 25th birthday through their GP surgery; this also applies to boys born after September 1, 2006.
HPV vaccinations are also offered to boys in school in year 8 and 9, and similarly help protect them against HPV infection and its complications, including genital warts, head and neck cancers (which includes mouth and throat) and genital cancers. But boys also have an important role to play in helping eliminate cervical cancer by being vaccinated and not passing on the HPV virus when they become sexually active.
For young adults up to age 25, who missed their school vaccinations, please speak to your GP about catch-up options. It's never too late to get protected.
And it's important to stress that even if you've had the HPV vaccine, it's vital you still attend your cervical screening appointments when invited. Both vaccination and screening together give you your best chance of protection against cervical cancer.
While the HPV vaccine provides excellent protection, attending cervical screening appointments remains crucial, regardless of vaccination status. Screening can detect abnormal cells before they develop into cancer, allowing for early treatment and prevention.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Dame Judi Dench shares plea after watching loved ones 'slip away'
Estimates suggest that almost one million people are living with dementia in the UK, but one in three remain undiagnosed Dame Judi Dench is urging the Government to provide earlier NHS diagnosis for people with dementia. The Oscar-winning actress supports a new campaign and petition by Alzheimer's Research UK, advocating for quicker diagnosis of the condition. Nearly a million people in the UK live with dementia, yet approximately one in three remains undiagnosed. Alzheimer's Research UK reports that in certain parts of England, people can wait as long as a year for diagnosis after referral, with those in the most deprived regions experiencing even greater delays. Dame Judi, 90, said: "Dementia doesn't just take away memories – it can take away identity, connection, and the future you thought you had. Watching loved ones slip away, and not knowing why, is an experience no one should have to go through without answers. "Many people across the UK are still waiting far too long for a dementia diagnosis – or never receive one at all. That means they miss out on vital support, on the chance to plan ahead, opportunities to get involved in research, and on precious time. "A diagnosis may not fix everything, but it gives people understanding, clarity, and some control at a time when everything feels uncertain. It allows families to make the most of the moments they have left. "That's why I've signed Alzheimer's Research UK's petition – and why I'm asking the public to do the same. Together, we can call on Government to fix the crumbling diagnosis system and make sure no one faces dementia unseen." The new Alzheimer's Research UK campaign, Dementia Unseen, comes after the NHS target to ensure 66.7% of people with dementia receive a diagnosis was removed from NHS planning guidance for 2025-26. It is calling for people with suspected dementia to be referred by their GP to see a specialist within six weeks – and to have a diagnosis and treatment plan in place within 18 weeks. Hilary Evans-Newton, chief executive of Alzheimer's Research UK, said: "Everyone who has dementia should have the right to know the disease or diseases causing it, and to be diagnosed early enough to get treatments that help with its symptoms. "But hundreds of thousands of people are waiting too long for a diagnosis, causing uncertainty, and adding distress to an already challenging situation. "We're incredibly grateful to Dame Judi for helping shine a light on what people with dementia need – and to everyone who has already signed our petition and stands with us. "More people are seeking answers, so it's vital that the NHS and government act now to fix the system – because no one should face dementia alone or unseen." Professor Fiona Carragher, chief policy officer at Alzheimer's Society, also added: "Everyone living with dementia deserves the clarity and dignity of an early and accurate diagnosis. Yet, more than a third of people living with this terminal condition are in the dark because they haven't been diagnosed, with many left to struggle alone without the care, support and treatment a diagnosis can bring. "In fact, on average people experience dementia symptoms for three and a half years before they receive a diagnosis. For some time, we've been calling on the UK Government to urgently address dementia diagnosis and we welcome the recommendations in this new report. "In particular, we support the call for health services to have the right teams and technology they need to diagnose more people, and for more data on diagnosis so that resources can be targeted where they're needed most. "The science for dementia treatments is flying but the diagnosis system is failing. It is crucial governments invest in diagnosis across England, Wales and Northern Ireland so people can access the existing treatments of today, plan for the future, and be eligible for the life-changing treatments of tomorrow. "If our governments set bold and ambitious new dementia diagnosis rate targets to get more people diagnosed, this would bring significant benefits for individuals, their families, and for health and care services."
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Overlooking sexual harassment against health staff ‘risks patient safety'
Medics claim that overlooking these incidents allows other toxic behaviours 'to perpetuate'. It comes as members of the British Medical Association (BMA) called for NHS trusts to include active bystander training – which aims to equip people with the skills to challenge unacceptable conduct – in mandatory training programmes. Delegates at the union's annual representative meeting (ARM) in Liverpool also voted for the BMA to lobby for a national anonymous reporting system for victims of sexual harassment. Dr Helen Neary, co-chairwoman of the BMA consultants committee, said: 'People are bystanders at all levels, and a working culture that turns a blind eye to this behaviour is also a risk to patient safety, enabling other poor behaviours to perpetuate.' The motion urged NHS organisations to probe allegations of sexual misconduct using trained investigators external to the trust. Dr Neary added: 'No one should feel unsafe at work. Yet the appalling truth is that doctors, disproportionately women, are still subject to sexual harassment, abuse and assault in the workplace – often by their fellow doctors. This has to stop. 'Not only is it obviously completely unacceptable and has a devastating impact on victims, but also affects the quality of care and workforce capacity as poor behaviours will do nothing to retain staff in the NHS.' In March, the latest NHS staff survey found one in 12 (8.82%) of workers were the target of unwanted sexual behaviour such as offensive comments, touching and assaults. The proportion was similar to that reported in 2023 (8.79%) when the question was first asked as part of the survey. Last October, NHS England launched a new national sexual misconduct policy framework to ensure trusts had robust policies in place for staff to report incidents. Speaking to delegates at the BMA ARM in Liverpool, Professor Bhairavi Sapra said that while the framework is a 'very welcome first step', it is not mandatory. 'It is up to individual employers to adopt it, and even then, perpetrators can simply move on from one employer to another without accountability for those in positions of power to prevent this behaviour,' she added. 'Worse still, there is no national reporting mechanism. That means if someone wants to report an incident months later in a different workplace, they face an uphill battle, often alone. 'Survivors have told us why they don't come forward. They fear being told they're overreacting. 'They fear retaliation or reputational damage. They fear nothing will change, and sadly, they are not wrong. 'Investigations, when they do happen, are rarely trauma informed, often the process itself can feel like another form of harm.' Dr Neary said: 'As the trade union and professional association for all doctors in the UK – from those beginning their careers as medical students to retirement and beyond – the BMA welcomes the legal obligation placed on the NHS to protect employees from sexual harassment. 'This vote makes some excellent suggestions on how this work can go further, including anonymous reporting, that will encourage those concerned about coming forward to do so, and better equipping doctors on how they can support colleagues when they witness sexual harassment at work.' Prof Sapra also claimed the 'power imbalance' in the medical profession is 'stark', adding: 'Junior staff rely on senior medical staff for training, for references and for their very careers. 'That dependency makes them especially vulnerable and often silent.' An NHS England spokesperson said: 'It is totally unacceptable that NHS staff experience sexual misconduct or harassment at work – this behaviour has no place in the health service, and all organisations must take robust and compassionate action to prevent it. 'The NHS Sexual Safety Charter has been adopted by every Integrated Care Board and NHS Trust in England, which encourages consideration of external, independent investigators in complex or sensitive cases – and all NHS organisations should ensure that those leading these processes are properly trained to handle them with the seriousness and sensitivity they require.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Third of Scots abandon ‘dying' NHS for private care
Almost a third of Scottish households have used private healthcare in the past two years, a survey reveals, as doctors' leaders warn the NHS is 'dying'. The majority of those who paid for treatment said they did so because waiting times on the NHS were too long. Iain Kennedy, chair of the British Medical Association (BMA) Scotland, will tell a major UK conference on Tuesday that Scottish society is divided between those 'languishing' in line for treatment and those who can afford to pay to access care more swiftly. Research for the union found 17 per cent of Scots had used private medicine in the past two years and a further 14 per cent lived with someone who had. • NHS 'prioritising financial targets over care', report finds In an address to the Annual Representative Meeting of the BMA in Liverpool, Kennedy will say: 'It is abundantly clear that Scotland has been divided into those who can afford private healthcare and those languishing on ever longer NHS waiting lists. 'Now, I don't believe anyone made an active choice to pursue this path towards a private health service. Rather, it is a failure to get to grips with an evolving population and its health needs. But, be in no doubt, the NHS is dying before our very eyes.' The latest waiting times figures for Scotland, released last month by monitoring body Public Health Scotland, showed 63,406 people waiting for an initial hospital consultation for a year — up 34 per cent compared to March 2024. Almost a quarter of patients on treatment waiting lists had been queuing for a year, with 7,969 waiting more than two years. Kennedy, a Highland GP, told The Times his conversations with colleagues in England suggested waiting times were worse in Scotland than south of the border. He said: 'I had a patient recently asking me about private dermatology [skin] services and I said you are going to be waiting six months for private healthcare. We have under invested so much in healthcare in Scotland that not even the private sector is able to deal with the problems we have got ourselves into.' In December last year The Times revealed two year waits for NHS treatment were 100 times higher in Scotland than south of the border. Meanwhile, NHS England waiting times have fallen to their lowest level in two years at 7.39 million, down from 7.42 million, as of June. The new BMA poll, involving more than 1,200 Scottish residents, found 64 per cent of households which had used private healthcare did so because NHS waiting times were too long. To fund the care and treatment 20 per cent had reduced leisure activities, 9 per cent had cut essential items such as groceries and 9 per cent had borrowed money. Of those who had not used private healthcare, 46 per cent said it was because they could not afford it. According to data published by the Private Healthcare Information Network (PHIN) there were 46,000 private hospital admissions in Scotland in 2023, an 11 per cent increase on the previous year and up 31 per cent on 2019. Cam Donaldson, emeritus professor of health economics at Glasgow Caledonian University and author of the newly released book Financing Health and Social Care, said the survey findings reflected the 'crisis of access across the whole system'. He warned if enough 'middle class people' took out health insurance, they would start to demand tax breaks and the decline of the NHS would become irreversible. 'The best way out of this crisis is more public funding possibly through taxation,' he said. 'What will happen if we do nothing is this trend will continue and we are just going to come into this constant vicious cycle of gradual decline.' Kennedy will say at the conference that the BMA's warnings about the state of the health service in Scotland have been repeatedly ignored by the Scottish government: 'Patients are suffering, unable to access the care they need when they need it, or having to use their own hard-earned money to go private. Everyone knows it is unacceptable.' Sandesh Gulhane, a GP and the Scottish Conservative Party health spokesman, said: 'The fact that so many Scots are having to raid their life savings to go private for treatment isn't just unfair, it's immoral and at odds with the founding principles of our health service.' Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour health spokeswoman, described the survey findings as 'damning' and said the SNP had taken a 'wrecking ball' to the founding principles of the Scottish NHS. However, Neil Gray, Scottish health secretary, claimed the party was protecting a service publicly owned and free at the point of need. He said: 'That's why we are investing a record £21.7 billion in health and social care this year, including £106 million to deliver over 150,000 additional appointments and procedures. 'But we recognise some of the concerns raised by the BMA, and we are determined to deliver the reform our NHS needs to ensure it provides quality care for everyone who needs it now and into the future.'
