China stockpiling nuclear warheads at fastest rate globally, new research shows
A report published on Monday by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) estimated that China now has at least 600 nuclear warheads, with about 100 per year being added to the stockpile since 2023.
At a regular foreign ministry press briefing on Monday, spokesperson Guo Jiakun declined to comment on the report but said: 'China has always adhered to the nuclear strategy of self-defence, always maintained its nuclear forces at the minimum level required for national security, and has not participated in the arms race.'
Guo said that China adheres to a policy of not being the first to use nuclear weapons at any time, and that China would not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear armed states.
'China will continue to firmly commit to safeguarding its legitimate security interests and maintaining world peace and stability,' Guo said.
At the current rate of increases, China could have 1,500 nuclear warheads by 2035. That is nearly as many as Russia and the US currently have ready for use at short notice.
Russia and the US's total inventories of weapons, which include both ready-to-use weapons and mothballed warheads, are far bigger. According to SIPRI's research, Russia has 5,459 warheads while the US has 5,177. The two countries hold about 90% of the global stockpile.
Last year, the US approved a new nuclear strategy that is focused on the threat from China.
China is thought to have 24 nuclear warheads that are already placed on missiles or located in bases with operational forces, meaning that they could be deployed at very short notice.
Xi Jinping, China's leader, has expanded the country's nuclear arsenal faster than any other Chinese leader. Previous leaders, such as Deng Xiaoping, argued that China only needed modest reserves to act as a deterrent for potential adversaries.
China's nuclear capabilities are of particular concern to Taiwan, the self-governing island that China claims as part of its own territory. Beijing has resolved to 'unify' Taiwan with the People's Republic of China, using force if necessary. Chinese scholars have argued that having a powerful deterrent, such as nuclear weapons, could prevent any third party from intervening in a conflict. The threat of a US intervention in support of Taiwan is one of the factors that is keeping a war at bay.
The report's authors noted fewer warheads are being dismantled each year, while the pace of deployment of new nuclear weapons is accelerating.
Hans M. Kristensen, an associate senior fellow at SIPRI, said: 'The era of reductions in the number of nuclear weapons in the world, which had lasted since the end of the cold war, is coming to an end'.
Hundreds of facilities for intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), long-range missiles used to deliver nuclear weapons, are being built in desert fields in the north of China. Three mountainous areas in the east of China also house ICBM silos, according to the report.
Additional research by Lillian Yang
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
India successfully tests nuclear-capable missile able to reach deep into China
India has said that it has successfully test-fired an intermediate-range ballistic missile which, when operational, should be capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to any part of China. The Agni-5 missile was successfully launched in India's eastern Odisha state on Wednesday, and authorities said it 'validated all operational and technical parameters'. India and China, the world's two most populous nations, are intense rivals competing for influence across south Asia and relations plummeted in 2020 after a deadly border clash. India is also part of the Quad security alliance with the US, Australia and Japan, which is seen as a counter to China. India's bitter rival, Pakistan, has nuclear weapons as well and the two countries came to close to war in May after militants killed 26 people in Indian-administered Kashmir, an attack New Delhi blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan denied any involvement. Caught in global trade and geopolitical turbulence triggered by Donald Trump's tariff war, Delhi and Beijing have moved to mend ties. Last October, the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, met the Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, for the first time in five years at a summit in Russia. Modi is expected to make his first visit to China since 2018 later this month to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation – a regional security bloc. Ties between New Delhi and Washington, meanwhile, have been strained by Trump's ultimatum that India end its purchases of Russian oil, a key source of revenue for Moscow as it wages its military offensive in Ukraine. The US says it will double new import tariffs on India from 25% to 50% by 27 August if New Delhi does not switch crude suppliers. The Agni-5 is one of a number of indigenously produced short- and medium-range Indian ballistic missiles aimed at boosting its defence posture against Pakistan, as well as China.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Russia says excluding Moscow on Ukraine talks is a ‘road to nowhere'
Russia 's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, issued a warning to Western nations regarding the exclusion of Moscow from security discussions concerning Ukraine. Speaking on Wednesday, Lavrov's comments followed a meeting hosted by Donald Trump at the White House with Volodymyr Zelensky and other Western leaders. Lavrov stated that alienating the Kremlin from collective security matters is a 'road to nowhere' and 'will not work'. He emphasised that Russia would continue to express its 'legitimate interests fairly and harshly', asserting that the US must understand the futility of excluding Moscow. Watch the video in full above.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump claimed peace was closer than ever. Then Lavrov threw a hand grenade
Donald Trump would like to have you believe that he has never been closer to settling the war in Ukraine. A high-stakes meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska was said to have ushered in a series of concessions from Moscow, which meant a peace deal was at his fingertips. An apparent compromise on security guarantees for Kyiv was leapt on by the European leaders who accompanied Volodymyr Zelensky to the White House as a real success. But with Mr Trump scrambling to bring the two warring leaders together, Russia appears to be rowing back against any suggestion that it was prepared to drop its maximalist position to deliver peace. On Wednesday, as European military leaders met to discuss how to secure a ceasefire, Russia's veteran foreign minister hurled a metaphorical hand grenade into the mix. Sergey Lavrov suggested Russia would only agree to security guarantees in which it and China have a veto over. He said a document drawn up during initial peace talks in the spring of 2022 would serve as a 'very good example' for a potential blueprint. Under the draft discussed at the time, a mechanism allowed for countries to come to Ukraine's aid militarily if it was attacked again. This was deliberately designed by Kyiv's team of negotiators to closely mimic Nato's Article 5, the alliance's mutual defence clause, so much so that it was also designated as article 5. It was envisaged that Kyiv's allies would send weapons and help police a no-fly zone above the country. Britain, France, Italy, Poland, Israel, Germany, Turkey, Canada and the United States were all listed as possible guarantors. The catch? Russia and China would also be included on the list of countries, which would have to unanimously agree there had been an attack on Ukraine. This handed Moscow, the most likely party to re-invade Ukraine, a veto over any future support for the country in case of a military attack. Fast-forward to the latest peace negotiations, brokered by Mr Trump, and there is no suggestion that Putin has deviated from his original position. 'We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work,' Mr Lavrov told a news conference on Tuesday. 'I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it's a road to nowhere.' Using the 2022 draft agreement as the basis for the current talks would suggest that Mr Trump and his peace envoy, Steve Witkoff, had fallen for Russian spin in their discussions with Putin. But had they? After all, Mr Witkoff has previously described the draft as a 'guidepost' for future negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow. Could his claim that Putin was ready to accept 'Article 5-style' guarantees have been misunderstood by the Americans as those promised in the 2022 draft? It would now seem concessions celebrated by the US president were simply a promise to repeat the guarantees offered in the original peace treaty, which was later described as a Ukrainian capitulation. In the days since meeting Putin, Mr Trump has ruled out Ukrainian membership of Nato, calling the idea 'insulting' and 'impossible', clearly using Kremlin talking points. The demand from Moscow goes back to the original document, which forced Ukraine to become a 'permanently neutral state' and forgo joining 'any military alliances' as the price for peace. If Russia was to get its own way in the latest round of talks, using the 2022 draft as the basis, Kyiv would have to significantly cut down the size of its army. The draft agreement stipulated that Ukraine's armed forces would be shrunk to less than 85,000 personnel – half its pre-war size. Any long-range missiles would also have to be forfeited. Rehashing this demand would make it impossible for Kyiv's European allies to support a peace settlement. Last week, Sir Keir Starmer and his European counterparts said 'no limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or its co-operation with third countries'. This might be why, secretly, European officials are less than hopeful about the prospect of peace, despite warm words from their political masters. Enthusiasm for Mr Trump's peace plan is, however, seen as a deliberate tactic, with both the Europeans and Putin tussling for his support. In his news conference, Mr Lavrov was clear in positioning Kyiv's most ardent allies as the problem, accusing them of trying to undemocratically sway the White House's opinion. 'We have only seen aggressive escalation of the situation and rather clumsy attempts to change the position of the US president,' he said in reference to Monday's meeting in Washington. He also attempted to stymie European attempts to convince Mr Trump to organise a meeting between Putin and Mr Zelensky as soon as possible. The minister said any summit between the leaders 'must be prepared in the most meticulous way' so the meeting does not lead to a 'deterioration' of the situation around the conflict.
