US Supreme Court reverses decision to rule on class action question
The justices' order, opens new tab said the court had 'improvidently' agreed in January to hear an appeal by diagnostics testmaker Labcorp, which was challenging a lower court's order that allowed thousands of consumers to sue the company in a class action for damages.
Labcorp's petition focused on a key issue in class actions that implicates billions of dollars: whether judges can certify a class action for damages that includes some members who have not been harmed.
After hearing arguments in the case in April, the Supreme Court took the unsual step on Thursday of dismissing the appeal.
The order did not discuss the merits of the appeal or the court's reasoning. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote separately that the court should have ruled for Labcorp.
Labcorp and a lawyer for the company at law firm Jones Day did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The plaintiffs' lead attorney, Deepak Gupta, in a statement said Labcorp's appeal was procedurally flawed, and called the Supreme Court's order a win for his clients.
'Class actions are a critical tool for ensuring access to the courts,' Gupta said. 'Today's dismissal leaves the law of class actions intact, allowing people to band together to hold powerful corporations accountable for their misconduct.'
The case had attracted many friend-of-the-court briefs at the Supreme Court, as business advocates, legal scholars, antitrust litigators and others tried to influence the justices.
Visually impaired consumers sued Labcorp in 2020 over their inability to use the company's self-service check-in kiosks where a person enters information prior to an appointment for a blood draw or urine screening.
Labcorp said many blind patients either were not aware of the kiosks or had no interest in using them. A federal district court judge in 2022 certified a nationwide class that made claims against Labcorp under the Americans with Disabilities Act and other laws.
In its petition, opens new tab, Labcorp said U.S. appeals courts are divided over whether to certify a class action that includes people who have not been injured.
The possibility that the justices might dismiss the case without ruling on the merits came up at the Supreme Court's argument in April.
Gupta, responding to a question, told the justices that Labcorp could still ask a lower judge to decertify the class action. 'They're not without rights,' Gupta told the court.
The case is Laboratory Corp of America v Davis, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 24-304.
For petitioner: Noel Francisco of Jones Day
For respondent: Deepak Gupta of Gupta Wessler
Read more:
Class action administrators, banks accused of kickback scheme in new lawsuits
Marriott wins US appeals order striking down data breach class action
This Supreme Court case could upend class actions
Lawsuit accuses American Arbitration Association of monopolizing consumer market
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Fed dissenters appeared alone in favoring rate cut at July meeting, minutes show
WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - The two Federal Reserve policymakers who dissented against the U.S. central bank decision's to leave interest rates unchanged last month appear not to have been joined by other policymakers in voicing support for lowering rates at that meeting, a readout of the gathering released on Wednesday showed. "Almost all participants viewed it as appropriate to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 4.25% to 4.50% at this meeting," the minutes of the July 29-30 meeting said. Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller both voted against the decision to leave the benchmark interest rate unchanged, favoring instead a quarter-percentage-point reduction to guard against further weakening of the job market. It was the first time since 1993 that more than one Fed governor dissented against a rate decision. Not even 48 hours after the conclusion of last month's meeting, data from the Labor Department appeared to validate the concerns of Bowman and Waller when it showed far fewer jobs than expected were created in July, a rise in the unemployment rate and a drop in the labor force participation rate to the lowest level since late 2022. More unsettling, though, was an historic downward revision for estimates of employment in the previous two months. That revision erased more than a quarter of a million jobs thought to have been created in May and June and put a hefty dent in the prevailing narrative of a still-strong-job market. The event was so angering to President Donald Trump that he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Data since then, however, has provided some fodder for the camp more concerned that Trump's aggressive tariffs risk rekindling inflation to hold their ground against moving quickly to lower rates. The annual rate of underlying consumer inflation accelerated more than expected in July and was followed by an unexpectedly large jump in prices at the producer level. The minutes showed officials continued an active debate on the effects of tariffs on inflation and the degree of restrictiveness in their policy stance. Several policymakers commented that the current level of the federal funds rate may not be far above its neutral level, where economic activity is neither stimulated nor constrained. Fed policymakers assessed that the effects of higher tariffs had become more apparent in some goods prices but that the overall effect on the economy and inflation remained to be seen, the minutes showed. Looking ahead, participants noted they may face difficult tradeoffs ahead if elevated inflation proved more persistent while the job market outlook weakened. Heading into the release of the minutes, CME's FedWatch tool assigned an 85% probability of a quarter-percentage-point reduction in the Fed's policy rate at the September 16-17 meeting. That rate has been unchanged since December. The minutes were released just two days before a highly anticipated speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell at the annual economic symposium near Jackson Hole, Wyoming, which is hosted by the Kansas City Fed. Powell's keynote speech on Friday morning - set to be his last such address as head of the central bank, with his term expiring next May - could show whether he has joined ranks with those sensing the time has come for steps to shield the job market from further weakening or if he remains in league with those more wary of inflation in light of its moves away from the Fed's 2% target. The lack of rate cuts since Trump returned to the White House has agitated the Republican president, and he regularly lashes out at Powell for not engineering them. Trump is already in the process of screening possible successors to Powell. After the unexpected resignation earlier this month of one of the seven Fed governors, Trump has a chance to put his imprint on the central bank soon. The president has nominated Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran to fill the seat recently vacated by former Fed Governor Adriana Kugler, a term that expires at the end of January. It is unclear whether Miran will win Senate confirmation before the Fed's next meeting. On Wednesday Trump demanded that Fed Governor Lisa Cook resign from the central bank over allegations of wrongdoing connected to mortgages on properties she owns in Georgia and Michigan.
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Thoma Bravo hails tech's ‘show me the money' era
TORONTO, Aug 20 (Reuters Breakingviews) - The cycle of technology fads is brutal. Once the darlings of public markets, given wide latitude to chase unprofitable growth, cloud software developers now seem pedestrian next to the incredible promise of artificial intelligence. Private equity firm Thoma Bravo's $11.2 billion mooted deal to buy, opens new tab human resources application provider Dayforce (DAY.N), opens new tab, disclosed on Wednesday, signals the end result of this shift: accept being a bit boring and transition into a cashflow machine, or become a target. Interest-rate hikes beginning in 2022 challenged the industry's 'expand at all costs' mantra: burning cash became more expensive, forcing a retrenchment that trimmed growth and valuations. Some firms have since regained speed, steadily beating, opens new tab Wall Street's revenue expectations by growing margins since early 2024, according to Altimeter Capital. Valuations, though, are still in the dumps. It might be a matter of measuring up to the next big thing. Bessemer Venture Partners research, opens new tab shows that, on average, private cloud software firms have taken about 7 years to hit $100 million in annual recurring revenue. Successful AI startups are crossing that threshold in just 4 years, or as little as 18 months for particularly hot breakthroughs. Just compare the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, which is down 10% year-to-date, to an exchange-traded fund tracking the AI-exposed Magnificent Seven stocks, up 7%. If you can't impress with growth, the next best thing is to at least throw off cash. Here, Dayforce has fallen behind its peers. The company is expected to achieve a free cash flow margin of 13.7% in the financial year ending this December, according to Visible Alpha. Rivals Paycom Software and Paylocity should notch margins of 18% and over 20%, respectively. Little wonder that Dayforce's stock had fallen over 25% thus far in 2025 before news of a potential sale arrived. Thoma Bravo's mooted $70 per share offer would represent a respectable 32% premium, valuing the company at a little over 6 times last year's revenue. That roughly matches the average multiple paid in deals across the industry in the second quarter, according to, opens new tab Software Equity Group data. Buyout barons can benefit from software investors' short attention spans. TD Cowen analysts reckon that Thoma Bravo could plausibly increase Dayforce's cash flow margin to over 20% while maintaining low-double-digit topline growth. If it can subsequently exit after five years at a multiple of between 6 and 7 times revenue, an average of where peers Automatic Data Processing and Paychex trade, its annualized rate of return could hit 24%, Breakingviews calculates. Dayforce struggled to meet public markets' 'show me the money' challenge. Private equity is probably happy to do the job.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Nasdaq drops for 2nd day as AI jitters rattle tech investors
NEW YORK, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Tech stocks led declines on Wall Street, with worries about AI spurring debates about its future. The Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.2% over the last two days, the worst two-day fall since August 1st. The semiconductor index was down 1.4% (.SOX), opens new tab, while the information technology sector (.SPLRCT), opens new tab was the second biggest decliner in the S&P 500, sliding 1% on Wednesday. Market participants attributed the selloff to a range of factors including a technical pullback after driving much of the stock market's recovery in the weeks after the April 2nd "Liberation Day." Aside from AI concerns, analysts also cited deepening fears of government interference with companies, as the Trump administration looked into taking equity stakes in chip companies such as Intel in exchange for grants under the CHIPS Act. COMMENTS: CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, CO-HEAD OF DERIVATIVES STRATEGY, SUSQUEHANNA, PENNSYLVANIA: "I think it's more likely this is an overstretched pause than the beginning of a new rotation. The most notable trade midday was a seller of 20k+ Dec 100 puts as SPX rebounded sharply, suggesting investors are taking advantage of the pullback via selling puts rather than signaling a wholesale shift. For now, flows point to taking advantage of the sell-off as opposed to a clear reallocation of capital into new sectors." CHRISTOPHER VECCHIO, HEAD OF FUTURES & FOREX, TASTYLIVE, NEW YORK: "Tech stocks are sliding as investors pare back risk ahead of the Fed's Jackson Hole meeting, with traders reluctant to chase valuations higher into a Powell speech that will likely fall short of promising a September rate cut." "Fresh concerns over the durability of the AI boom, after an MIT study highlighted weak corporate returns and comments from OpenAI's Sam Altman cited excess buildout in the space, have added to the pressure." "If it's the start of a rotation, it's less of a 'growth shifting to value' or 'smalls caps over mega caps' shift and more of a 'classic defensive' posturing around economic weakness: bonds, gold, healthcare, and consumer staples are leading the way. If there was a time of the year for a pullback, it's now: over the past 10- and 20-years, the S&P 500 has averaged losses of -1.7% and -1.2%, respectively, during the August to October window." ART HOGAN, MARKET STRATEGIST, B. RILEY WEALTH MANAGEMENT, BOSTON: "Technology in general is up 40% from its April lows, and the group clearly got ahead of itself. Also, if there's anything to the market consensus that we'll see a Fed rate cut, then there will be room for other things to work as well – and there are 493 other stocks in the S&P 500 that are lagging the Mag 7 right now. So I think there's a bit of a rotation." "I don't know how long it will last, but if it does keep going, well, August and September (are) the weak period seasonally in which it could do so. Also, there are some people who are beginning to question the pace at which we need to be chasing AI capital spending. If you put all this together: when technology stocks take a breather, this is what it looks like. Nvidia and other blue chips in the group are seeing relatively steady drawdowns, but things on the speculative edge are clearly seeing more selling pressure. Palantir has gone from trading at 200 times sales to 150 times its sales, for instance." MICHAEL ASHLEY SCHULMAN, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, RUNNING POINT, EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA: "Tuesday' s U.S. technology stock swoon and its continuation today looks like multiple compression meeting a little margin math, but the timing makes it hard to ignore the new elephant in the server room. Names that had been sprinting on AI dreams pulled back hard, with Nvidia, AMD, and Palantir Technologies among the drags." "DeepSeek's update landed on Tuesday represents a serious cocktail of capability and availability and traders well remember the original harsh tech-market pullback DeepSeek caused when it was first broadly recognized in January of this year." BRIAN JACOBSEN, CHIEF ECONOMIST, ANNEX WEALTH MANAGEMENT, BROOKFIELD, WISCONSIN: "When you go from rally to rout, it shows how vulnerable the names were to even a scent of bad news. It could have been (Sam)Altman's valuation warning and then Meta restructuring its AI division threw fuel on the fire." SETH HICKLE, PORTFOLIO MANAGER, MINDSET WEALTH MANAGEMENT, INDIANAPOLIS: "I think we are starting to see a little bit of rotation. It's always healthy to see a little bit of a pullback to that way, the markets can kind of get re-oriented." "To me, tech was overbought. Maybe it was justified, but it could have been kind of a buy on the rumor, sell it on the news type of thing where we had tech runup into earnings. We had really good earnings, and now it's kind of natural for the market just to sell some of that good news." "I wouldn't be surprised if we see a little bit of rotation into some smaller cap or into healthcare names, or consumer staples. And to me, that's kind of a healthy rotation. But honestly, I don't believe it will be a longer-term trend. It'll probably be a shorter-term trend. I think we'll see money flow back into tech in the next couple months." PHIL BLANCATO, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, LADENBURG THALMANN ASSET MANAGEMENT, NEW YORK: "It's much more about profit-taking and temporary rebalancing here. If you get a Federal Reserve cut or a mention of it on Friday, this will reverse pretty quickly, but this is a lot to do with names pushed up to really lofty levels and profit taking across the board." STEVE SOSNICK, CHIEF STRATEGIST, INTERACTIVE BROKERS, CONNECTICUT: "The tech-led selloff that we saw yesterday resumed this morning. That said, dip buyers stepped in around 11am EDT and we've now recovered about half our losses. It's somewhat inevitable to expect them to arrive promptly, though it did take a bit longer than usual." "I believe that some of the early declines are related to profit-taking and risk squaring ahead of (Fed Chair Jerome)Powell's speech on Friday. That is merely rotation and relatively benign, though it gets magnified because of megacap tech stocks' heavy weighting in key indices. But some of the ferocity of the early drop was related to the President's calls for Lisa Cook's resignation." "Note that futures broke through their pre-market lows shortly after he posted on Truth Social. Markets were not perturbed that there are inquiries into the propriety of her personal mortgage applications. She gets a presumption of innocence until proven guilty, like any other person. But when the President weighed in even before the process began, then it raised the specter of politicization. That put markets on the wrong foot early, and negative momentum ruled again – at least for a couple of hours." ADAM SARHAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, 50 PARK INVESTMENTS, NEW YORK: "To see a little pullback here after a big move up is perfectly normal and healthy. If the selling gets worse then you'll see a rotation out of tech and into undervalued areas of the market like biotech stocks or healthcare stocks or small cap stocks because those areas have not participated this year."
