Report Shows Govt's Callous Lack Of Support For System At Breaking Point
'This report paints a stark picture of systemic strain, with those working in learning support being pushed to breaking point,' says Green Party Education Spokesperson, Lawrence Xu-Nan.
'Education should serve the wellbeing and potential of all mokopuna—not just those whose needs align with the status quo. We have all the tools we need to give them that and more, but it requires serious investment and support for our workforce.
'However, the Government is intent on making cosmetic tweaks, like fragmented and reactive funding, while ignoring the core issue: the system was never set up to work properly in the first place.
'Every announcement to date from this coalition has tinkered around the edges to make the numbers look prettier, rather than prompting genuine change that benefits our tamariki, their whānau, kaiako, kaimahi, and the wider communities.
'Today's report shows decades of neglect, growing pressure, and a workforce pushed to breaking point. The Government's cancellation of 33 pay equity claims–many of which affect teachers and support staff–makes it blatantly clear they're not serious about fixing it.
'Further, the new Education and Training Amendment Bill completely fails to recognise the actual need of our education system.
'The Greens' plan lays out real solutions. As a starting point: nationalising ECE, expanding free school lunches, and building a learning support system where every child belongs.
'Our plan will put children's wellbeing at the centre of decision-making and policy, where it should have been all along,' says Lawrence Xu-Nan.
Notes:
The report can be found in full here.
Learning support can be defined as '... the systems, services, and personnel designed to ensure that all mokopuna—including those with neurodivergence, disabilities, health needs, or experiences of trauma—can access, participate in, and progress through the curriculum on an equitable basis.' (Beyond Capacity: Learning Support in Crisis, p.5).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Govt's Justification For Last-minute RMA Changes Appears To Directly Contradict EU Free Trade Agreement
The Government's attempt to justify last-minute changes to the Resource Management Act appear to contradict New Zealand's commitments under our Free Trade Agreement with the European Union, say freshwater campaign group Choose Clean Water. On Tuesday, the Government issued a press release stating that its last-minute changes to the Resource Management Act, which would allow agricultural and industrial pollution of waterways to continue where it's causing 'significant adverse effects on aquatic life', are 'Urgent economic action to protect exports'. The Government is aiming to change a long-standing and fundamental part of New Zealand's environmental law designed to protect fresh waterways from severe damage (ie, the loss of fish and other wildlife). 'What this means is that ongoing, severe pollution is being made legal at the stroke of a pen and that appears to directly contradict our obligations under our EU Free Trade Agreement,' says Tom Kay, Choose Clean Water spokesperson. 'A recent court decision on the Southland Land and Water Plan concluded that farming that was causing serious harm to rivers and other waterways could not simply be allowed as a permitted activity without a resource consent. This meant other councils who had similar permissions in their plans, like Waikato, are likely also allowing farming where it is causing significant degradation too.' Advertisement - scroll to continue reading 'But rather than do something to address this severe pollution, the Government is trying to cover it up by calling it 'routine on-farm activities', and trying to make the problem disappear by weakening the law and stating this is to 'protect exports'. 'There are clauses in our Free Trade Agreement with the EU about not weakening environmental protection in order to encourage trade.' Our European Union Free Trade Agreement states, 'Each Party shall strive to ensure that its relevant law and policies provide for, and encourage, high levels of environmental and labour protection, and shall strive to improve such levels, law and policies.' 'A Party shall not weaken or reduce the levels of protection afforded in its environmental or labour law in order to encourage trade or investment.' 'A Party shall not, through a sustained or recurring course of action or inaction, fail to effectively enforce its environmental or labour law in a manner affecting trade or investment.' 'A basic reading of the Free Trade Agreement would suggest that the Government's last-minute changes to the RMA, as well as its other efforts to weaken environmental law, directly contradict the clauses relating to environmental protection.' The Ministers' press release says they are making the changes because 'The Waikato region generates 20% of the nation's primary exports,' and 'If we don't act, the economic heart of New Zealand's primary sector could grind to a halt.' However, Kay says, the Government has not mentioned the potentially irreversible and intergenerational damage that could be done to waterways—such as groundwater underneath Canterbury that many rely on for drinking water—by allowing this pollution to be swept under the rug. Given the consequences of these changes on people's health and well-being, the places we live, and our international trade obligations, Ministers Bishop, McClay and Hoggard must issue a vastly more detailed explanation on the impacts of their changes to environmental protections for the state of our water and our trade agreement. 'There have been other instances where MFAT has advised we may breach these environmental obligations. How much can the Government weaken environmental law before there are international consequences?' 'If so-called 'routine on-farm activities' in New Zealand lead to the severe pollution of our freshwater, then our agricultural industry lobby groups aren't the international leaders they say they are.' 'The Government must drive and support more widespread improvement of farming activities, council enforcement, and accountability. They can not just magic away the problem by taking away environmental protection that safeguards all New Zealanders, the places we live in, and the water we all rely on.'
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Emergency System Reforms Will Place New Costs On Councils
Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) says the Government has signalled emergency system reforms will place new costs on councils – which will lead to higher rates bills. A Cabinet Paper released today estimates the reforms would initially cost councils $82.8 over their first four years. This would cover implementing new requirements, updating civil defence emergency management (CDEM) plans and better engaging with communities and iwi Māori. Councils will receive no additional funding to meet these new compliance requirements. LGNZ Chief Executive Susan Freeman-Greene says these new costs will leave councils with no option other than increasing rates. 'What local government needs is more financial backing from central government to respond to emergency weather events. Councils don't need more costs and compliance measures pushed onto them, that can only be funded from rates,' says Susan Freeman-Greene. 'Communities turn to their councils when disaster hits and the Government expects councils to be responsive to their community's needs. Locally led planning and response is critical, as councils lead their regions and communities through all phases of an emergency. 'As weather events become more frequent and extreme in New Zealand, councils are also increasingly bearing the brunt of emergency events. Currently councils fund civil defence activities through rates, receiving some central government support to respond to and recover from civil defence events. 'The actual bill for councils and their ratepayers could be much higher that the Cabinet paper implies, because it doesn't account for the ongoing resourcing implications of minimum service levels. 'Like the Government, councils want to keep rates down. But rates are the only way they can cover these kinds of costs imposed by central government.' Susan Freeman-Greene believes that a better solution is for the Government to empower councils through a separate funding source for emergency management. 'Last year LGNZ released a set of 25 funding and finance tools that could help councils better resource the infrastructure and services their communities need. "One of these tools was a civil defence levy to help councils fund emergency response efforts and alleviate some of the significant costs they face when responding to extreme weather events and natural disasters. 'This levy, modelled on natural hazards cover, could be included with insurance premiums to support emergency preparedness and response.'
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
New RMA Amendment To Speed Up Consenting Of Much-Needed New Generation
Energy Resources Aotearoa is celebrating a significant win for New Zealand's energy sector, with Parliament today passing the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill at its third reading. The new Act amends the RMA to open up a consenting pathway for specified energy activities, which is intended to reduce costs for operators and unlock much-needed investment in renewable energy infrastructure. Energy Resources Aotearoa is pleased the Act adopts its key recommendation to extend the same streamlined settings to thermal electricity generation. Projects such as gas-fired peaking plants - essential for meeting demand when wind generation is low, hydro storage is depleted, and solar output is unavailable - will now benefit from faster consenting, with decisions required within 12 months. Chief Executive of Energy Resources Aotearoa, John Carnegie, says this change is a big win for the energy sector and New Zealand households and businesses. "Renewables will power more and more of New Zealand's future energy needs, but we need firming capacity to step in when the weather doesn't co-operate. This decision means we can plan and build the backup generation that keeps the grid stable and the country's economy and industrial base humming." Carnegie says that in adopting this change, the Government has agreed with Energy Resources Aotearoa's call for a broader, fuel-agnostic consenting framework that includes all activities improving New Zealand's energy security. "We've long argued for a fuel-agnostic approach where projects are judged on their merits, not their fuel or technology type. Parliament has recognised that reality today, and it's a vital step toward a more secure system that provides the energy abundance New Zealand needs to thrive." Energy Resources Aotearoa commends the Government for taking a whole-of-system approach to resource management reform that recognises the interdependence of renewable and thermal generation in maintaining a secure and reliable electricity supply for New Zealand's future.
