MP meets volunteers supporting armed forces families
Danny Kruger, MP for East Wiltshire, visited the Salisbury Plain Community Serving Team (SCT) of SSAFA.
SCTs provide financial, practical, and emotional support for reservists, serving personnel, and their families, and operate independently of the chain of command.
In 2024, more than 4,800 people sought support from SCTs.
Mr Kruger met with various members of the SCT, including volunteer Julia Coxon, who is a military spouse and mother-of-two.
Ms Coxon shared insights on common challenges faced by military families, such as frequent relocations, isolation, employment challenges for spouses, and emotional and financial strains.
She told the MP about the "incredible work" the SCT does for those living in the Salisbury Plain area, which includes Tidworth, Bulford, and Ludgershall.
She said: "It was a pleasure to meet with Danny Kruger MP and talk through the incredible work our Serving Community Team delivers across Salisbury Plain, which ranges from practical and emotional assistance to hosting local events.
"Together, we discussed the real-life challenges military personnel and their families currently face, from financial pressures to emotional hurdles, and discussed our ongoing efforts to strengthen our support throughout the area."
READ MORE:
MP: 'The uncertain future of our Ukrainian guests living in and around Salisbury'
Charity calls on new minister to push for progress on promised renters bill
Housing freedoms to be introduced for military families in South East
Mr Kruger praised the efforts of the SCT.
He said: "Many people will have heard of SSAFA, but won't be aware of the work they do on the ground in our communities to ensure military personnel and their families do not feel isolated or unsupported.
"I was delighted to meet Julia from SSAFA's Salisbury Plain Serving Community Team to hear more about the excellent work they do.
"Julia and her fellow volunteers offer support, from friendship and community outreach to practical help, for service families in our area.
"I'm grateful to them for all they do, and am keen to work with them however I can."
Salisbury Plain SCT, like all others around the country and overseas, is a vital part of its community and frequently hosts events and gatherings.
Serving personnel and their families can learn more about SCTs by searching for "SSAFA SCT".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender
A campaign group which won a legal victory on the definition of gender is taking action against the Scottish Government over policies it says are 'inconsistent' with the ruling. For Women Scotland's legal battle with Scottish ministers on the definition of a woman ended in the UK Supreme Court, which ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. However, the group said that it now has 'little choice' but to take further legal action as some policies regarding transgender pupils in schools and transgender people in custody remain in place – which the group said is 'in clear breach of the law'. The schools guidance for single-sex toilets says it is important that young people 'where possible, are able to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'. The prison guidance allows for a transgender woman to be admitted into the women's estate if the person does not meet the violence against women and girls criteria, and there is no other basis to suppose that she poses an unacceptable risk of harm to those housed in the women's estate. For Women Scotland has now applied to the Court of Session seeking to quash the policies, which it says are 'inconsistent with the UK Supreme Court judgment of April 16 2025'. It has raised an ordinary action for reduction (quashing) of the policies relating to schools and prisons. In a statement, the group said: 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action and both policies remain stubbornly in place, to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls, leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. 'We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.' For Women Scotland previously brought a series of challenges over the definition of 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50% female representation on public boards. The last step of these ended in the Supreme Court ruling, which the campaign group's supporters hailed as a 'watershed for women'.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rail campaigners say potential 5.5% fares rise would be ‘ripping off' passengers
A potential 5.5% rise in England's train fares next year has been described by public transport groups as 'outrageous'. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6% hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5%, which means fares could jump by 5.5%. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for pressure group Railfuture, told the PA news agency 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He said: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' Mr Williamson said he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71% of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. 'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise, so as the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways (GBR), it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.' GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation. About 45% of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘I'm an ex-army officer whose family fled the Nazis. This is why the Palestine Action ban should be overturned'
King Charles Street, in central London, is a road Colonel Chris Romberg knows well. It was his postal address during his final posting in the military, a link to home while he was overseas. Last week, the address became significant in Col Romberg's life once again after he was arrested for the first time in his life and taken to a processing station – set up by the Metropolitan Police – on that same street. Hundreds of protesters, many of whom – like 75-year-old Col Romberg – were retired, had silently held up placards in Parliament Square, Westminster to protest genocide and express support for the group Palestine Action. Due to the home secretary's proscription of Palestine Action under terror laws, expressing support for them on a t-shirt or on a sign is now a criminal offence. As a result, 522 arrests were made by the Met Police – some 112 of them were over 70-year-olds. A former defence attache at the UK embassies in Jordan and Egypt, Col Romberg waited around five hours before he was arrested, and then a further three to be processed by officers and released on street bail. He had been involved in campaigning for the Palestinian cause for some years, feeling motivated by the oppression he saw during his time in the Middle East. His father, aunts and grandparents, who were Christians of Jewish descent, fled Nazi-controlled Austria in 1938, he explained. This history, he said, has also driven him to oppose what is happening in Gaza, and what he described as Western governments' complicity in the unfolding humanitarian crisis. Speaking about his decision to take part in last weekend's protest, he said: 'I did think about it and I did discuss it with family because it's not an easy decision to make. Although it wasn't certain we would be arrested, there was a high likelihood we would be. 'It was my first time being arrested. But all our freedoms and all the best movements that there have been in democratic and non-democratic history have been achieved by people taking risks, and people taking action. My motivation is to defend of freedom of speech and expression, and also to prevent a genocide - which we have a moral and legal duty to do.' He added: 'For a lot of people there, I believe it was the first time they have been arrested, and the first time they have taken action in that form. The implications are serious because we are being arrested under a very serious piece of legislation - the terrorism act. For many people, especially younger people, that can have serious implications for their lives. For those that are older like me, then those long-term consequences may not be quite the same but nevertheless they are serious.' His family's history has connected him to descendants of Holocaust survivors who are part of the pro-Palestine protest movement. He explained: 'In my case, my father and his parents and sisters survived because they fled. They fled Austria in 1938 after the German takeover. 'Because of our family connections, we are horrified that a genocide should again be taking place. And for many this brings back horrible memories from what they heard from their own parents and grandparents, and therefore we are determined to oppose it'. Labour peer and former shadow attorney general Shami Chakrabarti has warned that the ban is at risk of becoming an 'I am Spartacus' moment, urging the government to 'think again'. Former Labour minister Peter Hain has described the mass arrests as 'madness', saying Palestine Action was not 'equivalent to real terrorist groups like al-Qaeda or Islamic State'. Co-founder of Palestine Action Huda Ammori has been granted permission by the High Court to challenge the group's ban in the courts – the first case where such a legal battle has been allowed to go ahead. Defend Our Juries, who co-ordinated last Saturday's protest, have pledged that they will demonstrate again in September if 1,000 people agree to take part. With the demonstrators taking to the streets in protest genocide and to stand up for civil liberties, home secretary Yvette Cooper has sought to emphasise the dangers of Palestine Action. In a statement released after the weekend's arrests, she said: 'Palestine Action was proscribed based on strong security advice following serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear - this is not a non-violent organisation'. Ms Ammori said that the proscription of the group was 'solely based on property damage, and any insinuation that it is based on other things is categorically untrue or unavailable to the rest of us to be able to rebut'.
