Farm attack gang sentenced to life for Limpopo farmers murder
Prosecutors described the crime as 'premeditated executed with extreme violence'.
Three men have been sentenced to life in prison for the brutal murder of a 35-year-old farmer, Nicolaas 'Nicci' Janse van Rensburg, in Limpopo.
Malesela Albert Mangena (35), Velly Segwale (35), and Lesiba Solly Segwale (45) appeared in the Polokwane High Court on Monday, where the sentence was handed down.
The trio was also handed a combined additional 42 years' imprisonment for multiple related offences.
Conviction
The sentence for the farmer's murder comes after their conviction on 11 June in what prosecutors described as a 'premeditated crime executed with extreme violence'.
National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson Mashudu Malabi-Dzhangi said the three men were found guilty on several charges, including conspiracy to commit robbery, murder, robbery, possession of an unlicensed firearm, and unlicensed ammunition.
ALSO READ: Trio convicted for brutal farm attack in Eastern Cape
'The court ordered that the sentences will run concurrently with the life sentence for murder. Therefore, the effective sentence is life imprisonment. The court further declared the accused unfit to possess firearms under Section 103 of the Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000.'
Trial
Malabi-Dzhangi said during the trial, the accused pleaded not guilty to all charges.
'The court heard that on 07 October 2022, the trio conspired to commit a robbery at Derdekraal Farm. Upon arrival, they entered the house and held a 15-year-old boy at gunpoint, demanding money and the safe keys. They handcuffed the boy and began looting valuable items.
'When the farm owner, Nicolaas Johannes Janse van Rensburg, and his partner arrived, the accused ordered them to sit down. An altercation ensued, during which Van Rensburg was shot and killed. The accused fled the scene but were later arrested following a thorough police investigation and remained in custody until the finalisation of their trial,' Malabi-Dzhangi said.
Farm murders
In aggravation of sentence, state prosecutor Advocate Norman Makhubele called two key witnesses. Kobus de Lange, representing South African commercial farmers, testified about the critical role farmers play in ensuring food security, creating employment opportunities, and contributing to the national economy.
De Lange testified about the alarming rise in violent attacks on farmers.
The farmer's sister, Taleza van Rensburg, provided emotional testimony on the devastating impact of the murder on the family and farmworkers.
Taleza said livestock had to be sold due to safety concerns, resulting in job losses and ultimately the farm's closure.
Previous convictions
Malabi-Dzhangi said the accused had previous convictions for robbery and showed no remorse.
'The court agreed with the state's submission that there were no substantial or compelling circumstances to justify a lesser sentence.'
Limpopo Director of Public Prosecutions Advocate Ivy Thenga welcomed the sentence.
'The NPA remains committed to delivering justice for victims of violent crimes, especially those murdered in cold blood for their belongings. I commend Advocate Makhubele and all the stakeholders involved in securing this conviction and sentence,' Thenga said.
ALSO READ: Four arrested for Free State farm murder, kidnapped wife rescued
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
37 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Scopa launches inquiry into RAF misconduct claims
Whistleblower claims, governance failures, and vacant executive posts prompt Scopa to launch full inquiry into RAF operations. The Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) will investigate serious allegations of mismanagement, governance failures and financial misconduct at the Road Accident Fund (RAF). Scopa announced on Tuesday that it has resolved to initiate a comprehensive inquiry into allegations of maladministration, financial mismanagement, wasteful and reckless expenditure, and related financial misconduct at the RAF. The committee said the decision comes after months of several unsuccessful attempts by Scopa to obtain truthful, complete information from the RAF Board and executive management. RAF board failed to cooperate and disclose key information – Scopa 'The committee cannot perform its work effectively if state entities do not provide it with complete and truthful information with adequate context and supporting information,' the chairperson said in a statement. Among the committee's concerns are insufficient background checks on executive and senior management appointments who are entrusted with access to and oversight of substantial public funds. ALSO READ: RAF and its comms head found to have defamed Sunshine Hospital This is despite having a troubling employment and disciplinary record that includes accusations of making careless financial management decisions. The committee is also concerned about the subsequent refusal by the RAF to disclose to them where such funds are kept and for what purpose. Scopa is additionally troubled by the prolonged failure to appoint essential officials, including a chief claims officer, head of claims operations, head of legal, chief corporate support officer, and head of people management. Prolonged failure to appoint essential officials This comes as the RAF faces significant financial losses—either due to action being taken when it shouldn't be, or inaction when action is needed. Some of the issues also include failures of governance with a direct impact on the rule of law and the authority and powers of parliament, as well as Chapter 9 institutions tasked with performing oversight on behalf of the South African people. ALSO READ: State capture allegations come back to haunt RAF acting CIO The committee also expressed concern over numerous whistleblower reports alleging supply chain irregularities involving more than R1 billion, noting that internal management appears to be failing to apply proper controls. The committee said these allegations point to failure by the RAF Board to properly oversee management's decisions and actions in line with its statutory mandate. The chairperson of Scopa, Songezo Zibi, said an inquiry will give everyone involved or implicated an opportunity to state their case under oath and receive a fair hearing before the committee draws its conclusion. Inquiry will take place after August recess 'The volume of complaints and related documentary disclosures to the committee about the RAF make it necessary to examine them thoroughly and make such recommendations as may be necessary to ensure that the institution does its work within legal and constitutional prescripts and serves the public interest as intended,' Zibi said. The committee will approve the terms of reference on 1 July 2025, and the inquiry will take place after the August recess. ALSO READ: Two law firms get lion's share of RAF's R103m legal services spend The Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV) has welcomed Scopa's decision to initiate a full parliamentary inquiry after 'years of concern' about systemic mismanagement, growing dysfunction, and serious questions regarding financial and ethical oversight at the fund. 'This is a massive victory — not just for APRAV, but for every victim who has suffered silently under a broken and unaccountable RAF system,' said Pieter de Bruyn, speaking on behalf of APRAV. 'It is a long-overdue reckoning with a system that has failed too many for too long.' 'This is a massive victory' – APRAV As the inquiry process begins, APRAV called on victims, legal practitioners, former RAF employees and whistleblowers to come forward and share their evidence and experiences. 'Let this be the beginning of a new chapter for the RAF — one rooted in truth, accountability, and the collective will to do better,' said de Bruyn. NOW READ: RAF 'deliberately withholding' information from Scopa
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
FSCA's Deepfake Admission Sparks Industry Outrage: Why is Banxso facing the brunt?
The FSCA has issued a stark warning about deepfake investment scams targeting South Africans, implicating high-profile figures. Yet, why is Banxso facing severe penalties while others evade scrutiny? Image: IOL / Ron AI The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) has issued a damning public warning over a sophisticated network of deepfake investment scams exploiting high-profile South African figures, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, Dr Patrice Motsepe, Ms Leanne Manas, and Deputy President Paul Mashatile. But industry insiders are asking a pointed question: why is Banxso being crucified when others are quietly cautioned? This month's FSCA release formally acknowledges what many in the financial services industry have long suspected — that the problem of unauthorised third-party affiliates deploying AI-generated deepfake advertisements is industry-wide, not confined to one firm. Yet, in what critics describe as a deeply unbalanced enforcement approach, Banxso has seemingly become the regulator's scapegoat whilst other implicated platforms escape scrutiny. The Scale of Deception The FSCA's June 10, 2025, warning reveals the alarming sophistication of these fraud networks. Scammers are promising investors "unrealistic returns of between R13,000 and R17,000 per day, on an investment of R4,500" using fabricated endorsements from South Africa's most trusted public figures. In one particularly brazen deepfake video, Dr Motsepe appears to promote the investments, whilst Deputy President Mashatile is shown "confirming that the platform is authorised and that investors will receive returns". Another synthetic video features President Ramaphosa endorsing "guaranteed returns" — content so convincing it has fooled hundreds of potential investors. The FSCA explicitly states that "the individuals behind the platforms are not authorised in terms of any financial sector law to provide financial services to the public" and that these operators "failed to respond to FSCA queries." This represents a clear acknowledgement that multiple unauthorised entities are operating these schemes across various platforms and seemingly the FSCA has no way of combatting this. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Selective Enforcement Under Fire "Banxso acted swiftly when made aware of the deepfakes — refunding over R14 million of their own capital to affected consumers and laying criminal charges against the entity identified as operating the scam," an anonymous compliance expert said. "Other firms stayed silent or claimed ignorance. Why is only one company facing the full weight of enforcement?" Indeed, whilst the FSCA's press release highlights "platforms" plural using synthetic media to promote fraudulent investments, there is no specific mention of Banxso, nor any indication that Banxso continues to operate in connection with these ongoing scams. The regulatory warning appears to confirm that the deepfake problem extends far beyond any single financial services provider. Still, Banxso — a firm currently locked in multiple legal battles and awaiting judgment in a liquidation application that allegedly stems from the FSCA enforcement action — remains the only market participant to face such intense regulatory scrutiny and enforcement action. The company has not only ceased operations but has also proactively worked to trace the perpetrators of the fraudulent advertisements. Industry-Wide Problem, Singular Punishment "The FSCA is finally admitting that this isn't about one rogue actor. The deepfake threat is pervasive and sophisticated," said a fintech policy analyst. "These scammers are using unauthorised platforms, fake documentation, and AI-generated content to deceive consumers on a massive scale. But the regulator's response has been wildly inconsistent. Where is the fairness in targeting the one company that did the right thing?" The FSCA's own guidance emphasises that consumers should "verify that an entity or individual is authorised by the FSCA to provide financial products and services" and warns against "investment or trading offers on social media platforms or any unsolicited offers." This advice tacitly acknowledges that the deepfake threat spans multiple channels and operators — yet enforcement action remains concentrated on a single entity. Legal documents reviewed by IOL confirm that Banxso has initiated criminal proceedings against those behind what they believe to be the third party affiliate marketing scam, a fraudulent offshore entity believed to be at the centre of these AI-powered scams. The company has cooperated fully with authorities, and voluntarily compensated affected consumers — actions that stand in stark contrast to the unnamed platforms that continue operating without consequence. Questions of Proportionality "There is no question that regulation is necessary to protect consumers from these sophisticated fraud networks," added the regulatory source. "But we must ask who it truly protects when it turns a blind eye to some actors whilst hanging others out to dry. The FSCA's own warning confirms this is an industry-wide crisis, yet only one firm faces consequences for crimes it neither initiated nor condoned." The regulator's approach becomes more questionable when considering that the FSCA provides multiple verification methods for consumers to check authorisation status, including a toll-free number (0800 110 443) and online databases. These resources exist precisely because unauthorised operators are a systemic problem across the financial services landscape, not an isolated incident. Regulatory Inconsistency Under Spotlight The FSCA has advised the public to exercise "caution when considering investment or trading offers on social media platforms" and to verify that "the FSP number utilised by the entity or individual offering financial services matches the name of the FSP on the FSCA database." This guidance implicitly acknowledges that multiple unauthorised entities are exploiting regulatory gaps and consumer trust. Yet despite this industry-wide acknowledgement, enforcement actions remain conspicuously one-sided. Whilst unnamed platforms continue operating with apparent impunity, Banxso remains embroiled in costly legal proceedings despite its proactive response to the fraud network. "The selective enforcement sends a dangerous message to the industry," observed a former FSCA official. "Companies that cooperate, self-report, and take corrective action face harsher treatment than those who remain silent or deny responsibility. This approach will inevitably discourage transparency and cooperation in future incidents." The Broader Implications The FSCA's deepfake warning represents more than just consumer protection — it's an admission that South Africa's financial regulatory framework is struggling to keep pace with sophisticated AI-powered fraud networks. These criminals exploit the trust South Africans place in respected public figures whilst operating through unauthorised offshore entities that deliberately evade regulatory oversight. The scams described in the FSCA warning, promising guaranteed daily returns through fabricated celebrity endorsements, represent a clear and present danger to consumer confidence in legitimate financial services. Yet the regulator's response suggests a troubling pattern of selective enforcement that may ultimately undermine its stated objectives. Call for Balanced Response As artificial intelligence continues blurring the line between authentic and fabricated content, and as scammers become increasingly sophisticated in their tactics, the need for a coherent and even-handed regulatory response has never been more urgent. The FSCA's own warning confirms that deepfake investment fraud is a systemic threat requiring industry-wide vigilance and proportionate enforcement. But for now, Banxso remains the public face of a crime it neither initiated nor condoned whilst other implicated platforms escape meaningful scrutiny. The company paid dearly to correct a fraud perpetrated against it and its clients yet continues facing disproportionate regulatory consequences whilst the actual perpetrators operate with apparent impunity. The FSCA has not commented directly on the perceived imbalance in its enforcement actions, despite mounting questions from the financial services community about the consistency and fairness of its regulatory approach. With consumer protection hanging in the balance, South Africa's financial sector deserves regulatory oversight that targets actual wrongdoers. For verification of authorised financial service providers: Toll-free: 0800-110-443 Online: Click here. FSP Search: Click here. IOL
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Life sentences for three men convicted of murdering a Limpopo farm owner
Three men will each serve a life term behind bars for the murder of a Limpopo farm owner in 2022. Image: File The gavel of justice fell for three murderers, despite their attempts to maintain their innocence during trial proceedings. Each will serve a life imprisonment term after being sentenced at the Polokwane High Court this week. The trio, in their criminal deed, handcuffed a minor boy and held him at gunpoint while they ransacked a farmhouse before the farm owner and his partner entered the house and disrupted their act. However, the farm owner was shot and killed after an altercation ensued. The men from Limpopo - Malesela Albert Mangena, 35, of Mabotja Extension 45, Velly Segwale, 35, and Lesiba Solly Segwale, 45, of Mmotong Mokgokong village - faced multiple criminal charges, and the court ordered that their various sentences run concurrently with their life terms. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson, Mashudu Malabi-Dzhangi, confirmed they were convicted on charges of conspiracy to commit robbery with aggravating circumstances, murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, possession of an unlicensed firearm, and possession of unlicensed ammunition. All three pleaded not guilty to the charges. The court further declared the accused unfit to possess firearms under the Firearms Control Act of South Africa. 'The court heard that on 7 October 2022, the trio conspired to commit a robbery at Derdekraal Farm. Upon arrival, they entered the house and held a 15-year-old boy at gunpoint, demanding money and the safe keys. They handcuffed the boy and began looting valuable items. 'When the farm owner, Nicolaas Johannes Janse van Rensburg, and his partner arrived, the accused ordered them to sit down. An altercation ensued, during which Van Rensburg was shot and killed. The accused fled the scene but were later arrested following a thorough police investigation and remained in custody until the finalisation of their trial,' said Malabi-Dzhangi. In aggravation of sentence, State Advocate Norman Makhubele called two key witnesses. Kobus Delange, representing South African commercial farmers, testified about the critical role farmers play in food security, employment, and the national economy. Delange highlighted the alarming rise in violent attacks on farmers. Taleza van Rensburg, the sister of the deceased, provided emotional testimony on the devastating impact of the murder on the family and farmworkers. She noted that livestock had to be sold due to safety concerns, resulting in job losses and the eventual closure of the farm.
