This most walkable of cities trips up when it comes to fixing sidewalks
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
A world-class city is only as good as its infrastructure. And there are those who question the city's priorities with its construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction of bike lanes even as the backlog of sidewalk complaints lingers.
Advertisement
'Every neighborhood should have nice smooth streets and sidewalks. Why are we so far behind?' City Councilor Erin Murphy asked in an interview with the editorial board. 'What other things have become priorities? Bike lanes? Free bus lanes? White Stadium?'
Murphy filed an order for a council hearing on the sidewalk issue in April after getting a pile of messages from angry constituents about unanswered 311 complaints about hazardous sidewalks. The hearing is scheduled for July 22, and when she announced that on her
Advertisement
Like this one from Kristen Sweeney Berry of Roslindale, whose husband uses a wheelchair. 'Boston's sidewalks aren't just inconvenient — they're often impassable and frequently violate the Americans with Disabilities Act.
'Cracked pavement, missing curb cuts, and blocked pathways don't just inconvenience residents — they exclude an entire community from full participation in city life.'
Ruthie Burton complained that repeated 311 requests about sidewalks in the Tommy's Rock section of Roxbury have gone unanswered.
In fact, the city acknowledges that of the
At the time a
Then, of course, once a pedestrian has navigated the cracked sidewalk and the deteriorated curb ramp, there's the
Advertisement
The asphalt hodgepodge lurking at the corner of Tremont and School streets is an obvious one. And Murphy said she is still nursing a sore knee from an unfortunate encounter with a pothole in the Blackstone Block Historic District right near City Hall.
All three — sidewalks, curbs, and potholes — are sure to become issues in the mayoral election — right up there with, and not unrelated to, bike lanes.
Mayor Michelle Wu's chief rival, Josh Kraft, who has already vowed a
The city does have a
And it has budgeted some $55 million in its five-year Capital Plan for sidewalk and ramp reconstruction to 'enhance walkability, meet ADA standards, and create a safer, more inclusive public right-of-way.' When it comes to bike lanes, it's not either-or: The city can have bike lanes
and
safe sidewalks, but that would be an easier case for the mayor to make if the city started meeting its commitments on sidewalks.
Advertisement
Boston has always ranked high among the nation's
Sure, Boston has winters that are rough on infrastructure and a construction and repair season that is shortened by those sometimes long winters. But faulty sidewalks are a scourge that has spared no neighborhood. And while, according to a
The city has acknowledged the scope of the problem — and an $800 million backlog is no small problem. If people keep filing 311 complaints but don't seem to get results — well that's a real problem and it cries out for more than a
Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Involuntary commitment should be on the table in the opioid crisis
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Advertisement Wu administration officials told me they have been doing that since February and dispute the idea that the mayoral race has anything to do with it. To back up that contention, they cited Advertisement According to data supplied by city officials, so far this year in the Mass. and Cass area, there were 51 petitions for involuntary commitment under Section 35. According to this data, arrests are up, as well as what are called 'interactions' with people on the streets for situations involving drugs, fights, intoxication, panhandling, and vandalism. Documenting those interactions 'can also support a petition for a Section 35,' a Wu spokesperson pointed out. The issue of involuntary commitment is politically polarizing. From the liberal perspective, if someone believes that at some point a homeless person with substance-abuse issues should not be able to refuse treatment, they are considered callous, cold-hearted, and willing to violate the due process rights of others, with no understanding of what it takes to overcome the misery of addiction. Advertisement And yet, what about the rights of law-abiding citizens to live without stepping over needles or encountering assaults and other violence in front of their homes? Why should their rights be trampled? Never one to resist the chance to push a hot-button issue, President Trump presented that side of the argument in a recently issued executive order. Titled But the rationale behind the policy is also worthy of consideration: 'Shifting homeless individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment will restore public order,' states the Trump executive order. 'Surrendering our cities and citizens to disorder and fear is neither compassionate to the homeless nor other citizens.' Meanwhile, the impact on quality of life is unacceptable. Residents are very frustrated. Their patience is gone. Advertisement Imagine seeing what they see every day in front of your own home and it's easy to understand why. Joan Vennochi is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Emil Bove and the Kavanaugh rule: Loyalty to Trump dictates judicial confirmations, not qualifications
Of course, Trump didn't destroy this power single-handedly. Other precipitating factors, from Justice Clarence Thomas angrily denouncing Anita Hill's credible claims of workplace sexual harassment as a ' Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But a single event turned the judicial confirmation process into the kind of pure, bare-knuckled partisan cage match it is today: Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings, particularly Kavanaugh's Advertisement But back to Bove. There's a reason Bove is uniquely unfit to serve anywhere in the federal judiciary. The reasons are plentiful. He Advertisement But fitness is in the eye of the beholder. And Senate Republicans have a decidedly different eye than I. That was clear during Bove's Bove denied the accusation. But then, after paying brief lip service to the importance of whistleblower protections, he blamed the accuser. 'This is fundamentally a dispute about the challenges posed by the unelected bureaucracy to the unitary executive, and to the people that elected the president and put him in office,' Bove said. Advertisement Translation: How dare this whistleblower go against the imperial president's directives when told by his superiors to follow them? It's clear that Bove's loyalty lies with Trump. That alone is disqualifying not only for a lifetime judiciary post but also for any attorney who works in the Justice Department, whose clients are the American people, not the American president. But that loyalty is exactly what ensured his confirmation. Call it the Kavanaugh rule. In 2018, Kavanaugh appeared at what would be the first of two confirmation hearings in his bid for the high court, demonstrating an aw-shucks demeanor and a desire to steer clear of politics in his answers. 'I need to stay not just away from the line, but three ZIP codes away from the line of current events or politics,' But after Christine Blasey Ford came forward When it was Kavanaugh's turn to respond to Ford's claims, he didn't just deny them. His previous affable and apolitical demeanor was gone, and he stormed right into politics' ZIP code and scorched its earth. 'This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons, and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups,' Kavanaugh Advertisement 'This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination,' Kavanaugh said. 'And as we all know in the United States political system of the early 2000s, what goes around comes around.' And with that, Senate Republicans who were initially so worried about Ford's accusations that they refused to question her directly, 'Boy, y'all want power. God, I hope you never get it,' Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina fumed to his Democratic colleagues later during Kavanaugh's hearing. Kavanaugh became a justice, and controversial judicial confirmations became all about political payback, not qualifications. And who could more painfully stick in Democrats' craw than Bove? And that is how we got to a place where a nominee like Bove can become a judge and potentially be one heartbeat away from the highest court in the land. It was hard to watch. But we saw it coming. Kimberly Atkins Stohr is a columnist for the Globe. She may be reached at
Los Angeles Times
9 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: It's always been an uphill battle to secure disability rights. Under Trump, it's ‘scary'
To the editor: The 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act did truly help those with disabilities ('The Americans With Disabilities Act changed my life. Now my generation needs to fight for it,' July 26). As a special education teacher and disabilities services provider starting in the 1970s, I have seen an uphill battle in providing and promoting civil rights for the disabled. At that time, those students with 'observable' disabilities were sometimes given meager consideration. Those with 'hidden' conditions such as learning disabilities, autism and a myriad of other cognitive and psychological disorders were never addressed. In 1973, the Rehabilitation Act added several sections that advocated for the disabled, and in 1975, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act was implemented. These were important moves that supported the disability rights movement. In my 43 years in disability education, I have witnessed and celebrated disabled individuals flourishing because of the reasonable accommodations and equal access that the ADA and its precursors mandated. With education and Medicare funding on the chopping block, and our current president openly mocking the disabled, it's become scary. The fight continues. Judy Marks, Los Angeles .. To the editor: My life and the lives of thousands of other disabled people have been positively affected by all the inalienable rights written in the ADA. The bill allowed our community to thrive in schools with individualized education programs and student inclusion. We were given equal opportunities in the workplace with accessible modifications. We had greater freedom with more outdoor access thanks to added curb cuts and building entrances and exits that accommodate the disabled. I live in an apartment building for independent-living residents. Many depend on in-home supportive services for their independence. What will become of these services under this administration? Weakening the ADA would be a backward step. Why would the most powerful country in the world choose to go backward? Julie Inman, Irvine .. To the editor: My heart goes out to those who truly need the assistance that has been afforded by the ADA. However, too many small businesses have been the targets of 'gotcha' lawsuits stemming from abuse of this law. Many of those filing these 'gotcha' suits have only one goal in mind: enriching themselves. Loopholes in the ADA must be fixed, or these frivolous and expensive lawsuits will continue to harm California and its small businesses. Senate Bill 84 aims to address these abuses. It is essential that the reform legislation receives a fair hearing, answering the pleas of many small-business owners across the state. Barry E. Zanck, Newport Beach
