logo
Winter fuel payment changes to unleash ‘chaos' on HMRC

Winter fuel payment changes to unleash ‘chaos' on HMRC

Yahooa day ago

Rachel Reeves's winter fuel payment about-turn could unleash 'chaos' on pensioners and the tax office, experts have warned.
Under the new rules, the majority of pensioners will receive the winter fuel allowance but those earning more than £35,000 will have their payment clawed back through the tax system.
Experts have said the policy, which will save an estimated £450m a year and cost around £1.25bn, could have unintended consequences such as:
The £450m in savings could be wiped out due to the costs of administering the complex system.
HMRC could claw back 'the wrong amounts' from pensioners due to out-of-date records.
Customer service could suffer and tax dodgers could get off scot-free as HMRC's staff are moved away from regular work.
Rachel Vahey, of stockbroker AJ Bell, said claiming back the payment from 25pc of pensioners was 'the most convoluted and difficult' route the Government could have chosen.
She added: 'Given the chaos it could cause and the relatively tiny taxpayer savings on offer, it may have made sense for the Government to take the political embarrassment of a U-turn on the chin and make the payment to all pensioners.'
Around two million pensioners earn more than £35,000 and will have the winter fuel payment claimed back through the tax system.
For pensioners who file a tax return, this will be done via self-assessment. However, most pensioners are taxed through PAYE, which means the payment will be recovered through their tax code.
Robert Salter, of accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg, said this could result in pensioners losing the winter fuel payment unfairly due to HMRC's 'out-of-date' records.
'Given that many people subject to the winter fuel payment won't be doing tax returns, there is a real risk that HMRC might be claiming back the wrong amounts – at least in some cases – as they have used the wrong underlying data,' he said.
Former pensions minister Ros Altmann said she was also concerned about pensioners getting hit with incorrect bills relating to the winter fuel allowance.
'HMRC often makes mistakes and they warn that everyone needs to check the figures carefully to ensure the tax codes are correct.
'For many of the oldest pensioners, this is likely to be a massive challenge and, especially for those who are not digitally enabled, it could cause significant worry.'
The Government's previous experience with means-testing does not bode well for the success of the winter fuel allowance system.
Under the high-income child benefit system, which is also means-tested, the benefit is partially withdrawn once a parent earns more than £60,000.
This means the parent must either opt out of receiving child benefit or file a tax return and pay it back.
Over the years, many parents have been hit with unexpected tax bills because they do not know the rules or do not realise they have earned over the threshold.
This has led to HMRC spending valuable time and resources policing the complicated system in order to claw back a relatively small amount of tax.
Jon Greer, of wealth manager Quilter, said: 'The Government should learn lessons from the child benefit system and ensure it doesn't bake in unfairness from the outset. Getting that balance right is critical to avoiding the kind of unintended consequences that have plagued other means-tested benefits.'
The Department for Work and Pensions has said it will set up a simple system so pensioners over the threshold can opt out of winter fuel payments.
But even once this is up and running, there will be some pensioners who do not opt out because they do not realise they have earned more than £35,000 in one year.
HMRC said taxpayers could check taxable income quickly and easily in the app or online via their personal tax account.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the decision to reinstate winter fuel payments meant 'no pensioner on a lower income will miss out'.
The about-turn comes as Sir Keir Starmer tries to shore up support from MPs and the public following losses to Reform at the local elections last month.
A spokesman for HMRC said: 'No one will need to file a tax return just to pay back a winter fuel payment, and the vast majority will have the charge collected automatically through their tax code.
'HMRC has previous experience of introducing new processes at pace and doing so very successfully.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sheffield howitzer factory to be ‘home of UK artillery production'
Sheffield howitzer factory to be ‘home of UK artillery production'

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sheffield howitzer factory to be ‘home of UK artillery production'

A new £25m howitzer factory in Sheffield will become the home of Britain's defence manufacturing push as the country prepares for a weapons spending blitz. On Thursday, the Government said the state-of-the-art site, run by BAE Systems, will become the hub of Britain's defence manufacturing push after it opened this week to initially increase production of M777 towed howitzers. BAE's revamped facility, which has created 200 new jobs, has been hailed as a crucial part of UK efforts to support Ukrainian forces in their battle against Russia. Revived demand for arms during the Ukraine conflict prompted BAE to announce it was reopening the Sheffield facility, reversing its decision in 2023 to wind down production of the M777 howitzers in the UK. Kyiv has previously received several M777 howitzers, which are able to hit targets up to 30km away and are lightweight for artillery at 4.5 tonnes. However, many of those are in need of refurbishment or repair. John Healy, the Defence Secretary, said the new Sheffield factory marked a 'significant step forward in strengthening our British defence industrial base'. The announcement comes as the Government pushes ahead with efforts to drive up defence spending. Earlier this week, the Chancellor committed to increase spending on defence to 2.6pc of GDP by April 2027, from 2.3pc currently. In her spending review on Wednesday, Rachel Reeves said: 'A new era in the threats we face demands a new era for defence and security.' Labour has said it will go further on its military budget. Sir Keir Starmer promised to get defence spending to 3pc of GDP by the end of the next parliament. This includes a commitment to funnel £6bn into munitions production during the course of this parliament, to cover spending at least six new factories. However, the pledge still remains short of demands from Nato, with the military alliance expected to require members to lift defence spending to 3.5pc of GDP in the coming years. Nato is also expected to require allies to spend a further 1.5pc of GDP on related infrastructure, such as railways and highways used to transport military hardware. It follows complaints from Donald Trump that Europe is relying too heavily on America for defence. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general, told The Telegraph this month that people in Britain had 'better learn to speak Russian' if the Government did not increase its defence spending to 5pc of GDP. Meanwhile, Boris Johnson said Labour's spending pledges on defence had been 'feeble', adding: 'My view is that this Government is completely failing to show the leadership that is needed to defend Britain and defend Europe.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump Wants to Make It More Expensive to Sue Over His Policies
Trump Wants to Make It More Expensive to Sue Over His Policies

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump Wants to Make It More Expensive to Sue Over His Policies

President Donald Trump and his allies are pursuing an alternative strategy to defend against mounting court orders blocking his policies: Raise the financial stakes for those suing the administration. House Republicans want to force people suing the US to post financial guarantees to cover the government's costs if they win a temporary halt to Trump's policies but ultimately lose the case. The measure, included in their 'big, beautiful' tax-and-spending bill, would condition a judges' power to hold US officials in contempt for violating their orders to the payment of that security.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store