logo
Rep. Jerry Nadler demands probe after DHS handcuffs his aide

Rep. Jerry Nadler demands probe after DHS handcuffs his aide

Axios4 days ago

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Monday he will seek a congressional investigation after a Department of Homeland Security officer handcuffed one of his staffers at his office.
Why it matters: The incident — part of a series of confrontations with federal immigration authorities — has further escalated tensions between congressional Democrats and the Trump administration.
What happened: DHS officers handcuffed one of Nadler's aides at his district office in New York City last Wednesday and demanded entry to the office, accusing them of "harboring rioters," video of the incident shows.
Nadler said in a CNN interview that DHS was "upset that some of my staff members were watching them grab immigrants emerging from an immigration court in the same building" and "invited some of the observers up to my office."
"They then came up to the office and demanded entrance. One of my staff members said, 'You can't come in here, you need a warrant.' They said, 'No, we don't need a warrant,' which is incorrect," Nadler added.
The staffer was later released and no charges were filed.
The other side: A DHS spokesperson said the officers "responded to information that protesters were present" in the office and "went to the location to ensure the safety and wellbeing of those present."
"Upon arrival, officers were granted entry and encountered four individuals. Officers identified themselves and explained their intent to conduct a security check, however, one individual became verbally confrontational and physically blocked access to the office."
The officers detained the staffer "for the purpose of completing the security check," the spokesperson said.
Driving the news: Nadler said on CNN that he will send House Judiciary Committee chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) a letter requesting an investigation and hearing into the matter.
He said he wants Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem to have to testify about it.
"The tactics were totally unacceptable," Nadler said, adding that the investigation's scope should be "generally of [immigration officials'] tactics, which are, frankly, very threatening to liberty."
A spokesperson for Jordan did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Zoom out: Democrats have been ramping up their oversight of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement facilities after Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was charged with assaulting ICE officers last month.
McIver and other Democrats have accused DHS of pursuing a flimsy prosecution in an attempt to intimidate lawmakers and discourage oversight.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican Gets Good Sign in New Jersey Governor's Race Poll
Republican Gets Good Sign in New Jersey Governor's Race Poll

Newsweek

time26 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Republican Gets Good Sign in New Jersey Governor's Race Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli received a potentially good sign about his favorability in a new poll of Garden State voters days ahead of the primary election. Newsweek has contacted Ciattarelli's and Representative Mikie Sherrill's campaigns for comment via email. Why It Matters New Jersey voters are set to head to the polls next Tuesday to pick party nominees for the gubernatorial race scheduled for November. The competitiveness of the election could hinge on which candidates prevail in the primaries, and the race has major implications for both parties. The election may indicate whether Democrats are winning back key voter groups that shifted right in the 2024 presidential race—such as young adults and Latinos—or whether Republicans can continue winning those groups even though President Donald Trump's approval has dropped since January. What To Know A new poll conducted by SurveyUSA found that Ciattarelli, who is viewed as a strong favorite to win the GOP nomination next week, is viewed favorably by a similar percentage of New Jersey voters as Sherrill, the Democrat who has held a narrow but consistent lead in primary election polls. However, Sherrill is viewed unfavorably by a smaller percent of voters. The poll found that 40 percent of voters viewed Ciattarelli favorably, while 41 percent viewed Sherrill favorably. Meanwhile, 36 percent viewed Ciattarelli unfavorably, while 29 percent viewed Sherrill unfavorably. Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli at an election watch party in Bridgewater, New Jersey, on November 2, 2021. Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli at an election watch party in Bridgewater, New Jersey, on November 2, percent of respondents were unfamiliar with Ciattarelli, while 30 percent were unfamiliar with Sherrill. The poll surveyed 576 likely voters from May 28 to 30 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 6.1 percentage points. Ciattarelli was the GOP's nominee in the 2021 gubernatorial race, when he came close to unseating Democratic Governor Phil Murphy, losing by about 3 percentage points. Independent polling on the general election hasn't been released, but Republicans are hoping to build on the increased support Trump saw in the state in November. While Joe Biden won the state easily in 2020, securing victory by 16 percentage points, Democratic support collapsed in the state last year. Then-Vice President Kamala Harris carried the state by only 6 points—the closet margin since 2004. Shifts in heavily Latino areas in the north of the state, as well as eroding Democratic support in South Jersey, contributed to the shift. The latest head-to-head poll of the Democratic primary showed Sherrill leading the Democratic side with 28 percent of the vote, followed by Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop and Representative Josh Gottheimer each at 11 percent. Emerson College conducted the poll between May 11 and 13 among 386 likely voters. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percentage points. What People Are Saying Democratic Representative Mikie Sherrill's campaign manager, Alex Ball, told Newsweek in May: "New Jersey saw in the debate why Mikie Sherrill continues to lead in every poll: her lifelong commitment to service, strong record getting big things done and her ability to beat Trump Republicans at every turn. Republicans are afraid to go up against Mikie in November because she knows how to win and then deliver for New Jerseyans." Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli said on Fox & Friends First on Tuesday: "We're in a very commanding position in the primary. We're not taking anything for granted. We'll finish strong over the last week; early voting does start today. We'll be up and down the state once again delivering our message that there's only one Republican who can win in November, and that's why I'm honored to have President Trump's complete and total endorsement. I really am. Having his faith, trust and confidence. He knows New Jersey is in play." What Happens Next After the June 10 primary, voters are set to head to the polls for the general election on November 4. The Cook Political Report classifies the race as leaning Democrat—meaning it is "considered competitive," but the Democrats have "an advantage."

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Allow Education Department Firings
Trump Asks Supreme Court to Allow Education Department Firings

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Allow Education Department Firings

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump asked the US Supreme Court to let him resume dismantling the Department of Education, seeking to lift a lower court order that requires the reinstatement of as many as 1,400 workers. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. The emergency filing Friday challenges a federal district judge's conclusion that Trump's effort to shut down the department would leave it unable to perform duties required under US law, including managing federal student loans, aiding state education programs and enforcing civil rights law. The filing marks the 17th time since Trump's inauguration that his administration has asked the Supreme Court for help as he seeks to implement a far-reaching agenda through executive orders and other unilateral steps. It's the first Supreme Court clash to squarely address Trump's authority to dismantle entities created by Congress, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the US Agency for International Development and the US Institute of Peace. Education Secretary Linda McMahon announced March 11 that the department was cutting half its staff through a reduction in force. Trump followed with a March 20 executive order that said McMahon should 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education.' The effort is being challenged in two lawsuits, one brought primarily by states led by Democrats and the other filed by several Massachusetts public school systems and unions. US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston ruled in May that the personnel cuts would 'likely cripple the department.' He said the challengers were likely to succeed in showing that Trump lacked power to effectively dissolve the department by getting rid of its employees, closing regional offices and moving programs to other federal agencies. 'A department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all,' Joun wrote. 'This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself.' The Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday refused to block Joun's ruling, paving the way for Trump's Supreme Court filing. Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom What America's Pizza Economy Is Telling Us About the Real One The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Musk-Trump alliance craters
Musk-Trump alliance craters

USA Today

time31 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Musk-Trump alliance craters

Musk-Trump alliance craters | The Excerpt On Friday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer has the latest on the feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Plus, Josh takes a look at how the feud might end. Here's what you need to know about this week's travel ban. The Department of Homeland Security is ending its Quiet Skies surveillance program. The Supreme Court sides with a straight woman in a 'reverse discrimination' case. USA TODAY National Correspondent Elizabeth Weise tells us about invasive Asian needle ants. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending an email to podcasts@ Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text. Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here Taylor Wilson: Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson, and today is Friday, June 6th, 2025. This is The Excerpt. Today, Musk and Trump take their feud to a new level. Plus, details on this week's travel ban. And let's talk about invasive ants. ♦ Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's beef reached a new level of personal jabs yesterday. I caught up with USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer for a look at their ramped-up feud. Hello, sir. Josh Meyer: How's it going, Taylor? Taylor Wilson: Good, good, Josh. Thanks for hopping on, on this. We've been keeping a close eye on this alliance between Trump and Musk for weeks, and now this relationship really seems to be blowing up. What's the latest as Trump threatens to cut billions in federal contracts with Musk's companies? Josh Meyer: Well, it's blowing up in spectacular fashion, Taylor. Trump has threatened to end billions of dollars in federal contracts that Musk's companies have or have had with the government. He's also seeking billions more in contracts through SpaceX, through his AI company, and so forth. Trump, in one of his tweets during this escalating feud, said, "The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts." He said, "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it". Of course, Musk replied, and it kept escalating from there. Taylor Wilson: Absolutely. We'll get to some of those escalations. He also responded to this threat over government contracts by saying SpaceX will pull back from some of its work, and we know SpaceX does a lot of work for the government. What can you tell us here? Josh Meyer: Musk said he's already going to be decommissioning their Dragon spacecraft, which does payload deliveries to the International Space Station. Musk has already taken steps, he says, to pull back some of the deliveries from his contracts, including to NASA and the Defense Department. I'm not sure he can do that. I assume there's going to be some lawsuits flying from both of these guys in terms of this, but this is really like two junior high school kids that break up, and they're just getting very personal and very nasty, and they're just threatening all sorts of things and won't talk to each other. Who knows where this is going to end? Taylor Wilson: Speaking of nasty, I know Musk has even alleged that Trump's name is listed in classified files related to Jeffrey Epstein. What did he say here? What happened here? Josh Meyer: Basically, Musk said, "Time to drop the really big bomb. Real Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day DJT." I mean, it's really getting quite nasty here. Taylor Wilson: Yeah. Well, Musk's various companies have benefited from billions in government contracts over the past two decades. We've touched on some of this. What would this Trump threat to pull billions mean for Elon's businesses if came to fruition? Josh Meyer: A lot of the billions in subsidies came in the early years. I mean, Tesla got hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars of subsidies early on. We're at the point now where, I think, it's 18 different companies or entities from within the Musk empire are getting some federal money, and it's not that easy to just pull them back. I mean, Trump is threatening to do this, but SpaceX delivers a lot of payloads to the International Space Station. It helps get satellites up into space. It's interwoven within the fabric of the US government in ways that would be hard to disentangle. I'm not sure how much of this is actually going to happen, but I can say that there's people that are watching X, as it's now called very, very carefully to see how much more they escalate. I know that there's people acting as intermediaries to try to get both of them to calm down, but we don't really know where this is going to end. Taylor Wilson: As you write, Josh, the political battlefield is littered with the scorched remains of some of Trump's previous allies who picked a fight with him or were on the receiving end of one. I'll ask you, could Musk be next? Josh Meyer: Well, I think he already is next. The question is how much. I talked to John Bolton, who is Trump's national security adviser, and that was fired by Trump/faced Trump's vindictiveness, too. I mean, he wrote a book called In The Room Where It Happened. Trump tried to get it shut down before it could be published, claiming that he was using classified materials. Tried to get him prosecuted. What Bolton said about the current spat, "It's going to end up like most mud fights do, with both of them worse off. The question is how much worse the country is going to be off as a result." Taylor Wilson: All right. I'm sure this is not the last of this. Josh Meyer covers domestic security for USA TODAY. Thanks, Josh. Josh Meyer: Thanks, Taylor. ♦ Taylor Wilson: We're learning more about President Trump's travel ban this week. On Wednesday, he signed the sweeping proclamation that will bar or partially restrict entry to the US from nearly 20 countries, citing national security concerns. The ban prohibits travel into the US for foreign nationals from Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Haiti, Iran, and many other countries, and he issued travel suspensions for a number of other nations. The White House emphasized that the ban targets countries with high visa overstay rates and that are deficient with regards to screening and vetting. There are similarities to Trump's controversial 2017 ban, which targeted several majority-Muslim nations and faced widespread protests and legal challenges. Former president Joe Biden repealed that ban in 2021, calling it a stain on our national conscience. This latest ban includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, current visa holders, and certain visa categories, and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. Though, those qualifications were not specified. ♦ The Department of Homeland Security is ending its controversial Quiet Skies surveillance program for airline travelers, saying yesterday that since its existence, it has failed to stop a single terrorist attack while costing US taxpayers $200 million a year. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that the program had been improperly politicized and that under the guise of national security, the Quiet Skies watch list was used to target political opponents and benefit political allies. Noem said the Transportation Security Administration will maintain its critical aviation and security vetting functions, and the Trump administration will return TSA "to its true mission of being laser-focused on the safety and security of the traveling public". Quiet Skies was revealed in 2018 by the Boston Globe, which said the program deployed air marshals who fly armed and undercover to thwart terrorists, to track dozens of suspicious travelers daily. Lawmakers and civil rights groups have long criticized the program for potentially masking racial or religious discrimination in deciding who to focus on. Part of identifying suspicious travelers had relied on noticing behaviors like fidgeting or having a penetrating stare, which government watchdogs and some lawmakers have criticized in the past as an unreliable basis for probable cause. ♦ The Supreme Court agreed yesterday that a worker faced a higher hurdle to sue her employer as a straight woman than if she'd been gay. The unanimous decision could trigger a wave of reverse discrimination lawsuits, and it came amid a national backlash from some against DEI programs. The justices rejected a lower court's ruling that Marlean Ames could not sue the Ohio Department of Youth Services because she had failed to provide background circumstances showing the department was that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority. US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit said back in 1981 that, while white people are covered by the Civil Rights Act, it defied common sense to suggest that the promotion of a Black employee justifies an inference of prejudice against white coworkers in our present society, but the law itself, which bans discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, does not set different thresholds for members of minority and majority groups. You can read more with the link in today's show notes. ♦ Asian needle ants are spreading across the country. I spoke with USA TODAY National Correspondent Elizabeth Weise, to learn more about this invasive species. Thanks for joining me, Beth. Elizabeth Weise: Once more into the scary creatures beat. Taylor Wilson: Well, I love the scary creatures beat, Beth. Let's start with the basics, though. What are these ants? Elizabeth Weise: They're called Asian needle ants, and the problem with them is they look like a lot of other ants, so there's no way that they're Asian needle ants until they sting you. Then, you know. Taylor Wilson: Well, all right. What does happen when they sting you? Elizabeth Weise: They are carnivorous. They hunt prey, especially termites. They love termites. They're used to attacking. If they sting you... They're not very aggressive, but if you reach into where they live, they will sting you. First, you feel this intense sharp pain like somebody poked you with a needle. That lasts for a couple of minutes, and then it fades and you're like, "Cool, I'm fine." Then, five minutes later, you feel the same thing again as if you'd just been stung but you hadn't. The pain continues to reoccur in the same place. It disappears. It comes back. It disappears. It comes back. One of the researchers I spoke with said, for him, that pattern lasts for about two hours, but he has talked to people for whom the reoccurring pain can go up to two days. That's not the only thing. These ants also... They can cause severe allergic reactions in some people and in about 1% of the people that get stung, they can cause anaphylactic shock, which can kill you. Taylor Wilson: Well, in terms of how they got here and how they've spread in the US, tell us about this mystery behind this. Elizabeth Weise: It's a bit of a mystery. They were first recorded in the US in Georgia in 1932, but they must have been here before that because two years later in '34, they were being seen in three different states, mostly in the southeast. They live in mulch and loamy soil. It's thought they probably came over in the root ball of trees that were being imported. They're originally from Asia. They occur natively in China, Japan, and Korea. There's thought that they might've come over perhaps in the flowering cherry trees, the ones that we just had the blooms of and that are popular in Washington, that were very popular at the turn of the 20th century. A lot of them were imported from Japan. At that time, trees were transported with soil around their roots. We don't do that anymore, partly because it's dangerous because they can carry things with them. Taylor Wilson: I guess you don't want heaps of these in your back or front yard. What can folks listening at home do about these ants? Elizabeth Weise: Yeah. There's not a lot you can do to prevent their arrival. They're now in more than 20 states, mostly in the southeast, but they've been seeing as far north as Connecticut/as far south as Florida. If you leave them alone, they will be fine. They will not bother you. They're not like fire ants that will go on the rampage. But they do like to live in mulch and loam, so if you're out gardening... Or they also like to live in rotting logs, so if you've got a wood pile and you pick that up/up a log, you might disturb a nest. They're a little hard to deal with because they don't lay pheromone trails. Most ants lay a pheromone trail, and so, one, you can see where the nest is. You follow it back. And two, you can disrupt the pheromone trail and stop them. These don't. You have to look to see where their nest is. Then, you can put out bait. Protein bait works really well. That will kill off the nest. But all the entomologists I spoke with said, "Don't try and do just widespread spraying because it's not going to work because they're underground, and you'll kill a lot of things that you want in your garden and you probably won't kill the ants." Taylor Wilson: And they are invasive, right? These ants, Beth? What have they done ecologically? Elizabeth Weise: I mean, that's the other problem, is that like a lot of invasive species, when they show up someplace where they did not evolve, they out-compete other native ants. It turns out they will push out other ants. They'll eat a lot of insects that would've been there otherwise. Those are important... I mean, even termites. You don't want termites in your house, but you sure need termites out in the forest because they're what break down fallen logs. If you don't have termites, those logs don't necessarily break down as fast. Another thing is, this was interesting, a researcher who's now in Hong Kong did some work. There are ants that disperse seeds. They eat them, and they carry them away, and then the seeds get dispersed and plants and trees grow. The Asian needle ants out-compete those seed-dispersing ants. The Asian needle ants don't disperse the seeds. They just stay where they fall and they die. Then, they're seeing places where plants that should be spreading naturally are not. Taylor Wilson: All right. Elizabeth Weise is the national correspondent with USA TODAY. Thanks, Beth. Elizabeth Weise: You're so welcome. Thanks a lot. ♦ Taylor Wilson: Thanks for listening to The Excerpt. We're produced by Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan, and our executive producer is Laura Beatty. You can get the podcast wherever you get your audio, and if you're on a smart speaker, just ask for The Excerpt. I'm Taylor Wilson, and I'll be back tomorrow with more of The Excerpt from USA TODAY.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store