
Katha To Caste Conflict: Brahmin Vs Yadav Turns Into Political Battle In UP's Etawah
What began as a religious discourse and humiliation of a Yadav narrator in a Brahmin-majority village led to mass protests, clashes with police, and a sharp political response
'First they asked about my caste. When I said I was a Yadav, they accused me of being a Dalit. Then they beat me, chopped off my hair, and shaved my head," recalled Bhagwat Katha narrator Mukut Mani Yadav, trembling after what he says was a brutal caste-based attack in Dadarapur village of Etawah.
What began as a religious discourse and public humiliation of a Yadav narrator in a Brahmin-majority village has triggered a fierce backlash, leading to mass protests, violent clashes with police, and a sharp political response—sparking a fierce Brahmin vs Yadav confrontation in the heart of Uttar Pradesh.
The incident took place on June 22 during a Bhagwat Katha organised at the residence of Jai Prakash Tiwari in Dadarapur village, about 35 km from Etawah town. Narrator Mukut Mani Yadav, who was invited by local priest Ram Swaroop Das, alleged that he was first asked his caste by locals. Upon learning he was a Yadav, a group of villagers allegedly assaulted him, shaved his head, and vandalized his musical instruments.
A video that went viral shows the narrator's hair being cut off by youths amid loud jeers. His associate's head was also forcibly shaved. According to Mukut Mani, a female devotee was forced to rub her nose on someone's feet in an act of forced humiliation. 'They said Yadavs had no right to preach in a Brahmin village," he claimed.
'He told my wife to feed him by hand and serve him for seven days to gain punya," Jai Prakash told reporters. 'My wife got scared and informed me. When I confronted them, they left in a hurry and dropped two Aadhaar cards—one with Agnihotri and one with Yadav."
His wife, Renu, added, 'We were told he was an Agnihotri. We never asked his caste after that. But his behavior during rituals was uncomfortable. He was touching inappropriately during puja."
Both deny involvement in any violent act, saying that 'some boys in the village" acted on their own.
इटावा के बकेवर इलाके के दान्दरपुर गांव में भागवत कथा के दौरान कथावाचक और उनके सहायकों की जाति पूछने पर पीडीए की एक जाति बताने पर, कुछ वर्चस्ववादी और प्रभुत्ववादी लोगों ने साथ अभद्र व्यवहार करते हुए उनके बाल कटवाए, नाक रगड़वाई और इलाके की शुद्धि कराई।हमारा संविधान जातिगत भेदभाव… pic.twitter.com/Pr11ohEp59
— Akhilesh Yadav (@yadavakhilesh) June 23, 2025
YADAV ANGER EXPLODES
On Thursday, the situation escalated dramatically when nearly 2,000 members of various Yadav organizations gathered outside Dadarapur, demanding the release of Indian Reforms Organization's national president Gagan Yadav, who was detained by police ahead of his planned protest visit. The crowd turned aggressive, blocking the Agra-Kanpur National Highway and clashing with police.
According to officials, the protesters pelted stones at police vehicles, breaking windshields and injuring personnel. In response, police used force to disperse the crowd. Eyewitnesses say a Circle Officer and Inspector drew their pistols and chased protesters, with unconfirmed reports of aerial firing.
'A few people tried to incite violence. Stone pelting happened. But there was no police firing," said ASP Rural Shreeshchandra. Nineteen protesters have been detained, and search operations have been launched in four villages—Dadarapur, Ureng, Pahadpura, and Noudhana—for others involved.
AKHILESH YADAV'S INTERVENTION
As the protests gained traction, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav weighed in strongly, turning the incident into a political flashpoint. He met Mukut Mani and Sant Kumar in Lucknow, offered them Rs 51,000 each, and gifted them new musical instruments. He also invited them to perform a Katha at the SP headquarters.
'Prabhutvawadi seemayein langh gayi hain (supremacist limits have been crossed)," Akhilesh said. 'They shave heads, beat people, snatch instruments, and demand money. Who gives these supremacists such impunity? This is a heartless government that supports every unconstitutional act."
A VILLAGE DIVIDED, A TEMPLE EMPTY
Dadarapur, a village with 103 Brahmin households and a mix of Thakur and Dalit families, now resembles a fortress. Roads are barricaded, police from 12 stations are deployed, and tension hangs heavy. The temple where the Katha was held is locked. The sacred kalash lies abandoned. The event tent has been dismantled. Ram Swaroop Das, the priest who arranged the Katha, is absconding.
Locals admit that caste was not discussed openly until now. 'No one knew they were Yadavs," said a villager. 'The invitation card listed him as Pandit Mukut Mani Maharaj from Vrindavan. His assistant Surdas had a family link here. That's how it came out."
THE POLITICAL UNDERCURRENT
While the state government has remained largely silent, the opposition has found in this a potent narrative of upper caste oppression and police bias. Dalit and OBC activists have drawn parallels to past cases where caste-based humiliation went unpunished or was institutionally inverted through FIRs against victims.
'The government must answer—how is the victim now the accused?" asked Rajeev Yadav, a protester from Mainpuri. 'Is this justice or a show of caste supremacy?" he added.
With the village still tense, political temperatures rising, and no arrests of the alleged attackers, the road to justice appears uncertain.
But one thing is clear: the Brahmin vs Yadav flashpoint in Dadarapur is no longer a local issue.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Akhilesh Yadav news18 specials
Location :
Etawah, India, India
First Published:
June 27, 2025, 18:39 IST
News india Katha To Caste Conflict: Brahmin Vs Yadav Turns Into Political Battle In UP's Etawah
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
EC asks Tejashwi to hand over voter ID for investigation: ‘Not issued officially'
Patna/New Delhi: The Election Commission (EC) on Sunday asked Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav to 'hand over for investigation' a voter ID card that he claimed to be in possession of despite having been 'not issued officially', in a development that came a day after the Leader of Opposition in the Bihar assembly claimed that his voter ID card was not available in the new draft electoral roll. LoP in Bihar assembly and RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav attends Adhikaar Mahasammelan programme at S.K. Memorial hall, in Patna on Saturday. (ANI Photo)(Rahul Sharma) Meanwhile, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lashed out at Yadav, alleging that the RJD leader had two EPIC (Election Photo Identity Card) numbers and two Voter IDs, and termed his accusation against EC a 'conspiracy to defame India.' Addressing a press conference in Patna on Saturday, Yadav demonstrated an online search, with the EPIC number RAB2916120, to claim that his name was missing in the draft electoral rolls published as part of special intensive revision (SIR). Also Read: EC junks Tejashwi Yadav's claim, says voter ID he showed does not exist The former Bihar deputy chief minister questioned whether he would be allowed to vote in the upcoming assembly elections slated to be held in October-November this year. EC, however, later clarified that Yadav's officially registered EPIC number was RAB0456228 and he had used the same in his 2020 election affidavit. 'Our preliminary investigation suggests that the EPIC number you mentioned at the press conference on August 2 was not issued officially. You are therefore requested to hand over the EPIC card in original for detailed investigation,' the sub divisional magistrate of Patna Sadar-cum-electoral registration officer for Digha assembly constituency said in a letter to Yadav. Later, the RJD leader alleged that his EPIC number had been 'changed', but the same was refuted by Patna district magistrate Thiyagaraja SM. 'The EPIC number in the electoral rolls is the one that was submitted by the honourable leader of the opposition in his affidavit in the 2020 assembly polls. If he is in possession of another EPIC card with another number as well, then it is a matter of investigation,' the DM said. The ruling BJP lashed out at the Opposition over this issue, with party lawmaker Sambit Patra accusing Tejashwi Yadav of spreading misinformation about the electoral process. 'This means he (Tejashwi Yadav) had two EPIC numbers... Did he have two voter IDs? The way in which Congress and RJD are scathing an attack on the EC, is a conspiracy to defame India,' Patra told reporters in Delhi. Though Yadav did not make any comment on the letter issued by the SDO Patna Sadar till Sunday evening, RJD spokesperson Chittaranjan Gagan alleged that the letter to the Opposition leader was a ploy by EC to divert attention from the questions raised by Yadav regarding alleged anomalies in the SIR exercise. '...In the draft rolls issued in which Tejashwi's name figures with a particular house number, several other electors' names having different surnames have been mentioned having the same house number. Does one family have members with different surnames? This must be clarified by ECI,' Gagan said.


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Poll body flags duplicate voter ID of Sudama Prasad's wife amid poll roll revision
Amid the ongoing controversy surrounding Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav having two voter ID cards, Election Commission sources on Sunday said that another case of dual voter ID cards has come to light. According to officials, the wife of Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation MP Sudama Prasad also holds two Electoral Photo Identity Cards (EPIC). Sudama Prasad is the member of the Bihar Legislative Assembly who serves as a Member of Parliament in Lok Sabha from Arrah. advertisementCPI(ML) Liberation is one of the petitioners in the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. Meanwhile, earlier on Sunday, the poll body asked RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav to submit a voter ID card he displayed publicly, which officials say was 'not issued officially.'Yadav, the leader of the opposition in the Bihar assembly, had on Saturday alleged that his name was missing from the draft electoral rolls published as part of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. He claimed that his original EPIC number had been changed and demonstrated an online search using the number at a press response, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Patna Sadar-cum-Electoral Registration Officer for Digha constituency wrote to Yadav, saying that a preliminary investigation showed the EPIC number he mentioned had not been officially issued. He was asked to hand over the card in question for further Magistrate Thiyagaraja S M clarified that the EPIC number currently in the electoral roll is the same as the one listed in Yadav's 2020 assembly election affidavit. If another EPIC card exists, he said, it warrants NDA leaders including BJP's Ajay Alok, JD(U)'s Neeraj Kumar, and LJP (Ram Vilas)'s Rajesh Bhatt demanded legal action against Yadav for allegedly holding two voter ID cards. They questioned whether Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, a key ally in the INDIA bloc, supported what they termed as 'fraud.'Their remarks follow Gandhi's recent claim that the Congress has an 'atom bomb' of evidence to prove the Election Commission manipulated votes in favour of the BJP. NDA leaders said the opposition was attempting to discredit the EC due to fear of defeat in upcoming elections.- Ends


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
HC stays conviction of vax scientist for wife's suicide; cites 'national interest'; allows returns to duty
. DEHRADUN: Uttarakhand HC has suspended the conviction and five-year rigorous imprisonment of a vaccine scientist found guilty of abetment to suicide following the death of his wife in 2015. Justice Ravindra Maithani granted the relief to Dr Akash Yadav during the pendency of his appeal, saying his role was "undoubtedly essential for public health and national interest" and his conviction had rendered him ineligible to continue contributing to vaccine programmes. Yadav, a vaccinologist with a PhD in biotechnology from IIT-Kgp, had been working as a senior manager at Indian Immunologicals Limited, a PSU that makes human and veterinary vaccines and plays a critical role in national immunisation efforts. tnn Court allows scientist to resume duties at IIL Yadav was convicted by a sessions court under IPC section 306 for abetment to suicide but was acquitted under section 304-B (dowry death) and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He married on May 7, 2015. His wife, who was employed at Pantnagar University, was taken to her maternal home by her brother on July 4, 2015, while Yadav was working in Hyderabad. She resumed her duties but died by suicide on Dec 14, 2015. In her suicide note, she stated that her husband would be responsible for her death. Yadav was arrested on May 11, 2017, and after spending more than three months in jail, he got bail on Aug 28. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo On Jan 21 this year, the sessions judge of Rudrapur sentenced him to five-year RI and a fine of Rs 20,000 under Section 306. After being granted bail, Yadav filed an interim application under section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking suspension of his conviction. He submitted that because of the conviction, he had become disqualified from working with Indian Immunologicals Limited (IIL) and was unable to resume his scientific duties. His counsel argued that the case met the criteria for exceptional circumstances, as the conviction had a direct impact on "work of national importance." Justice Maithani noted that an appellate court can suspend a conviction if failure to do so would result in injustice or irreversible consequences. He cited the Supreme Court rulings in Navjot Singh Sidhu vs State of Punjab (2007) and Rama Narang vs Ramesh Narang (1995) and said that courts must examine whether maintaining the conviction would unfairly affect a person's professional standing or public interest responsibilities. The bench observed, "This was a greater issue of public health and national interest. In light of the afore-stated reasons, the court was of the view that this was a fit case in which the order of conviction as well as execution of sentence, appealed against, should be suspended." The high court suspended both the conviction and sentence during the appeal's pendency, allowing Yadav to resume his duties at IIL. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !