This most walkable of cities trips up when it comes to fixing sidewalks
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
A world-class city is only as good as its infrastructure. And there are those who question the city's priorities with its construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction of bike lanes even as the backlog of sidewalk complaints lingers.
Advertisement
'Every neighborhood should have nice smooth streets and sidewalks. Why are we so far behind?' City Councilor Erin Murphy asked in an interview with the editorial board. 'What other things have become priorities? Bike lanes? Free bus lanes? White Stadium?'
Murphy filed an order for a council hearing on the sidewalk issue in April after getting a pile of messages from angry constituents about unanswered 311 complaints about hazardous sidewalks. The hearing is scheduled for July 22, and when she announced that on her
Advertisement
Like this one from Kristen Sweeney Berry of Roslindale, whose husband uses a wheelchair. 'Boston's sidewalks aren't just inconvenient — they're often impassable and frequently violate the Americans with Disabilities Act.
'Cracked pavement, missing curb cuts, and blocked pathways don't just inconvenience residents — they exclude an entire community from full participation in city life.'
Ruthie Burton complained that repeated 311 requests about sidewalks in the Tommy's Rock section of Roxbury have gone unanswered.
In fact, the city acknowledges that of the
At the time a
Then, of course, once a pedestrian has navigated the cracked sidewalk and the deteriorated curb ramp, there's the
Advertisement
The asphalt hodgepodge lurking at the corner of Tremont and School streets is an obvious one. And Murphy said she is still nursing a sore knee from an unfortunate encounter with a pothole in the Blackstone Block Historic District right near City Hall.
All three — sidewalks, curbs, and potholes — are sure to become issues in the mayoral election — right up there with, and not unrelated to, bike lanes.
Mayor Michelle Wu's chief rival, Josh Kraft, who has already vowed a
The city does have a
And it has budgeted some $55 million in its five-year Capital Plan for sidewalk and ramp reconstruction to 'enhance walkability, meet ADA standards, and create a safer, more inclusive public right-of-way.' When it comes to bike lanes, it's not either-or: The city can have bike lanes
and
safe sidewalks, but that would be an easier case for the mayor to make if the city started meeting its commitments on sidewalks.
Advertisement
Boston has always ranked high among the nation's
Sure, Boston has winters that are rough on infrastructure and a construction and repair season that is shortened by those sometimes long winters. But faulty sidewalks are a scourge that has spared no neighborhood. And while, according to a
The city has acknowledged the scope of the problem — and an $800 million backlog is no small problem. If people keep filing 311 complaints but don't seem to get results — well that's a real problem and it cries out for more than a
Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Boston needs to talk about housing for the middle class
Advertisement 'The number of middle-income households living in the city of Boston Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up How to change that trajectory needs to be front and center in the mayor's race. Housing, after all, is arguably the weakest point in Mayor Michelle Wu's record as mayor. Production of new housing in 2023 and 2024 was the weakest since 2011. Some of that slowdown may indeed be due to economic forces outside Wu's control, but on her watch the city has also set requirements that some developers say are so unrealistic they've stalled construction. Challenger Josh Kraft, eager to capitalize on frustration over housing, has offered a different vision, borrowing from the 'abundance agenda' that's popular with Democratic policy wonks these days. He's calling to relax requirements on developers to spur construction. Advertisement Which is to say that when it comes to housing, there are clear differences between the candidates, and voters deserve a thoughtful airing of the trade-offs that both candidate's visions would involve. What kind of a city we will have hangs in the balance. As home prices have escalated — the average home value in Boston has risen to The mayor has said all the right things. 'To be a home for everyone, we must be the best city for families, and there's more work to do,' Wu said in her But it's unclear whether the signature housing policy of her first term has helped or hurt. The Wu administration has required developers to include more housing reserved for people with low incomes, with rents or sale prices set at below-market levels. That seems like a worthy goal. The problem, though, is that it can easily backfire. Projects that may have been economically viable under the old requirements, which called for 13 percent of housing to be income-restricted, might no longer make financial sense at 20 percent. Twenty percent of nothing, as developers are fond of pointing out, is nothing. Advertisement And as Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce President Jim Rooney That is a mantra now picked up by Kraft, who told the editorial board that the 26,000 housing units currently permitted by the city's planning agency, but not yet under construction, were rendered not financially viable by that shift, proposing to return the requirement to 13 percent, the level it had been under former mayor Marty Walsh. Wu called the accusation 'factually incorrect' and told the editorial board that many of those stuck-in-the-pipeline projects weren't even subject to the new inclusionary zoning requirements. Some, such as the development of ten thousand units planned for the old simply hit a wall caused by high interest rates and rising construction costs. Yet two things can be true at the same time: Wu's affordability requirements could be deterring new housing, while economic conditions could be hindering projects that were already in the pipeline. How to set requirements — and when to change them as economic conditions change — are an important debate for the city and its mayoral candidates to have. At any percentage, though, there's a danger in over-relying on inclusionary development as the linchpin of the city's housing policy, because by their nature mandates can aggravate the city's missing-middle problem. That's because new market-rate housing has to be even more expensive to cover the cost of the income-restricted units (often euphemistically referred to as 'affordable housing'). Advertisement There's an economic argument that even creation of high-end housing helps the middle class, because those pricey new condos sop up demand from high-earners who would otherwise be bidding up the prices of existing family housing. And that's true to an extent. But the city also needs policies aimed squarely at new housing for the middle tier, too. Wu can rightly boast some other measures that take steps in that direction. One answer with the potential to create 200 to 300 new housing opportunities a year, for instance, is Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) or so-called granny flats — small buildings adjacent or adjoining existing housing structures. They can be an alternative for housing relatives or renters. A new state law and new encouragement at the city level, including expansion of the In 2023, former planning chief Wu also got a $110 million Advertisement Separately, a small ($600,000 budgeted to start) Wu's administration has also But on the other side of the ledger, there have been numerous instances when private, market-rate housing is on the line and the city, with its lengthy community review process, just can't get out of its own way. Witness what was once the 270-unit Then there's the long-running saga of the incredible shrinking 766 Summer Street project on the old Boston Edison Power Plant site that began life in Advertisement It's a familiar story of obstruction and delay, but that doesn't make it acceptable. One of the silver linings of Democrats' national losses in 2024 is that it has led to welcome introspection and debate about how blue states and cities govern themselves. It seems to have occurred to Democrats that when voters look at solidly Democratic places like Boston and see such high prices, it doesn't exactly help the brand. The mayor's race should be an opportunity for Boston to participate in that introspection. It's not only a matter of improving the Democratic Party's image: The plain truth is that over the decades, Boston (and the rest of the metro region) has failed to allow enough housing, and now residents — and would-be residents — are suffering the consequences. There are worse problems to have than being a city people would love to live and work in. But making room for all kinds of people — rich and poor and those in the vast middle — is key to keeping it the vibrant place that it is. It's a given that candidates will talk about housing, because rising prices have made the issue impossible to ignore. What the city has done to date hasn't worked. Voters are looking to the candidates for ideas that will. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Massachusetts' sinking reading scores should be a five-alarm fire on Beacon Hill
Massachusetts can't afford to have an ideological fight over literacy instruction. Barely Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The Mass Reads Coalition, a diverse group that includes members ranging from Boston's NAACP branch to Latinos for Education, is backing the legislation that could help get Massachusetts students back on track by mandating school districts choose a literacy curriculum 'aligned with evidence-based literacy instruction.' The bill would require that the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education come up with annual data requirements for districts to report to ensure they are implementing science-backed literacy instruction. If the results show that more than 50 percent of kindergarten through third-grade students are falling behind, the district would be required to come up with a plan to implement science-backed instruction. Advertisement 'Our data has been telling us a very clear story for a number of years, and that story is, we're not teaching children how to read the right way,' Mary Tamer, MassPotential's executive director and a member of the Mass Reads coalition, told me. (Disclosure: Tamer is related to me through marriage on my father's side.) 'We need to do what Advertisement According to a 2023 Globe Even as the literacy crisis worsens, the MTA is yet again opposing the literacy bill. The union has raised questions about district autonomy. Max Page, the union president, told me there's a need for a 'systematic approach to improving literacy,' and even said that phonics needs to be a part of it. But he's opposed to the bill's supposedly narrow approach. 'This notion of science of reading, as if it is a thing that does not change and develop, seems wrong-headed and it limits the kind of creativity and flexibility that school districts and educators need to to model instruction for their particular students.' Advertisement But the bill doesn't mandate just one curriculum — it would allow for a range of approved methods. State Representative Simon Cataldo, a Democrat from Concord who is one of the cosponsors of the bill, told me that it's 'not acceptable' for the state to tolerate methods that have been proven not to work. Cataldo, a former special education teacher, said: 'What are we doing in government if we're not ensuring that a student can read?' Without accountability, some districts will continue to use disproven methods — often at the expense of their most vulnerable students. Some of the strongest pushback against state literacy requirements has come from Massachusetts' wealthiest communities. Lexington Superintendent Julie Hackett, for example, opposed the 2024 literacy bill and That's easy to say in a wealthy town like Lexington. 'If you look in leafy suburbs, you will find that there is a very robust portfolio of private tutoring, and parents can afford it, and they can access it, and they're going to do everything they can to make sure that they get their kids up to performance,' Jamie Gass, an education expert at the Pioneer Institute, told me. 'Mostly poor and minority kids in larger school districts don't have those same resources.' Advertisement That might also be true for disadvantaged kids in wealthy districts. On the third-grade English MCAS in 2024, Massachusetts has two options going forward. The supposedly progressive state can continue to settle for mediocre reading outcomes, dooming a generation of students to the challenges that come with poor literacy. Or it can set the standards it takes to be the leader in public education it purports to be. Carine Hajjar is a Globe Opinion columnist. She can be reached at
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Access Ready Strategic Celebrates The 35th Anniversary of the ADA by Asking: What If the Americans with Disabilities Act Had Never Been Passed?
Access Ready Highlights Vital Policy and Public Interest Positions Many Groups and Organizations respond to Policy Issues WASHINGTON, July 24, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The recent rapid approach to policy changes at the Federal and State levels are prompting detailed responses by the effected communities through the organizations that represent their collective interests. July 23, 2025What If the ADA Had Never Been Passed By Eve Hill and Henry Claypool July 23, 2025Press Release " CPSC Budget Letter July 23, 2025NAAOP Press Release for Medicare O P Patient-Centered Care Act (D1188890) July 23, 2025Letter " HHS Budget CPSC Transfer July 23, 2025Pay Teachers Act Text July 23, 2025Pay Teachers Act Section-By-Section July 23, 2025Pay Our Teachers Act Fact Sheet July 21, 2025CMS Reinforces Medicaid and CHIP Integrity by Strengthening Eligibility Oversight and Limiting Certain Demonstration Authorities July 21, 2025Budget Reconciliation Act Implementation Dates, Funding, and Authorities for Medicaid & Select Health Provisions OBBA Detailed CMS HHS Funding and Implementation Dates July 21, 2025Budget Reconciliation Act Implementation Dates For Select Medicaid & Health Provisions OBBA High Level Implementation Dates Chart July 21, 2025ED OMB Final Letter from 600 Orgs RE Withholding of Funds July 21, 2025July 2025 Voucher Funding Letter Sign On July 21, 2025ED OMB Withholding Press Release July 21, 2025Letter to Congress Opposing IDEA Block Grants 2 July 21, 2025Senator Warren " Education at Risk " Frontline Impacts of Trump's War on Students July 21, 2025Senator Warren " Education At Risk Press Release July 18, 2025DOGE Cuts Are Final (Editor's Note) We apologize for duplicate or cross postings made in our effort to include as many as possible in our information stream. Access Ready Strategic Social Purpose Corporation is an independent, cross-disability education and advocacy organization promoting a policy of civil rights, and equality for all. It advocates for digital inclusion and accessibility across information and communications technology (ICT). The business, government and nonprofit sectors at all levels are becoming increasingly dependent on information and communications technology to provide goods and services. For people with disabilities, accessible information and communications technology is a necessity, not a luxury or a convenience, which fosters independence, economic self-sufficiency, and active, meaningful participation in civic life. Access Ready is pleased to support the Policies and Positions of our compatriot organizations and civil rights advocates. These positioning statements and communications of support will all be found on at: Media Contact:Douglas George TowneChair and Chief Executive OfficerAccess Ready Strategic(Email) 398572@ (Cell) (727) 452-8132(Office) (727) 531-1000(Website) (Press) View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Access Ready Inc. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
