Canada must come off the sidelines of international justice
Prime Minister Mark Carney was elected on a promise to stand up to Donald Trump's bullying, supposedly heralding a new era in U.S.-Canada relations.
Yet Mr. Carney's first months in office have revealed a sharp turn toward Mr. Trump and U.S. interests, including on border control and military spending. Now, it seems Canada has capitulated to yet another U.S. obsession: attacks on the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Canada has remained silent in the face of a recent round of withering U.S. attacks on the ICC for charging two senior Israeli leaders with oversight of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. Mr. Trump's vitriol against the ICC has led to sanctions against the court's chief prosecutor and four of its judges, as well as a UN independent expert who has supported the court's investigation of Israel. Other ICC personnel could be sanctioned at any time.
At a UN Human Rights Council session in June, 50 states released a joint statement in which they 'firmly reject[ed] these regrettable attempts to undermine the judicial independence of the court and the integrity of the Rome Statute system.' At another UN meeting in July, 48 states jointly reiterated that 'the court, its officials and staff must be able to carry out their mandate and professional duties without intimidation, coercion or duress.' Many of our closest allies endorsed these statements. Canada did not.
Is Canada's silence a sign that we are moving to the sidelines of international justice? Mr. Carney and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand have said nothing to explain this about-face in our foreign policy toward an institution that we helped to establish.
Opinion: Canada needs to follow through on its promise to help Palestinians
Indeed, one of Canada's proudest moments on the world stage was its leadership during the 1998 global conference to adopt the Rome Statute and establish the ICC. Canada was the 14th country to sign the treaty and one of the first countries to pass domestic legislation to implement it. Canadian Philippe Kirsch was the court's first president. Canadian Kimberly Prost is currently an ICC judge and could be at risk of being sanctioned for her work. How dismal, therefore, to see Canada's leadership squandered in recent weeks because of what appears to be a fixation on appeasing Mr. Trump.
While the Rome Statute was a historic breakthrough, delivering international justice was bound to be complicated. There are significant practical challenges in carrying out investigations amidst armed conflict and mass atrocities. There are daunting political challenges with many countries not only refusing to recognize the ICC's jurisdiction but aggressively objecting to cases the court has properly initiated.
The U.S. is no fan of the court and has relentlessly lashed out at any prospect of U.S. or Israeli officials being charged for their involvement in international crimes. Although the U.S. and Israel are not members of the ICC, the State of Palestine is a recognized member and crimes committed on its territory or by its nationals fall within the jurisdiction of the court. This means that the Oct. 7 attacks in Israel and the ongoing bombardment of Gaza – which legal and human-rights experts argue amounts to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity – can all be investigated.
And the ICC did investigate. In November, 2024, the court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. The prosecutor had also sought three warrants for Hamas leaders but abandoned them when they were killed by Israeli forces.
Prior to Mr. Carney's election, Canada publicly joined other states in June, 2024, and February, 2025, in expressing 'continued and unwavering support for the independence, impartiality, and integrity of the ICC.' What has changed since then is our country's leadership, and the fact that sanctions have now actually been imposed.
Whether Canada's silence is a roundabout way of showing displeasure with the arrest warrants lawfully issued against Israeli leaders, or a timid unwillingness to say anything indirectly critical of the Trump administration (or both), it represents an unprincipled and craven abandonment of the imperative to strengthen the rule of law in our turbulent, violent world.
At a time when civilian protection is desperately under threat, not only in Gaza, but in Ukraine, Sudan, Afghanistan, Myanmar and many other corners of the world, Canada cannot afford to be equivocal and selective about something as essential as international accountability and justice.
What is most objectionable is that this shift in Canadian policy was carried out by stealth, with no public notification or explanation, at a time when Canadians crave principled and ethical leadership on the international stage. We need better. And the world certainly deserves better.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
U.S. senators say meeting with Carney was ‘very constructive'
US Senator Maggie Hassan, left, Senator Lisa Murkowski and Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, right, listen to Senator Ron Wyden speak with media following a meeting with the prime minister on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Monday, July 21, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld OTTAWA — A bipartisan group of U.S. senators are in Ottawa looking to 'build bridges, not throw wrenches' as Canada and the United States close in on the Aug. 1 deadline to reach a trade agreement. The four-member delegation — Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nevada), and Maggie Hassan (D-New Hampshire) — said their aim was to signal congressional support for a resolution to ongoing trade disputes, particularly within the framework of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. The delegation is part of the powerful Senate Committee on Finance and is led by ranking member Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon. The senators discussed a wide range of issues with Prime Minister Mark Carney behind closed doors for forty-five minutes in his office. Sen. Wyden said that tariffs were central to the discussions, with the cost to consumers being the biggest concern. 'We made it clear that on a bipartisan basis, we want to work with all sides of the executive branch in both countries to get some stability back in the economy in the United States and in Canada,' Sen. Wyden told reporters following the meeting. At issue are mounting trade irritants between Canada and the U.S., including disputes over dairy, digital services, clean energy incentives, and softwood lumber. The Canada-U.S. softwood lumber trade relationship has dealt with ups and downs for decades. Canadian exporters are concerned as the U.S. threatens to more than double softwood lumber duties and add even steeper tariffs under a national security investigation. 'I think we now have a clear idea of how to proceed, and that's to build around some sort of quota arrangement,' said Wyden, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee. 'And the prime minister said he was open to that, so lots to work on.' Wyden also noted signs of progress in the discussions, saying both sides appeared open to 'constructive solutions.' Senator Cortez Masto emphasized the importance of maintaining the USMCA, which came into effect in 2020. 'There traditionally has been that great partnership with Canada, and for that reason, as a member of Senate Finance, I do think it is important we reinvigorate the USMCA and work within the confines of the agreement that we've already negotiated.' Murkowski echoed that sentiment, saying, 'I think this is yet another aspect of what we're trying to do today to reinforce these relationships, to ensure that going forward, we see good reforms to the USMCA.' Carney described the meeting as 'good,' and did not offer additional comment. The delegation also attended meetings with Dominic LeBlanc, Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, as well as Industry Minister Mélanie Joly, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand. When asked by CTV News outside his office on the potential of reaching a deal with LeBlanc said he was 'hopeful.' The visit comes just days before the July 31 deadline for USMCA dispute consultations, adding urgency to efforts on both sides of the border to reach a path forward. Sen. says Trump's 51st state rhetoric is 'positioning statement' Speaking to reporters following the meeting, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski was asked about Trump's taunts about Canada becoming the 51st state. 'I think it has been made very, very clear that most view that as nothing more than a positioning statement, if you will, something to maybe agitate.' Murkowski went on to offer some advice to Trump. 'My advice to the President, not that he will take it willingly, is that constructive dialogue is going to be what reinforces this long-standing relationship between these two countries.' With files from CTV News' Mike Le Couteur
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Michael Higgins: Locking Tamara Lich up for 7 years would be shameful retribution
It is to be hoped that the judge in the case of Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, key organizers of the notorious Freedom Convoy, has more common sense and respect for justice than the prosecution which seems intent on nothing more than revenge and retribution. Article content Whatever one's view of the Freedom Convoy and its actions during a three-week period in early 2022, a prison sentence of seven years for Lich and eight years for Barber would throw the administration of justice into disrepute. Article content Article content Article content That the Crown is asking for these sentences is shameful and ignores some of the other issues in this country that is making Canadians doubt that the legal system is fair, balanced, impartial and beyond reproach. Article content Article content Most of the prosecution case has been demolished. Lich was facing six charges and Barber seven for a variety of accusations including mischief, intimidation, counselling others to break the law, obstructing police and counselling others to obstruct police. Article content At the end of a 45-day trial the organizers of the convoy were both found guilty of mischief and Barber was also found guilty of counselling others to disobey a judge's order to stop honking horns. Article content They were found not guilty of the majority of the charges and yet the Crown demands a penalty that is entirely unjustified. Article content This week they will be sentenced by Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey but at the weekend Lich tweeted that the Crown was asking for seven years imprisonment for her and eight for Barber. Article content Article content Their fate will be decided three years and five months after they were first arrested. An old adage says justice delayed is justice denied. Article content Article content But it is interesting to note that in her April 3 judgement finding the pair guilty, the judge said she accepted that Lich and Barber came to Ottawa 'with the noblest of intentions to simply protest their wish for the government and Prime Minister (at the time) Trudeau to end COVID mandate.' Article content Further, 'The Crown agrees that the accused came to Ottawa to advance a noble cause and had the right to protest against COVID mandates, but argues they crossed the line with the means used to achieve their ends.' Article content The Freedom Convoy was certainly a nuisance. It caused inconvenience and hardship for citizens for some three weeks. The honking of horns was particularly annoying until stopped by a court order. Article content The judge said in her ruling, 'Persons testified that the noise from the truck horns made it difficult for downtown residents to sleep and focus on work. Others testified that the egress from their buildings was blocked or that because of the streets being blocked that it was difficult or impossible to get to work and appointments. Generally, the central core of the city came to a standstill. Article content 'The downtown residents who testified including persons and their families who lived in the downtown core, owners and employees of small businesses and other institutions such as churches suffered significant interferences in the use and enjoyment of their property and in their daily activities because of the protest.' Article content But the Freedom Convoy was not violent. Article content The line that Lich and Barber crossed is one written in sand, shifting, defined only after the fact by the courts and only after a contest between competing rights. Article content The judge said that there is a 'delicate balance between law enforcement concerns for public safety and order and individual rights and freedoms on the other.' Article content There was 'tension' between those rights, she said. Article content Judge Perkins-McVey quoted a judge in another case who said, 'in a free and democratic society such as Canada, we welcome and encourage people to hold demonstrations if such is necessary to exercise their right of freedom of conscience, freedom of expression, freedom of peaceful assembly and their right to freedom of association as guaranteed by section two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Article content Article content 'However, society also expects demonstrators to exercise these rights to do so without violating the rights of others to move about freely or to engage in activities which they have a perfect legal right to do so.' Article content Here is the nub of the case. The judge had to balance the tension between Lich's and Barber's perfect right to protest with the rights of people to go about enjoying their daily lives. Article content 'At the heart of the competing interests in this case lies the question to what extent does the exercise of the right to protest protects those from criminal liability when the rights of other citizens to enjoy their property have been impacted by their actions. Even Charter-protected rights are not absolute,' said the judge. Article content The defence argued the pair were 'engaged in and encouraged a lawful and constitutionally protected peaceful protest.' Article content The judge has found them guilty, but clearly from her ruling there has been, and will be going forward, much more debate and cases involving protests and citizens' rights. Article content Article content Since October 7, 2023, Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and other Canadian cities, have seen constant anti-Israel protests (along with demonstrations in support of the terror group Hamas) that have blocked streets, traffic, led to emergency vehicles being diverted, and caused much annoyance, nuisance, fear and alarm to citizens. Article content Yet they are continuing and more are planned. Article content Who decides that the rights of citizens have been impacted to such an extent that the protests are unlawful? The protesters won't do it. As is the case with protests, they push boundaries until they cross lines they don't see. Article content As for the citizens of Toronto, Montreal, et al, they aren't being listened to. Article content Regularly blocking intersections and causing distress to citizens in downtown Toronto for 21 months doesn't appear to be a crime. And yet honking horns and, yes, causing annoyance to the citizens of Ottawa for three weeks, is deemed worthy by the Crown of sending people to jail for seven and eight years. Article content
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Canada's premiers meeting in Ontario
Vancouver Watch Canada's premiers are meeting in Muskoka, Ontario, Monday to discuss protecting the economy and breaking down interprovincial trade barriers.
