
Third of Scots abandon ‘dying' NHS for private care
Almost a third of Scottish households have used private healthcare in the past two years, a survey reveals, as doctors' leaders warn the NHS is 'dying'.
The majority of those who paid for treatment said they did so because waiting times on the NHS were too long.
Iain Kennedy, chair of the British Medical Association (BMA) Scotland, will tell a major UK conference on Tuesday that Scottish society is divided between those 'languishing' in line for treatment and those who can afford to pay to access care more swiftly.
Research for the union found 17 per cent of Scots had used private medicine in the past two years and a further 14 per cent lived with someone who had.
• NHS 'prioritising financial targets over care', report finds
In an address to the Annual Representative Meeting of the BMA in Liverpool, Kennedy will say: 'It is abundantly clear that Scotland has been divided into those who can afford private healthcare and those languishing on ever longer NHS waiting lists.
'Now, I don't believe anyone made an active choice to pursue this path towards a private health service. Rather, it is a failure to get to grips with an evolving population and its health needs. But, be in no doubt, the NHS is dying before our very eyes.'
The latest waiting times figures for Scotland, released last month by monitoring body Public Health Scotland, showed 63,406 people waiting for an initial hospital consultation for a year — up 34 per cent compared to March 2024. Almost a quarter of patients on treatment waiting lists had been queuing for a year, with 7,969 waiting more than two years.
Kennedy, a Highland GP, told The Times his conversations with colleagues in England suggested waiting times were worse in Scotland than south of the border. He said: 'I had a patient recently asking me about private dermatology [skin] services and I said you are going to be waiting six months for private healthcare. We have under invested so much in healthcare in Scotland that not even the private sector is able to deal with the problems we have got ourselves into.'
In December last year The Times revealed two year waits for NHS treatment were 100 times higher in Scotland than south of the border. Meanwhile, NHS England waiting times have fallen to their lowest level in two years at 7.39 million, down from 7.42 million, as of June.
The new BMA poll, involving more than 1,200 Scottish residents, found 64 per cent of households which had used private healthcare did so because NHS waiting times were too long. To fund the care and treatment 20 per cent had reduced leisure activities, 9 per cent had cut essential items such as groceries and 9 per cent had borrowed money.
Of those who had not used private healthcare, 46 per cent said it was because they could not afford it.
According to data published by the Private Healthcare Information Network (PHIN) there were 46,000 private hospital admissions in Scotland in 2023, an 11 per cent increase on the previous year and up 31 per cent on 2019.
Cam Donaldson, emeritus professor of health economics at Glasgow Caledonian University and author of the newly released book Financing Health and Social Care, said the survey findings reflected the 'crisis of access across the whole system'.
He warned if enough 'middle class people' took out health insurance, they would start to demand tax breaks and the decline of the NHS would become irreversible.
'The best way out of this crisis is more public funding possibly through taxation,' he said. 'What will happen if we do nothing is this trend will continue and we are just going to come into this constant vicious cycle of gradual decline.'
Kennedy will say at the conference that the BMA's warnings about the state of the health service in Scotland have been repeatedly ignored by the Scottish government: 'Patients are suffering, unable to access the care they need when they need it, or having to use their own hard-earned money to go private. Everyone knows it is unacceptable.'
Sandesh Gulhane, a GP and the Scottish Conservative Party health spokesman, said: 'The fact that so many Scots are having to raid their life savings to go private for treatment isn't just unfair, it's immoral and at odds with the founding principles of our health service.'
Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour health spokeswoman, described the survey findings as 'damning' and said the SNP had taken a 'wrecking ball' to the founding principles of the Scottish NHS.
However, Neil Gray, Scottish health secretary, claimed the party was protecting a service publicly owned and free at the point of need. He said: 'That's why we are investing a record £21.7 billion in health and social care this year, including £106 million to deliver over 150,000 additional appointments and procedures.
'But we recognise some of the concerns raised by the BMA, and we are determined to deliver the reform our NHS needs to ensure it provides quality care for everyone who needs it now and into the future.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
30 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Breastfeeding motion at North Lanarkshire Council meeting passes unanimously
Councillors Geraldine Woods and Fiona Fotheringham marked the anniversary of the Breastfeeding (Scotland) Act, which resulted from a Private Member's Bill presented by former MSP Elaine Smith. A motion passed at a full meeting of North Lanarkshire Council marked the progress made locally with regard to breastfeeding in the 20 years since legislation came into effect. Councillors Geraldine Woods (Labour, Coatbridge South) and Fiona Fotheringham (SNP, Wishaw) marked the anniversary of the Breastfeeding (Scotland) Act, which resulted from a Private Member's Bill presented by former MSP Elaine Smith. At the meeting Councillor Woods said: 'There can be no better start in life for babies than to get their mother's milk. It is designer made by mums for their baby,' before mentioning numerous health benefits breastfeeding provides to both mother and baby. Councillor Woods also elaborated on the importance of the 2005 Act, explaining that it made it an offence to attempt to stop a mother from breastfeeding in public. She said challenging this behaviour could undermine the confidence of mothers and put them off breastfeeding, which is dictated by demand from the baby and thus had to be permitted everywhere. Seconding, Councillor Fotheringham said her daughter had been born in 2006, soon after the Act came into effect, and that she had seen a 'massive shift' in how women were empowered to breastfeed, before talking about her experiences with her own children and adding that she had shared stories with many other mothers and acknowledged those who were unable or unwilling to do so. The motion celebrated the fact North Lanarkshire had recently surpassed the 50 per cent milestone for breastfeeding of newborn babies, and congratulated the work of NHS Lanarkshire's Infant Feeding and Maternity Services, as well as those in the council and partner organisations. It also acknowledged that not all mothers are capable of breastfeeding so efforts to promote its benefits must be supportive, non-judgemental, and inclusive. READ MORE: The motion further commended NHS Lanarkshire's maternity services for their collaboration with both North and South Lanarkshire Health and Social Care Partnerships, which earned them the UNICEF Achieving Sustainability Gold Baby Friendly Accreditation and supported participation in World Breastfeeding Week which begins on August 1. No amendments were presented in relation to this motion so it was carried unanimously. And did you know Lanarkshire Live had its own app? Download yours for free here.


Glasgow Times
41 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Give doctors work phones to tackle burnout and abuse, medics say
It comes as one doctor described using six apps on her personal device to do her job 'safely', and revealed the trust she works at relies on WhatsApp to fill locum shifts. Currently, there is no national NHS England policy that requires trusts to provide work phones to doctors or other staff. Delegates at the BMA's annual representative meeting in Liverpool voted for the union to demand employer-funded mobile phones for all medical staff to carry out NHS or university work, while rejecting any expectation that medics should use personal devices for professional communication. Dr Latifa Patel, chairwoman of the BMA's representative body and workforce lead, said: 'Many workplaces offer devices for professional communication, and the NHS should be no different. 'Doctors often work across the hospital site and in the community, including home visits, and need to be contactable. 'In recent years, we have seen an increasing reliance on doctors' own personal mobile phones.' BMA members also called for 'robust' safeguards to protect doctors from inappropriate contact, including sexual harassment, while advocating for clear boundaries between work life and personal life to reduce burnout. Dr Patel added: 'Using a work device, like a mobile phone, can help to define boundaries between work and home life, and significantly reduce burnout – something we know many doctors experience, and which is undoubtedly contributing to them either reducing their hours or leaving the NHS altogether. 'We also know some doctors are impacted by inappropriate contact, such as abuse or sexual harassment, sometimes in the form of unwanted messages and communication outside of work. 'Removing the reliance on personal devices is an action employers can take to mitigate these risks. 'We invite the Government to work with us to see how these devices can be introduced in the NHS as part of efforts to improve doctor wellbeing.' Emma Andrews told delegates she uses six different apps on her personal phone to do her job 'safely and to do it well'. She spoke of one incident where a medical team would not have been able to locate a patient in an 'obscure' room without using WhatsApp, with locum shifts in her trust also filled using the app. 'Before medicine, I was a civil servant, and I was provided with a phone, a laptop, because I needed it to do my job. 'It also provided security to the departments I worked in, so that government business only happened on government devices. 'Albeit it's not unreasonable to expect an employer to provide the tools I need to do my job. 'We shouldn't be subsidising the NHS with our data, with our battery life or with our work-life balance.'


Glasgow Times
41 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Overlooking sexual harassment against health staff ‘risks patient safety'
Medics claim that overlooking these incidents allows other toxic behaviours 'to perpetuate'. It comes as members of the British Medical Association (BMA) called for NHS trusts to include active bystander training – which aims to equip people with the skills to challenge unacceptable conduct – in mandatory training programmes. Delegates at the union's annual representative meeting (ARM) in Liverpool also voted for the BMA to lobby for a national anonymous reporting system for victims of sexual harassment. Dr Helen Neary, co-chairwoman of the BMA consultants committee, said: 'People are bystanders at all levels, and a working culture that turns a blind eye to this behaviour is also a risk to patient safety, enabling other poor behaviours to perpetuate.' The motion urged NHS organisations to probe allegations of sexual misconduct using trained investigators external to the trust. Dr Neary added: 'No one should feel unsafe at work. Yet the appalling truth is that doctors, disproportionately women, are still subject to sexual harassment, abuse and assault in the workplace – often by their fellow doctors. This has to stop. 'Not only is it obviously completely unacceptable and has a devastating impact on victims, but also affects the quality of care and workforce capacity as poor behaviours will do nothing to retain staff in the NHS.' In March, the latest NHS staff survey found one in 12 (8.82%) of workers were the target of unwanted sexual behaviour such as offensive comments, touching and assaults. The proportion was similar to that reported in 2023 (8.79%) when the question was first asked as part of the survey. Last October, NHS England launched a new national sexual misconduct policy framework to ensure trusts had robust policies in place for staff to report incidents. Speaking to delegates at the BMA ARM in Liverpool, Professor Bhairavi Sapra said that while the framework is a 'very welcome first step', it is not mandatory. 'It is up to individual employers to adopt it, and even then, perpetrators can simply move on from one employer to another without accountability for those in positions of power to prevent this behaviour,' she added. 'Worse still, there is no national reporting mechanism. That means if someone wants to report an incident months later in a different workplace, they face an uphill battle, often alone. 'Survivors have told us why they don't come forward. They fear being told they're overreacting. 'They fear retaliation or reputational damage. They fear nothing will change, and sadly, they are not wrong. 'Investigations, when they do happen, are rarely trauma informed, often the process itself can feel like another form of harm.' Dr Neary said: 'As the trade union and professional association for all doctors in the UK – from those beginning their careers as medical students to retirement and beyond – the BMA welcomes the legal obligation placed on the NHS to protect employees from sexual harassment. 'This vote makes some excellent suggestions on how this work can go further, including anonymous reporting, that will encourage those concerned about coming forward to do so, and better equipping doctors on how they can support colleagues when they witness sexual harassment at work.' Prof Sapra also claimed the 'power imbalance' in the medical profession is 'stark', adding: 'Junior staff rely on senior medical staff for training, for references and for their very careers. 'That dependency makes them especially vulnerable and often silent.' An NHS England spokesperson said: 'It is totally unacceptable that NHS staff experience sexual misconduct or harassment at work – this behaviour has no place in the health service, and all organisations must take robust and compassionate action to prevent it. 'The NHS Sexual Safety Charter has been adopted by every Integrated Care Board and NHS Trust in England, which encourages consideration of external, independent investigators in complex or sensitive cases – and all NHS organisations should ensure that those leading these processes are properly trained to handle them with the seriousness and sensitivity they require.'