
Do Ho Suh: Walk the House, Tate Modern: ‘Impossible' architecture remade on a human scale
Are we in London? Or have we been teleported to New York? At points, it seems, we could even be in Seoul. Suh has lived in all three cities, and his work – which he describes as 'impossible' architecture, and which often plays with the notion of 'home', by reimagining it as something flimsy and portable that could be packed into a suitcase – commemorates many of the nondescript houses and apartments he's inhabited.
Nest/s (2024), the show's centrepiece, is a case in point. Fashioned from semi-transparent, brightly coloured polyester, it consists of several contrasting, building-block-like sections, each replicating a room once occupied by Suh, yet stitched together – as they never could be in reality – to create a continuous passageway through which the viewer is invited to walk. Tiny details (doorknobs, security chains, shower heads, toothbrush holders) are reproduced, also in sheer fabric, with astonishing verisimilitude, with the instructions on, say, a fire alarm, or an exhaust fan's logo, picked out in intricate stitching.
There's nothing special about the rooms and corridors these spaces duplicate, but that, surely, is the point. Suh turns something humdrum – the interstitial, forgettable nooks and crannies in which we spend much of our lives – into a glowing, ethereal counterpoint to reality, which the visitor enters while always remaining visible to gallery-goers outside. Suh compares the experience to passing through a 'portal' – an alternate dimension, perhaps, colliding West and East.
Architecture's permanence is thus made porous, tent-like, and poetic; sculpture (traditionally associated with mass) becomes light, see-through, and suggestive. These are buildings of the mind.
Perfect Home (2024), towards the end of the exhibition, takes the conceit further. The white-polyester walls and ceiling of its hangar-like structure, which replicates the volume of Suh's home in London (where he has lived since 2016), are studded, seemingly at random, with small, tangible representations (which he calls 'specimens'), also in colourful translucent polyester fabric, of domestic fixtures and fittings handled daily by the artist in various places over the years.
The effect is uncanny, as if reality's veil has been torn asunder, to reveal a three-dimensional blueprint detailing the Platonic ideal of, say, a strip light, thermostat, or ceiling rose. Perfect Home is also subtly autobiographical. J Alfred Prufrock, in TS Eliot's poem, 'measured out [his] life with coffee spoons'; Suh quantifies his existence with light switches, plug sockets, and the like.
While he's best known for these fabric edifices, Suh also produces rubbings of buildings. In 2013, he began making a full-size, 3D facsimile of his family's 'hanok' (a traditional Korean dwelling) by covering it with mulberry paper and rubbing every inch of its surface with graphite to record the varying textures of, say, speckled brick or wood-grain. With the sheets mounted on an aluminium frame, the finished piece, completed almost a decade later, appears like a house for an enormous spirit.
Not everything in the exhibition is so evocative. Suh's works on paper incorporating colourful thread, on display, here, near his installations, can feel uptight and second-tier; his stodgy videos, screened at one end of the gallery, left me indifferent. But his yearning, spectral installations, addressing memory, are both formally ingenious and emotionally affecting.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Out
3 hours ago
- Time Out
Waterbomb Singapore 2025: Timings, getting there, what to wear, how to join the water games and more
In less than two weeks, Waterbomb, South Korea's top summer music festival, is making its splash in Singapore. From August 30 to 31, things are about to get soaking wet at Siloso Beach, Sentosa. Rave to an exciting music lineup featuring some of South Korea's biggest stars, get down and damp at the water games, and feast on delicious local and Korean food at exciting pop-up zones. If it's your first time attending this rain-or-shine water fest in Singapore, it's natural to have some burning questions like what to wear, what to bring, how to participate in the water games, and more. Plus, you definitely don't want to be that person who shows up to a splash fest looking like they mistook it for a picnic. So with that being said, we're here to help – keep scrolling to make sure you're all prepared! RECOMMENDED: Waterbomb Singapore is back this August featuring 2NE1, Taemin, EXID, and more and 16 brilliant music festivals in Asia you don't want to miss What is Waterbomb Singapore 2025? Waterbomb is one of South Korea's top summer music festivals. Its lineup usually features renowned K-pop and K-hiphop icons, alongside electronic music acts by South Korean DJs. And as its name suggests, there will be a ton of water activities too such as 'water fighting' – a game that utilises water guns. Waterbomb is set to run for 7 to 8 hours each day. When is Waterbomb Singapore 2025? Waterbomb Singapore 2025 will take place in Singapore on August 30 and 31. Where will the Waterbomb Festival Singapore 2025 take place? Just like last year, Waterbomb Singapore 2025 will take place at Siloso Beach, Sentosa. Are there still tickets? Yes, tickets are still available for purchase here. Is there an age limit for Waterbomb Singapore 2025? Yes. You'll have to be 18 and above to enter Waterbomb Singapore 2025. Attendees may be required to show their photo ID at the entrance. What time does it start and end? Ticket booths open at 10am on Saturday and Sunday, while gates open at 3pm. The full performance timetable is also up on Waterbomb Singapore's official Instagram – here's a look at Day 1's schedule: View this post on Instagram A post shared by WATERBOMB SINGAPORE (@waterbomb_singapore_official) How do I get to Waterbomb Singapore at Siloso Beach? To get to Waterbomb Singapore at Siloso Beach, travel to HarbourFront MRT (NE1/CC29) station on the North-East Line (NEL) via the MRT. Then, head to the third level of VivoCity and hop on the Sentosa Express ($4) and alight at Beach station. After which, transfer to Sentosa's free beach shuttle for direct access to the festival grounds, or board Bus A and alight at Siloso Point station and walk about five to ten minutes to the festival grounds. If you're taking the bus instead, bus 123 will take you directly to Beach station. Similarly, once you've alighted, look out for the beach shuttle board Bus A and alight at Siloso Point station before walking over to the festival grounds. For those driving, limited parking lots are available at the Beach Station Car Park. Alternate parking options include: Seah Im Carpark (2 Seah Im Rd, Singapore 099114), Resorts World Sentosa (8 Sentosa Gateway, Singapore 098269), and VivoCity (1 HarbourFront Walk, Singapore 098585). Who are the music acts performing at Waterbomb Singapore, and what is the timetable like? Waterbomb Singapore's lineup boasts several big K-pop and K-hiphop stars. Day 1 will see icons like Taemin, Choi Minho and EXID. Day 2 will feature big names like 2NE1, Lee Youngji, Ash Island, and Jay B. What are the other programmes at Waterbomb Singapore 2025? Apart from music, attendees can look forward to a 'water fighting' game using Waterbomb's official water guns, swimming pool parties, and a pop-up zone with photo spots and lots of food. Will there be Waterbomb Singapore merchandise? Yes. Waterbomb Singapore has its own official merchandise. There will be official Waterbomb water guns, beach towels, and more. Purchase in advance online here (DBS/POSB cardholders are entitled to a 10 percent discount while DBS Live Fresh cardholders are entitled to 15 percent off). How do I participate in Waterbomb's water fighting game? Based on last year's Waterbomb event, you'll need to exchange your QR tickets for wristbands that will indicate your team (blue or pink) for the festival. YThis can be done on-site during the event day. Once you're done with that, purchase your very own official Waterbomb water gun and you're all set. Can I bring my own water guns? No, only Waterbomb's official water guns are allowed. However, if you have water guns from other Waterbomb festivals, you'll be able to bring those too. What should I wear to Waterbomb Singapore 2025? There are no strict rules as to what you can or cannot wear to Waterbomb Singapore. But we highly recommend decking out in swimwear or wetsuits, or something that you're comfortable getting drenched in. The floor may be slippery due to the nature of the festival, so avoid wearing heels or flip flops as this may lead to accidents. We suggest wearing waterproof sneakers or sandals instead. Do note that there will not be any changing rooms within the festival grounds, so do get changed before entering the venue. You can also bring 'protective gear' such as goggles or ponchos which may come in handy during the 'water fighting' games. Extra towels and a change of clothes will be useful too. Potentially, electronic devices might get wet too. If you want to protect your phones, we strongly suggest keeping them in waterproof cases or pouches. What items cannot be brought into the venue? You will not be able to bring tents and umbrellas into the venue due to safety and sightline concerns. Any forms of liquid, camping equipment, large bags, glass wares, sound equipments, professional/aerial photography gears are also not allowed. Is re-entry allowed?
-Fabi-Waters-(2).jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26trim%3D0%2C243%2C0%2C243%26crop%3D&w=3840&q=100)

Scotsman
7 hours ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh Fringe Theatre reviews: Eggs Aren't That Easy to Make + more
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Eggs Aren't That Easy to Make ★★★☆☆ Underbelly Bristo Square (Venue 302) until 25 August Drunken promises made in the flush of youth nearly come back to bite everyone in this gentle but amusing comedy about pregnancy and friendship from Maria Telnikoff. Specifically a promise made at a student party by Claire to her best friend Dan, when she tells him that if she ends up in a lesbian relationship later in life, she wants him to be the sperm donor with whom she conceives a child. Eggs Aren't That Easy to Make | Fabi Waters Fast forward ten years and Claire is indeed in a relationship with Lou, while Dan is dating Naomi. At the first hint that Claire and Lou are planning to have a child, Dan joyously agrees that he'd love to finally do his duty as a friend – only to find Claire has scrubbed her half-cut promise from memory, and that she has a list of difficult and demanding requirements for any prospective father to live up to. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What follows is a very modern comedy of manners, where this quartet of well-adjusted, dinner-partying young professionals (and bumbling, over-enthusiastic Dan) navigate the complicated intricacies of starting a different type of family to the norm. It's warm-hearted, agreeable and sapped of real bite because everyone involved just wants to get along and do their best for one another, but four capable actors, Lauren Tranter's smooth direction and Telnikoff's witty dialogue make for a perfectly truthful and enjoyable hour. DAVID POLLOCK The Time Painter ★★★☆☆ Assembly George Square Studios (Venue 17) until 24 August On 18 May 1980, troops fired on civilians in Gwangju, Korea, who were protesting against the expanded use of martial law, with the loss of between 1000 and 2000 lives. Some see echoes of that time in the recent debates on the use of martial law in the country. Part of the Korean season at this year's Fringe, The Time Painter looks back to 1980 through the eyes of Kyung-ja, a female painter (in the painter-decorator rather the artistic sense) living and working at the Gwangju provincial office. The story of Kyung-ja and her daughter, Bok-hee, is explored in largely wordless vignettes which make creative use of objects: paper, apples, chunks of piping, balloons. The five female performers work a kind of magic, turning a sheet of paper into a valley at night, a computer keyboard, a child's doll. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As a magical account of a child growing up, it's gently comedic and completely charming. Then, suddenly, the day of the protest arrives and the tone shifts completely. It's too big a change, too fast, and the playful theatrical language which has been established feels inadequate for the weight of such a tragedy. SUSAN MANSFIELD Her Raving Mind ★★★☆☆ Just the Tonic at the Caves (Venue 88) until 24 August El (Fenia Gianni) is in a psychiatric facility. In her regular therapy sessions, she gradually reveals her story: parents who had little time for her; a gaslighting, narcissistic mother. As a youngster she was already binge eating. El parties through her twenties then, just when life seems to be entering a happier phase, the 'love of her life' turns out to being a master at coercive control. Reliving these experiences in therapy sends her fragile mind into turmoil, represented by sound and strobe lighting. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Gianni wrote and co-directs the play with actors Edward Garcia and Kat de Leiros playing all the other parts. The low, dark space of The Caves adds plenty to the atmosphere. El's name is a reference to Electra but it's unclear whether Gianni intends to mirror specific elements of the Electra story or just evoke the general mood. The play is confusing at times, particularly when it becomes hard to distinguish El's story from her violent fantasies. Mostly, she seems calm and committed to getting well, but a strange twist at the end throws all this open to question. SUSAN MANSFIELD Parody of the Rings ★★★☆☆ Gilded Balloon Patter House (Venue 25) until 24 August For some reason this year at the Fringe appears to be the year of Tolkien, with Recent Cutbacks' foley-based spoof Fly You Fools also making its debut alongside a number of unrelated fantasy comedies. There's no mistaking the tone of Parody of the Rings from that title, although the work itself isn't so much a send-up of the Lord of the Rings trilogy itself. Just like Fly You Fools, rather, much of the humour is in recreating such a lengthy and big-budget epic with the slimmest of resources and plenty of well-practiced theatrical nous. Actors Jacob Alcroft and Alexandra Ricou are a pair of red-waistcoated cinema ushers named Peter and Jackson, who are welcoming the audience to their theatre for a marathon screening of the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy, just as the projector gives out. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Panicked, they inevitably launch into a frantic reenactment of the films together, with lots of impressive clowning, vocal mimicry, physical comedy and inventive use of props taking the place of big budget special effects, and three willing audience members briefly press-ganged into Frodo's band of warriors. It's light but it's consistently funny, with memorable moments including the use of an at-hand mop as Gandalf's beard and an impressively staged battle scene between Gandalf and Saruman. How they get around the obvious problem of fitting nine hours into less than one is also amusingly done. DAVID POLLOCK SWAN? ★★☆☆☆ Underbelly, Cowgate (Venue 61) until 24 August Deriving from the film Black Swan (which is itself a derivative of the classic ballet Swan Lake), SWAN? follows a half-swan, half-ballerina on her quest to escape the strictures of a sorcerer's curse. What starts promisingly devolves quickly, as the audience – who are given a collective name, the day they attend – are asked to detail their dream hero. The damsel-hero trope is explored but never excavated as the Swan, played by Lauren Brady, speaks in sounds and expletives and engages in mating dances and phallic imagery. There is little nuance, however, and innuendo is more gratuitous than it is subversive. JOSEPHINE BALFOUR-OATTS Play On ★★☆☆☆ Paradise in the Vault (Venue 29) until 24 August Although competently (under)played, this very mild two-hander by Erin Boulter fatally lacks much in the way of tension, pace or drama. The characters, two estranged siblings, Ash (Boulter) and Lea (Nora Went), are decently sketched. Locked in an escape room after their mother's funeral, they're faced with solving the cryptic Shakespearean clues in order to exit and access the will. The set-up holds potential but little of it is fulfilled as there's no sense of urgency (a time-limit would help) and the conclusion is flatly predictable. Fans of the people-locked-in-a-room subgenre will leave disappointed. RORY FORD


Spectator
10 hours ago
- Spectator
Art and moralising don't mix
Against Morality is not against morality. But it is against moralising. Which is a start. Anti-cancel culture, anti-identity politics, Rosanna McLaughlin's small book of essays is the first insider-artworld publication to condemn the Savonarolan turn within culture. A cause for celebration, you might think. Her argument is perfectly sound. 'Morality has become the central pillar, the justification for art, the bar by which we measure whether something is good or bad', and it's been a disaster. Forcing art to 'communicate clear and approvable messages', cleansing the canon of bad behaviour, conscripting artists as 'empathetic social workers', has impoverished art, flattened it to such an extent that the work of the past has become meaningless, the work of the living 'timid, defensive and rule-bound'. She calls all this 'liberal realism'. Like Mark Fisher's capitalist realism and Soviet social realism before it, the aim of liberal realism is to shut down alternative ways of interpreting the world: Thus, the viewer is told what to think and why, artworks become illustrations for the meta-narrative of biography, and artists and their subjects ciphers for social-justice narratives… to better meet the needs of the present. She ridicules the 'moralistic glow-ups' of dead artists – how Andy Warhol was comically recast as a queer role model by Tate Modern, his Factory a 'safe space'. Warhol's exploitative nature was one of the most fascinating things about him, McLaughlin rightly argues. She winces at how victimhood has been fetishised. How artists 'perform their ethnic or gender identities' for a global elite in an 'identity-political reboot of the National Geographic'. The book reads like one long sigh. And well may you sigh, too – that art is better when it doesn't reiterate what we already know; that it's a bad idea to assess a work of art according to its social usefulness or the moral worth of its creator. There's nothing here to disagree with. But honestly, what a state the arts are in that commonplaces like these need to be aired, argued for, repeated again and again. It was progress of sorts that the pamphlet's launch last month was able to be held at the ICA at all (an enemy stronghold) to a capacity crowd. But on Instagram the gallery was accused of hosting fascists. So we're not out of the woods yet. Much worse, the audience – young and eager to overhaul the status quo as they were – appeared as aesthetically illiterate as the people they're trying to oust. What Against Morality is really against – the enemy that unites the puritans, anti-puritans, McLaughlin, everyone – is form. And yet form is the only way out. The only way to judge whether an artwork has succeeded or failed is not to force it to undertake any kind of moral MOT, but to look at it, look at it long and hard, and examine what's happening formally. Inspect what the artist is doing aesthetically with the materials at hand and the quality of the work will instantly become clear. But form is treacherous, difficult to write about and liable to make you sound unforgivably pretentious. Far safer, more socially acceptable, less work, to retreat into sixth-form debating over Moral Maze-type quandaries. McLaughlin rebukes this tendency, too – then does it herself. She counters salaciously moralising biographical facts about Ana Mendieta and Artemisia Gentileschi not with an aesthetic defence of their work but with her own, more sophisticated biographical facts. She eulogises the film Tár. A giveaway. Tár – a formal nullity, a New Yorker long-read masquerading as a work of art that will disappear as quickly as the discourse that birthed it – could only be confused for a fine film by someone who thinks artworks are ethical puzzles rather than aesthetic objects. It's why McLaughlin retains a crucial role for morality: it can be a useful yardstick for measuring artistic quality, she admits, as long as you privilege the knotty over the simplistic. But I can think of many simple-minded marvels: constructivism's geometric first-fights on behalf of communism; the Byzantine masterpieces that shout their worship of Christ Pantocrator as obnoxiously as any TfL poster. And I can think of many more artworks that remain resolutely amoral. Ignoring form, she neglects the most interesting – and ironic – aspect of the progressive chokehold of the past decade. Namely that it has ushered in one of the most formally conservative periods of art for 200 years. Look at the revival of craft at the last Venice Biennale. Note the way, under the cover of identity, the canon has been reactivated – the black Manets, female Manets, gay Manets, black Rauschenbergs, female Rauschenbergs, even gayer Rauschenbergs, etc. Observe the explosion of bad figurative painting. As the Soviets learnt, the most effective propaganda was not formally experimental but crisply real. The result has been a decade of what Dean Kissick coined, in these pages, 'zombie figuration'. Cultural paleoconservatives – the 'RETVRN' lot on Twitter who swoon over Poundshop Berninis – owe the woke movement an apology. So does anyone who has prayed for the decorative and illustrative to retvrn. Forget liberal realism, GCSE realism is the triumphant style du jour. And identity politics is the midwife to it all. The real problem with McLaughlin's publication is timing. The shows where she first sensed things going badly wrong date from 2016 and 2017. It's now 2025. The whole point of a critic is to say things before anyone else, not once a consensus has formed. Against Morality might seem startlingly fresh within the cossetted world of art. But to the rest of us, it will feel at best hopelessly late, at worst opportunistic.