Donald Trump Weighs In on Plan To Increase Minimum Wage
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump expressed uncertainty over whether he would support a Republican-led proposal to raise the federal minimum wage, when asked about the measure at the White House on Wednesday.
The bill, introduced by Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri last week, seeks to double the current federal minimum wage to $15 per hour. In response to a reporter's question on the plan, Trump replied: "I haven't seen it. I'd have to speak to Josh. He's a very good friend of mine."
"That's interesting that Josh did that," Trump added. "You have to think about that one."
Newsweek contacted Senator Hawley's office via email on Thursday for comment on the bill and President Trump's reaction.
Why It Matters
The federal minimum wage was last increased in 2009, rising to $7.25
While many states have independently adopted minimum wages well above the mandated rate, advocates for increasing this nationwide maintain that this would directly benefit lower earners, while reducing income inequality and improve average living standards. Critics, however, contend that a significant hike would raise labor costs to the detriment of employers, particularly small businesses, and result in increased unemployment.
What To Know
Hawley's $15 Minimum Wage Proposal
Last week, Senator Hawley, along with Vermont Democrat Senator Peter Welch, introduced the "Higher Wages for American Workers Act of 2025."
If signed into law, the bill would doubled the current minimum wage to $15 from January 2026 and allow increases with inflation in subsequent years.
Hawley has in the past proposed similar measures, including a 2021 plan to force companies with revenues over $1 billion to pay their employees $15 per hour, and has argued that the latest bill is necessary for earnings to "keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day."
Hawley also addressed the bill's bipartisan sponsorship of the bill, describing it as "a populist position," and telling NBC News that, "if we're going to be a working people's party, we have to do something for working people."
Current U.S. Minimum Wage Context
Thirty states have adopted their own minimum wages above the 2009 federal rate, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI). These include Hawley's home state of Missouri, which increased its baseline to $13.75 and plans to raise it to $15.00 starting January 1, 2026.
Ben Zipperer, senior economist with the EPI, a progressive think tank that supports raising the minimum wage, told Newsweek that a Republican's sponsorship of the bill "is admission that minimum wages are a very popular policy to correct the widespread problem of low pay." However he expressed skepticism that the party would "abandon their consistent role as the chief obstacle to federal minimum wage increases."
Advocates for raising the federal minimum wage have argued that increases benefit low-income workers, increasingly grappling with inflation and strained budgets, while detractors worry about potential negative impacts for businesses and on employment.
US President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House as members of Italian soccer club Juventus pay a visit in Washington, DC, on June 18, 2025.
US President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House as members of Italian soccer club Juventus pay a visit in Washington, DC, on June 18, 2025.
Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images
Zipperer said that the hike proposed by Hawley and Welch, or the Democratic bill introduced earlier this year which would raise this incrementally to $17 an hour by 2030, would "unambiguously benefit low wage workers and their families and communities." He cited a 2024 EPI study which found that most research into the topic has found either no resulting job losses or "only small disemployment effects."
However, economist David Neumark of the University of California, Irvine, said that research "overwhelmingly points to some job loss for the least skilled, and no gains on net for low income families, as some gain higher wages but others lose jobs or have hours reduced." Neumark's recent research into the topic, he told Newsweek, "says the burden falls very disproportionately on blacks, not whites. I.e., whites get more of the wage gains, and blacks experience more of the jobs/hours loss."
U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with Sarah Wynn-Williams, former Director of Global Public Policy at Facebook, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on April 09,...
U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with Sarah Wynn-Williams, former Director of Global Public Policy at Facebook, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on April 09, 2025 in Washington, DC. MorePresident Trump has previously expressed some openness to raising the minimum wage. In an interview with NBC's Meet the Press in December, Trump acknowledged that $7.25 was "a very low number," and that there "is a level at which you can do it."
"Let me give you the downside, though: In California, they raised it up to a very high number, and your restaurants are going out of business all over the place," Trump told host Kristen Welker. "The population is shrinking, it's had a very negative impact," But there is a level at which you could do it, absolutely."
California had a $15 per hour cap on mimimum wage, which most employees hit in 2023. High inflation allowed for a further 50 cents in 2024.
The state last rose minimum rose in January 2025, reaching $16.50. Its population grew by 108,000 people in calendar year 2024, according to new data from the California Department of Finance released last month.
"Despite the common myth of a continually declining population," a media release said. "California has only saw a short period of population loss in its 174 year history — during the peak of the COVID pandemic, when it decreased by 379,544 people (which represents about 1% decrease over those two years), according to the U.S. Census Bureau."
What People Are Saying
President Trump, asked about the bill on Wednesday, said: "Some people agree with it. Some people don't. You know, some people say it really turns away business, restaurants, clothes and a lot of things happen. Other people agree. I'd have to speak to Josh—he's a good guy."
Senator Josh Hawley said in a statement last week: "For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline. One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day. This bipartisan legislation would ensure that workers across America benefit from higher wages,"
Ben Zipperer, senior economist with the Economic Policy Institute told Newsweek he had "no predictions" about Trump's position on the issue, adding: "I'd hope that he would be concerned that over 14 million workers are paid less than $15 per hour, but given that he was unaware of a bill to raise their wages, it seems he's out to lunch."
David Neumark, professor of economics at the University of California, Irvine, told Newsweek: "This isn't new for [Senator] Hawley. He is conservative on many issues, but a populist when it comes to labor. Still, some Republican support could make this happen, and would be popular politically."
Michael Reich, professor of Economics and Chair of the Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics at the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, told Newsweek: "Public opinion polls and polls of economists have long revealed majority support for a $15 federal minimum wage. Yet Hawley's proposal has not drawn support from any other Republican politicians, even among those in states that already have $15 minimum wages." He added that Trump was "famously fickle on many economic policies."
"He expressed varying views about raising the minimum wage during the 2024 campaign, but has not raised it himself since."
What Happens Next?
Hawley and Welch's bill has been referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions for review and consideration, who will be tasked with deciding whether it should move forward to a vote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
White House: Trump to take two weeks for diplomacy before deciding on US strike in Iran
In a White House briefing, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt shared a statement from President Donald Trump regarding a US strike on Iran.
Politico
10 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump to make a decision on Iran within two weeks
President Donald Trump has set a two week deadline to decide if the United States will strike Iran. 'Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place in the near future, I will make my decision of whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday, reading a statement from the president to reporters. Leavitt said Trump would prefer a diplomatic solution, but the president — in consultation with the National Security Council — is weighing U.S. military intervention to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, according to a recent POLITICO report. The U.S. is the only country with the military capacity to destroy Iran's nuclear program. 'Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' Leavitt said. 'All they need is a decision from the supreme leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon, which would of course pose an existential threat not just to Israel, but to the United States and to the entire world.' The comments came at the end of a week of heightened tension in the decades-long conflict between Israel and Iran. As Iran and Israel lobbed rockets at each other, Trump left the Group of Seven conference early and has convened multiple meetings in the Situation Room. The conflict has divided Trump's coalition, driving a rift between an isolationist faction and hawks who have long sought to hobble Iran. Leavitt said Trump has long maintained his position that the U.S. should interfere to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and quoted his comments on the subject from more than a decade ago. 'The president has made it clear he always wants to pursue diplomacy, but believe me, the president is unafraid to use strength as necessary,' Leavitt said. 'And Iran and the entire world should know that the United States military is the strongest and most lethal fighting force in the world, and we have capabilities that no other country on this planet possesses.' Leavitt declined to answer whether the president wanted regime change in Iran, which has been a goal of hawks like Sen. Lindsey Graham and a red line for MAGA isolationists.
New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Entry level jobs are disappearing — Gen Z should learn these skills if they want to get hired
AI in, Gen Z out. Experts are warning that entry-level jobs may be disappearing — leaving Gen Z unemployed. 3 Entry-level jobs may be shifting or all together disappearing leaving Gen Z on the job hunt. LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – Advertisement This generation of young workers, expected to make up about 30% of the global workforce by 2030, is entering the job market as the roles they were set to apply for might not exist. As AI continues to evolve, it's clear that many of the traditional entry-level roles, often seen as stepping stones into the workforce, are rapidly being automated. A YouGov survey found that 54% of Americans say they feel cautious about advances in AI and 47% feel concerned. Advertisement The shift towards AI is impacting the types of jobs available, especially those for new employees. 'Entry-level jobs tend to involve routine, well-defined tasks — exactly the kind of work current AI systems are best suited to automate,' Professor Daniela Rus, the Director of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at MIT, told Newsweek. Experts argue that while some of these roles might not disappear entirely, they are evolving into something unrecognizable. 3 A YouGov survey found that 54% of Americans say they feel cautious about advances in AI and 47% feel concerned. – Advertisement For Gen Z, this transition could wipe out or change the roles they expected to apply for. 'AI is rapidly reshaping entry-level jobs, automating repetitive tasks, streamlining workflows, and, in some cases, eliminating roles entirely,' Keri Mesropov, founder of Spring Talent Development, said. However, Gen Z's chances of being employed aren't completely deleted. Those looking to enter the workforce may just need to adapt to utilize this new technology. But this is nothing entirely new. The workforce as gone through changes due to technological leaps throughout history — the industrial revolution and the dot-com era. Advertisement 3 The shift towards AI is impacting the types of jobs available, especially those for new employees. Seventyfour – Industry analyst Josh Bersin argues that entry-level hiring has currently slowed due to economic factors, but that the introduction of AI could also create entirely new job categories. These roles would involve building, managing, and optimizing AI systems, presenting an opportunity for digital natives to step into new roles. This shift isn't just about surviving in the job market — it's about adapting to a new professional environment where AI becomes a powerful tool in everyday work. 'AI is changing everything, faster than most institutions, companies or curriculums can keep pace with. But no, that doesn't mean your education or potential is obsolete. It means we have to think differently about what growth and opportunity look like,' wrote LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman in a recent post on the platform. 'You were born into this shift. You're native to these tools in a way that older generations aren't. Lean into it. Teach others.' Despite fears that AI will replace human workers, experts agree that AI cannot fully replace human judgment. Mesropov argues that while AI can automate tasks, it still requires human input for context-heavy decisions, judgment calls, and troubleshooting. Advertisement And Gen Z's familiarity with technology, particularly AI, could make them valuable assets in this new era. According to the YouGov survey, adults under 30 are more likely than older Americans to ever use AI tools (76% vs. 51%) and are also more likely to use AI at least weekly (50% vs. 23%). 'The advantage Gen Z has is that they are digital natives. They are well-positioned to work alongside AI, not in opposition to it,' Rus told Newsweek. 'Young people today are using AI to solve problems and even have fun by creating stories and images.' As AI reshapes the job market, the skills companies will need most in their entry-level hires won't just be technical— they will need strong problem-solving abilities, creativity, and emotional intelligence. Advertisement Experts suggest that while the structure of entry-level jobs is changing, the challenge will be to rethink what these roles look like. AI-assisted apprenticeships, project-based learning environments, and hybrid human-AI teams are among the potential models for the future. However, experts also caution that while young workers have an advantage in terms of digital fluency, they must still build the soft skills necessary to succeed in the workforce, such as communication, adaptability, and critical thinking. Though it's easy to get lost in the rhetoric surrounding AI's potential to disrupt jobs, the reality is that the technology is not just a threat — it's an opportunity. For Gen Z, the key to thriving in this new era will be their ability to adapt, learn, and leverage AI tools to solve real-world problems.
