logo
Julie Etchingham ends Garrick Club application after drawn-out process

Julie Etchingham ends Garrick Club application after drawn-out process

The Guardian3 days ago

Julie Etchingham has withdrawn her candidacy to join the Garrick Club, uncomfortable with the protracted process of being vetted by the London club's membership of 1,500 men.
The broadcast journalist said she would not comment on her decision, but she is understood to have been uneasy at the level of hostility displayed by men opposed to the admission of women during a candidacy lunch at the club, when members have the opportunity to question prospective members.
One member said he understood that with 'hardly any women being elected, it is very uncomfortable to walk into a room full of men scrutinising (and ogling) you'.
Only three women have been admitted in the year since members decided to drop the club's men-only rule last May, 193 years after the club was founded. The comedian Matt Lucas was one of six men elected last month alongside one woman, Celia Imrie, who joins fellow actors Judi Dench and Siân Phillips, named as members last year.
Several women from the first batch of female nominees for membership have expressed frustration at the club's 'half-hearted' steps towards admitting women.
After decades of internal wrangling over the issue, 60% of members voted last May to confirm that women could be admitted to the club. But none of the seven women nominated as prospective candidates last year, all of whom occupy senior roles in journalism, law or academia, have yet been voted in as members.
One woman whose candidacy is being considered by the club described the vote to admit women as a cynical public relations gambit, designed to allow the club to continue functioning quietly as essentially a men-only club. She said she found the vetting process absurd.
'We're all being made to feel we need to beg to join; most of us don't give a toss whether we join or not and think they should be making every effort to persuade us,' she said, asking not to be named to avoid alienating her sponsors at the club.
She said it was clear that men who opposed women's membership were continuing to fight against the swift admission of women. 'It's frankly ridiculous and embarrassing. What are they scared of?'
The actor Juliet Stevenson said she had heard nothing further from the club since she received a phone call from a member early in 2024 asking her if she would like to be nominated. She was uncertain about whether her candidacy had been dropped.
'I was asked if my name could be cited as a potential candidate and I agreed, but since then I've heard nothing more,' she said. 'I haven't set foot in the place. It wouldn't surprise me if they've decided they don't want a troublemaker like me in there.'
One recent visitor to the club said the vote to admit women had had no impact on the atmosphere there, with just two women in a dining room full of approximately 50 men. A cohort of men who remain opposed to the rule change have set up a WhatsApp group named Status Quo where they continue to protest against the admission of women.
The classicist Mary Beard, the former home secretary Amber Rudd, the Channel 4 News presenter Cathy Newman and the Labour peer Ayesha Hazarika were among the first nominees to join the club, along with Stevenson, Margaret Casely-Hayford, who was chair of Shakespeare's Globe and was chancellor of Coventry University until last year, and Elizabeth Gloster, a former appeal court judge. None of them have yet been approved for membership.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Another female prospective candidate said she understood that there was a 'dead man's shoes' element to the process of becoming a member (new members can only be appointed when old members die) but she hoped that the club would soon vote in some female lawyers, to balance the high concentration of senior barristers, judges and solicitors at the club. The club has consistently said it would not fast-track female members, stressing that women may have to wait three or four years for approval.
'It would be a helpful change if they brought in some female members of the legal profession; it would demonstrate the keenness of members to modernise themselves,' she said.
A string of high-profile names resigned from the Garrick last year after the Guardian published a long list of senior figures from the civil service, politics, the arts and the judiciary who were members of a club that had repeatedly blocked the admission of women since the 1960s.
Listed alongside the king were the then deputy prime minister, dozens of members of the House of Lords and 10 MPs, as well as heads of influential thinktanks, law firms and private equity companies, academics, senior journalists, the head of the Royal Opera House and the head of the Independent Press Standards Organisation.
The head of the MI6, Richard Moore, and the then head of the civil service resigned from the club after deciding that membership was incompatible with their organisations' commitment to improving diversity. Several judges also left the club.
The Garrick club did not respond to a request for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'
Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'

BBC News

time9 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'

Campaigners have welcomed a council's decision to scrap its plans for close to 1,000 homes on a peatland site in Cheshire as the "first step to victory".Cheshire East Council has rowed back on the proposal and asked officers to look at alternative uses for Danes Moss in Macclesfield, which could include restoring the Eccles, the chair of the Danes Moss Trust, said he felt pressure from the campaign group had led to the decision and there was "no justification to build there". Cheshire East opposition councillor, Conservative Chris O'Leary, told a meeting of the authority it was right to "reset the council's plan". The original proposals for the site, known as the South Macclesfield Development Area, included 950 homes, a supermarket and a link East Council owns 55% of the site, while Barratt Homes owns approximately 41%.Campaigners had been calling for no building there because of the amount of peatland, although it has been earmarked for development since 1997.A report ahead of the council meeting said the proposals to build on the land "cannot be fully reconciled" with the council's peat and carbon on Cheshire East Council's economy and growth committee voted on Tuesday to withdraw the homes application and approved plans to review include selling the land rethinking the development plans, or allowing for a "nature-led" recovery, an option added after a cross-party amendment. During the debate, O'Leary said: "Anyone who's visited Dane's Moss will know what an incredibly special place it is and it's quite right we reset the council's plans".The withdrawal was needed to "consider all the available options and make the right decisions for the right reasons for the future of this incredible site," he Labour's Anna Burton said that doing nothing was "not an option"."The wetland peat is drying out, so whatever decisions are made long term doing nothing is not an option," she councillors voted in favour of the withdrawing the application, with two Eccles told BBC Politics North West that he hoped councillors had "seen sense that there's no justification on earth to damage or build on peatlands".He said: "It's good news that the original plans are not going to go ahead but we still feel there should be zero development on this site because of the huge global importance of peatlands."James Melling of the Cheshire Wildlife Trust, which has a nature reserve on the border of the site, said he was "delighted" with the said: "I think it's testament to the hard work of all the campaigners involved and Save Danes Moss have been fantastic." See more Cheshire stories from the BBC and follow BBC North West on X. For more local politics coverage, BBC Politics North West is on BBC One on Sunday at 10:00am and on BBC iPlayer.

Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine
Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine

BBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine

A woman has vowed to fight a fine she was given for setting up a table in Leicester city centre while campaigning against city council Rawling was given a £100 penalty under new rules to prevent anti-social behaviour on Saturday 31 72-year-old, from Leicester, said she believed the fine had been issued to prevent political campaigning and she would rather go to court than council said its new public spaces protection order (PSPO) introduced in April does not restrict free speech and that Mrs Rawling had been fined for putting an unauthorised structure on the highway. Mrs Rawling, a member of the Socialist Party, said she was not causing a nuisance or blocking the highway. "I accept the PSPO can be needed to deal with people on e-bikes, noisy speakers or street drinkers," she said."But this was a small camping table which we had for leaflets and so people could sign a petition."I don't think we were in anybody's way. There's plenty of space. We weren't being a nuisance."I think this was political - we were asked to take it down because we were campaigning about council cuts."It was all very amicable. The warden asked me to take it down. I said I would not and he issued a fine."I'm not going to pay it on principle, and if I have to go to court, I will."Mrs Rawling said she was opposing cuts to public services at the city council, including potential closures of community centres, and public sector job council said the penalty for breaching a PSPO could rise to £1,000 if the matter goes to court for prosecution. 'Noticeably improved' Campaigners previously wrote to Leicester's mayor Sir Peter Soulsby seeking assurances they are exempt from the PSPO.A number of groups including unions and political parties said they feared the order could "constitute an unjustified limit on their democratic rights" as the ban also includes "unauthorised structures" such as banners, stalls and told the BBC: "There's absolutely nothing in the PSPO that prevents people from going out and trying to persuade people on political matters - if they do it without a table or gazebo or loud speaker."A council spokesperson said: "The PSPO does not restrict freedom of speech, but it does restrict the nuisance of amplifiers, gazebos and other structures that more than 1,100 respondents to our consultation told us negatively impacted their experience of Leicester city centre."Many groups have been respectful of this so far and, as a result, the environment in the city centre is noticeably improved.""This group had put up a table, in breach of the public spaces protection order (PSPO) that covers the city centre. "One of our wardens asked them to take down the table and advised that if they didn't, they would be issued with a fixed penalty notice. "They refused to take it down and so a fine was issued."The council said three fixed penalty notices were issued in May under the new PSPO rules - all relating to unauthorised use of unauthorised structures on the highway.

'False bin collection leaflet delivered in Birmingham is insulting'
'False bin collection leaflet delivered in Birmingham is insulting'

BBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'False bin collection leaflet delivered in Birmingham is insulting'

Leaflets informing Birmingham residents about changes to their bin collections, in the middle of a bin strike, left them feeling insulted and notices, informing people about a switch to fortnightly general waste collections and changes to recycling, should have gone to people living in nearby they also went to people in Hockley, Birmingham, who have had rubbish mount their pavements several times since the city's all-out bin strike begun in March and not had a recycling collection since Birmingham City Council and Sandwell Council said the leaflets had been sent in error. The changes only relate to Sandwell, the council added. It comes as Unite the union announced the strike could last until December after members voted to continue industrial action."It's just insult to injury, I am not amused," resident Judith Warley said."I feel a bit taunted. We have been suffering all sort of hassle because of the rubbish. "I have friends who live in Sandwell and their rubbish collections are working really well, and here we are in the middle of chaos." Ms Warley has previously been unable to get her mobility scooter along the street because of bin bags blocking the are Birmingham bin workers on strike?Bin strike exposes divide between rich and poorOn-and-off strike action began on 6 January with 12 walkouts planned across four months. The union began an indefinite all-out strike on 11 have been held under the chairmanship of concilliatory firm Acas, but the dispute has remained in Message, who lives on Brookfield Road, said: "It's been pretty depressing to be honest because we never know if we are going to get a collection and the rubbish has piled up, it was really horrific. "I was really surprised to get the leaflet from Sandwell, it turns out it was wrongly delivered. "There is no communication, that is my bug bear, we don't know what is going on. " Mr Message added. The strike started when the union claimed about 170 workers faced losing up to £8,000 a year - but the council disputed the has since escalated into a dispute about a decision to remove a Waste Recycling and Collection Officer (WRCO) The Union said on Wednesday that 97% of those who voted backed continued strike action, on a 75% turnout."The decision makers at Birmingham council need to get in the room and put forward an acceptable offer," said Unite general secretary Sharon Graham, warning strikes would continue for "as long as it takes".A council spokesperson said it had made a "fair and reasonable offer" and that it remained committed to resolving the added that it had urged the union to put that offer to its Council said it used "the most cost-effective approach to reach the vast majority of Sandwell households, although this means some leaflets have unfortunately been delivered to addresses just outside Sandwell."To help avoid confusion, we have clearly stated on the front of the leaflet that the changes relate to Sandwell's bin collections." Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store