Actor Vijay Deverakonda At Probe Agency Office Over Online Betting Case
Telugu actor Vijay Deverakonda appeared before the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in Hyderabad today in connection with a money laundering investigation linked to the promotion of illegal online betting applications.
The ED's probe is based on an Enforcement Case Information Report or ECIR filed against 29 celebrities, including actors, TV personalities, and social media influencers. The case stems from multiple First Information Reports filed by the Telangana Police, which allege that these public figures promoted betting apps in violation of the law. The ED suspects that these endorsements were part of a scheme to launder large sums of money generated through illegal gambling.
Vijay Deverakonda's team had earlier issued a clarification after his name surfaced in the case. They clarified that Vijay Deverakonda's association was strictly limited to endorsing a "skill-based gaming platform" and was not for any illegal betting or gambling apps. His team highlighted that his endorsement was only for "regions and territories where online skill-based games are legally permitted." They further said that his legal team thoroughly reviewed the agreement to ensure compliance with all legal standards.
The statement refers to the Supreme Court of India, which has, on multiple occasions, distinguished "skill-based games" like rummy from gambling, asserting that they require skill rather than chance.
The clarification also notes that Vijay Deverakonda's endorsement contract with the brand in question, A23, ended in 2023 and that he is no longer associated with them.
The actor's position, as communicated through his team, is that his endorsement was for a legally recognized skill-based game and was done in a completely lawful manner. This stands in contrast to the allegations that the promotions were part of a larger money laundering scheme involving illegal betting platforms.
Veteran actor Prakash Raj was one of the first to appear before the ED for questioning. After his questioning, he told the media that his association with a betting app was a limited one from 2016. He claimed he had withdrawn from the contract on "moral grounds" and had not received any payment for the endorsement. He has not been asked to appear again.
Rana Daggubati was initially summoned to appear on July 23 but requested an extension as he waa shooting in Tamil Nadu. He has been given a new date of August 11 to depose before the ED. His team had previously stated that his contract for a skill-based gaming platform ended in 2017 and was legally compliant.
The ED's investigation extends to a total of 29 individuals, including actors like Manchu Lakshmi, Nidhhi Agerwal, Pranitha Subhash, and television personalities. The agency is examining financial transactions and digital records to determine the extent of their involvement and the flow of funds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
32 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Dancer Leela Samson on how Bharata Natyam adapted Indian music, literary texts, and languages
From the very start, in all Indian dance forms, especially the classical, seemingly micro-positions of the fingers called hasta mudras coordinate with positions of the head, accompanied by neck and eye movements – which together like a symphony aid and abet the macro movements of the body as a whole. These are considered 'graces' without which the whole has no meaning, almost. It is what happens between two beats that is the magic of dance. It is akin to placing an object in a room. Where you choose to place it, what angle you place it in, what lies next to it, and what the background to the object is – all these matter. On the other hand, it is arguable that the object can be placed anywhere and it will find its own space. It is the privilege of the dancer in India to gradually grow into a consciousness of these and of the many other arts and intellectual processes that inform the dance. It never fails to amaze, how varied these other arts are and how their particular fragrance enhances the art of dance. So much so, that without their presence the dance is simply incomplete. These arts were meant to be expressed together, as a single and whole offering. This does not take away from their individual merit or distinction to stand on their own. You cannot be a sound Bharata Natyam dancer, for instance, if Indian philosophy, customs, or ritual practices evade you. Certainly, your knowledge of Indian mythology has to be thorough, if not an obsession. India's temple architecture, sculpture, iconography; textiles, and jewellery; its languages, especially the ancient ones like Tamizh, Sanskrit, and Telugu – their prose, poetry, and recitation, vocal and instrumental music – the language of rhythm; a knowledge of the six seasons in nature and the their unmistakable connect to our five senses, physiology, anatomy, yogic practice, reeti-rivaaz or customary practice both past and present; as also sampradaya or propriety – where every nation or society has a different notion of these. The list of these interdependent knowledge systems is truly endless for a dancer. But most important, and perhaps least talked about, is philosophy. You only have to look at our myths and Puranas to know how complicated our concept of the truth is, as also the lush fertility of our imagination! In the epics of India, at first glance incidents seem like yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Actually, in time–space it could be a lifetime, an avatar or a yuga even, that separates these incidents. This is 'us'. We do not conform to linear time. Our lives are punctuated by events that are cyclical in nature. In relation to the infinite cycle of time and the mythological concept of time, human existence pales into insignificance. An adept dancer with a sound knowledge of the Puranas, for instance, as seen in senior Kathakali dancers, may well be arguing with his enemy on stage, but relates to the audience a similar incident in the past when the gods and demons fought over a similar matter. This can be boastful in nature, or hilarious even in that he puts paid to the remarks of his illustrious opponent. Moving between mythological space and the present is totally natural for him and the audience gets it. This, of course, is an actor–dancer's delight! Such an amazing wealth of narrative and audiences who understand them too! In such a scenario, what does the actor who presumably reflects or comments upon this complex society do? In theatre, they do the story as it is written, or do a 'take' on it – which is either hilarious, or pathetic, or blasphemous, or bold, or different. In music, they feed the story nostalgia and have a raga tell it like no narrator can. They give it rise and fall, pathos and bhakti or devotion. In films, they throw in songs that enhance the mood of the moment, they have a comedian funny it up, a villain pepper it up, a gangster blaze it up, a moll sugar it up and, of course, the most 'beauteous' belle of them all – kickstart the whole thing up! I love all these forms of art. But I believe the ploy used in the classical dance forms of this country to be the most unique. In the classical solo traditions, it is nayika, the woman who tells her story. She is a metaphor for male, female, and others. She is the jiva atma, the human soul. Words that make up stories or poems change for each person according their own experiences, by their particular understanding of language and by the meaning they give those words, by the connotation they have for you at any given time. Those words that once had meaning, however, seem to lose their worth as we move through the passage of life. Many experienced artists use a text to suit an occasion or their mood. The rasika, or viewer, receives this as they see fit. Some do not receive the meaning at all; some receive a meaning that neither the poet nor the dancer intended. Some text also has the capacity to move the rasika without any prior knowledge of its meaning, simply by the power of expression, the power of recitation. It also receives strength from the power of expression invested in it by the particular raga and the voice and rendition of the singer. Artists of exceptional talent like Balasaraswati were able to create 'an experience' for the audience. Then words had little meaning. The idea, of course, is to transcend meaning. It is necessary to get over the words and transfer them, to look at the soul within words, not be bound by them. They must become the truth for each of us, in our own time. So where does this leave those amongst us who express themselves differently? Those that do not wish to refer to Hindu mythology and its numerous characters, who wish to make their own stories real. Many of us imagine we are 'thinking dancers' who broke from the norm. In fact, in every generation of folk or classical dancers, of ritualistic or martial art practitioners, from urban or rural landscapes, from lower or higher castes – there were always those who moved the river through new paths. They did not depend upon smoother language skills or fancy degrees. There were movers and shakers in every aspect of the dance and its accompaniment. Even the fingering on the mridangam for a Bharata Natyam recital changed drastically in the 1960s when a young Karaikudi R. Krishnamurthy created empathetic drum patterns for the jaatis of Bharata Natyam that had not been heard before. This is but a tiny example, not the extent of change that was brought about over time. Change came in context, content, and core practice. It came in the text, in the music, and in the form. It happened in what was apparent, as also in the hidden aspects of performance – thought processes. It came about in modern interpretations of traditional texts, as also in traditional expressions of modern texts. Languages were included, the process was given due consideration, and myths about the dance exploded.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Can't Act Like Crook': Supreme Court Slams ED Over Low Convictions
Last Updated: The bench also raised serious concerns about prolonged incarceration during pending investigations and trials. The Supreme Court on Thursday questioned the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for its low conviction rate under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The apex court said that the agency 'cannot act like a crook". The remarks by the Supreme Court cam during two different hearings by separate benches of the Supreme Court. The court reviewed matters concerning the legitimacy and execution of the PMLA. Both benches voiced concerns about the Enforcement Directorate's investigative practices, extended timelines, and notably low rate of convictions. In the first case, a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai was hearing review petitions challenging its earlier ruling from May 2 in the Bhushan Power & Steel Limited (BPSL) insolvency case. That ruling had ordered the company's liquidation and rejected the resolution plan submitted by JSW Steel. However, the verdict has since been withdrawn, and the review petitions are now being reconsidered. During the hearing, the Enforcement Directorate's handling of the BPSL case came under scrutiny. This led to a tense exchange between the bench—which also included Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and K Vinod Chandran—and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was representing the ED. In response, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta defended the Enforcement Directorate by highlighting the agency's financial recoveries. 'Let me tell a fact which was never said before in any court — ED has recovered Rs 23,000 crore and given it to the victims," he stated, stressing that the funds do not remain with the government but are returned to those defrauded. 'In some of the cases where politicians were raided and cash was found, our machines stopped functioning due to the volume of money… we had to bring in new machines," Mehta further defended. CJI, however, mentioned that judges don't decide matters on narratives. 'I don't see news channels. I only read headlines in newspapers for 10 to 15 minutes in the morning," he said. In a second and separate hearing, a three-judge bench comprising justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh said that ED cannot act like a crook. The remarks came while the court was hearing review petitions against the 2022 judgment in the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case. 'You cannot act like a crook. You have to work within the four corners of the law," said the bench. 'There is a difference between law-enforcing authorities and law-violating bodies. See what I observed in one of the cases….it came true in what a minister said in Parliament. After 5,000 cases, less than 10 convictions… That's why we insist improve your investigation, witnesses…we are talking about liberty of people," the bench. Justice Bhuyan added. The bench also raised serious concerns about prolonged incarceration during pending investigations and trials. Addressing Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, who appeared for the Enforcement Directorate, it remarked, 'We are equally concerned about the image of ED also. At the end of five-six years of judicial custody, if people are acquitted, who will pay for this?" Previously, in the Vijay Madanlal ruling, the Supreme Court had upheld several contentious provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). These included the ED's authority to arrest, conduct searches and seizures, impose a reverse burden of proof, withhold the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR), and enforce strict bail conditions. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
‘Arabia Kadali' review: An emotion-heavy exploration of fishermen in troubled waters
The Telugu show Arabia Kadali takes viewers on a sweeping maritime journey through the lives of fishermen caught in the net of geopolitics. The Prime Video series from Krish Jagarlamudi and Chintakindi Srinivas Rao spans eight episodes and covers over a year. Directed by VV Surya Kumar, Arabia Kadali explores what happens when men from rival villages are forced to depend on each other after being captured in foreign waters and incarcerated in a hostile environment. The story centres on Badiri (Satyadev) and the struggles of other local fishermen like him. The coastal villages of Andhra Pradesh are in crisis. The once-bountiful Bay of Bengal has been overfished and polluted. There's no jetty or proper boats. The fishermen migrate to Gujarat for long weeks at sea as hired hands on company fishing boats. The lure of the Arabian Sea's richness draws them further westward. What begins as a desperate mission for livelihood turns into a nightmare when the fishermen inadvertently cross into Pakistani waters and are arrested on the charge of being Indian spies. The core of Arabia Kadali lies not in politics, but in human endurance. The series draws attention to the plight of innocent fishermen who are detained and forgotten across national borders. The prison scenes in Pakistan depict systemic brutality and neglect, with jailer Saleem (Amit Tiwari) and others showing little compassion. Badiri's romance with the schoolteacher Ganga (Anandhi) is not just a tender subplot but a source of emotional depth. A determined Ganga, with the help of Sekhar (Vamsi Krishna), accelerates the fishermen's defence. In Pakistan, Fathima (Poonam Bajwa) displays similar compassion, supported by her husband Hanief (Nihar Pandya). Rivalry plays a key role in the plot. The inter-village conflict continues even in captivity. As the men are forced into survival mode, the dynamic evolves from antagonism to solidarity – one of the show's more effective arcs. Lokesh Chenna, Kota Jayaram, Hara Srinivas and Bhuvan Salaru play some of the prisoners. However, the show misses out on fully capturing the emotional weight of confinement and the longing for home. The situation escalates into an international relations issue, involving ministers, diplomats and politicians in both territories. As Badiri, the de facto leader of the fishermen, Satyadev delivers a stoic, grounded performance. The absence of complexity in Badiri – he chooses restraint over rebellion – makes him unbelievable at times, dampening the narrative tension. Anandhi brings warmth and strength, portraying Ganga as a woman armed with education and agency who is unwilling to be a mere bystander. Sameer Reddy's cinematography is one of the standout elements. The sea is shot beautifully, alternating between turbulence and sereneness. The production design by D Siva Kamesh – especially the fishing vessels and prison interiors – adds grit and realism. Some of the special effects, particularly involving the sea, are poorly animated and distract from the otherwise solid visual design. While the daily routines and struggles of the fishermen are authentically portrayed, the drama is occasionally diluted by excessive information. At times, Arabia Kadali veers into docudrama territory, offering too much fish-ology and exposition. Some dialogue, especially from non-Telugu characters like the Gujarati businessmen and Pakistani officers, feels unnatural. Though rich in atmosphere and emotion, the series struggles with pacing and tends to over-explain its themes. A message about gender equality and women's choice is overtly stated. Play
