Ford Explorer Tremor Looks Like the Brand's Next Off-Road-Ready SUV
The will add a Tremor model later this year, replacing the pre-refresh .
Ford didn't share any details about the forthcoming Tremor, but we expect lots of orange accents, a slightly raised suspension, and beefier tires.
The new model marks the end of the Timberline name, which appeared on the Explorer and but is being replaced by Tremor models for each SUV.
When it comes to off-roading, Ford has something for everyone. There are the beastly Raptor models—found in the F-150, Ranger, and Bronco lineups—as well as the tamer, albeit still capable, Tremor trim that even graces the little Maverick pickup. EV fans can hop into the Mustang Mach-E Rallye, while lucky hardcore racers could have snagged a limited-production Bronco DR in 2023. Now, Ford is teasing another addition to the Tremor lineup, releasing an image that appears to show an upcoming Explorer Tremor.
Ford didn't explicitly say which model is getting a new Tremor trim, but the photo doesn't hide much. The lower portion of the taillight matches up with that of the Explorer, and we can make out most of the word "Explorer" on the trim piece above the license plate. The Tremor will replace the Timberline trim from the pre-refresh Explorer, which departed after the 2024 model year, following a similar move for the bigger Expedition.
Ford didn't provide any other details about the upcoming Explorer Tremor, but we can look to the Expedition for clues of what to expect. Ford added the off-road trim to the Expedition for the 2025 model year, coinciding with a significant overhaul for the F-150-based SUV. The Expedition Tremor wears skid plates underneath to shield the transfer case and fuel tank, gains a pair of side steps, and rides on 33-inch-tall all-terrain tires wrapped around 18-inch wheels. The other changes are purely visual, with a plethora of orange trim inside and out, a restyled grille with inboard auxiliary lights, and tow hooks in the front bumper.
We expect the Ford Explorer Tremor to pack many of the same upgrades as the Timberline, which featured a slight suspension lift, retuned springs, and a Torsen limited-slip rear differential. The powertrain should remain the base turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder producing 300 horsepower and 310 pound-feet of torque. Ford didn't provide any specifics on when to expect the Explorer Tremor, simply stating it will debut later this year.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Ford Sets Bold Condition to Stay in Formula One Amid V8 Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ford Performance has laid out a bold condition to remain in Formula One as it partners with Red Bull Powertrains for the new era of regulations beginning in 2026. Next year marks a big reset in F1, as new cars powered by an equal ratio of electric power and internal combustion on sustainable fuels will zip through Grand Prix circuits. Given Ford's expertise in the electrification department, its partnership with Red Bull is a result of the new regulations. Though the plans for 2026 are on course, and as teams develop their challengers in full swing, discussions about the return of cars powered by V8 engines running on sustainable fuels have led many to question whether F1 cars will rely on electric power in the distant future. Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 and Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 battle for track position during the F1 Grand Prix of Spain... Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 and Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 battle for track position during the F1 Grand Prix of Spain at Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya on June 01, 2025 in Barcelona, Spain. MoreWhile the developmental path ahead seems unclear at this stage, Ford has made it clear that it will stay in the sport as long as the cars remain electrified. Ford Performance global director Mark Rushbrook said: "For Ford Motor Company, we believe there should be some form of electrification in there. "That's part of what attracted us to the 2026 rules. It's all about that balance between the ICE and electrification. Does it need to be 50-50? No, not necessarily. "As long as we have the opportunity to contribute, to learn and to bring knowledge to our road cars, then that's ideally what we're looking for." Rushbrook confirmed that the American brand was committed to the future of the sport. He added: "That is definitely our intent. We're committed to working with all the other stakeholders for what is the right thing for the future of this sport. "Is it going to be exactly what any single manufacturer wants? No. But that's part of the process, because at the end of the day, if that discussion is exactly what we want and every other manufacturer leaves, then it's not a healthy sport either. "We know that and the other manufacturers know that as well. So you've got to work together for the good of the sport, the health of the sport and that basically means being partners off the track. "You want to race each other fiercely on the track, but you need to work together off the track." 2026 marks the first year when Red Bull will roll out its own F1 engines in collaboration with Ford, after ending a successful partnership with Honda. The Japanese automaker joined hands with Aston Martin to develop power units for cars of the new era.
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
IIHS Crash Tests: The Toyota Prius Is Officially Safer Than The Ford Bronco
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has released the results of its latest crash tests, and while most models achieved the organization's 2025 Top Safety Pick+ award - indicating the highest possible safety standards - Ford won't be pleased with the outcomes for two of its best SUVs. The Bronco and Bronco Sport SUVs both missed out on a Top Safety Pick+ award following new ratings, while at least three much smaller cars achieved better safety scores. While this does not mean that the SUVs are unsafe, they each failed to protect occupants according to the agency's highest standards. Here, we'll look at exactly where the Bronco and Bronco Sport fell short. To qualify for the Top Safety Pick award, a vehicle has to achieve the following in IIHS crash tests: Good ratings for the small overlap front and update side testsAcceptable or Good ratings in the pedestrian front crash prevention testAcceptable or Good ratings for headlights, applicable to all trimsAcceptable rating for the updated moderate overlap front test Furthermore, the Top Safety Pick+ award is only achievable if a Good rating for the updated moderate overlap front test is received. The IIHS regularly updates its testing procedures with tougher tests, so a vehicle that qualified for a Top Safety Pick+ award a few years ago may not get one now. The Bronco may look like a safe place to be in a crash, given its tall stance and beefy bodywork, but it didn't do enough to ace its crash tests. Marginal ratings for the moderate overlap, pedestrian front crash prevention, and headlight tests held the SUV back. For the moderate overlap test, the IIHS noted a higher risk of chest injuries when the rear crash dummy was assessed. Then again, even minivans were found to do an inadequate job of protecting second-row passengers, and those are dedicated family movers. The Bronco still received Good ratings for the small overlap front, updated side, and seat belt reminder tests, though. Its vehicle-to-vehicle crash prevention system got an Acceptable score, as did the ease of using the LATCH system. It must be noted that the LATCH system, seat belt reminder, and vehicle-to-vehicle crash prevention scores are not factored into the award criteria. Overall, the Bronco could be improved, but previous tests show it's still safer than its Jeep Wrangler rival. Thanks to LED projector headlights instead of the Bronco's LED reflector headlights, the Bronco Sport gets off to a better start than its bigger sibling, with a Good rating for its headlights. The Bronco Sport's pedestrian crash prevention system also performed better, with a Good rating. In the updated moderate overlap front test, the Bronco Sport got the same Marginal score as the Bronco. The post-crash analysis showed that the rear dummy's lap belt slid up onto its abdomen, which poses a higher risk of internal injuries. This is in addition to elevated chest, neck, and head injuries for rear-seat passengers. The Acceptable rating in the side test was due to a risk of injury to the driver's pelvis. Interestingly, smaller cars like the Toyota Prius, Hyundai Elantra, and Kia K4 achieved better ratings than the Ford SUVs, proving that vehicle size has nothing to do with occupant protection. Take the Prius, for example. Besides an Acceptable rating for its headlights, it received a Good score in every crash test. However, since no two accidents are exactly the same, the Bronco and Bronco Sport still have every chance of adequately protecting occupants in a crash. Both come with a decent roster of passive and active safety features. These IIHS tests do, however, show that there is some room for improvement in this area for the Ford twins. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Q&A with BMI's Santiago Arieu on the magnet crisis disrupting global auto production
The introduction of a new licensing system by China, now slowing the export of rare earth elements, has sent a ripple of disruption across global vehicle production lines, raising the spectre of stalled factories and delayed deliveries. Rare earth magnets, often invisible yet indispensable, are the backbone of modern automotive technology. From the motors powering electric vehicles (EVs) to the sensors, steering systems, and regenerative brakes that define the modern driving experience, these small but mighty components are everywhere. But as China tightens its grip on these critical exports, amid a backdrop of rising geopolitical tension and new US tariffs, the industry is facing a reckoning. Europe, which sources 98% of its rare earth magnets from China, finds itself particularly exposed. Efforts to bolster domestic supply through initiatives like the EU's Critical Raw Materials Act have thus far failed to match China's scale or competitiveness. Meanwhile, automakers are issuing warnings: stockpiles are dwindling, and the clock is ticking. Ford has already paused operations at a major plant, Suzuki has pulled back production on key models, and Germany's influential automotive industry group VDA (Verband der Automobilindustrie) has raised red flags about looming shutdowns. Behind the headlines, the implications are even more serious for the EV sector, which depends on rare earth materials far more than traditional internal combustion engine vehicles. As electrification accelerates globally, the threat to supply chains grows more acute, and more costly. In this Q&A, Santiago Arieu (SA), Senior Autos Analyst at BMI, a Fitch Solutions company, sheds light on how the rare earth bottleneck could shape the next chapter for automakers and auto financiers. In conversation with Alejandro Gonzalez (AG), editor of Motor Finance Online. SA: If the supply constraints for these critical minerals do not improve, we believe it is highly likely that we will need to implement downward revisions to our 2025 vehicle forecasts (involving both production and sales projections). Regarding regional exposure, whilst rare earth magnets are utilised across all vehicle types, we highlight that markets and regions producing more technologically advanced vehicles with a greater number of features requiring these components face disproportionate risk. SA: Whilst we believe some automakers may consider reverting to older EV motor technologies or reducing premium features that significantly rely on rare earth magnets, we believe that carmakers are likely to exhaust all other options before implementing such measures. It is worth noting that these components are strategically crucial as they enable carmakers to differentiate their products in increasingly competitive markets. Moreover, many of these magnet-dependent features form a central part of the value proposition for modern vehicles. Removing such features would risk compromising brand positioning and consumer appeal, particularly in premium segments where these differentiators justify higher price points. SA: We believe the disruptions we are beginning to observe stemming from rare earth supply constraints will drive regions such as North America and Europe to accelerate and facilitate the onshore production of these minerals and components. That said, we forecast a substantial dependency on Mainland China for these critical materials and components will persist in the short term (at least 6 to 12 months). This is because the development of alternative supply chains represents a significant industrial challenge that cannot be resolved quickly, particularly given China's dominant position in processing capacity and technical expertise built over several years. SA: We believe the EU needs to significantly enhance economic incentives and simplify regulatory procedures to accelerate the development of new rare earth processing facilities within its borders. Currently, European operations struggle to compete with Chinese producers on cost efficiency and scale, creating a critical vulnerability in the automotive supply chain. To achieve genuine supply chain resilience, the EU could introduce more robust financial support measures and cut red tape, enabling European processors to achieve commercially viable economies of scale. SA: We believe that if industry production volumes are negatively affected by rare earth supply issues, similar to the semiconductor shortage in 2020-2021, vehicle prices are very likely to rise due to rapidly shifting supply-demand dynamics. These price increases could have a substantial impact on vehicle sales volumes, as higher costs would further strain affordability at a time when vehicle pricing is already elevated. We also see the potential for this situation to lead to tighter auto financing terms across Europe, as ongoing rare earth mineral supply constraints could create additional challenges for EV pricing. China's rare earth clampdown strains global auto production "Q&A with BMI's Santiago Arieu on the magnet crisis disrupting global auto production" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
