logo
HRF and HRW demands criminal prosecution against police personnel

HRF and HRW demands criminal prosecution against police personnel

The Hindu13 hours ago
The Human Rights Forum (HRF) and the Human Rights Watch (HRW) demanded criminal prosecution of police personnel responsible for the killing of three Maoist armed squad members on the morning of June 18, 2025 in the forest area of Rampachodavaram mandal in Alluri Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh.
In a statement released by HRF on Monday (July 21), they noted that those involved must be booked under relevant provisions of the law, including murder and the SC, ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is imperative that an independent, impartial investigation — either by the CBI or under Supreme Court monitoring — be taken up. It cannot be entrusted to the local police, regular or special, since they are implicated in the crime, as HRF's AP and TS coordination committee member V. Krishna said.
A three-member HRF and HRW team on July 18, 2025 visited the Rampachodavaram Agency area on a fact-finding into the 'encounter'.
'We spoke with Adivasis of several villages in the Vemulakonda and Akuru panchayats as well as residents of Kintukuru, a remote habitation. The version of the police that a combing party of Greyhounds personnel were fired upon by the Maoists and the retaliatory fire in self-defence resulted in the death of three Maoists is a patent falsehood,' Mr. Krishna told The Hindu on Monday.
The rights activists alleged that the three Maoists were ambushed and executed in a burst of one-sided firing by the Greyhounds in the early morning of June 18.
The Maoists had encamped deep in the forest area at a location about 3.5 km to the West of Kintukuru village. The camp is at a place referred locally as 'Oota mamidi' a perennial spring abutting a mango tree. Just behind it is a rivulet that flows East to merge with the Pamuleru vaagu. The three Maoists had camped at that spot for over two weeks.
A large contingent of Greyhounds went via Kintukuru (Akuru panchayat) past midnight of June 17. They evidently had precise detail of the camp location, which they surrounded from two sides to the South. The Greyhounds opened fire at daybreak, killing all three Maoists. There was no exchange of fire — no crossfire — only a targeted execution. The Greyhounds could have easily apprehended the three alive but they chose to kill them instead, the HRF and HRW members alleged.
The three Maoists killed were Gajarla Ravi (of Velishala village in Chityala mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally district, Telangana), who was also a member of the Central Committee of the banned Maoist party, Venkata Ravivarma Chaitanya (of Karakavanipalem in Pendurthi mandal, Visakhapatnam district, A.P.) and Kovvasi Anju, an Adivasi from Bodagubal village, Konta block, Sukma district of Chattisgarh.
The bodies were taken to the Rampachodavaram Area Hospital the same evening, but the post-mortem was deliberately delayed until the next day. Relatives were forced to wait, plead, and it was only after sustained media pressure that they ultimately received the decomposed bodies late on the night of June 19. By the time they were brought home, the bodies were infested with worms, HRF A.P. State general secretary Y Rajesh said.
Since January 2024, over 440 Maoists and unarmed civilians — preponderantly Adivasis in Chattisgarh — have been killed in encounters, many of them allegedly staged, they alleged.
'We call on the Central and State governments in Maoist-affected regions to immediately halt this campaign,' HRW A.P. State president Balu Akkisa said. HRF and HRW are of the opinion that the Maoists' repeated offers to cease hostilities and pursue peace talks warrants the government's utmost seriousness and constructive engagement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cash-at-home row: Justice Varma removal notices handed; LS may initiate
Cash-at-home row: Justice Varma removal notices handed; LS may initiate

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Cash-at-home row: Justice Varma removal notices handed; LS may initiate

MPs submit notices for removal of Justice Varma to LS Speaker NEW DELHI: Notices for the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad HC were submitted in both Houses of Parliament on Monday in what could potentially result in the first instance of a judge being benched for alleged misconduct. While 145 LS members, cutting across party lines, signed the notice, 63 members belonging to different parties made an identical move in RS. Sources said that both the Houses are on the same legal footing in this regard and proceedings are likely to be launched in Lok Sabha. 'Removal of judge will not be completed in current session' According to the Judges (Inquiry) Act, when notices of a motion are submitted on the same day in both Houses, a committee to examine the charges levelled against the judge will be constituted by LS Speaker and RS Chairman. The notable signatories to the LS notice, submitted to Speaker Om Birla, included leader of the opposition Rahul Gandhi, BJP MPs Ravi Shankar Prasad and Anurag Thakur, NCP-SP's Supriya Sule, Congress's K C Venugopal and K Suresh, DMK's T R Baalu, RSP member N K Premachandran and IUML member E T Mohammed Basheer. The notice signed by 63 opposition RS members was submitted to Upper House chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar who, before his shock resignation as vice-president, said he had received a notice for the removal of Justice Varma. 'It has been signed by more than 50 members of the council of states. Thus, it meets the numerical requirement of signing by MPs for setting in motion the process of removal of an HC judge,' Dhankhar said. On law minister Arjun Ram Meghwal's confirmation that a notice has also been submitted in LS, Dhankhar asked the RS secretary general to 'take necessary steps in this direction'. Hours after the opposition move, BJP also collected signatures of its RS members and those from its allies to file a notice. BJP sources said the opposition-sponsored notice in RS prompted the party to act as it did not want to be left out of the exercise in the Upper House. Party sources said they had no idea about the opposition's unilateral move as they cited their own bipartisan exercise in LS seeking signatures from all parties. Govt sources, however, confirmed that the matter will be taken up in LS first. Sources also confirmed that since the petition is set to be referred to a committee, the removal of the judge will not be completed in the current session. According to the Act, no committee shall be constituted unless the motion has been admitted in both Houses. The committee comprising a senior SC judge, a sitting HC chief justice and a distinguished jurist will then probe the charges levelled against Justice Varma and will be asked to come out with a report in three months. As sources indicated that LS is set to witness the motion first, this is the second time that a motion for the removal of a judge is being brought in the House after 32 years. In 1993, Justice V Ramaswami, an SC judge, faced a removal motion in LS.

Train blasts verdict shocking, will move SC, says Fadnavis
Train blasts verdict shocking, will move SC, says Fadnavis

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Train blasts verdict shocking, will move SC, says Fadnavis

CM Devendra Fadnavis, Mumbai train blast (file photo) MUMBAI: CM Devendra Fadnavis expressed shock at the Bombay HC verdict quashing conviction of all 12 accused in the 11/7 train blasts case. 'Bombay HC decision is very shocking. We will challenge it in Supreme Court,' he said. Speaking to the media in Mumbai late on Monday Devendra Fadnavis said, 'The lower court gave a verdict, and in 2006, after the blasts, ATS caught the accused, collected evidence and presented it before the courts. I have not read the full (HC) judgment, but I discussed it with the lawyers and informed them it must be challenged in Supreme Court. We will go to SC at the earliest,' he Kirit Somaiya, who has been advocating for the train blasts survivors, said the CM had assured him that the state would appeal against the verdict. 'We are all shocked and pained by the verdict. I have spoken to CM Fadnavis. He has assured us the govt will seek help of top legal experts and an appeal will be filed as soon as possible,' said Somaiya, who had taken a group of survivors to meet additional chief secretary Iqbal Singh Chahal in Mantralaya Monday. 'The lower court had awarded the death sentence. But there must have been some shortcomings in the investigation conducted in 2006. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo I am convinced SC will give us justice,' Somaiya added. Shiv Sena MP Milind Deora said on X, 'As a Mumbaikar, I cannot accept the verdict of HC. In 2006, I was an MP from Mumbai and went and saw what happened in that terrorist attack. I appeal to Maharashtra govt that they should involve the best lawyers and appeal against the verdict as soon as possible.' Congress MP Varsha Gaikwad said on X, 'Victims of the the train blasts must get justice. The CM should urgently intervene in this matter. An appeal must be filed in SC.' She added, 'I think Maharashtra govt may not have done what we expected in terms of collection of evidence or appointment of public prosecutor.' Rohit Pawar from NCP (SP) said, 'We will have to look at why HC gave this decision and whether the evidence fell short. Did state govt fall short in presenting its position?'

Two Walk Free from Nagpur Jail, Four from Amravati After Acquittal in 2006 Mumbai Train Bombings
Two Walk Free from Nagpur Jail, Four from Amravati After Acquittal in 2006 Mumbai Train Bombings

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Two Walk Free from Nagpur Jail, Four from Amravati After Acquittal in 2006 Mumbai Train Bombings

Nagpur/Amravati: Two of the three prisoners convicted in the 2006 Mumbai suburban train bombings were released from Nagpur Central Jail on Monday evening following their acquittal by the Bombay High Court earlier in the day. Another four convicted in the same case were simultaneously released from Amravati central prison. The men — Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui and Mohammad Ali Alam Sher Sheikh — spent more than 17 years behind bars. A third inmate, Naved Hussain Rashid Hussain Khan, remains in custody in connection with a separate case, jail superintendent Vaibhav Agey confirmed to TOI. The four released from a jail in Amravati, 155km off Nagpur, include Mohammad Majid Mohammad Shafi (51), Jamir Ahmad Latifur Rehman Sheikh (55), Tanveer Ahmad Mohammad Ibrahim Ansari (56) and Sohail Mehmood Sheikh (52). The High Court's acquittal of all 12 accused brought a dramatic end to one of the most closely watched terrorism trials in the country, stemming from the July 11, 2006, bombings on Mumbai's suburban train network. The attacks killed over 180 people and injured more than 800. The case drew criticism over the alleged custodial torture and lack of forensic evidence against the accused. Siddiqui and Khan were sentenced to death, while Sheikh was serving a life term. Another key accused, Kamal Ansari — listed as Accused No. 1 — died in April 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic, while still in Nagpur jail. The released prisoners were arrested in 2006, shortly after the blasts, and remained incarcerated till Monday's judgment. Following the verdict pronounced in Mumbai by Justice Anil Kilor, the new administrative judge of Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court, Siddiqui and Sheikh were released quietly through a side gate, avoiding the waiting media. They were then flown to Mumbai on an Indigo flight from Nagpur airport. Jail authorities confirmed that under updated Supreme Court guidelines, an accused can now be released on the basis of a digitally signed judgment, eliminating the need to wait for a hard copy. "We only need approval from the High Court's local office. Warrants from the sessions court are required only in bail cases," a jail official clarified. During their incarceration, Siddiqui enrolled in a law degree course through Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University and is now in the final semester of his LLB. Khan started a BA course but did not complete it. All three actively used the Right to Information (RTI) Act to file applications challenging prison rules, legal procedures, and lack of academic access. The high court noted in its ruling that all four accused alleged custodial torture at the hands of Mumbai ATS and later retracted their confessions in court. Each of the acquitted individuals was directed to execute a personal bond of ₹25,000 under Section 481 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for future court appearances in the event of an appeal by the state in the Supreme Court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store