World's first 1-nanometre RISC-V chip made in China with 2D materials
Advertisement
Details of the
chip , which is less than one nanometre thick, were published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature on Wednesday. Its most notable advance is that fabrication of the chip does not rely on advanced extreme ultraviolet (
EUV ) lithography, opening a new, independent pathway for China in semiconductor innovation.
As silicon-based integrated circuits approach the physical limits of miniaturisation, researchers worldwide have turned to 2D materials, such as molybdenum disulphide and tungsten diselenide, to push the boundaries of chip performance.
Typically
only one atom thick , these materials offer remarkable physical properties, enabling further scaling and improved functionality in next-generation circuits.
Although wafer-scale growth of 2D materials has been achieved over the past decade, until now the most complex 2D semiconductor digital circuit – developed by the Vienna University of Technology in 2017 – contained just 115 transistors.
Advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
12 hours ago
- RTHK
Nvidia 'starting to get chip export licences to China'
Nvidia 'starting to get chip export licences to China' Jensen Huang attends the 'Winning the AI Race' Summit in Washington in late July. File photo: Reuters The US commerce department has started issuing licenses to Nvidia to export its H20 chips to China, an official said, removing a significant hurdle to the AI bellwether's access to a key market. Washington last month reversed an April ban on the sale of the H20 chip to China. The company had tailored the microprocessor specially to the Chinese market to comply with the Biden-era AI chip export controls. The curbs will slice US$8 billion off sales from its July quarter, the chipmaker has warned. Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang met with Trump on Wednesday, two sources said. The company said in July it was filing applications with the US government to resume sales to China of the H20 graphics processing unit, and had been assured it would get the licenses soon. It is unclear how many licenses may have been issued, which companies Nvidia is allowed to ship the H20s to, and the value of the shipments allowed. Nvidia disclosed in April that it expected a US0$5.5 billion charge related to the restrictions. In May, Nvidia said the actual first-quarter charge due to the H20 restrictions was US$1 billion less than expected because it was able to reuse some materials. Nvidia said last month that its products have no "backdoors" that would allow remote access or control after China raised concerns over potential security risks in the H20 chip. Exports of Nvidia's other advanced AI chips, barring the H20, to China are still restricted. Successive US administrations have curbed exports of advanced chips to China, looking to stymie Beijing's AI and defense development. While this has impacted US firms' ability to fully address booming demand from China, one of the world's largest semiconductor markets, it still remains an important revenue driver for American chipmakers. Huang has said the company's leadership position could slip without sales to China, where developers were being courted by Huawei Technologies with chips produced in China. In May, Nvidia said the H20 had brought in US$4.6 billion in sales in the first quarter and that China accounted for 12.5 percent of overall revenue during the period. (Reuters)
AllAfrica
16 hours ago
- AllAfrica
'You're fired!': Trump tells Intel boss to resign over China ties
Intel Chief Executive Lip-Bu Tan was told by US President Donald Trump to step down after a chip design software firm he managed pleaded guilty to violating US export controls. 'The Chief Executive of Intel is highly conflicted and must resign, immediately,' Trump posted on Truth Social on August 7. 'There is no other solution to this problem.' The comments followed a letter sent by US Senator Tom Cotton to Intel chairman Frank Yeary on August 5, expressing concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and their potential impact on US national security. Cotton pointed out that Cadence, an electronic design automation (EDA) software maker, pleaded guilty on July 28 to illegally selling its products to a Chinese military university and transferring its technology to an associated Chinese semiconductor company without obtaining licenses. 'These illegal activities occurred under Tan's tenure,' Cotton said in his letter. He added that the US government awarded approximately $8 billion to Intel under the CHIPS and Science Act, while the company is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and comply with applicable security regulations. He said Tan's associations with China raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations. He asked Intel's board to explain whether: It was aware of Cadence's subpoenas before hiring Tan as Chief Executive; It required Tan to divest from his positions in semiconductor firms linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or the People's Liberation Army (PLA); Tan disclosed any remaining investments, professional roles, or ties to Chinese companies to the US government. Tan sent a note to all Intel employees on August 7 stating that there has been a lot of misinformation circulating about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence. 'Over 40+ years in the industry, I've built relationships around the world and across our diverse ecosystem – and I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards,' he says in the note. 'My reputation has been built on trust – on doing what I say I'll do, and doing it the right way. This is the same way I am leading Intel,' he adds. 'We are engaging with the [Trump] Administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts.' Tan, dubbed the 'Godfather of the chip industry,' was born into a Malaysian Chinese family in 1959. He grew up in Singapore and later became an American. His father was the chief writer of Nanyang Siang Pau, and his mother was a dormitory warden at Nanyang University (now Nanyang Technological University) in Singapore. Tan was admitted to the Department of Physics at Nanyang University at the age of 16. After studying nuclear engineering at America's elite Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), he pursued a degree in business administration at the University of San Francisco. In 1987, he founded Walden International with an initial management fund of $3 million, focusing on early-stage technology investments. According to Chinese media, Walden International began investing in Chinese startups in 1994, starting with Little Swan, a washing machine manufacturer, and subsequently investing in numerous other companies, including Skyworth, DJI, Meituan and Mindray. In 2000, Walden International financed Taiwanese entrepreneur Zhang Rujing in founding the Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC). 'Over the past 20 years, every time SMIC overcame adversity and achieved every process breakthrough, Walden International has been with SMIC, standing by it through thick and thin and providing its full support,' Tan says in an article when SMIC went public on the Shanghai Stock Exchange STAR Market in July 2020. He praised SMIC for having advanced its products from 250 nanometers to 14 nm within two decades. He also said Walden International had invested in more than 500 companies globally, including 120 semiconductor firms. Among these, 110 companies went public. In 2009, he set up Sakarya Limited and Seine Limited in Hong Kong to manage his investments in China. In 2011, Walden International, the National Development and Reform Commission, and the Shanghai government established Shanghai Huaxin Venture Capital Enterprise, one of the first funds in China dedicated to the country's semiconductor industry. 'I am an overseas Chinese and have always had a Chinese complex,' he told in an interview in 2018. 'Although Cadence is an American company, within the scope allowed by the US government, we will help domestic [Chinese] companies in tools and intellectual property as much as possible.' In April 2025, Reuters reported that Tan controls more than 40 Chinese companies and funds, and has minority stakes in over 600 via his investment firms. While investing in China, Tan joined Cadence's board in 2004 and was the company's Chief Executive from 2009 to 2021. At the CDNLive 2018 conference, Xia Yu, director of Huawei HiSilicon Platform and Key Technology Development Department, complained about the slow development of Cadence's Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD) software. 'We like to work with customers like HiSilicon. They run fast themselves, and they push us to run fast too,' Tan said. At that time, Trump, in his first term, had not yet sanctioned Huawei Technologies, HiSilicon, and SMIC. Chinese fabless chipmakers could freely order chips from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. On July 28, the US Justice Department announced that Cadence agreed to plead guilty and pay over $140 million in fines for unlawfully selling EDA hardware, software, and semiconductor design intellectual property (IP) technology to the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT). NUDT, a university under the leadership of the People's Republic of China (PRC)'s Central Military Commission, was added to the US Commerce Department's Entity List in February 2015 due to its use of US-origin components to produce supercomputers believed to support nuclear explosive simulation and military simulation activities in the PRC. According to court documents, Cadence and its units in China violated US export controls by providing EDA tools to NUDT from February 2015 to April 2021. Tan stepped down as Cadence's Chief Executive in December 2021 and Chairman in May 2023. In July 2023, the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the US and the CCP wrote to Tan , expressing serious concern about Walden International's investments in Chinese artificial intelligence and chip firms. In February 2024, the Select Committee on the CCP published a report about how Walden and four other US venture capital funds helped fuel the Chinese military and human rights abuses in China. Despite all these disputes, Tan became Intel's chief executive on March 18 this year. Most Chinese media and pundits have praised Tan for his new position. They said Chinese people feel proud that 'Chinese faces' (Jensen Huang, Lisa Su, Hock Tan, and Lip-Bu Tan) are now controlling four US chip giants (Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, and Intel, respectively). Huang and Su were born in Taiwan, while Hock Tan hails from Malaysia. Read: US senators sound alarm on DeepSeek's security risks
AllAfrica
16 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Mysterious Chinese stealth jet a fresh test for US air dominance
A mysterious tailless stealth jet spotted in China has intensified the US-China race for sixth-generation air dominance, where competing ambitions face significant technological and operational uncertainties on both sides of the Pacific. This month, multiple media sources reported that images circulating on Chinese social media appear to show a previously unknown tailless stealth aircraft, igniting debate over whether it is China's third distinct sixth-generation crewed fighter or a high-performance autonomous 'loyal wingman' drone. Photographed from multiple angles, the jet features a pointed nose, mid-set highly swept wings with cropped tips, no vertical stabilizers and possibly twin engines—design traits suggesting either a Chengdu-built rival to Shenyang's J-50 fighter or an advanced unmanned combat air vehicle. The lack of clear cockpit imagery leaves its role unresolved. Analysts note similarities to China's massive J-36 stealth jet, but on a smaller, potentially faster airframe, with landing and nose gear hinting at carrier operations. The emergence comes amid a rapid expansion of Chinese military aerospace programs, including multiple collaborative combat aircraft designs—informally dubbed 'teacups'—that could debut at China's September 3 'Victory Day' parade marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. These developments parallel US efforts under its Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, underscoring intensifying competition to field stealthy, AI-enabled platforms capable of operating in crewed-uncrewed teams for long-range, high-survivability missions. Carrier integration is a primary focus for China's next-generation designs. The South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported in April 2025 that China's J-36 stealth fighter design team is developing a carrier landing-assist system for a planned naval variant of the tri-engine, tailless flying-wing jet. Detailed in Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, the system uses 'direct force control' to adjust lift independently of pitch, aided by a Fixed-Time Disturbance Observer that counters turbulent 'ship-airwake' effects in real time, as stated by SCMP. According to SCMP, the technology—integrated with 3D thrust vectoring and drag rudders—achieved two-centimeter altitude precision in simulations under extreme sea states. Such precision could allow sixth-generation flying-wing aircraft to operate from China's carriers, extending the People's Liberation Army Navy's (PLAN) reach into blue waters, a capability that would advance Beijing's long-stated objective of sustained power projection. Yet while China's carrier integration efforts advance, both Beijing and Washington face unresolved technical and operational challenges. Chinese initiatives must contend with potential counter-stealth vulnerabilities and immature manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T) concepts. US efforts, meanwhile, remain at the conceptual level amid secrecy and internal debate. David Bacci wrote in a March 2025 article for The Conversation that sixth-generation fighters mark a shift from raw performance toward operational dominance through integrated systems. He said they prioritize stealth evolution—diamond-shaped airframes, radar-absorbing materials and reduced or eliminated vertical tails—enhanced by thrust vectoring and fluidic actuators for control. While fighter speed and maneuverability have plateaued, Bacci noted that onboard AI, adaptive engines and MUM-T redefine combat roles, enabling these fighters to operate as networked nodes in a battlespace. Leveraging sensor fusion and electronic warfare, they aim to outpace adversaries' decision cycles, with survivability, autonomy and seamless integration as central goals. China's unveiling of several new-generation fighter types, such as the J-36, J-50 and possibly this new model, could also herald structural changes in the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF). Lauren Edson and Phillip Saunders wrote in a July 2025 Joint Force Quarterly article that once these prototypes mature, the PLAAF may have to decide on the right mix of expensive, high-tech sixth-generation fighters and less costly fourth- and fifth-generation aircraft. Technical details underscore the scope of these decisions. Janes reported in January 2025 that the J-36 is a tailless, tri-engine strike platform with compound diamond-delta wings, caret-shaped intakes and split rudders, featuring large internal bays capable of carrying very-long-range air-to-air missiles (VLRAAMs) and cruise missiles, suggesting long-range, high-speed strike capability. Janes also described the J-50 as a twin-engine fighter with diverterless supersonic inlet (DSI) intakes, drooped wingtips and AI-enabled systems, possibly incorporating adaptive engines and MUM-T. Both platforms, Janes assessed, reflect China's intent to rival Western sixth-generation programs, though their operational viability remains uncertain. Strategic caveats cut through the hype. Andrew Erickson wrote in December 2024 that while it is important not to underestimate China's capabilities, overreliance on stealth can be misleading. He argued that low-observable technology isn't a perfect solution, as it becomes less effective with advancing electromagnetic detection. Regardless of how well radar and thermal emissions are hidden within a low-observable aircraft and despite meticulous maintenance of its sensitive surfaces, it grows more susceptible to advanced, persistent countermeasures. Doctrinal and organizational factors also pose hurdles. John Chen and Emilie Stewart wrote in an April 2025 China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) article that the PLA's thinking on MUM-T and swarm tactics is still formative. They noted that while PLA literature increasingly discusses these concepts—particularly the shift toward 'unmanned-centric' warfare—actual development and deployment remain uneven. Many capabilities are aspirational, with limited evidence of operational maturity. Challenges include integrating autonomous systems into command structures, ensuring reliable communications in contested environments, and aligning industrial capacity with doctrinal ambitions. While experimentation is ongoing, authoritative sources suggest practical implementation lags behind conceptual enthusiasm. The US, for its part, is also moving toward a sixth-generation carrier-based fighter. This month, The War Zone (TWZ) reported that Northrop Grumman released rare concept art for its proposed F/A-XX next-generation carrier-based fighter, offering a rare public look at the US Navy's future air combat plans amid ongoing debate over the program's direction. The rendering, as shown by TWZ, reveals a stealth-optimized design with a broad nose for radar aperture, a single-seat bubble canopy and a deep fuselage for internal fuel and weapons. Notable features include a top-mounted intake and reinforced landing gear for carrier operations. TWZ noted that while the US Air Force's NGAD program garners more attention, the US Navy's F/A-XX remains shrouded in secrecy, with internal debates over its trajectory and limited public disclosures from competing vendors. How these programs evolve may hinge less on public unveilings than on solving the complex problems of integration, survivability, and sustained production. The mystery jet on a Chinese tarmac may signal rapid prototyping and industrial drive, but its true measure—and that of its US counterparts—will be proven in bridging the gap between concept and combat. The next decisive advance in the US-China sixth-generation race may not be the aircraft we see, but the invisible systems that make it dominant in the battlespace.
