San Francisco Says Goodbye to 99-Year-Old Fisherman's Wharf Institution
A cornerstone of San Francisco's Fisherman's Wharf is coming down. Alioto's, a 99-year-old Sicilian seafood restaurant that survived fires, earthquakes, and generations of diners, will be demolished as part of a sweeping $10 million renovation of the iconic waterfront.
Once the wharf's first permanent building, Alioto's began as a modest fish stand in 1925 before evolving into an 11,000-square-foot institution known for Dungeness crab and shrimp cocktails. Its founder, Italian immigrant Nunzio Alioto, carved out a legacy that weathered decades of change until the COVID-19 pandemic shuttered the family-run restaurant for good in 2020.
SFGate reported that efforts to revive Alioto's failed, according to Port Director Elaine Forbes, who said the structure's age, deterioration, and costly repair needs scared off potential operators. So instead of another tenant, the site will become part of a new public plaza, complete with lighting installations and scenic overlooks.
The first phase of the project is scheduled to wrap by summer 2026. Plans include direct access to docked fishing boats, where visitors will once again be able to buy fresh fish and crab straight from the source.
Alioto's isn't the only lost legend. Longtime fixtures like Fishermen's Grotto and Tarantino's are also gone. But fresh names are moving in. Salvadoran spot Chasca Rio will open in the former Pompei's Grotto by year's end, and Everett & Jones barbecue will take over Lou's Fish Shack's old space on Jefferson Street.
The port's long-term plans stretch through the next 75 years, with a focus on climate resilience. Projects will strengthen seawalls, flood-proof buildings, modernize retail and public spaces, and support the fishing fleet that gives the wharf its name.
Fisherman's Wharf drew 10 million visitors in 2024, and San Francisco hopes these updates will keep that number climbing even as it says farewell to one of its oldest culinary landmarks.San Francisco Says Goodbye to 99-Year-Old Fisherman's Wharf Institution first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 9, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LQpay Expands Compliant Surcharging Solution, Optimizing Payment Strategy for Healthcare Practices
End-to-End Compliant Credit Surcharging with Custom Integration Now Available PLANTATION, Fla., June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- LQpay, a leading provider of innovative patient payments and automation technology, announced the expansion of its end-to-end compliant credit card surcharging solution, empowering healthcare practices to optimize their payment strategy and more seamlessly defray operational costs without sacrificing efficiencies or the patient experience. The latest enhancements enable medical and dental organizations to pass along credit card processing fees and serve up the necessary disclosures to patients across all eligible channels, encompassing both in-office and remote payment types, such as recurring billing plans, text- and email-to-pay, card on file, etc. In addition, by leveraging its proprietary RPA (Robotics Processing Automation) technology, LQpay has the unique capability to customize the integration of these payment types into any underlying EMR/practice management system. This custom integration capability allows practices to tailor the posting and reporting of surcharged transactions according to their unique workflows, business requirements, and practice management systems. By automatically calculating and applying compliant surcharges to eligible credit card transactions and facilitating accurate record-keeping of patient accounts, healthcare practices can reduce operational expenses without increasing administrative burden. As payment processing costs continue to rise, healthcare providers face continuous pressure on operating margins. LQpay's enhanced surcharging platform offers a powerful, compliant way for practices to offset these expenses without disrupting workflows or compromising the patient experience. 'Today's healthcare practices need more than a payment processor. They need a partner who can help them navigate complexity while protecting profitability,' said Shashi Kapur, CEO of LQpay. "Based on valuable feedback from our customers and partners, along with our dedication to innovation, we are proud to be a premier payments technology provider merging end-to-end compliant surcharging with robust Robotics Processing Automation (RPA). Our expanded surcharging capabilities provide healthcare organizations with a turnkey, compliant way to reduce costs and operate more efficiently.' Since its initial introduction, LQpay's compliant surcharging feature has provided practices with a valuable tool to offset the growing expense of payment processing fees. Recognizing the evolving needs of the healthcare industry and LQpay's commitment to continuous improvement, these enhancements truly set LQpay apart in the industry, ensuring practices experience greater efficiency and maximized financial benefit. Key Benefits of LQpay's Surcharging Enhancement: Optimized payment strategy ensuring credit card processing fees are consistently offset, regardless of how patients choose to pay. Custom integration with practice management systems (PMS). Unlike generic surcharge options, payments are automatically posted according to each practice's workflow and reporting requirements. Certified, compliant solution aligned with processor mandates, card network rules, and applicable state and regional regulations. Configurable patient communications and transparent fee disclosures to ensure patients are clearly informed about surcharges before payment and provided options for alternative, non-surcharge payment methods (e.g., ACH, debit, cash). Real-time reconciliation and reporting tools with detailed dashboard, making it easy to track surcharge revenue and monitor compliance without manual record-keeping. The surcharging capability is now available to both new and existing LQpay customers using approved payment gateways. Practices eager to enhance their financial performance and reduce processing expenses are encouraged to schedule a personalized demonstration. About LQpay Based in Plantation, FL, LQpay stands as a leading end-to-end patient payments platform, dedicated to serving the healthcare, dental, and veterinary practices. By integrating cutting-edge automation, AI-powered integrations, and modern payment functionalities such as text-to-pay and auto-posting, LQpay empowers practices to streamline operations, accelerate cash flow, and elevate the overall patient financial experience. For more information or to schedule a demo, please visit CONTACT: Press Contact: 954.909.5948 info@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
38 minutes ago
- Newsweek
DoorDash Hit With Major Lawsuit Over 'Deceptive' Pricing
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. DoorDash, America's premier food delivery platform, has been sued by Canada's competition authority for "allegedly advertising misleading prices and discounts." Newsweek reached out to DoorDash via email outside of regular hours for comment. Why It Matters This marks the second major lawsuit to face DoorDash this year, following a $17-million settlement over the misuse of driver tips in February. As well as potentially forcing the delivery firm to significantly alter its pricing practices, the latest action could force the company to pay a significantly higher penalty, as well as restitution to affected customers. What To Know On Monday, the Canadian Competition Bureau announced it would be taking legal action against the San Francisco-based company, as well as its Canadian subsidiary DoorDash Technologies Canada. The antitrust watchdog said that the company had consistently promoted its services at lower prices than customers were eventually forced to pay, in violation of the Canadian Competition Act, while also misrepresenting certain fees as taxes rather than discretionary charges. The lawsuit stems from DoorDash allegedly advertising food and other items at prices far lower than those customers eventually paid, and engaging in what the bureau refers to as "drip pricing": a sales tactic in which customers are shown an initial lower price, with additional fees added later in the purchasing process. These included delivery costs, as well as obligatory "regulatory response" and "expanded range" fees. "A bureau investigation found that consumers were unable to purchase food and other items at the advertised price on DoorDash's websites and mobile applications due to the addition of mandatory fees at checkout," the announcement read, describing the practice as "deceptive," as "consumers are not presented with an attainable price up front." The Bureau alleged that DoorDash has been engaged in this alleged conduct for "close to a decade," and has acquired nearly $1 billion in customer fees from doing so. Stock image of the DoorDash logo on a smartphone screen. Stock image of the DoorDash logo on a smartphone screen. Photo illustration byIn addition, the investigation found that the company had combined service fees and taxes into a single item on a user's bill, which it said was "false or misleading as it requires an extra click for the consumer to actually see that the 'fees and estimated taxes' are two separate charges, only one of which is imposed by the government on the purchaser and not the other." In its application with the Canadian Competition Tribunal, the bureau requested that DoorDash and its subsidiary stop engaging in the practices, pay a monetary penalty "as the tribunal deems appropriate," and to pay restitution to affected customers. The latter amount, it said, could reach "the total amounts paid to DoorDash for the products in respect of which the reviewable conduct was engaged in." What People Are Saying Canada's competition commissioner Matthew Boswell said: "Parliament has made it clear that businesses must not engage in drip pricing by advertising unattainable prices and then adding mandatory fees. The Competition Bureau has been fighting against this misleading practice for years. "Our litigation against DoorDash is another example of our efforts to ensure consumers are not misled and can trust the prices they see online. We urge all businesses to review their pricing practices and make sure they comply with the law." DoorDash denied hiding fees from or misleading customers, saying it believes the lawsuit "is an overly punitive attempt to make an example of an industry leader in local commerce," in a statement quoted by Reuters. What Happens Next? According to the application, DoorDash has 45 days to issue a response to the Competition Tribunal.
CNN
39 minutes ago
- CNN
CFPB enforcement lead resigns, slams ‘attack' on core mission in departure email
Cara Petersen, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's acting enforcement director, resigned from the agency on Tuesday. In an email to colleagues announcing her decision, Petersen slammed the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle the agency, which was established as a banking watchdog following the 2008 global financial crisis. 'I have served under every Director and Acting Director in the Bureau's history and never before have I seen the ability to perform our core mission so under attack,' Petersen wrote in an email seen by CNN. 'It is clear that the Bureau's current leadership has no intention to enforce the law in any meaningful way.' The CFPB, which is tasked with ensuring banks, lenders and other financial companies play fair with consumers, has been thrown into chaos since President Donald Trump took office this year. The agency has faced several mass layoff attempts and abruptly decided to dismiss cases against several companies. The CFPB was an early target of the Trump administration's downsizing efforts, but its undoing has largely been blocked in federal court. Republicans have long wanted to close down the agency, whose creation was spearheaded by Elizabeth Warren, now a Democratic senator from Massachusetts. The agency was established as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, a 2010 federal law enacted to address the financial vulnerabilities that contributed to the global financial crisis. As of January 2025, the CFPB has delivered $19.7 billion in consumer relief since its creation, with 195 million people eligible for that relief, according to the agency. This year, the CFPB abruptly dropped cases against multiple companies that had previously been accused of hurting consumers, like Capital One, Rocket Homes and a unit of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, according to court filings. The decision to abandon the cases reflects the Trump administration's hands-off approach to regulation. Less than two weeks into Trump's second term, he fired Rohit Chopra, the CFPB director appointed by then-President Joe Biden in 2021. The agency's new leadership has been reviewing the agency's activities and staffing since February, Mark Paoletta, the agency's chief legal officer, said in a court filing in April. Paoletta argued that, under previous administrations, the CFPB's activities have 'pushed well beyond the limits of the law' and the agency has 'engaged in intrusive and wasteful fishing expeditions.' In February, the Trump administration made its first attempt to gut the CFPB, ordering the agency's employees to cease operations. That directive was challenged by a federal judge the following month. In April, the CFPB sent layoff notices to nearly 1,500 of its 1,700 staffers soon after an appellate court said the agency could lay off some staffers but not so many that it could not carry out its statutory functions. A federal judge also halted the mass layoffs. The case is now being considered by an appellate court. Although courts have so far halted mass layoffs at the agency, one CFPB staffer on the enforcement team said they've worked maybe a total of three days since being brought back in March. Many of their colleagues are in the same situation. 'It's been very frustrating to have active investigations and litigations dropped, as well as negotiated settlements,' said the staffer, who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation. 'We have to be 'work-ready,' but there is very little work. I've maxed out the work I can do.' Petersen became the agency's acting head of enforcement after Eric Halperin, who previously led the agency's enforcement arm, resigned in February. 'It has been devastating to see the Bureau's enforcement function being dismantled through thoughtless reductions in staff, inexplicable dismissals of cases, and terminations of negotiated settlement that let wrongdoers off the hook,' Petersen wrote.
